Safety and efficacy of biatrial vs left atrial surgical ablation during concomitant cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of clinical studies with a focus on the causes of pacemaker implantation

Concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation: New pacemakers and early rhythm recovery

OBJECTIVE

New permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has been associated with surgical ablation (SA). We sought to determine factors for PPM use as well as early rhythm recovery.

METHODS

From 2004 through 2019, 6135 patients underwent valve surgery and were grouped: No AF (n = 4584), AF no SA (n = 346), and AF with SA (n = 1205) to evaluate predischarge PPM and 3-month rhythm recovery (intrinsic heart rate >40 beats per minute).

RESULTS

Overall, 282 (4.6%) patients required a predischarge PPM: atrioventricular node dysfunction in 75.3%, sick sinus syndrome in 19.1%, both (5%), and indeterminate (0.7%). Patients with AF had more PPMs: AF with SA (7.9%) versus AF no SA (6.9%) versus No AF (3.6%) (P < .001). For patients with AF, PPM rates were not significantly higher for ablation patients (7.6% SA vs 6.9% AF no SA; P = .56). There were differences in PPM by SA lesion set (biatrial 12.8%; left atrial only 6.1%; pulmonary vein isolation 3.0%; P < .001). Among patients with AF treated with 3-month PPM follow-up, rhythm recovery was common (35 out of 62 [56.5%]) and did not differ by lesion set. Rhythm recovery was seen in 63 out of 141 (44.7%) in the atrioventricular node dysfunction group versus 24 out of 35 (68.6%) in the sick sinus syndrome group (P = .011). In propensity score-matched groups, late survival was similar (P = .63) for new PPM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding conduction system trauma and delaying implantation reduces the need for postoperative PPM. Rhythm recovery within 3 months is frequent, especially for patients with sick sinus syndrome. A conservative approach to the implantation of a new PPMs is warranted.

The long-term influence of lesion set in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: Multicenter propensity-score weighted study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of the lesion sets for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation on long-term outcomes and identify the optimal lesion set.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2017, 1825 patients underwent surgical ablation concomitant to mitral valve surgery in the participating institutions. Of these, 529 underwent left atrial ablation, whereas the remainder had biatrial ablation. The clinical and rhythm outcomes were compared, considering death as a competing event. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to mitigate the selection bias.

RESULTS

The patients undergoing left atrial ablation were younger and less frequently had long-standing atrial fibrillation with a shorter duration or required concomitant tricuspid valve surgery. Adjusted analysis showed that left atrial ablation was associated with a lower risk of early pacemaker implantation (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.38; P < .001) than biatrial ablation. Over a median follow-up of 70.4 months (interquartile range, 44.1-111.2 months), the left atrial ablation group presented a higher risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41; P < .001), with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 34.2% compared with 28.6% in the biatrial group. The risk of late mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.74-1.86; P = .507) and stroke (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.82-1.79; P = .345) did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing surgical ablation concomitant to mitral valve surgery, both lesion sets provided comparable incidence of mortality and stroke. However, biatrial ablation was associated with a superior rhythm outcome at the expense of a higher risk of early pacemaker implantation.

Perioperative and mid-term outcomes of mitral valve surgery with and without concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively analysed perioperative and mid-term outcomes for patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with and without atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent mitral valve surgery between January 2018 and February 2023 were included and categorized into 3 groups: 'No AF' (no documented atrial fibrillation), 'AF no SA' (atrial fibrillation without surgical ablation) and 'AF and SA' (atrial fibrillation with concomitant surgical ablation). Groups were compared for perioperative and mid-term outcomes, including mortality, stroke, bleeding and pacemaker implantation. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 400 patients included, preoperative atrial fibrillation was present in 43%. Mean follow-up was 1.8 (standard deviation: 1.1) years. The patients who underwent surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation exhibited similar overall outcomes compared to patients without preoperative atrial fibrillation. Patients with untreated atrial fibrillation showed higher mortality ('No AF': 2.2% versus 'AF no SA': 8.3% versus 'AF and SA': 3.2%; P-value 0.027) and increased postoperative pacemaker implantation rates ('No AF': 5.7% versus 'AF no SA': 15.6% versus 'AF and SA': 7.9%, P-value: 0.011). In a composite analysis of adverse events (Mortality, Bleeding, Stroke), the highest incidence was observed in patients with untreated atrial fibrillation, while patients with treated atrial fibrillation had similar outcomes as those without preoperative documented atrial fibrillation ('No AF': 9.6% versus 'AF no SA': 20.2% versus 'AF and SA' 3: 9.5%, P-value: 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant surgical ablation should be considered in mitral valve surgery for atrial fibrillation, as it leads to similar mid-term outcomes compared to patients without preoperative documented atrial fibrillation.

