Ripple Mapping: A precise tool for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation

High-density "APLE" Mapping-Activation, Propagation, Low Voltage, and Electrogram Evaluation with the HD Grid for Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entry Tachycardia Ablation

This is the first case series to evaluate high-density mapping of the triangle of Koch (TOK) using the HD Grid to guide slow-pathway ablation integrating activation, propagation (with wave collision), low-voltage signals, and atrial electrogram appearance. We will describe our technique and the results in this case series. Using three-dimensional mapping and the HD Grid, patients underwent high-density voltage mapping of the TOK. Ablation site selection was based on properties during sinus rhythm with late activation, at or above the propagation wave collision, over low voltage, and with appropriate electrogram appearance. Five patients underwent mapping of the slow pathway using the HD Grid. Their median age was 14 years, their median weight was 54.1 kg, and their median height was 161.5 cm. The TOK was mapped with the HD Grid for a median of 3 min. The procedure was successful in all patients using this technique. The median lesion number to the site of success was 3, with a median total number of cryotherapy lesions of 11. No radiation was used. There were no recurrences. Using activation, propagation wave, low voltage, and electrogram appearance when mapping for slow-pathway localization and ablation with the HD Grid can be successful, results in high-density maps, and is relatively faster.

Effect of Direct Slow Pathway Capture Mapping-Guided Ablation on Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Direct slow pathway capture (DSPC) mapping is a novel electrophysiological technique for detecting antegrade slow pathway input sites. However, the effect of DSPC mapping-guided ablation on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DSPC mapping-guided ablation in typical AVNRT patients.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 301 consecutive typical AVNRT patients. The outcomes in patients who underwent DSPC mapping-guided ablation (DSPC group) and those who underwent conventional anatomical ablation (conventional group) were compared. The conventional group was established before introducing DSPC mapping-guided ablation. Positive DSPC sites were defined as sites with a return cycle atrioventricular prolongation of ≥20 ms with high-output (10-20 V) pacing during tachycardia or the last paced beat of the atrial extrastimulation.

RESULTS

Among 116 patients in the DSPC group, 102 (88%) had positive DSPC sites, and 86 (74%) had a successful ablation at that site. Of the remaining 30 patients, 27 had a successful anatomical ablation. The DSPC group had a significantly lower frequency of radiofrequency applications and shorter total application time than the conventional group (median: 5.5 [IQR: 3-11] times vs 9 [IQR: 5-15] times, and 168 [IQR: 108-266] seconds vs 244 [IQR: 158-391] seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, the DSPC group had a numerically lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and AVNRT recurrences than the conventional group (0% vs 1.6%; P = 0.17, and 1.7% vs 3.2%; P = 0.43, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DSPC mapping-guided ablation was associated with a lower operative time, which can reduce the risk of AV conduction injury in typical AVNRT.