Unipolar voltage mapping criteria for right ventricular septum: Influence of the aortic root

Importance of Right Ventricular Mapping and Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Postinfarction Patients

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of patients with post-myocardial infarction (PMI) ventricular tachycardia (VT) who require right ventricular (RV) ablation are underreported.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to examine the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing PMI VT ablation who have target sites in the right ventricle and to compare patient and VT characteristics between patients with free wall vs septal RV target sites.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing ablation for PMI VT with target sites located within the right ventricle were included. Patients were stratified on the basis of the presence of free wall vs septal RV target sites.

RESULTS

Among 277 consecutive patient undergoing PMI VT ablation, 30 (11%) had RV target sites (mean age 68.71 ± 9.5 years, 29 men [97%], mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 28.7% ± 16.7%). Twenty patients had only septal VTs, and 10 patients had only free wall VTs. Fifty-seven VTs with RV targets (1.9 ± 1.4 per patient, mean cycle length 338 ± 90 ms, 53 left bundle branch, 36 superior axis) were induced. Patients with RV free wall VTs had greater rates of RV dysfunction (80% vs 30%; P = 0.023) but had greater LVEFs (38.3% ± 21.06% vs 23.9% ± 11.93%; P = 0.02). Over a mean follow-up period of 3.4 ± 3.2 years, patients with RV septal target sites had worse survival free of VT, transplantation, or left ventricular assist device placement after ablation (log-rank P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The arrhythmogenic substrate in PMI patients often involves the right ventricle, including the septum and free wall. The presence of RV dysfunction and greater LVEF were associated with the presence of RV free wall target sites. Patients with only RV septal target sites had worse postablation outcomes.

Multimodality Imaging to Guide Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Non-ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The heterogeneous nature of NICM aetiologies and VT substrate in patients with NICM play a role in long-term ablation outcomes in this population. Over the past decades, more precise identification of NICM aetiologies and better characterisation of various substrates have been made. Application of multimodal imaging has greatly contributed to the accurate diagnosis of NICM subtypes and improved VT ablation strategies. This article summarises the current knowledge of multimodal imaging used in the characterisation of non-ischaemic NICM substrates, procedural planning and image integration for the optimisation of VT ablation.

Characterization of Structural Changes in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy With Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Ablation: Insights From Repeat Electroanatomic Voltage Mapping

BACKGROUND

Data characterizing structural changes of arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy are limited.

METHODS

Patients presenting with left bundle branch block ventricular tachycardia in the setting of arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy with procedures separated by at least 9 months were included.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients (84% males; mean age 39±15 years [range, 20-76 years]) were included. All 19 patients underwent 2 detailed sinus rhythm electroanatomic endocardial voltage maps (average 385±177 points per map; range, 93-847 points). Time interval between the initial and repeat ablation procedures was mean 50±37 months (range, 9-162). No significant progression of voltage was observed (bipolar: 38 cm² [interquartile range (IQR), 25-54] versus 53 cm² [IQR, 25-65], P=0.09; unipolar: 116 cm² [IQR, 61-209] versus 159 cm² [IQR, 73-204], P=0.36) for the entire study group. There was a significant increase in RV volumes (percentage increase, 28%; 206 mL [IQR, 170-253] versus 263 mL [IQR, 204-294], P<0.001) for the entire study population. Larger scars at baseline but not changes over time were associated with a significant increase in RV volume (bipolar: Spearman ρ, 0.6965, P=0.006; unipolar: Spearman ρ, 0.5743, P=0.03). Most patients with progressive RV dilatation (8/14, 57%) had moderate (2 patients) or severe (6 patients) tricuspid regurgitation recorded at either initial or repeat ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy presenting with recurrent ventricular tachycardia, >10% increase in RV endocardial surface area of bipolar voltage consistent with scar is uncommon during the intermediate term. Most recurrent ventricular tachycardias are localized to regions of prior defined scar. Voltage indexed scar area at baseline but not changes in scar over time is associated with progressive increase in RV size and is consistent with adverse remodeling but not scar progression. Marked tricuspid regurgitation is frequently present in patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy who have progressive RV dilation.

Three-dimensional myocardial scar characterization from the endocardium: Usefulness of endocardial unipolar electroanatomic mapping

Epicardial ablation may be required to eliminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with underlying structural heart disease. The decision to gain epicardial access is frequently based on the suspicion of an epicardial origin for the VT and/or presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate. Epicardial pathology and VT is frequently present in patients with nonischemic right and/or left cardiomyopathies even in the setting of modest or no endocardial bipolar voltage substrate. In this setting, unipolar voltage mapping from the endocardium serves to help identify midmyocardial and/or epicardial VT substrate. The additional value of endocardial unipolar mapping includes its usefulness to predict the clinical outcome after VT ablation, to determine the irreversibility of myocardial disease, and to guide endomyocardial biopsy procedures to specific areas of intramural scarring. In this review, we aim to provide a guide to the use of endocardial unipolar mapping and its appropriate interpretation in a variety of clinical situations.