Left atrial strain predicts the rhythm outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing left atrial cryoablation during minimally invasive mitral valve repair

Objectives

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have lower left atrial (LA) strain, which is a predictor for LA function. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of LA strain to predict the rhythm outcome in patients with persistent AF undergoing LA cryoablation concomitant to minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

Methods

Between 01/2016 and 12/2020, 72 patients with persistent AF underwent LA cryoablation during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. All patients received a complete LA lesion set and left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with a clip. All patients received preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with LA and left ventricular strain measurements. Preoperative LA and LV strain analysis was correlated with postoperative rhythm outcome.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 66.9 ± 7.2 years, of whom 42 (58%) were male patients. No major ablation-related complications occurred in any of the patients. Successful LAA closure was confirmed by intraoperative echocardiography in all patients. The 1-year survival rate was 97%. Freedom from AF at 12 months was 72% and 68% off antiarrhythmic drugs. Preoperative LA strain values were statistically significantly higher in patients with freedom from AF at 12 months of follow-up (12.7% ± 6.9% vs. 4.9% ± 4.1%, p = 0.006). Preoperative LV strain value was not associated with postoperative rhythm outcome. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LA strain (p < 0.001) and AF duration (p = 0.017) were predictors for freedom from AF at 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

In our study, LA strain analysis predicted the rhythm outcome in patients with persistent AF undergoing concomitant surgical AF ablation. In the future, LA strain might be a useful tool to guide decision-making on ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF.

Trends in surgical ablation at the time of cardiac surgery among patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

The 2017 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) guidelines support surgical ablation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) owing to a reduction in early mortality and improved overall safety. We explored practice patterns changes and outcomes in patients undergoing concomitant surgical ablation following the guideline change.

Methods

We identified 19,246 patients with preoperative AF who underwent cardiac surgery between 2016 and 2019 from the Florida and Maryland State Inpatient Databases. Rates of surgical ablation by procedure type were temporally trended across years. Secondary outcomes included complications, inpatient mortality, and hospital readmissions. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified patient variables associated with concomitant surgical ablation.

Results

A total of 2738 patients (14.3%) with AF underwent a concomitant surgical ablation. The rate of surgical ablation increased from 2.1% to 17.4% (P < .001) from 2016 to 2017 but remained unchanged thereafter. Postoperative mortality was lower in the surgical ablation cohort (2.7% vs 3.7%; P = .006), although with a higher rate of pacemaker insertion (11.8% vs 7.2%; P < .0001). Patients with a high-risk Elixhauser score (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.95), lower income (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.75), or African American or Hispanic race/ethnicity (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96 and OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96, respectively) had lower odds of undergoing concomitant surgical ablation.

Conclusions

Despite a class I-2a recommendation by the AATS, surgical ablation continues to be underutilized in clinical practice, especially in patients with high-risk comorbidities, with lower incomes, or from minority populations. Surgeons should be mindful of guideline-directed AF management in these vulnerable populations.

Three Ablation Techniques for Atrial Fibrillation during Concomitant Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a frequent procedure used in concomitant cardiac surgery. However, uncertainty still exists concerning the optimal extent of lesion sets. Hence, the objective of this study was to assess the results of various ablation techniques, aiming to offer a reference for clinical decision making. This review is listed in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under ID CRD42023412785. A comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCOHost, PubMed, Medline, Wiley, ProQuest, and Embase) up to 18 April 2023. Studies were critically appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale adapted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for cohort studies. Forest plots of pooled effect estimates and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) were used for the analysis. Our analysis included 39 studies and a total of 7207 patients. Both bi-atrial ablation (BAA) and left atrial ablation (LAA) showed similar efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm (SR; BAA (77.9%) > LAA (76.2%) > pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; 66.5%); LAA: OR = 1.08 (CI 0.94-1.23); PVI: OR = 1.36 (CI 1.08-1.70)). However, BAA had higher pacemaker implantation (LAA: OR = 0.51 (CI 0.37-0.71); PVI: OR = 0.52 (CI 0.31-0.86)) and reoperation rates (LAA: OR = 0.71 (CI 0.28-1.45); PVI: OR = 0.31 (CI 0.1-0.64)). PVI had the lowest efficacy in restoring SR and a similar complication rate to LAA, but had the shortest procedure time (Cross-clamp (Xc): PVI (93.38) > LAA (37.36) > BAA (13.89)); Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB): PVI (93.93) > LAA (56.04) > BAA (0.03)). We suggest that LAA is the best surgical technique for AF ablation due to its comparable effectiveness in restoring SR, its lower rate of pacemaker requirement, and its lower reoperation rate compared to BAA. Furthermore, LAA ranks as the second-fastest procedure after PVI, with a similar CPB time.

