Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with history of moderate to severe periodontitis: a long-term evaluation

A 30-year retrospective cohort outcome study of periodontal treatment of stages III and IV patients in a private practice

AIM

Tooth loss studies show that periodontal treatment is effective. However, it is not known whether these results can be projected into a lifetime of treatment. The aim of the study was to study all patients with stages III/IV of periodontitis over 30 years in a private practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients referred between 1986 and 1990 were monitored for 30 years for tooth loss and prognostic factors. All dropouts were accounted for.

RESULTS

In all, 386 patients were followed, of whom 283 patients dropped out, leaving 103 patients (67 females and 36 males, average age 40.1 years) monitored over 30 years. Tooth loss was stable until 16 years, when the population was divided into groups of low (n = 65), moderate (n = 18) and high (n = 20) tooth loss, losing 1.05 (SD 1.27), 4.83 (SD 0.96) and 11.90 (SD 4.25) teeth, respectively. The strongest prognostic factors were first-degree relatives with periodontitis, periodontal treatment before the age of 35 years, diabetes and patients with teeth with initial hopeless prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with stages III and IV periodontitis could be successfully treated with conventional periodontal treatment over a period of 30 years. The findings suggest that retrospective studies with shorter observation times cannot automatically be projected onto the outcome of a lifetime of periodontal treatment.

Is the Diagnosis of Generalized Stage IV (Severe) Periodontitis Compatible with the Survival of Extended Stabilizing Prosthetic Restorations? A Medium-Term Retrospective Study

The aim of the study was to identify the most relevant patient-related factors directly involved (alone or in combinations) in the long-term survival and functionality of the abutment teeth of extensive stabilizing bridges and removable prosthesis, in patients treated for Stage IV periodontitis, adhering to SPT over a period of at least 5 years. Seventy-six patients treated between 2000-2022, rehabilitated with FDPs and RDPs, adhering to SPT for at least 5 years were included. Patient-related factors influencing retention of RDPs and FDP, survival rates in regular (RCs) and irregular compliers (ICs), and incidence of biological and technical complications were assessed. During a follow-up of 69 months, from 57 patients with FDPs and 19 patients with RDPs, 39 (51.32%) were ICs, while 37 (48.68%) were RCs. An overall statistically significant association (p = 0.04) was identified between biological complications and the type of prostheses. The RDP patients had more complications than FDP patients. In 5.26% of the RDP patients, root caries were identified, and 10.53% were diagnosed with a periapical (endodontic) lesion, while 3.51% of the FDPS patients presented root caries. In five (6.57%) cases, abutment loss resulted in the loss of the prosthesis. Statistically significant correlations were observed between systemic diseases and tooth loss, and between type of tooth lost and the reason for tooth loss, irrespective of the type of prosthesis. A total of 66.67% of the lost incisors, 85.71% of the lost premolars, and 88.89% of the lost molars occurred due to periodontal causes. Furthermore, 93% of the FDPs and RDPs were still in place and in function.

Efficacy and risks of tooth-supported prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients with stage IV periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of tooth-supported fixed prostheses in partially edentulous patients with stage IV periodontitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Randomized and controlled clinical trials (RCTs and CCTs) and prospective/retrospective cohort studies or case series were searched in three databases. Survival rate of abutment teeth was considered the primary outcome. Meta-analyses were performed whenever possible.

RESULTS

Twenty-four publications were included. No RCTs or CCTs compared the efficacy of tooth-supported fixed prostheses between patients with severe periodontitis or non-periodontitis patients. Most of the data retrieved were derived from case series. The incidence of abutment-tooth loss after a follow-up period from 2 to 35.4 years was low (n = 17 studies; weighted mean incidence (WMI) = 4.8%; confidence interval (CI) [3.2, 6.5]). The corresponding figure for prostheses failure was WMI = 6.9% (n = 18; 95% CI [4.1, 9.7]). Technical complications seemed to be more frequent than biological complications (caries, endodontic failure, root fracture, etc.). Periodontal outcomes tended to remain stable over time.

CONCLUSION

Tooth-supported fixed prostheses seemed to be a valid treatment approach to restore masticatory function in patients with stage IV periodontitis once periodontal therapy has been accomplished. However, the comparative efficacy of this treatment among periodontitis and non-periodontitis patients is unclear due to the absence of clinical trials.

Impact of tooth loss due to periodontal disease on the prognosis of rehabilitation

When periodontal disease is diagnosed, it is difficult to predict the clinical response of treatment of a tooth over time because the result of treatment is affected by several factors and will depend on the maintenance and support of periodontal treatment. Rehabilitation with removable dental prostheses, fixed prostheses, and dental implants makes it possible to restore the function and esthetics of patients with tooth loss due to periodontal disease. The predictive factors of tooth loss in periodontitis patients should be assessed by dentists to inform their clinical decision-making during dental treatment planning. This will provide detailed individualized information and level of risk of patients considered suitable for dental rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this article was to review the subject of "Impact of tooth loss due to periodontal disease on the prognosis of rehabilitation" and the effect of fixed, removable, and implant-supported prostheses in periodontal patients.

Association, prediction, generalizability: Cross-center validity of predicting tooth loss in periodontitis patients

OBJECTIVES

To predict patients' tooth loss during supportive periodontal therapy across four German university centers.

METHODS

Tooth loss in 897 patients in four centers (Kiel (KI) n = 391; Greifswald (GW) n = 282; Heidelberg (HD) n = 175; Frankfurt/Main (F) n = 49) during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) was assessed. Our outcome was annualized tooth loss per patient. Multivariable linear regression models were built on data of 75 % of patients from one center and used for predictions on the remaining 25 % of this center and 100 % of data from the other three centers. The prediction error was assessed as root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), i.e., the deviation of predicted from actually lost teeth per patient and year.

RESULTS

Annualized tooth loss/patient differed significantly between centers (between median 0.00 (interquartile interval: 0.00, 0.17) in GW and 0.09 (0.00, 0.19) in F, p = 0.001). Age, smoking status and number of teeth before SPT were significantly associated with tooth loss (p < 0.03). Prediction within centers showed RMSE of 0.14-0.30, and cross-center RMSE was 0.15-0.31. Predictions were more accurate in F and KI than in HD and GW, while the center on which the model was trained had a less consistent impact. No model showed useful predictive values.

CONCLUSION

While covariates were significantly associated with tooth loss in linear regression models, a clinically useful prediction was not possible with any of the models and generalizability was not given. Predictions were more accurate for certain centers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Association should not be confused with predictive value: Despite significant associations of covariates with tooth loss, none of our models was useful for prediction. Usually, model accuracy was even lower when tested across centers, indicating low generalizability.

Long-term costs of post-restorations: 7-year practice-based results from Germany

Objectives

We evaluated the initial and follow-up treatment costs of different post-restorations in a practice-based German healthcare setting.

Methods

A total of 139 incisors, canines, or premolars received post-restorations placed by eight general dental practitioners in Germany, and were followed over a mean ± SD 7.1 ± 4.5 years. Preformed metal (MP, n = 68), glass-fiber (GF, n = 28), or cast post-and-core buildups (MC, n = 23) had been used to retain crowns or bridge anchors. Preformed metal and glass-fiber had also been used to retain directly built up post-retained composite restorations (PC, n = 20). Material and treatment costs for the initial post-restorations as well as restorative, endodontic, or surgical re-treatments were estimated from a public-payer-perspective in Germany. Associations between total and annualized total costs and covariates were assessed using generalized linear modeling. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00012938).

Results

MC showed highest initial treatment costs (557.23 Euro), but the least re-treatments (6/23, 26%), while PC showed lowest initial costs (203.52 Euro) but the most re-treatments (11/20, 55%). Costs for MP/GF post-crowns were initially similarly costly (496.47/496.87 Euro), and both also showed similar re-treatments (35%/36%). The overall annual failure rate was 5.2% (MC: 3.5%, MP: 4.6%, GF: 5.3%, PC: 10.3%). Including costs for the resulting re-treatments, mean total costs were 591.66 Euro (MC), 548.31 Euro (MP), 526.37 Euro (GF), and 361.81 Euro (PC). Annualized total costs were 171.36 Euro (MC), 141.75 Euro (MP), 146.12 Euro (GF), and 135.65 Euro (PC). Total and annualized total costs were highest for MC, with PC being the significantly less costly option (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Within German healthcare, both initial and follow-up costs for post-restorations were considerable. Saving costs initially may, at least partially, be offset by more complications long-term.

Clinical relevance

Dentists need to be aware that the placement of posts is not only initially costly but also comes with significant long-term costs for treating occurring complications. This should be communicated with patients and considered during treatment planning.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00784-020-03529-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A nomogram prediction for mandibular molar survival in Chinese patients with periodontitis: A 10-year retrospective cohort study

AIMS

To develop a nomogram prediction model of mandibular molar survival by comprehensively analysing clinical and radiographic risk factors of mandibular molar loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred and seventy-eight mandibular molars of 139 subjects who underwent non-surgical periodontal treatment were examined retrospectively within a mean follow-up period of 11.1 years. The association of risk factors including clinical and radiographic parameters with mandibular molar loss was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A nomogram prediction model was developed, and the validation and discriminatory ability of it were analysed.

RESULTS

Hundred and four molars were lost in this study. Probing depth (PD), attachment loss (AL), furcation involvement (FI), bleeding on probing (BOP), tooth mobility and radiographic bone loss were significantly associated with tooth loss (p < .01). A gradient effect of degree of FI on mandibular molar loss existed increasing from degree Ⅱ (HR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.79) to Ⅲ (HR = 5.61, 95% CI: 3.01, 10.45) versus none & degree Ⅰ. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.891. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis demonstrated good performance and high net benefit of nomogram, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A specific nomogram could be adopted to predict the mandibular molar survival and formulate tailored treatment plans in Chinese.

Influence of retainer and major connector designs of removable partial dentures on the stabilization of mobile teeth: A preliminary study

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of retainers and major connector designs on the stabilization of remaining mobile teeth using removable partial dentures (RPDs). We prepared experimental RPDs with several retainer designs and major connectors for lower Kennedy class I models. The simulated RPD insertion and removal test was conducted and retentive force and mobility of mobile remaining teeth with and without RPD placement were measured throughout a simulation test. Regardless of reduction of retentive force, the placement of RPDs using cast clasps and/or lingual plates resulted in reduced mobility of the remaining teeth than use of wrought wire clasps and/or lingual bars. The results suggested that cast clasps and lingual plates are effective for the stabilization of mobile, remaining teeth. Additionally, the stabilizing effect of RPD on abutment teeth was not diminished, despite decreases in retentive force.

Long-Term Outcomes of Tooth-Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Periodontally Compromised and Treated Patients Refusing Bone Grafting Surgical Therapies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term incidence of complications in abutment teeth and dental implants in periodontally treated and maintained patients, refusing bone grafting surgical therapies, rehabilitated with full-arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses (TRPs) and full-arch fixed prosthesis (FPs), both supported by teeth-implants combination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After active periodontal therapy, 18 patients were rehabilitated with full-arch TRPs, whereas 17 patients were rehabilitated with full-arch FPs. Patients were annually evaluated for technical and/or biological failures/complications.

RESULTS

During the 15-year observation period, 6 of 164 (3.6%) implants failed and 19 of 233 teeth were extracted (9.2%) in the TRPs group, whereas 6 of 152 (3.9%) implants failed and 23 of 221 (10.4%) abutment teeth were extracted in the FPs group. Differences in implant failures and abutment teeth loss between the 2 groups were not statistically significant. In both the groups, Cox regressions identified significant difference (P < 0.05) for mean initial bone loss, aggressive periodontitis, and smoking, as factors contributing to tooth loss and implant failures in general.

CONCLUSION

In periodontally treated patients, refusing bone grafting surgical therapies, rehabilitated with full-arch TRPs and full-arch fixed prostheses, both supported by teeth-implants connection, high survival rates can be expected if regular supportive periodontal therapy had been performed.

Comparison of periodontitis patients' classification in the 2018 versus 1999 classification

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess how the 2018 and 1999 classifications of periodontal diseases reflect (a) patients' characteristics, (b) disease severity/extent/progression and (c) tooth loss (TL) during observation period.

METHODS

A total of 251 patients were followed over 21.8 ± 6.2 years. For the 1999 classification, using clinical attachment level (CAL), patients were classified as localized/generalized, mild/moderate/severe and aggressive/chronic periodontitis. For the 2018 classification, patients were staged according to their CAL or bone loss (BL) and the number of lost teeth (stages I-IV). Further factors like probing pocket depths (PPD) or furcation involvement modified the stage. The extent was sub-classified as generalized/localized. Patients were graded according to the BL/age index, smoking and/or diabetes.

RESULTS

According to the 1999 classification, most patients suffered from generalized severe chronic periodontitis (203/251) or generalized aggressive periodontitis (45/251). Patients with aggressive periodontitis were younger and less often female or smokers. They showed similar TL (0.25 ± 0.22 teeth/patient*year) as generalized severe chronic periodontitis patients (0.23 ± 0.25 teeth/patient*year). According to the 2018 classification, most patients were classified as generalized III-C (140/251), III-B (31/251) or IV-C (64/251). Patients' age, smoking status, CAL, PPD and BL were well reflected. TL differed between IV-C (0.36 ± 0.47), generalized III-C (0.21 ± 0.24) and localized forms (0.10-0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' characteristics, disease severity/extent/progression and TL were well reflected by the 2018 classification.

Predictors for tooth loss in periodontitis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

A range of predictors for tooth loss in periodontitis patients have been reported. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the consistency and magnitude of any association between a total of 12 predictors and tooth loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline/Embase/Central were searched for longitudinal studies investigating the association between predictors and tooth loss in periodontitis patients. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and study quality assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (15,422 patients, mean follow-up: 12 years) were included. The mean annual tooth loss/patient was 0.12 (min./max: 0.01/0.36). Older patients (n = 8 studies; OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08/year), non-compliant ones (n = 11; 1.51, 1.06-2.16), diabetics (n = 7; 1.80, 1.26-2.57), those with IL-1-polymorphism (n = 3; 1.80; 1.29-2.52) and smokers (n = 15; 1.98, 1.58-2.48) had a significantly higher risk of tooth loss. Teeth with bone loss (n = 3; 1.04, 1.03-1.05/%), high probing pocket depth (n = 6; 3.19, 1.70-5.98), mobility (n = 4; 3.71, 1.65-8.38) and molars (n = 4; 4.22, 2.12-8.39), especially with furcation involvement (n = 5; 2.68, 1.75-4.08) also showed higher risks. Gender (n = 16; 0.95, 0.86-1.05) and endodontic affection (n = 3; 3.62, 0.99-13.2) were not significantly associated with tooth loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Older, non-compliant, smoking or diabetic patients, and teeth with bone loss, high probing pocket depth, mobility, or molars, especially with furcation involvement showed higher risks of tooth loss.

Survival and maintenance efforts of adhesively attached extracted teeth in periodontitis patients

OBJECTIVES

For extracted teeth in periodontitis patients, adhesively attaching their crown to the adjacent teeth temporarily closes the otherwise resulting gap, allowing to postpone more comprehensive prosthetic treatment to a more appropriate time if required. This study assessed the survival and maintenance efforts of adhesively attached extracted tooth crowns ('immediate pontics'; IPs).

METHODS

Patients receiving active and supportive periodontal treatment involving IPs in a university setting were retrospectively assessed. Survival and repairs of IPs were recorded. Multilevel Cox and linear regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with survival and maintenance efforts.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (male/female: 12/15) with 34 IPs (maxilla/mandible: 13/21) were followed over mean ± SD 8.0 ± 5.0 [range: 2.0-19.3] years. At baseline 85.2% suffered from periodontitis stage II or III and 59.3% showed rapid progression (grade C). The mean (95% CI) survival time of splinting was 5.3 ± 3.8 [range: 0.1-18.0] years. Three IPs had been removed without any significant association with patient- or tooth-level factors. 35.3% of the IPs (n = 12) required a repair, with a mean of 0.5 ± 0.9 [0-3] repairs per IP (annual: 0.1 ± 0.2 [0-0.5]). The risk of repairs significantly increased with patients' age (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

IPs showed moderate survival. However, to maintain IPs, frequent repairs were needed.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Immediately and adhesively attached crowns of extracted teeth in periodontitis patients seems like a valid, albeit temporary strategy which may allow to postpone more comprehensive prosthetic treatment if required, for example during active periodontal therapy. However, to maintain immediate pontics, frequent repairs were needed.

Chronological grey scale changes in supporting alveolar bone by removable partial denture placement on patients with periodontal disease: A 6-month follow-up study using digital subtraction analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose was to assess the early effects of removable partial denture (RPD) placement on abutment teeth in patients with periodontal disease.

METHODS

Fifteen distal-extension RPDs and 19 abutment teeth were evaluated in 13 patients with moderate-to-severe periodontal diseases. Clinical periodontal records and grey level (GL) score based on digital subtraction radiography were measured on the day of denture placement (baseline) and at 1day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the placement. Occlusal force on total dentition (Ft) and abutment tooth (Fa) were recorded with (baseline) and without denture on the day of the placement, and with denture in the follow-up examinations.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference between a follow-up period and the baseline was found in the clinical periodontal and occlusal force records, except for Ft with denture on the day of the placement, which was significantly lower than the baseline (p<0.05). The GL at distal crestal of the abutment was significantly higher at 1 week after the placement than at the baseline (p<0.05), while the scores of following examinations returned to the baseline level.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal crestal bone of the abutment tooth transitorily reacts to mechanical stress due to the denture placement, while this does not suggest a detrimental effect within the limitation of the study design with a short-term observation period.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The RPDs can be safely used for patients with periodontal diseases for at least 6 months if they are properly placed and maintained by professional care.

Osseointegration of Dental Implants in a Patient with Hajdu-cheney Syndrome

Background:

Hajdu-Cheney Syndrome (HCS) is a rare hereditary bone metabolism disorder characterized by acro-osteolysis, short stature, craniofacial changes, periodontitis and premature tooth loss. Extensive search of the current literature revealed no reports of implant placement in patients with HCS.

Case Report:

A 22-year old woman with osteoporosis, generalized advanced chronic periodontitis and premature tooth loss was referred to the Postgraduate Clinic of Periodontology, University of Athens-Greece. The patient was diagnosed in 2001 with HCS. The patient received non-surgical periodontal treatment and several teeth were extracted due to extensive alveolar bone loss.

After careful consideration of the possible implications deriving from the patient’s condition and having taken her young age into account, initially, a dental implant was placed in the upper right first premolar region. Specific protocols such as longer healing periods were implemented, so five years after placement and successful osseointegration of this implant, four additional dental implants were placed in the posterior regions of the maxilla and the mandible. Prosthetic rehabilitation followed 6 months after implant placement. Upon completion of periodontal treatment, the patient was enrolled in a periodontal maintenance program.

Results:

Clinical and radiographic examination of the patient during the periodontal maintenance program after implant placement revealed no abnormalities in the implant region.

Conclusion:

Patients with HCS suffer from periodontitis, bone destruction and premature tooth loss. This case indicates the successful osseointegration of dental implants in patients with HCS. However, further research is required in order to determine the predictability of dental implant placement in those patients.

Retention costs of periodontally compromised molars in a German population

AIM

This study assessed the long-term costs per retention year for periodontally affected molars.

METHODS

A cohort of 379 compliant subjects was retrospectively evaluated. Periodontal, restorative, endodontic, prosthetic and surgical treatment costs were estimated based on fee items of the private German health insurance. Costs/year were calculated and the impact of tooth- and subject-related factors on this cost-effectiveness ratio assessed using generalized linear-mixed modelling.

RESULTS

2306 molars received non-regenerative initial and supportive therapy and were followed until extraction or censoring (in mean (SD): 16.5 [6.8] years). Per year, 0.07 (SD: 0.12) deep scalings, 0.04 (0.11) open flap debridements, 0.01 (0.04) resective therapies and 2.49 (0.12) SPTs had been provided. Few teeth received non-periodontal treatments. Costs/year decreased significantly with each tooth a patient had at baseline (mean difference: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02/-0.01 Euro/year), and increased with each mm of probing-pocket depth (0.04 [0.03/0.06] Euro/year), in upper (0.07 [0.11/0.31] Euro/year) or mobile molars (up to 0.33 [0.18/0.48] Euro/year), those with bone loss (up to 0.11 [0.04/0.17] Euro/year), endodontic treatment (0.24 [0.15/0.33] Euro/year), peri-apical lesions (0.24 [0.11/0.38]) and prosthetic treatment (0.54 [0.49/0.59] Euro/year).

CONCLUSIONS

Annual costs for retaining periodontally affected molars were limited, and associated mainly with tooth-level factors.