1
|
Inzunza-Cervantes G, Díaz-Dávalos JDJ, Flores-Anguiano A, Ornelas-Aguirre JM, Peralta-Figueroa IC, Zazueta-Armenta V. [Follow-up of the patient with pacemakers: Interrogation and basic programming]. REVISTA MEDICA DEL INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL SEGURO SOCIAL 2023; 61:809-818. [PMID: 37995347 PMCID: PMC10721337 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10064399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Permanent pacemakers are a frequently used therapeutic modality. Its use has had a great impact on the morbidity and mortality and quality of life of patients with heart rhythm disturbances, with an exponential increase observed in recent decades. The use of this strategy presents different phases, in which follow-up throughout the useful life of the device is a fundamental and determinant pillar of the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic modality. This review seeks to provide a clear and structured update of the fundamental aspects to consider in the follow-up of all patients with pacemakers. The follow-up of the patient with a pacemaker must follow a complete, systematic and periodic protocol, evaluating aspects and parameters related to the patient and the pacemaker, in order to ensure the proper and safe operation of the device adapted to the person.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Inzunza-Cervantes
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Noroeste, Hospital de Especialidades No. 2 “Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta”, Grupo de Investigación Cardiovascular del Centro Médico Nacional del Noreste. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, MéxicoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialMéxico
| | - Jose de Jesús Díaz-Dávalos
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Hospital de Especialidades “Ignacio García Téllez", Servicio de Electrofisiología, Clínica de marcapasos. Guadalajara, Jalisco, MéxicoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialMéxico
| | - Arturo Flores-Anguiano
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Hospital de Especialidades “Ignacio García Téllez", Servicio de Electrofisiología, Clínica de marcapasos. Guadalajara, Jalisco, MéxicoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialMéxico
| | - José Manuel Ornelas-Aguirre
- Universidad de Sonora, Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, MéxicoUniversidad de SonoraMéxico
| | - Isabel Cristina Peralta-Figueroa
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Noroeste, Hospital de Especialidades No. 2 “Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta”, Grupo de Investigación Cardiovascular del Centro Médico Nacional del Noreste. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, MéxicoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialMéxico
| | - Verónica Zazueta-Armenta
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Noroeste, Hospital de Especialidades No. 2 “Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta”, Grupo de Investigación Cardiovascular del Centro Médico Nacional del Noreste. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, MéxicoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialMéxico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Silva JNA, Balaji S, Beach CM, Benjamin MN, Berul CI, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen MI, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Foster A, Gebauer R, Gonzalez Corcia MC, Kannankeril PJ, Karpawich PP, Kim JJ, Krishna MR, Kubuš P, LaPage MJ, Mah DY, Malloy-Walton L, Miyazaki A, Motonaga KS, Niu MC, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel EV, Silvetti MS, Stephenson EA, Tan RB, Triedman J, Bergen NHV, Wackel PL. 2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2021; 7:1437-1472. [PMID: 34794667 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maully J Shah
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Michael J Silka
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Monica N Benjamin
- Hospital de Pediatría Juan P. Garrahan, Hospital El Cruce, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Instituto Cardiovascular ICBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Frank Cecchin
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Aarti S Dalal
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Anne Foster
- Advocate Children's Heart Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Roman Gebauer
- Heart Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Peter P Karpawich
- University Pediatricians, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Peter Kubuš
- Children's Heart Center, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | - Aya Miyazaki
- Shizuoka General Hospital and Mt. Fuji Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Mary C Niu
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Melissa Olen
- Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Thomas Paul
- Georg-August-University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eric Rosenthal
- Evelina London Children's Hospital and St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Reina B Tan
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Nicholas H Von Bergen
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Cardiol Young 2021; 31:1738-1769. [PMID: 34338183 DOI: 10.1017/s1047951121003413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Silva JA, Balaji S, Beach C, Benjamin M, Berul C, Cannon B, Cecchin F, Cohen M, Dalal A, Dechert B, Foster A, Gebauer R, Gonzalez Corcia MC, Kannankeril P, Karpawich P, Kim J, Krishna MR, Kubuš P, Malloy-Walton L, LaPage M, Mah D, Miyazaki A, Motonaga K, Niu M, Olen M, Paul T, Rosenthal E, Saarel E, Silvetti MS, Stephenson E, Tan R, Triedman J, Von Bergen N, Wackel P. 2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:1888-1924. [PMID: 34363988 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consenus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology, (ACC) and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate follow-up in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maully J Shah
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Michael J Silka
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
| | | | | | - Cheyenne Beach
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Monica Benjamin
- Hospital de Pediatría Juan P. Garrahan, Hospital El Cruce, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Instituto Cardiovascular ICBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Frank Cecchin
- New York Univeristy Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Aarti Dalal
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Anne Foster
- Advocate Children's Heart Institute, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Roman Gebauer
- Heart Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Peter Karpawich
- University Pediatricians, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | - Peter Kubuš
- Children's Heart Center, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Doug Mah
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussetts
| | - Aya Miyazaki
- Shizuoka General Hospital and Mt. Fuji Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Mary Niu
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Thomas Paul
- Georg-August-University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eric Rosenthal
- Evelina London Children's Hospital and St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Reina Tan
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - John Triedman
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Nicholas Von Bergen
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2021; 21:367-393. [PMID: 34333141 PMCID: PMC8577100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Andreozzi E, Gargiulo GD, Fratini A, Esposito D, Bifulco P. A Contactless Sensor for Pacemaker Pulse Detection: Design Hints and Performance Assessment. SENSORS 2018; 18:s18082715. [PMID: 30126178 PMCID: PMC6111969 DOI: 10.3390/s18082715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of pacemaker activity can provide valuable information to improve patients' follow-up. Concise information is stored in some types of pacemakers, whereas ECG can provide more detailed information, but requires electrodes and cannot be used for continuous monitoring. This study highlights the possibility of a continuous monitoring of pacemaker pulses by sensing magnetic field variations due to the current pulses. This can be achieved by means of a sensor coil positioned near the patient's thorax without any need for physical contact. A simplified model of coil response to pacemaker pulses is presented in this paper, along with circuits suitable for pulse detection. In vitro tests were carried out using real pacemakers immersed in saline solution; experimental data were used to assess the accuracy of the model and to evaluate the sensor performance. It was found that the coil signal amplitude decreases with increasing distance from the pacemaker lead wire. The sensor was able to easily perform pacemaker spike detection up to a distance of 12 cm from the pacemaker leads. The stimulation rate can be measured in real time with high accuracy. Since any electromagnetic pulse triggers the same coil response, EMI may corrupt sensor measurements and thus should be discriminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Andreozzi
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio, 21-80125 Napoli, Italy.
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri S.p.A.-Società benefit, Via S. Maugeri, 4-27100 Pavia, Italy.
| | - Gaetano D Gargiulo
- The MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
| | - Antonio Fratini
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
| | - Daniele Esposito
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio, 21-80125 Napoli, Italy.
| | - Paolo Bifulco
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio, 21-80125 Napoli, Italy.
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri S.p.A.-Società benefit, Via S. Maugeri, 4-27100 Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|