Incidence of and risk factors for pacemaker implantation after the modified Cryo-Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

The Maze procedure is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation. However, it is sometimes associated with bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation. We assessed the rates of in-hospital and late-onset pacemaker implantation after the modified Cryo-Maze procedure and explored the risk factors for pacemaker implantation.

METHODS

This study enrolled a series of 751 patients who underwent the modified Cryo-Maze procedure at our institution between 2001 and 2020. Multivariable Fine-Gray regression was used to analyze the risk factors for late-onset pacemaker implantation.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (1.6%) underwent in-hospital pacemaker implantation, and 55 patients (7.3%) underwent late-onset pacemaker implantation during a median follow-up of 4.5 years (interquartile range, 1.4-10.0). The most common primary indication for pacemaker implantation was sick sinus syndrome (56 patients [7.5%]), followed by complete atrioventricular block (11 patients [1.5%]). The cumulative incidence of late-onset pacemaker implantation with death as a competing risk was 2.8% at 1 year, 7.7% at 5 years, and 10.8% at 10 years. Risk factors for late-onset pacemaker implantation included a longer preoperative atrial fibrillation duration (hazard ratio, 1.14; P < .001) and an older age (hazard ratio, 1.05; P = .001). The mortality, cumulative incidence of cerebrovascular accidents, and rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence were not significantly different between patients with and without pacemaker implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer preoperative atrial fibrillation duration and older age are risk factors for late-onset pacemaker implantation after the modified Cryo-Maze procedure. However, the incidence of pacemaker implantation is not associated with increased morbidity or atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Rhythm outcomes of minimally-invasive off-pump surgical versus catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data

BACKGROUND

Mid- and long-term rhythm outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are reported to be suboptimal. Minimally invasive surgical off-pump ablation (MISOA), including both thoracoscopic and trans-diaphragmatic approaches, has been developed to reduce surgical invasiveness and overcome on-pump surgery drawbacks. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of MISOA and CA for AF treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed including studies comparing MISOA and CA. The primary endpoint was survival freedom from AF at follow-up after a 3-month blanking period. Subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint was performed according to the type of surgical incision and hybrid approach.

RESULTS

Freedom from AF at 4 years was 52.1% ± 3.2% vs 29.1% ± 3.5%, between MISOA and CA respectively (log-rank p < 0.001; Hazard Ratio: 0.60 [95%Confidence Interval (CI):0.50-0.72], p < 0.001). At landmark analysis, a significant improvement in rhythm outcomes was observed in the MISOA group after the 5th month of follow-up (2 months from the blanking period). The Odds Ratio between MISOA and CA of postoperative cerebrovascular accident incidence and postoperative permanent pacemaker implant (PPM) were 2.00 (95%CI:0.91-4.40, p = 0.084) and 1.55 (95%CI:0.61-3.95, p = 0.358), respectively. The incidence rate ratio of late CVA between MISOA and CA was 0.86 (95%CI:0.28-2.65, p = 0.787), while for late PPM implant was 0.45 (95%CI:0.11-1.78, p = 0.256).

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis suggests that MISOA provides superior rhythm outcomes when compared to CA in terms of sinus rhythm restoration. Despite the rhythm outcome superiority of MISOA, it is associated to higher postoperative complications compared to CA.

Bi-atrial versus left atrial ablation for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ABLATION): rationale, design and study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) and increase the risk of stroke and death. Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation remains controversial for treatment of AF during mitral valve surgery. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of bi-atrial ablation with those of left atrial ablation among patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ABLATION trial (Bi-atrial vs Left Atrial Ablation for Patients with RMVD and Non-paroxysmal AF) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. The trial will randomly assign 320 patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF to bi-atrial ablation procedure or left atrial ablation procedure in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of >30 s at 12 months after surgery off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary end point is the probability of freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the probability of freedom from any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs, AF burden, incidence of adverse events and cardiac function documented by echocardiography at 12 months after operation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the ABLATION trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05021601.

