• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4605772)   Today's Articles (0)   Subscriber (49373)
For: Andreadis EA, Geladari CV, Angelopoulos ET. The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020;22:555-559. [DOI: 10.1111/jch.13837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Juraschek SP, Ishak AM, Mukamal KJ, Wood JM, Anderson TS, Cohen ML, Li JX, Cluett JL. Impact of 30- Versus 60-Second Time Intervals Between Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements on Measured Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2021;78:1502-1510. [PMID: 34488436 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
2
Paiva AMG, Mota-Gomes MA, Feitosa ADM, Azevedo TCP, Amorim NW, Mion D, Sposito AC, Nadruz W. Differences in the diagnosis of high blood pressure using unattended and attended automated office blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 2021;36:370-372. [PMID: 34404899 DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00593-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
3
Herrera FC, Siaron KB, Stutzman SE, Wilson J, Olson D. Exploring the accuracy and precision of BP measurements. Nursing 2021;51:47-50. [PMID: 34157002 DOI: 10.1097/01.nurse.0000751336.84200.7a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
4
Lee CJ, Ha JH, Kim JY, Kim IC, Ryu SK, Rhee MY, Lee JH, Lee JH, Lee HY, Ihm SH, Chung JW, Choi JH, Shin J, Park S, Kario K. Office blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg better predicts uncontrolled out-of-office blood pressure in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020;23:595-605. [PMID: 33280228 PMCID: PMC8029554 DOI: 10.1111/jch.14113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
5
Myers MG. More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020;22:560-561. [PMID: 32112482 DOI: 10.1111/jch.13835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA