Association between real-world home blood pressure measurement patterns and blood pressure variability among older individuals with hypertension: A community-based blood pressure variability study

Home blood pressure-centered approach - from digital health to medical practice: HOPE Asia Network consensus statement 2023

Recent innovations in digital technology have enabled the simultaneous accumulation, and the linking and analysis of time-series big data relating to several factors that influence blood pressure (BP), including biological indicators, physical activity, and environmental information. Various approaches can be used to monitor BP: in the office/clinic; at home; 24-h ambulatory recording; or with wearable and cuffless devices. Of these, home BP monitoring is a reliable and convenient method, and is recommended for hypertension management by current national and international guidelines. This recommendation is based on evidence showing that home BP is an important predictor of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and kidney disease in patients with hypertension. In addition, lifetime personalized health record (PHR)-based home BP with telemonitoring combined with co-interventions has been shown to lower BP more effectively than the traditional approach based on office BP. Thus, home BP represents a key metric for personalized anticipation medicine, from digital healthcare to digital medicine. This paper summarizes the latest evidence on home BP monitoring and proposes a Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network consensus on a home BP-centered approach to the management of hypertension.

Association Between Regular Blood Pressure Monitoring and the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: a Multicenter Retrospective Study with Propensity Score Matching

Although hypertension is a known risk factor for intracranial aneurysm rupture, the benefit of the management of blood pressure in reducing the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms remains largely unknown, especially for regular blood pressure monitoring. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 3965 patients with saccular intracranial aneurysms from 20 medical centers in China. The patients were divided into the non-hypertensive group and hypertensive group. Propensity score matching was applied to identify a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between intracranial aneurysm rupture and the management of blood pressure. After matching, hypertension was significantly associated with an increased rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms (OR = 2.559, 95%CI = 2.161-3.030, P = 0.000). For the management of blood pressure, controlled hypertension (OR = 1.803, 95%CI = 1.409-2.307, P = 0.000), uncontrolled hypertension (OR = 2.178, 95%CI = 1.756-2.700, P = 0.000), and hypertension without regular blood pressure monitoring (OR = 5.000, 95%CI = 3.823-6.540, P = 0.000) were all significantly associated with a higher rupture risk compared with the absence of hypertension. Moreover, hypertension without regular blood pressure monitoring was associated with a higher rupture risk compared with either controlled hypertension (OR = 3.807, 95%CI = 2.687-5.395, P = 0.000) or hypertension with regular blood pressure monitoring (including controlled and uncontrolled hypertension) (OR = 2.893, 95%CI = 2.319-3.609, P = 0.000). The absence of regular blood pressure monitoring was significantly associated with an increased risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture, emphasizing the importance of implementation of regular blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with intracranial aneurysms.