Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: Three-year outcomes of the PREVENT AF I study

A Simple Score to Predict New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter

BACKGROUND

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NeAF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent counterclockwise atrial flutter (CCW-AFL) ablation. This study aimed to investigate a simple predictive model of NeAF after CCW-AFL ablation.

METHODS

From January 2013, to December 2017, consecutive patients receiving CCW-AFL ablation were enrolled from 3 centres. Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic data were collected and followed. Patients from 2 centres and another centre were assigned into the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of parameters to discriminate those with and without NeAF. A score system was developed and then validated.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-one patients (mean 59.7 ± 13.6 age; 205 male) were analyzed. During follow-up (73.0 ± 6.5 months), 107 patients (39.5%) had NeAF; 190 and 81 patients were detected in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Hypertension, age ≥ 70 years, left atrial diameter ≥ 42 mm, P-wave duration ≥ 120 ms and the negative component of flutter wave in lead II ≥ 120 ms were selected as the final parameters. A weighted score was used to develop the HAD-AF score ranging from 0 to 9. In the derivation cohort, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.902-0.974), superior to those of currently used CHA2DS2-VASC (0.679, 95% CI, 0.600-0.757) and HATCH scores (0.651, 95% CI, 0.571-0.730) (P < 0.001). Performance maintained in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Six years after CCW-AFL ablation, 39.5% of patients developed NeAF. HAD-AF score can reliably identify patients likely to develop NeAF after CCW-AFL ablation.

[Isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter : Clinical course after isthmus ablation]

Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) to create bidirectional isthmus blockade is the most effective way to achieve rhythm control in typical atrial flutter. Compared with drug therapy, ablation reduces cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, stroke risk, and the risk of cardiac decompensation. Concomitant arrhythmia of atrial flutter is atrial fibrillation (AF); therefore the duration of oral anticoagulation should be adapted according to the risk of stroke and bleeding. A combined procedure of CTI ablation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with typical atrial flutter but without evidence of AF should be evaluated individually especially in patients aged > 54 years depending on (cardiac) comorbidities. The comprehensive diagnostic view should keep in mind not only arrhythmias but also possibly underlying coronary artery disease.

Long-term results of two-stage ablation approach in coexistent atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter: prospective randomized study

Background One of the most arrhythmias associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) is typical atrial flutter (AFL). The main methods of surgical treatment of these arrhythmias is catheter ablation. The problem of catheter ablation strategy for these coexistentarrhythmias is not solved. Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in a two-stage approach to the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation associated with typical atrial flutter. Methods: The study included 34 patients aged 41-82 years with AF and coexistent typical AFL. Female 11 (32,35%), male 23 (67,35%). Randomization 1:1. Group 1 (n=17) has been performed radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) with radiofrequency catheter isolation of the PV. Group 2 (n=17) has been performed only RFA of CTI. AF and AFL recurrences rate has been evaluated in both groups. Follow-up period 12 months. Results: Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were less in group 2 that those in group 1. Extended intervention in group 1 was accompanied with complications in two cases. There were no significant differences in AF recurrence rate in both groups (p=0,43183). AFL recurrences has not been found in both groups. Conclusion: One stage ablation approach in AF patients with coexistent AFLassociated with increaseprocedure duration and fluoroscopy time. The frequency of AF recurrence in patients who underwent extended intervention (catheter isolation of the PV and RFA CTI) and in patients who underwent only the elimination of typical atrial flutter, was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.43183). In the presence of AF and typical atrial flutter, a two-stage approach to interventional treatment should be regarded as appropriate.

Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation as First-Line Treatment for Typical Atrial Flutter

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with standard radiofrequency cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation as first-line treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS

Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation as First-Line Treatment for Typical Atrial Flutter was an international, multicentre, open with blinded assessment trial. Patients with CTI-dependent AFL and no documented atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomised to either cryoballoon PVI alone or radiofrequency CTI ablation. Primary efficacy outcome was time to first recurrence of sustained (>30 s) symptomatic atrial arrhythmia (AF/AFL/atrial tachycardia) at 12 months as assessed by continuous monitoring with an implantable loop recorder. Primary safety outcome was a composite of death, stroke, tamponade requiring drainage, atrio-oesophageal fistula, pacemaker implantation, serious vascular complications or persistent phrenic nerve palsy.

RESULTS

Trial recruitment was halted at 113 of the target 130 patients because of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (PVI, n=59; CTI ablation, n=54). Median age was 66 (IQR 61-71) years, with 98 (86.7%) men. At 12 months, the primary outcome occurred in 11 (18.6%) patients in the PVI group and 9 (16.7%) patients in the CTI group. There was no significant difference in the primary efficacy outcome between the groups (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.67). AFL recurred in six (10.2%) patients in the PVI arm and one (1.9%) patient in the CTI arm (p=0.116). Time to occurrence of AF of ≥2 min was significantly reduced with cryoballoon PVI (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85). The composite safety outcome occurred in four patients in the PVI arm and three patients in the CTI arm (p=1.000).

CONCLUSION

Cryoballoon PVI as first-line treatment for AFL is equally effective compared with standard CTI ablation for preventing recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and better at preventing new-onset AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03401099.

Ready to Deploy Prophylactics?

A variety of interventions are used in contemporary medicine to prevent the first occurrence of a clinical condition or event (e.g. antibiotic to prevent surgical infection). Prophylactic treatment by invasive catheter ablation This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Elevated Left Atrial Volume Index Predicts Incident Atrial Fibrillation After Typical Right Atrial Flutter Ablation

Purpose

Incident atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. Risk factors for the development of AF post ablation are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify patients undergoing CTI ablation for AFL most likely to develop AF.

Methods

Retrospective chart review identified 114 consecutive patients without a history of AF or prior cardiac surgery who underwent typical CTI dependent AFL ablation between December 2013 to November 2018, who also had a complete preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram, and at least 1 year of follow-up at our medical center. We evaluated baseline characteristics, electrophysiology study (EPS) data and echocardiographic data for incidence of AF within 3 years.

Results

Incident AF was identified in 46 patients (40%) during 600 + 405 days follow-up. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) was significantly greater in patients who developed AF compared to those that did not (37 ± 12.2 ml/m² vs 30 ± 13.4 ml/m², p=.004), with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve based on the LAVI of 0.7 (p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of AF was significantly greater in patients with LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m² than LAVI < 30 ml/m² (66% vs 27%, p=0.004). Risk of incident AF in patients with LAVI > 40 mL/m2 was similar to that of LAVI 30-40 ml/m2 (67% vs 63%, respectively, p=0.97). In multivariable analysis LAVI remained the sole independent predictor of incidence AF after CTI AFL ablation.

Conclusions

LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m² is associated with significantly increased risk of incident AF following CTI ablation for typical AFL. HATCH <2 was notably not an independent predictor of AF after AFL ablation.

Preventing atrial fibrillation by combined right isthmus ablation and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with typical atrial flutter: PAF-CRIOBLAF study

BACKGROUND

Although less common, typical atrial flutter shares similar pathophysiological roots with atrial fibrillation. Following successful cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation using radiofrequency, many patients, however, develop atrial fibrillation in the mid-to-long-term. This study sought to assess whether pulmonary vein isolation conducted at the same time as cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation would significantly modify the atrial fibrillation burden upon follow-up in patients suffering from typical atrial flutter.

METHODS

This was a multicenter randomized controlled study involving typical atrial flutter patients with history of non-predominant atrial fibrillation (1 atrial fibrillation episode only, in 67% of population) who were scheduled for cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation. Patients were randomly assigned to either undergo cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation alone or cavo-tricuspid isthmus plus pulmonary vein isolation (CTI+). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed using cryoballoon technology. An outpatient consultation with ECG and 1-week Holter monitoring was performed at 3, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postprocedure. The primary endpoint was atrial fibrillation recurrences lasting more than 30 s at 2 years postablation.

RESULTS

Of the patients enrolled, 36 were included in each group. At 2-year follow-up, the atrial fibrillation recurrence rate was significantly higher in the CTI vs CTI+group (25/36, 69% vs. 12/36, 33% respectively; P < .001), with similar typical atrial flutter recurrence rates. There were no differences in undesirable events, except for transient phrenic nerve palsy reported from three CTI+patients (8.3%).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon technology was proven to significantly reduce the atrial fibrillation incidence at 2 years postcavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation.

Cavotricuspid isthmus line in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without history of typical atrial flutter: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the mainstay of catheter ablation (CA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, for persistent and long-standing persistent AF, there are no established strategies to improve the success rate of CA. Despite studies indicating that prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation provides no or limited incremental benefit in patients with AF, it is still routinely performed worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine whether CTI ablation for AF is associated with improvement in recurrence of all-atrial arrhythmias, compared with PVI alone in patients with and without typical atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed for clinical studies including AF patients, reporting outcomes of CTI + PVI versus PVI alone. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrence of all-atrial arrhythmias.

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 1400 patients undergoing CTI + PVI versus PVI alone were included; 1110 patients had AF without AFL, and 290 patients had coexistent AF and AFL. After a mean follow-up of 14.4 ± 4.8 months, CTI + PVI was not associated with improvement in recurrence of all-atrial arrhythmias when compared with PVI alone (risk ratio [RR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.79;p = .13). In the subgroup analysis, there were no differences between both groups in patients with AF without AFL (RR: 1.55; 95% CI: 0.96-2.48; p = .07), and in patients with AF and AFL (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.6-1.39; p = .68).

CONCLUSION

In AF patients, irrespective of the presence of typical AFL, additional CTI ablation is not associated with improvement in recurrence of all-atrial arrhythmias, compared with PVI alone.

CHA2DS2-VASc Score as a Predictor of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter

Purpose

Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is an effective procedure for typical atrial flutter (AFL), but patients remain at an elevated risk for developing new atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, there are limited data on the utility of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation. In this study, we assessed whether the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is a useful predictor of new-onset AF after CTI ablation in typical AFL patients without a prior history of AF.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 103 typical AFL patients with no prior history of AF, who underwent successful CTI ablation. The endpoint was occurrence of new-onset AF during follow-up.

Results

During a mean follow-up period of 24.6 ± 16.9 months, at least one episode of AF occurred in 33 (32%) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (hazard ratio = 1.736; 95% confidence interval = 1.370–2.201; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with postablation new-onset AF (area under the curve = 0.797). A cutoff value of three stratified these patients into two groups with different incidences of postablation new-onset AF (67.9 vs. 18.7%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is a useful tool for the prediction of new-onset AF after ablation of typical AFL. Patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥3 are more likely to develop new-onset AF and should be monitored more closely.

Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation in typical atrial flutter patients without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the benefit of prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in typical AFL patients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing prophylactic PVI to CTI ablation alone in typical AFL patients without prior documentation of AF were identified in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. A total of 357 patients with follow-up of 20 ± 9 months were included. More patients in prophylactic PVI group were free from atrial arrhythmias (AA) compared with those in CTI group (69% versus 50%, OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.51 to 3.68; P = 0.0001). In the subgroup of age > 55, prophylactic PVI showed even higher incidence of freedom from AA. There is a lower occurrence of AF in prophylactic PVI group (27% versus 46%, OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.73; P = 0.001) and no difference of complications between prophylactic PVI group and CTI group (4% versus 2%; P = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic PVI during CTI ablation in typical AFL patients without AF history, especially for elder patients. Large prospective RCTs are warranted to confirm the benefit of prophylactic PVI in typical AFL.

Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial arrhythmias (AA), including atrial fibrillation (AF), have been reported in patients after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFL). Several studies have examined the effect of performing concomitant pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with CTI on recurrent AA. These studies were analyzed to determine the overall effect of this approach on recurrent AA.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for randomized trials comparing the incidence of AA after CTI versus CTI + PVI until June 2018. Only patients without prior history of AF were included in the recurrent AA analysis. All patients were included in the analyses of other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Four randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. In the recurrent AA analysis, a total of 314 patients were randomized in the studies (n = 158 CTI, n = 156 CTI + PVI). Freedom from AA at 1 year was significantly higher in the CTI + PVI group versus CTI alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.25 [0.14, 0.44] 95% confidence interval [CI], P < 0.00001). A total of 550 patients (n = 336 CTI, n = 214 CTI + PVI) were included in analyses for procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and complications rates. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the CTI + PVI group (mean difference [MD]: 103.31 min [94.40, 112.23] 95% CI, P < 0.00001) and (MD: 16.47 min [14.89, 18.05] 95% CI, P < 0.00001), respectively. Total complications were statistically similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows addition of a prophylactic PVI during CTI ablation significantly reduces recurrent AA at 1 year without significantly increasing major complications.