Efficiency and safety of ablation procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in valve surgery: A PRISMA-compliant cumulative systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the main complication of patients who suffer from valvular heart disease (VHD), which may lead to an increased susceptibility to ventricular tachycardia, atrial dysfunction, heart failure, and stroke. Therefore, seeking a safe and effective therapy is crucial in prolonging the lives of patients with VHD and improving their quality of life.

METHODS

Our target database included PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from which published articles were retrieved from inception to June 2020. We retrieved all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared patients undergoing valve surgery with (VSA) or without ablation (VS) procedure. Studies to be included were screened and data extraction was performed independently by 2 investigators. The Cochrane risk-of-bias table was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included RCTs. The mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and relative risk (RR) ratio was calculated to analyze the data. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and chi-square tests. Egger test and the trim and fill analysis were used to further determine publication bias.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs that included 1376 patients were eventually selected for this meta-analysis. Surgical ablation was found to be effective in restoring sinus rhythm in valvular surgery patients at discharge (RR 2.91, 95% CI [1.17, 7.20], I2 97%, P = .02), 3 to 6 months (RR 2.85, 95% CI [2.27, 3.58], I2 49%, P < .00001), 12 months, and more than 1 year after surgery (RR 3.54, 95% CI [2.78, 4.51], I2 27%, P < .00001). All-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI [0.64, 1.51], I2 0%, P = .94) and stroke (RR 1.29, 95% CI [0.70, 2.39], I2 0%, P = .57) were similar in the VSA and VS groups. Compared with VS, VSA prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD 30.44, 95% CI [17.55, 43.33], I2 88%, P < .00001) and aortic cross-clamping time (MD 19.57, 95% CI [11.10, 28.03], I2 89%, P < .00001). No significant differences were found between groups with respect to the risk of bleeding (RR 0.64, 95% CI [0.37, 1.12], I2 0%, P = .12), heart failure (RR 1.11, 95% CI [0.63, 1.93], I2 0%, P = .72), and low cardiac output syndrome (RR 1.41, 95% CI [0.57, 3.46], I2 18%, P = .46). However, the demand for implantation of a permanent pacemaker was significantly higher in the VSA group (RR 1.84, 95% CI [1.15, 2.95], I2 0%, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Although we found high heterogeneity in the restoration of sinus rhythm at discharge, we assume that the comparison is valid at this time, given the current state in the operating room. This study provides evidence of the efficacy and security of concomitant ablation intervention for patients with VHD and atrial fibrillation. Surgical ablation would increase the safety of implantation of a permanent pacemaker in the population that underwent valve surgery.

Comparative characteristics of a pacemaker implantation after biatrial or left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic heart disease and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Aim      To compare the incidence of a permanent pacemaker (PP) implantation based on the chosen treatment technology (biatrial ablation, BA, or left atrial ablation (LAA) for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with simultaneous coronary bypass (CB).Material and methods  The study included 116 patients with long-standing persistent AF and indications for CB. Patients were randomized to two equal groups (58 patients in each). Group 1 underwent BA in combination with CB; group 2 patients underwent isolated LAA with simultaneous CB under the conditions of artificial circulation. Incidence of PP implantation was assessed during the early (to 30 days) and late (to 60 months) postoperative periods.Results For the observation period, a total of 9 PPs was implanted in both groups, 6 in the BA group and 3 in the LAA group (odds ratio, OR, 0.5; 95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.1-2.4; р=0.490). During the early postoperative period, 5 patients in the BA group and 2 patients in the LAA group were implanted with PP (OR, 0.4; 95 % CI. 0-2.5; р=0.438). During the late postoperative period, one (2%) patient of the BA group was implanted with a permanent PP at 30 months of follow-up due to the development of sick sinus syndrome (SSS); also, one (2%) patient of the LAA group required PP implantation at 54 months of follow-up due to the development of SSS. The causes for PP implantation in the BA group included the development of complete atrioventricular (AV) block in 9 % of cases (95 % CI, 4-19 %); sinus node dysfunction and junctional rhythm in 2 % of cases (95 % CI, 0-9 %). Compared to this group, the LAA group showed a statistically significant difference in the incidence of AV block (0 cases, р=0.047). The major cause for PP implantation in the LAA group was the development of sinus node dysfunction in 3 (5 %) patients (95 % CI, 2-14 %).Conclusion      The use of BA in surgical treatment of long-standing persistent AF with simultaneous myocardial revascularization is associated with a high risk of AV block, which requires permanent PP implantation in the postoperative period. Total incidence of permanent PP implantation for dysfunction of the cardiac conduction system following the combination surgical treatment of long-standing persistent AF and IHD, either CB and LAA or BA, did not differ between the treatment groups both in early and late postoperative periods.

The German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation Registry: In-Hospital Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 The aim of this study was to describe outcomes of patients undergoing surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) as either stand-alone or concomitant cardiosurgical procedures in Germany.

METHODS

 Patients with AF undergoing concomitant or stand-alone surgical ablation were included in the registry. Cardiac surgery centers across Germany were invited to participate and sought to enroll 1,000 consecutive patients. Data was obtained through electronic case report forms. The protocol mandated follow-up interviews at 1 year.

RESULTS

 Between January 2017 and April 2020, 17 centers enrolled 1,000 consecutive patients. Among concomitant surgical patients (n = 899), paroxysmal AF was reported in 55.4% patients. Epicardial radio frequency (RF) bilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with excision of the left atrial appendage (LAA) was the most common operative strategy. In the stand-alone cohort (n = 101), persistent AF forms were reported in 84.1% of patients. Moderate-to-severe symptoms were reported in 85.1%. Sixty-seven patients had previously underwent at least two failed catheter ablative procedures. Thoracoscopic epicardial RF bilateral PVI and completion of a "box-lesion" with LAA closure were frequently preformed. Major cardiac and cerebrovascular complications occurred in 38 patients (4.3%) in the concomitant group. No deaths were reported in the stand-alone group. At discharge, sinus rhythm was achieved in 88.1% of stand-alone and 63.4% concomitant patients.

CONCLUSION

 The CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation registry provides insights into surgical strategies for AF ablation in a considerable cohort across Germany. This in-hospital data demonstrates that concomitant and stand-alone ablation during cardiac surgery is safe and effective with low complication rates.

Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a routine procedure during concomitant cardiac surgery, however, the extension of lesion sets remain controversial. We sought to compare the relative benefit and risk of different lesion sets through a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the rhythm outcome of AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), left atrial Maze (LAM), bi-atrial Maze (BAM), or no ablation during concomitant cardiac surgery. An NMA was conducted to explore the difference of over 1 year AF freedom as well as risks for early mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI).

RESULTS

A total of 2031 patients of 19 RCTs were included. PVI, LAM, and BAM (OR [95% Cr.I]: 5.02 [2.72, 10.02], 7.97 [4.93, 14.29], 8.29 [4.90, 14.86], p < .05) demonstrated higher freedom of AF compared with no ablation, however, no significant difference of rhythm outcome was found among the three ablation strategies based on the random-effects model. BAM was associated with an increase in early mortality when compared with no ablation (OR [95% Cr.I]: 4.08 [1.23, 17.30], p < .05), while none of the remaining comparisons reached statistical difference in terms of early mortality and PPMI.

CONCLUSION

Bi-atrial ablation is not superior to left atrial ablation strategies in reducing AF recurrence for un-selected surgical patients. BAM has a higher risk of early mortality than no ablation, but no difference was found between bi-atrial and left atrial ablation in regard to early mortality and PPMI based on the current evidence.

Isolated left atrial cryoablation of atrial fibrillation in conventional mitral valve surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent trends of surgery for atrial fibrillation (AF) are towards more safe and effective energy sources, as well as to simplified sets of atrial lesions.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen (mean age, 67.4 ± 9.2 years) selected patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF and mitral valve (MV) disease underwent cryoablation of AF combined with conventional (not via mini-thoracotomy) MV surgery; the lesion set was limited to only the left atrium. Multivariable analyses identified predictors of cardiac rhythm at hospital discharge and follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 7 (5.9%) hospital deaths; 33 (28%) patients were discharged on AF. Higher values of preoperative left atrial volume index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.01-1.13) and mixed etiology of MV disease (OR = 4.19, 95%CI: 1.23-14.2) were predictors of hospital discharge on AF. Seventy-four (66.7%) patients were on stable sinus rhythm at follow-up (median period, 6.6 years); the 1, 5, and 10-year nonparametric estimates of adjusted freedom from AF were 98.1%, 89.2% and 45.6%, respectively. Higher values of preoperative systolic pulmonary artery pressure (hazard ratio [HR] = HR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.08) and AF at hospital discharge (HR = 4.14, 95%CI: 1.50-11.4) were predictors of AF at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

During conventional MV surgery, a cryo-lesion set limited to only the left atrium may give good, immediate and long-term results. Left atrial dilation and mixed etiology of MV disease were predictors of hospital discharge on AF. Preoperative pulmonary hypertension and AF at discharge combined with an increased risk of AF at follow-up.