Is adenosine useful for the identification of atrial fibrillation triggers?

Clinical Significance of Adenosine-Induced Atrial Fibrillation after Complete Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Background: Adenosine can cause dormant electrical conduction between the pulmonary vein and left atrium after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Adenosine can also induce atrial fibrillation (AF) during catheter ablation. However, the clinical outcomes and effects of additional ablation for the trigger sites of adenosine-induced AF (AIAF) are unknown. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of AIAF. Methods: Between January 2010 and September 2019, we analyzed 616 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), including wide-area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and post-PVI adenosine testing. Results: Among 616 patients, 134 (21.7%) and 34 (5.5%) showed dormant conduction and AIAF, respectively. Eight patients (1.3%) had both dormant conduction and AIAF. The AF recurrence rate was not significantly different between patients with and without AIAF (16.7% vs. 18.6%, log-rank p = 0.827) during a mean follow-up period of 17.9 ± 18 months. Additional RFCA for the trigger site was attempted in 10 patients with AIAF; however, the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias was also not different between the groups with and without additional ablation (20% vs. 16.7%, log-rank p = 0.704). Conclusions: AIAF after PVI was not clinically associated with recurrence during long-term follow-up. Ablation of the trigger site in AIAF did not improve the clinical outcomes.

Catheter ablation of ganglionated plexi in patients with adenosine triphosphate-induced atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

Intravenous ATP may induce atrial fibrillation (AF). ATP shares similar receptor-effector coupling systems with acetylcholine. However, the association between an ATP injection and the hyperactivity of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system, known as ganglionated plexi (GPs), is not well understood. We describe a series of patients with non-pulmonary vein (PV) trigger sites provoked by an ATP injection, and assess the feasibility of a ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation. We retrospectively analyzed 547 patients (69% male; mean age 67.4 ± 10.4 years; 38.5% non-paroxysmal AF) who underwent a total of 604 ablation procedures. Intravenous ATP was administered with an isoproterenol infusion during sinus rhythm after a pulmonary vein isolation in 21.3%, Box isolation in 78.6%, and SVC isolation in 52.0% of the procedures, respectively. We reviewed the incidence, the distribution of the foci, and the ablation outcomes in patients with ATP-induced AF. A total of seven patients (1.3%) had ATP-induced AF. Foci were identified in the coronary sinus (CS) in six patients, right atrial posterior wall (RAPW) adjacent to the interatrial groove in two, mitral annulus in two, ligament of Marshall in one, right septum below the foramen ovale in one and left atrial posterior wall in one, respectively. Among these trigger foci, we confirmed the vagal response by high-frequency stimulation in the CS and RAPW in six and two patients, respectively. After a median RF time of 2.9 min (range 2.5-11.3) targeting these foci, in five of six patients who received a repeat ATP injection, the AF became non-inducible. ATP-provoked trigger foci were distributed among certain sites that overlapped with the distribution of the GPs. The GP ablation was effective for this rare, but challenging situation.

Efficacy of isoproterenol in the evaluation of dormant conduction and arrhythmogenic foci identification in atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established therapy. However, postoperative recurrence is a serious issue caused by the reconduction of the isolated pulmonary veins (PV) and the onset of non-PV foci. The objectives of this study were to elucidate dormant conduction, confirm PV arrhythmia substrate, induce non-PV foci after PV isolation, and assess the acute efficacy of high dose isoproterenol (ISP) when administered in addition to adenosine.

Methods

The study consisted of 100 patients with drug-refractory AF (paroxysmal and persistent) who underwent ablation therapy (either radio-frequency or cryoballoon ablation) as the first-line of therapy at our hospital. All patients first underwent PV isolation (PVI) and were administered adenosine followed by ISP (6 μg × 5 min). The effects were observed, and the therapeutic strategy was evaluated.

Results

Persistent dormant conduction due to ISP administration was observed in 13 patients. In over half of the patients, arrhythmia substrates were identified in the PV. Ten patients presented with persistent PV firing. The ablation of non-PV foci was additionally performed in 23 patients.

Conclusions

We found that dormant conduction, as a result of ISP administration, is persistent and ISP is useful when performing an ablation. In addition, ISP administration is useful for the identification of PV arrhythmia substrates and induction of non-PV foci. However, the effectiveness of ISP may be partially due to the complementary effect of adenosine, and, therefore, a combination of the two drugs seems preferable.