A novel technique—Prophylactic septal radiofrequency ablation to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with transcatheter mitral valve replacement (RADIO‐TMVR)

Rheumatic and Degenerative Mitral Stenosis: From an Iconic Clinical Case to the Literature Review

Mitral stenosis (MS) poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management due to its varied etiologies, such as rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) and degenerative mitral stenosis (DMS). While rheumatic fever-induced RMS has declined in prevalence, DMS is rising with aging populations and comorbidities. Starting from a complex clinical case of DMS, the aim of this paper is to review the literature on mitral stenosis by analyzing the available tools and the differences in terms of diagnosis and treatment for rheumatic and degenerative stenosis. Emerging transcatheter techniques, such as transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) and lithotripsy-facilitated percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PMC), represent promising alternatives for DMS patients deemed unfit for surgery. In particular, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown potential in facilitating percutaneous interventions by fracturing calcific deposits and enabling subsequent interventions. However, larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish IVL's role in DMS management. To further enhance this technique, research could focus on investigating the long-term outcomes and durability of mitral lithotripsy, as well as exploring its potential in combination with PMC or TMVR.

Emerging Approaches to Management of Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction Risk in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

An increasing number of patients with mitral valve disease are high risk for surgery and in need of less invasive treatments including transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a predictor of poor outcome after TMVR, and its risk can be accurately predicted using cardiac computed tomography analysis. Novel treatment strategies that have shown efficacy in reducing risk of LVOT obstruction after TMVR include pre-emptive alcohol septal ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and anterior leaflet electrosurgical laceration. This review describes recent advances in the management of LVOT obstruction risk after TMVR, provides a new management algorithm, and explores forthcoming studies that will further advance the field.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Prevention of Outflow Tract Obstruction in Percutaneous Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) can complicate percutaneous mitral valve replacement and may preclude patients considered high surgical risk from transcatheter therapies. We report a case of mitral valve-in-valve procedure in a patient at high risk for LVOTO. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Preemptive Septal Radiofrequency Ablation to Prevent Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction may occur following transcatheter mitral valve replacement in the setting of mitral annular calcification.

METHODS

We present a case series whereby preemptive septal radiofrequency ablation (RADIO-TMVR) was used to augment the left ventricular outflow tract for transcatheter mitral valve replacement in 4 patients at risk for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction despite alcohol septal ablation.

RESULTS

All patients were female, average age of 74.9 (68.8-80.4) years. Baseline ejection fraction was 71% (63%-75%). Mean mitral valve area was 1.28 (range, 1.0-1.59) cm². Mean mitral valve gradient at rest was 9.5 (range, 7-11) mm Hg. New York Heart Association symptoms were III to IV at baseline. Patients underwent preemptive septal radiofrequency ablation to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with transcatheter mitral valve replacement a range between 69 and 154 days after alcohol septal ablation. Procedural time was 384 (337-424) minutes with a fluoroscopic time of 31 (14-71) minutes. Radiofrequency ablation time was 132 (100-175) minutes. As anticipated, 3 patients developed complete heart block and underwent pacemaker implantation, whereas 1 had a preexisting pacemaker. One patient developed groin hematoma and heart failure exacerbation. There were no peri-procedural deaths. Preemptive septal radiofrequency ablation to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with transcatheter mitral valve replacement resulted in septal end-diastolic wall thickness reduction compared with baseline (28.6%, 30.4%, 30.3%, and 11.1%) and following alcohol septal ablation (23.1%, 12%, 8.5%). Valve replacement in the setting of mitral annular calcification was performed in all patients 89 (range, 38-45) days after preemptive septal radiofrequency ablation to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Two patients had concomitant laceration of the anterior mitral leaflet to further augment the neo-left ventricular outflow tract. Postprocedure, New York Heart Association symptoms improved to class I (3 patients) and class II (1 patient).

CONCLUSIONS

In at-risk individuals, preemptive septal radiofrequency ablation may be an effective strategy at preventing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

Safety and Outcomes of Alcohol Septal Ablation Prior to Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Background

Patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for mitral valve disease caused by severe mitral annular calcification are at risk of left ventricular outflow obstruction. Preemptive alcohol septal ablation (ASA) can potentially mitigate the risk of this complication and is well established in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods

This retrospective study compared procedural characteristics and outcomes in patients who underwent ASA for TMVR vs HCM.

Results

In total, 102 patients were included, 22 in the TMVR group and 80 in the HCM group. Echocardiography demonstrated increased septal wall thickness in the HCM group (19 ​± ​3.1 ​mm vs 12.7 ​± ​2.0 ​mm; P ​< ​.001). The mean volume of ethanol injected was higher in the HCM group (1.4 ​± ​0.49 ​mL vs 0.8 ​± ​0.2 ​mL; P ​< ​.001). The average neo-left ventricular outflow tract area increased significantly after ASA in the patients undergoing TMVR (135 ​± ​89 ​mm2 vs 233 ​± ​111 ​mm2; P ​< ​.001). Six patients in the TMVR group did not achieve an adequate increase in the neo-left ventricular outflow tract area and required further procedures after ASA. The incidence of post-ASA complete heart block requiring a permanent pacemaker tended to be higher in the TMVR group (35% vs 21%; P ​= ​.195). No patients in either group had ventricular arrhythmia or stroke. Major bleeding complications were 4% in the HCM group and 0 in the TMVR group. The 30-day mortality was 4% in the HCM group and 0 in the TMVR group; however, 1 patient died at 37 ​days in the TMVR group, presumably from late heart block.

Conclusions

Preemptive ASA in patients undergoing TMVR demonstrated safety and short-term clinical outcomes similar to patients with HCM.

The Art of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Valve-in-Ring and Valve-in-Mitral-Annular-Calcification Procedures

The SAPIEN 3 is the only transcatheter heart valve commercially available for compassionate transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with previous mitral surgical rings and mitral annular calcification (valve in ring [VIR] and valve in mitral annular calcification [VIM]). Reported outcomes have been inconsistent or poor. The review provides an overview of the authors' approach to achieve largely consistent results despite the intrinsic limitations of SAPIEN 3 VIM and VIR. The approach includes bedside modifications of the valve implant, the delivery system, and of the cardiac substrate itself. Until purpose-built devices are readily available, VIR and VIM procedures will require aggressive multidisciplinary cooperation, meticulous planning and execution, and postprocedure management by experienced, high-volume operators.

Mitral annular calcification and valvular dysfunction: multimodality imaging evaluation, grading, and management

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) refers to calcium deposition in the fibrous skeleton of the mitral valve. It has many cardiovascular associations, including mitral valve dysfunction, elevated cardiovascular risk, arrhythmias, and endocarditis. Echocardiography conventionally is the first-line imaging modality for anatomic assessment, and evaluation of mitral valve function. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has demonstrated importance as an imaging modality for the evaluation and planning of related procedures. It also holds promise in quantitative grading of MAC. Currently, there is no universally accepted definition or classification system of MAC severity. We review the multimodality imaging evaluation of MAC and associated valvular dysfunction and propose a novel classification system based on qualitative and quantitative measurements derived from echocardiography and cardiac CT.

How to Manage Mitral Stenosis Due to Mitral Annular Calcification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is associated with cardiovascular comorbidities and events and in the presence of mitral stenosis (MS) represents a high-risk cohort with limited treatment options. Emerging hybrid, minimally invasive, and transcatheter therapies that use circumferential MAC as an anchor for mitral valve replacement are emerging, but none are consistently associated with ideal outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients with MAC and nonrheumatic calcific mitral stenosis who are severely symptomatic, mitral intervention may be indicated. Surgical decalcification and replacement of the mitral valve remains the conventional therapy. Surgical techniques to avoid decalcification are being described including a left atrium to left ventricular apex graft conduit. Transcatheter balloon-expandable valves designed for the aortic valve have been implanted in the mitral position in MAC with a surgical direct transatrial transcatheter approach or transseptal transcatheter approach. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction remains prevalent and associated with increased mortality. Direct transatrial approach allows for surgical resection of the anterior leaflet to mitigate this risk, and percutaneous therapies to lacerate the anterior leaflet or to ablate the basal septum are being developed. Cardiac computed tomography has emerged as a requisite for patient selection and procedural planning and has powerful predictive value for LVOT obstruction and valve embolization in valve-in-MAC. Novel transcatheter valves designed specifically for the mitral space are being studied in patients with MAC. MAC with mitral stenosis remains a challenging disease. Advances in technique, technology, and imaging may create new and reproducible treatment options with low procedural mortality for this challenging disease entity.

Dynamic nature of the LVOT following transcatheter mitral valve replacement with LAMPOON: new insights from post-procedure imaging

AIMS

To characterize the dynamic nature of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry and flow rate in patients following transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with anterior leaflet laceration (LAMPOON) and derive insights to help guide future patient selection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Time-resolved LVOT geometry and haemodynamics were analysed with post-procedure computed tomography and echocardiography in subjects (N = 19) from the LAMPOON investigational device exemption trial. A novel post hoc definition for LVOT obstruction was employed to account for systolic flow rate and quality of life improvement [obstruction was defined as LVOT gradient >30 mmHg or LVOT effective orifice area (EOA) ≤1.15 cm2]. The neo-LVOT and skirt neo-LVOT were observed to vary substantially in area throughout systole (64 ± 27% and 25 ± 14% change in area, respectively). The peak systolic flow rate occurred most commonly just prior to mid-systole, while minimum neo-LVOT (and skirt neo-LVOT) area occurred most commonly in early-diastole. Subjects with LVOT obstruction (n = 5) had smaller skirt neo-LVOT values across systole. Optimal thresholds for skirt neo-LVOT area were phase-specific (260, 210, 200, and 180 mm2 for early-systole, peak flow, mid-systole, and end-systole, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The LVOT geometry and flow rate exhibit dynamic characteristics following TMVR with LAMPOON. Subjects with LVOT obstruction had smaller skirt neo-LVOT areas across systole. The authors recommend the use of phase-specific threshold values for skirt neo-LVOT area to guide future patient selection for this procedure. LVOT EOA is a 'flow-independent' metric which has the potential to aid in characterizing LVOT obstruction severity.