Totally peripheral approach for ICD lead vegetation removal in a GUCH patient

Scoping review of percutaneous mechanical aspiration for valvular and cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous mechanical aspiration (PMA) of intravascular vegetations is a novel strategy for management of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who are at high risk of poor outcomes with conventional cardiac surgery. However, clear indications for its use as well as patient outcomes are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a scoping review of the literature to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing PMA for management of IE.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full text for inclusion and independently extracted data.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies published until February 21, 2023, describing the use of PMA for management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) or valvular IE were included.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

As this was a scoping review, risk of bias assessment was not performed.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive data was reported.

RESULTS

We identified 2252 titles, of which 1442 abstracts were screened, and 125 full text articles were reviewed for inclusion. Fifty-one studies, describing a total of 294 patients who underwent PMA for IE were included in our review. Over 50% (152/294) of patients underwent PMA to debulk cardiac implantable electronic device lead vegetations prior to extraction (152/294), and 38.8% (114/294) of patients had a history of drug use. Patient outcomes were inconsistently reported, but few had procedural complications, and all-cause in-hospital mortality was 6.5% (19/294).

CONCLUSIONS

While PMA is a promising advance in the care of patients with IE, higher quality data regarding patient outcomes are needed to better inform the use of this procedure.

Transcatheter vacuum aspiration of valvular and lead related infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aspiration is utilized for removal of thrombi and vegetations in inoperable patients and high-risk surgical candidates where medical therapy alone is unlikely to achieve desired outcome. A number of case reports and series have been published since the introduction of AngioVac system (AngioDynamics Inc., Latham, NY) in 2012 where this technology was used in the treatment of endocarditis. However, there is a lack of consolidated data reporting on patient selection, safety and outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for publications reporting cases where transcatheter aspiration was used for endocarditis vegetation debulking or removal. Data on patient characteristics, outcomes and complications from select reports were extracted and systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Data from 11 publications with 232 patients were included in the final analyses. Of these, 124 had lead vegetation aspiration, 105 had valvular vegetation aspiration, and 3 had both lead as well as valvular vegetation aspiration. Among the 105 valvular endocarditis cases, 102 (97 %) patients had right sided vegetation removal. Patients with valvular endocarditis were younger (mean age 35 years) vs. patients with lead vegetations (mean age 66 years). Among the valvular endocarditis cases, there was a 50-85 % reduction in vegetation size, 14 % had worsening valvular regurgitation, 8 % had persistent bacteremia and 37 % required blood transfusion. Surgical valve repair or replacement was subsequently performed in 3 % and in-hospital mortality was 11 %. Among patients with lead infection, procedural success rate was reported at 86 %, 2 % had vascular complications and in-hospital mortality was 6 %. Persistent bacteremia, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and clinically significant pulmonary embolism occurred in about 1 % each.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter aspiration of vegetations in infective endocarditis has acceptable success rates in vegetation debulking as well as rates of morbidity or mortality. Large prospective multi-center studies are warranted to determine predictors of complications, thus helping identify suitable patients.

The AngioVac System in Childhood and Adolescence: A New Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Like Configuration

Intravascular and intracardiac clots, thrombi, and vegetative material can be safely and effectively treated with the AngioVac System (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY) as an alternative to open surgery. However, this technology is still not performed in children or adolescents as a rule. We aimed to present our experience with two cases (a 10 year old girl and a 17 year old male adolescent) with concurrent hypoxemia in whom this device was successfully used in combination with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to remove caval thrombi and cavoatrial septic material, respectively. This extracorporeal circuit configuration allowed adequate respiratory support during the procedure. No endovascular recurrence of the pathologic material was found at 2 and 1 year of follow-up, respectively.

Outcomes and survival of patients undergoing percutaneous vegetectomy for right heart endocarditis

Backgrounds

AngioVac is used for the percutaneous removal of vegetations and for debulking of large vegetations in patients who are not surgical candidates.This study aims to identify the demographics, echocardiographic features, indications, improvement of the tricuspid valve regurgitation, and survival outcomes of patients who have undergone AngioVac vegetectomy reported in the literature.

Methods

A systematic review was performed to identify articles reporting suction thromectomy or vegetation removal using the AngioVac system for RSIE (right sided infective endocarditis). Survival on discharge was our primary outcome. Additionally, we evaluated indications for suction thrombectomy and TR improvement. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and ratios.

Results

A total of 49 studies were identified. The most common risk factor was intravenous drug abuse seen in 45% (20/49) and cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) in 45% (20/49). Circulatory shock was seen in 35% of patients. The causative organism was gram positive cocci (86%). Moderate to severe TR was present in 74% of cases with documented echocardiograms. Indications for AngioVac were poor surgical candidacy (81%) or to reduce septic emboli risk (19%). Survival at discharge was 93%. TR improvement was reported only in 16% cases and remained unchanged/worsened in 84%.

Conclusion

AngioVac procedure is an alternative treatment for critically ill patients who cannot undergo surgery. To understand the survival, safety and candidacy of patients undergoing this procedure, further randomized control studies and literature reviews are needed. The improvement or worsening of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with TR valve involvement is another factor to be investigated.

