The Development of the Extravascular Defibrillator with Substernal Lead Placement: A New Frontier for Device-Based Treatment of Sudden Cardiac Arrest

[Treatment with cardiac electronic implantable devices]

Cardiac device therapy provides not only treatment options for bradyarrhythmia but also advanced treatment for heart failure and preventive measures against sudden cardiac death. In heart failure treatment it enables synergistic reverse remodelling and reduces pharmacological side effects. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has revolutionized the treatment of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left bundle branch block by decreasing the mortality and morbidity with improvement of the quality of life and resilience. Conduction system pacing (CSP) as an alternative method of physiological stimulation can improve heart function and reduce the risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy. Leadless pacers and subcutaneous/extravascular defibrillators offer less invasive options with lower complication rates. The prevention of infections through preoperative and postoperative strategies enhances the safety of these therapies.

Ultrasound utilization for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices

Ultrasound (US) guidance for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is currently not routine practice. This article sought to review published data on the use of ultrasound in each of the major surgical steps involved in implantation of CIEDs, including achieving anesthesia, obtaining venous access and implantation of leads. A literature review was performed, revealing a total of 20 peer-reviewed studies that assessed US guidance for CIED implantation; 3 of these were randomized trials while the remainder were mostly feasibility studies. The available data suggest that ultrasound can be useful in guiding implantation of CIEDs, with a trend towards less complication rates; however, more high-quality studies that compare US guidance to traditional techniques in CIED implantation are required.

Characterization of the substernal space with computed tomography imaging in patients with and without median sternotomy: Assessing a novel implant location for extravascular defibrillation lead placement

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide clinically significant therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. This study aimed to characterize the substernal space using computed tomography (CT) in patients with and without prior midline sternotomy to investigate the feasibility of substernal ICD lead implantation in post-sternotomy patients.

METHODS

High-quality electrocardiogram-gated CT images from 100 patients (71% male, average body mass index 23.5 ± 2.9) were retrospectively collected, including 50 patients with prior midline sternotomy (S-group) and 50 patients with no prior sternotomy (NS-group). Distances were measured from the retrosternal surface to the epicardial surface of the heart and segmented into four regions from the xiphoid tip and superiorly along the sternum.

RESULTS

Results generally showed a measurable but narrower average sternum-to-heart distance in the prior sternotomy group compared to the non-sternotomy group in all four regions (p < .05). In the S-group, the sternum-to-heart distances across all regions ranged from 0 to 32.0 mm, while in the NS-group, the distances ranged from 0 to 39.9 mm.

CONCLUSION

Small but measurable separations between the heart and sternum were observed in patients with prior sternotomy, particularly near the xiphoid region, indicating the potential viability of extravascular substernal ICD lead implantation in post-sternotomy patients.

Substernal Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System Infections in Large Animals

The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) with lead implantation in the substernal space may provide clinical advantages over transvenous and subcutaneous systems. This is the first reported examination of substernal infection in large animals implanted with the EV ICD system.The system was implanted in 13 large animals (canine, porcine, and ovine). The porcine were co-implanted with a transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) system. Infection was promoted through a cadence of immunosuppressive monitors and study interventions. The animals were monitored for clinical presentation of infection over 12-18 weeks, and cultures were collected to confirm infection. Treatment was bifurcated: 1) some infections were treated only with antibiotics ( "antibiotics only" ), whereas 2) some infections were treated with system removal and antibiotics ( "antibiotics + explant" ). Histopathology was conducted at the study closure.Five infections were confirmed over the course of the study, four of which involved infection of the EV ICD system and one infection of only the concomitantly implanted transvenous CRT-D system without EV ICD-related infection. Among the four EV ICD infections, two of two infections treated with antibiotics only did not resolve whereas two of two infections treated with antibiotics + explant resolved, as shown by histology. The transvenous CRT-D system infection progressed to septicemia and endocarditis, requiring early study discontinuation. No EV ICD-related infection progressed to blood stream infection, and the sternal bone did not become infected when infection was present in the substernal tissues.The study findings suggest that EV ICD-related infections are treatable with system removal and antibiotic therapy.

Evolution of extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for ventricular arrhythmias

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have become an established therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death due to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the last decades. In all those years, the use of transvenous leads has proven to be the most vulnerable part of the system. The development of the completely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator opened a new era of device therapy outside of the vascular system. The next step, enabling extravascular devices with the option of antitachycardia pacing, is just around the corner. This may become an important option for all patients without a bradycardia pacing indication that are in need for antitachycardia pacing because of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Efficacy and Safety of an Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

BACKGROUND

The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has a single lead implanted substernally to enable pause-prevention pacing, antitachycardia pacing, and defibrillation energy similar to that of transvenous ICDs. The safety and efficacy of extravascular ICDs are not yet known.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-group, nonrandomized, premarket global clinical study involving patients with a class I or IIa indication for an ICD, all of whom received an extravascular ICD system. The primary efficacy end point was successful defibrillation at implantation. The efficacy objective would be met if the lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the percentage of patients with successful defibrillation was greater than 88%. The primary safety end point was freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications at 6 months. The safety objective would be met if the lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the percentage of patients free from such complications was greater than 79%.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients were enrolled, 316 of whom had an implantation attempt. Among the 302 patients in whom ventricular arrhythmia could be induced and who completed the defibrillation testing protocol, the percentage of patients with successful defibrillation was 98.7% (lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 96.6%; P<0.001 for the comparison with the performance goal of 88%); 299 of 316 patients (94.6%) were discharged with a working ICD system. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients free from major system- or procedure-related complications at 6 months was 92.6% (lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 89.0%; P<0.001 for the comparison with the performance goal of 79%). No major intraprocedural complications were reported. At 6 months, 25 major complications were observed, in 23 of 316 patients (7.3%). The success rate of antitachycardia pacing, as assessed with generalized estimating equations, was 50.8% (95% CI, 23.3 to 77.8). A total of 29 patients received 118 inappropriate shocks for 81 arrhythmic episodes. Eight systems were explanted without extravascular ICD replacement over the 10.6-month mean follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective global study, we found that extravascular ICDs were implanted safely and were able to detect and terminate induced ventricular arrhythmias at the time of implantation. (Funded by Medtronic; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04060680.).

Emerging Concepts on Infection of Novel Cardiac Implantable Devices

Novel cardiac devices, including the MitraClip system, occluder devices, leadless pacemakers, and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD), are mostly used in the management of patients who are at high risk for surgery and/or developing infections. Several mechanisms render most of these devices resistant to infection, including avoiding long transvenous access and novel manufacturing material. Since subjects who use these devices already endure several comorbid conditions, uncommon cases of device-associated infection could result in serious complications and increased mortality. In this review, we aim to summarize the current state of evidence on the incidence, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of new cardiac devices' associated infection.