Comparison of burst versus ramp antitachycardia pacing therapy for ventricular tachycardia: A meta-analysis

Case report: successful termination of ventricular tachycardia by intrinsic anti-tachycardia pacing beyond conventional anti-tachycardia pacing

Background

Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) is a pain-free alternative to defibrillation shock for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Intrinsic ATP (iATP) is a novel algorithm of auto-programmed ATP. However, the advantage of iATP over conventional ATP in clinical cases is still unknown.

Case summary

A 49-year-old man with no significant past medical history was transferred to our institution with sudden-onset fatigue from working on a farm. A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed monomorphic sustained wide QRS tachycardia with a right bundle branch block pattern and superior axis deviation with a cycle length (CL) of 300 ms. Sustained monomorphic VT originating from the left ventricle due to underlying vasospastic angina was diagnosed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, coronary angiography, and the acetylcholine stress test, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation was performed. Nine months later, a clinical VT episode with a CL of 300 ms was observed, which could not be terminated by three sequences of conventional burst pacing. Ventricular tachycardia was finally terminated by a third iATP sequence without any acceleration.

Discussion

Although standard burst pacing by conventional ATP reached the VT circuit, it failed to terminate the VT. Using the post-pacing interval, iATP automatically calculated the appropriate number of S1 pulses required to reach the VT circuit. In iATP, the S2 pulses are delivered with a calculated coupling interval based on the estimated effective refractory period during tachycardia. In this case, iATP might have led to less aggressive S1 stimulation, followed by aggressive S2 stimulation, which probably helped terminate the VT without any acceleration.