Proof of Concept: Trans-atrial AngioVac Aspiration of Mitral Valve Thrombosis in a COVID-19 Patient

In patients with a prohibitive surgical risk, the AngioVac cannula can be used to remove left-sided cardiac masses, as an off-label adaptation of the device. We herein describe a novel micro-invasive approach to gain access to the left atrium for the aspiration of a mitral valve mass in a patient affected by severe coronavirus disease 2019. Through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy, the right superior pulmonary vein was accessed and used to insert the aspiration cannula. A parallel venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-like circuit provided circulatory and respiratory support to ensure proper intra- and postoperative hemodynamic stabilization.

Navigating the Heart. The Evolution of the AngioVac System in a Single-center Experience

We investigated the efficacy, safety, and versatility of the AngioVac (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY) system for the treatment of intravascular and intracardiac masses of different origins. We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients treated with the AngioVac system between July-2016 and November-2021 at our institution. Three configurations of the device were adopted in 44 patients: a venous-venous circuit in 21 cases (47.7%), a venous-arterial ECMO-like configuration in 20 (45.5%), and a venous-arterial-arterial circuit with 2 centrifugal pumps for left-sided cardiac masses in 3 (6.8%). Successful removal of the mass was achieved in 41 patients (93.2%), while in the other cases conversion to full sternotomy was necessary. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 cases (6.8%), including 1 death, 1 pulmonary embolization, and 1 cardiac perforation. The AngioVac system is a valid, safe, and versatile option for the treatment of intravascular masses also in patients with prohibitive surgical risk.

Case report: Treatment of left-sided valve endocarditis using the Transapical AngioVac System and cerebral embolism protection device: A case series

The AngioVac System (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY) was developed for the treatment of right-sided heart and intravenous masses. Lately, it has been employed to deal with left-sided heart masses, in particular, native valve endocarditis (NVE) and valve prostheses endocarditis (VPE) in high-risk patients. Left-sided heart endocarditis has a high morbidity, and it also has a high mortality when open heart surgery is performed. Recently, patients presenting with left NVE and VPE have been treated with the off-label use of the AngioVac System even if the solution presents a considerable cerebral embolization risk issue due to the risk of fragmentation rather than a complete en-bloc aspiration of the masses. A percutaneous cerebral embolism protection system is currently used in TAVI procedures, especially when the native valve presents extensive calcifications and consequent significant embolic risks. We hereby present a clinical case series of a combined utilization of the AngioVac System and cerebral embolism protection system Triguard (Keystone Heart Ltd., Herzliya, Israel) to treat left NVE and VPE in prohibitive-surgical-risk patients.

AngioVac for Vegetation Debulking in Right-sided Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the utility of AngioVac-assisted vegetation debulking (AVD) in right sided infective endocarditis (RSIE) BACKGROUND: : AngioVac is a vacuum-based device that was approved in 2014 for the percutaneous removal of undesirable materials from the intravascular system. Although there are multiple reports on the use of the AngioVac device to aspirate right-sided heart chamber thrombi, data on its use to treat RSIE is limited.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the utility of AVD. The primary outcomes of our study were the procedural success, defined as the ability of AngioVac to produce residual vegetation size <50% (RVS<50%) without serious procedural complications, and the clinical success, defined as composite of RVS<50%, in-hospital survival, absence of recurrent bacteremia, and valve function not requiring further intervention. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcomes and average length of hospital stay. The pooled means and proportions of our data were analyzed using random effects model, generic inverse variance method, and represented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies, including 301 patients (mean age: 44.6±18.2 years, 71.6% males) were included. Procedural success was achieved in 89.2% of patients (95% CI:82.3%-93.6%, I²=0%). Clinical success was achieved in 79.1% of patients (95%CI:67.9%-87.2%, I²=15%). Overall survival rate was 89.7% (95% CI:83.1%-93.9%%, I²=9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that AVD is a promising therapeutic option for RSIE offering a high success rate with an acceptable complication rate across a wide range of patients.

Vacuum-Implemented Removal of Lead Vegetations in Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis

When approaching infected lead removal in cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE), a surgical consideration for large (>20 mm) vegetations is recommended. We report our experience with the removal of large CDRIE vegetations using the AngioVac system, as an alternative to conventional surgery. We retrospectively reviewed all infected lead extractions performed with a prior debulking using the AngioVac system, between October 2016 and April 2022 at our institution. A total of 13 patients presented a mean of 2(1) infected leads after a mean of 5.7(5.7) years from implantation (seven implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, four cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators, and two pacemakers). The AngioVac system was used as a venous−venous bypass in six cases (46.2%), venous−venous ECMO-like circuit (with an oxygenator) in five (38.5%), and venous−arterial ECMO-like circuit in two cases (15.4%). Successful (>70%) aspiration of the vegetations was achieved in 12 patients (92.3%) and an intraoperative complication (cardiac perforation) only occurred in 1 case (7.7%). Subsequent lead extraction was successful in all cases, either manually (38.5%) or using mechanical tools (61.5%). The AngioVac system is a promising effective and safe option for large vegetation debulking in CDRIE. Planning the extracorporeal circuit design may represent the optimal strategy to enhance the tolerability of the procedure and minimize adverse events.