Collaborative care for the wearable cardioverter defibrillator patient: Getting the patient and medical team "vested and active"

Wearable cardioverter defibrillator for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients at risk: An updated systematic review of comparative effectiveness and safety

Objectives

To synthesise the available evidence of wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) therapy as an add-on measure to optimal medical therapy (OMT) or as a replacement of hospital stay.

Methods

An update systematic review (SR) of comparative effectiveness and safety of WCD therapy was conducted. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), prospective comparative studies and prospective uncontrolled studies with at least 100 patients. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted.

Results

One RCT (n = 2348) and further eleven observational studies (n = 5345) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. In the only available RCT, the use of the WCD was not statistically associated with a clinical benefit on arrhythmic mortality in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with an ejection fraction of ≤35%. The compliance with WCD therapy was low in the RCT and high in observational studies, with ten observational studies reporting on a daily wear time between 20 and 23.5 h. The range of percentage of patients receiving at least one appropriate shock was 1-4.8% and the rate of first shock success was reported to be 100% in three studies. Serious adverse events (SAEs) such as inappropriate shocks occurred rarely, with between 0% and 2% of patients being inappropriately shocked within ten observational studies. In one of the observational studies, two patients (2%) were allergic to nickel developing skin rash and false alarms occurred in 58 patients (57%) in this study. Another registry study (n = 448) reported milder AEs, such as dermatitis and pressure marks, occurring in 0.9% and 0.2% of enrolled patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The only available RCT failed to show superiority of add-on use of WCD in post MI patients. Observational evidence shows that the compliance with WCD is good, but the evidence is afflicted with selection bias and the inclusion of diverse mixed patient populations diluting the ability to draw indication-specific conclusions on the utility of the device. More comparative data is needed to justify continuing or expanding use of WCD therapy.

Evaluation of a Standardized Training and Adherence Surveillance Programme to Overcome Quality-of-Life Impairments and Enhance Compliance in Patients Treated with Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Treatment with wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCD) is a non-invasive, transient therapy option for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with temporary contraindications for implantation of a permanent cardioverter defibrillator. Due to the constant risk of fatal arrhythmias, compliance is the fundamental requirement for effectiveness of a WCD, but this might be hindered by the poor quality-of-life (QoL) during WCD therapy. In this retrospective single-center study, we examined if a standardized WCD training and adherence surveillance programme could enhance compliance and QoL.

METHODS

All patients with a prescription for WCD treatment from January 2017 to August 2019 were included and received a standardized WCD training programme. QoL was validated using the modified EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The findings were compared to a historical, previously published, retrospective cohort from our center (WCD prescription period 03/2012-02/2016), not receiving the additional training programme. Endpoints comprised therapy adherence, arrhythmic episodes, and dimensions of QoL.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients underwent WCD treatment in the study cohort for a median of 49 days. Median daily wear time was enhanced in the study cohort (historical cohort vs study cohort 21.9 vs 23.3 hours/per day, p<0.01) and artefact alarms occurred less frequently (67.9% vs 48.9%, p 0.01). Major restrictions in QoL in the study cohort were found in mobility (48%), daily routine (44%), and sleep (49%), but the dimensions pain (36% vs 4%, p<0.01), mental health (43% vs 29%, p 0.03), and restrictions in daily routine (48% vs 30%, p 0.04) improved.

CONCLUSION

A standardized training and adherence surveillance programme might have beneficial effects on compliance and QoL. As these findings are essential for therapy success, they might potentially lead to a reduction in arrhythmic deaths in upcoming WCD trials.

Experience with a Wearable Cardioverter-defibrillator in 436 Patients

The aim of the present study was to review the safety and efficiency of wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) under current guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). We retrospectively analyzed 436 consecutive WCD patients seen in the years 2014–2020. Detected automatic arrhythmia alarm (AA) episodes were validated and classified as correct or incorrect. The positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated. GDMT was optimized in our outpatient clinic to maximal tolerated doses. During a total wear time (WT) of 23,527 days, 3,135 AAs were transmitted from 206 of 436 (47.2%) patients. Visual analysis revealed correct diagnoses of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 38 AAs from 6 patients (total PPV, 1.21%; PPV in VT patients, 41%); the remaining AAs were artifacts. No appropriate or inappropriate shocks and fatalities were recorded. LVEF significantly improved (P < .001) during the WT from 25% (range, 20%–30%) to 40% (range, 34%–46%). Defibrillators were implanted in 109 patients (27%). The PPV for VT of the WCD was very low. There were fewer instances of true VT than previously reported, and no shocks (appropriate or inappropriate) were delivered. The majority of patients greatly improved with GDMT, and device implantation rates were lower than previously reported. Improvements in arrhythmia detection algorithms are warranted. Based on our results, WCDs are rarely needed for lifesaving shocks under optimal GDMT.

Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator-Measured Step Count for the Surveillance of Physical Fitness during Cardiac Rehabilitation

Background: The wearable cardioverter–defibrillator (WCD) has a built-in accelerometer, which allows tracking of patients’ physical activity by remote monitoring. It is unclear whether WCD-measured physical activity, step count, and heart rate correlate with established tools for the assessment of cardiopulmonary fitness such as the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Objective: To correlate measurements of patient physical activity through the WCD with a supervised 6MWT during in-patient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and to allow their use as surrogate parameters of cardiopulmonary fitness in an out-patient setting. Methods: Consecutive patients with a history of WCD use treated at our center and an in-patient CR following an index hospitalization were included. Baseline characteristics, measurements of WCD accelerometer (median daily step count, median daily activity level), median daily heart rate, and clinically supervised 6MWT at admission and discharge of CR were obtained. Results: Forty-one patients with a mean age of 55.5 (±11.5) years were included. Thirty-five patients (85.4%) were male and 28 patients (68%) had a primary prophylactic WCD-indication. The most common underlying heart diseases were ischemic heart disease (24 patients 58.6%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (13 patients, 31.7%). Median CR duration was 20 (IQR 19.75–26.25) days. 6MWT distance increased from a mean of 329 m (±107) to 470 m (±116) during CR (p < 0.0001). The median daily step count and activity level increased significantly, from 5542 steps (IQR 3718–7055) to 8778 (IQR 6229–12,920, p < 0.0001) and median 117 × 10⁶ (IQR 96 × 10⁶–142 × 10⁶) threshold value exceedance (TVE) to 146 × 10⁶ TVE (IQR 110 × 10⁶–169 × 10⁶, p < 0.0001), respectively. The median heart rate was 74.9 bpm (IQR 65.8–84.5) and 70.2 (IQR 64.1–77.3, p = 0.09) at admission and discharge, respectively. Of all three parameters, median daily step count showed the best correlation to the results of the 6MWT at admission and discharge (r = 0.32, p = 0.04 and 0.37, p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Remote monitoring of median daily step count as assessed by the WCD’s accelerometer showed positive correlation with the 6MWT and could serve as a surrogate for cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Assessment of daily step count and activity level measured remotely by the WCD could help to tailor optimal exercise instruction for patients not attending CR.