Definition of aggressive periodontitis in periodontal research. A systematic review

Results of microbiological study of dental biofilm in generalized periodontitis against the background of different body reactivity

OBJECTIVE

Aim: To study the spectrum, frequency of isolation and level of colonization of dental biofilm with microorganisms in generalized periodontitis against the background of different body reactivity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: 216 people with the diagnosis of generalized periodontitis. Depending on the state of reactivity of the organism, the patients were divided into 3 groups: with normo-, hyper- and with hyporeaction. The patients underwent patch surgery. After the surgery, dental biofilm was taken. Microbiological studies included the isolation and species identification of dental biofilm microorganisms, the results of quantitative studies of microflora: the level of colonization was expressed in colony-forming units per 1 ml (CFU/ml); the frequency of microorganisms isolation was expressed in absolute numbers. Statistical processing of the obtained digital data was performed using the computer program Statistica 8.0.

RESULTS

Results: The studies have shown that in different states of the body's reactivityi n patients with generalized periodontitis after flap surgery, different quantitative and qualitative composition of the microflora of the dental biofilm is determined. In case of normal body reactivity, there are predominantly aerobic-anaerobic associations with a wide range and quantitative predominance of aerobic microflora; in case of impaired (hyper- and hypo-) reactivity, there are predominantly aerobic-anaerobic associations with an expansion of the spectrum, frequency of isolation and level of colonization of facultative and obligate anaerobes.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The identified differences in the quantitative and qualitative composition of the microflora of the dental biofilm indicate the key role of the body's reactivity in the studied processes.

Different Scaling And Root Planing Strategies In Turkish Patients With Aggressive Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare clinical, cytokine and microbiological responses after quadrant-based scaling and root planing (Q-SRP), full-mouth SRP (FM-SRP) and full-mouth disinfection (FMD) in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP), which is currently termed as generalized stage III grade C periodontitis.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with GAgP were randomly assigned into groups as Q-SRP, FM-SRP or FMD with chlorhexidine. Clinical parameters were recorded and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and subgingival plaque samples collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment. GCF levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-17 were analysed using ELISA. Quantities of six bacterial species were determined using qPCR.

RESULTS

Clinical parameters improved significantly in all groups at 3 and 6 months (p<0.05). Percentage of sites with probing depth >6 mm was lower in the FMD than Q-SRP group at 3 and 6 months (p<0.05). FMD showed significantly higher percentage of pocket closure compared to Q-SRP and FM-SRP at both 3 and 6 months after treatment (p<0.05). The IL-1β levels decreased only in the FMD group (p<0.05), whereas no changes were found in IL-17 levels in any group. The levels of five out of six bacterial species decreased at 3 and/or 6 months only in the FMD group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The FMD treatment appears to offer superior outcome than Q-SRP and could be the first choice for patients with GAgP.

Orthodontic treatment in the presence of aggressive periodontitis

Introduction:

Aggressive periodontitis causes periodontal destruction, with loss of supporting alveolar bone. The common symptom is rapid attachment loss in the first molar and incisor area, in young adults.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to discuss the challenges, implications and the impact of orthodontic treatment in patients affected by severe periodontal problems, specifically aggressive periodontitis.

Discussion:

In addition to other bacteria, the main pathogen involved in aggressive periodontitis is the Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. However, the susceptibility to the disease differs among individuals, being immune deficiencies the main reason for this variability. Many orthodontists are not comfortable about performing treatments on individuals with aggressive periodontitis.

Conclusion:

Orthodontic treatment is feasible in young patients with severe and localized aggressive periodontitis, as long as the limitations imposed by the disease are respected. An interdisciplinary approach is required, with frequent periodontal follow-up before, during and after orthodontic treatment, allowing the correction of dental positions without aggravating bone loss.

Application of weighted gene co-expression network analysis to reveal key modules and hub genes in generalized aggressive periodontitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to construct a gene co-expression network to identify key modules and genes in people with generalized aggressive periodontitis.

METHODS

We used database GSE79705 to construct a co-expression network by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 51 co-expression modules were conducted, darkseagreen1 and blue1 modules were the most significantly related to generalized aggressive periodontitis. Genes in the darkseagreen1 module enriched in affecting cellular response to tumor necrosis factor and vascular endothelial growth factor production, and the blue1 module enriched in the regulation of ion transport, proteinaceous extracellular matrix and neuropeptide binding. Besides, we found that 4 hub genes (SNRPG, MRPL22, MRPS18C and CEP290) played an important role in the occurrence of generalized aggressive periodontitis.

CONCLUSION

Through this study, we identified two modules and four hub genes associated with generalized aggressive periodontitis. Besides, 4 hub genes (SNRPG, MRPL22, MRPS18C and CEP290) can be expected to trigger new therapeutic drug development for generalized aggressive periodontitis.

Th2 cell regulatory and effector molecules single nucleotide polymorphisms and periodontitis

To investigate the association between T helper 2 (Th2) cell regulatory and effector molecules' genetic polymorphisms and periodontitis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 11 Th2 cell regulatory or effector molecules genes (CD28, CTLA4, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL9, IL10, IL13, IL4R, GATA3, STAT6, and rs1537415; total 130 SNPs) were studied in Chinese nonsmokers (163 periodontitis-free controls, 141 periodontitis patients) using Sequenom iPlex assays. SNPs potentially associated with periodontitis (adjusted allelic P < 0.1) in this cross-sectional study were further investigated via meta-analysis. Allele G of rs4553808 in promoter of CTLA4 was more frequently detected in periodontitis than controls (P < 0.005), but did not remain significant after age and gender adjustment. Haplotype (GTT) in a block of three CTLA4 SNPs (rs4553808, rs16840252, rs5742909) was significantly associated with periodontitis. Meta-analysis of SNPs identified indicated allele T of CTLA4 rs5742909 (3 studies; 461 control, 369 periodontitis) and allele G of IL6 rs1800796 (18 studies; 2760 control, 2442 periodontitis) were significantly associated with periodontitis (OR = 1.44 and OR = 1.30, respectively). Within limitations of this study, a haplotype of CTLA4 concerning Th2 cell regulation, may be associated with periodontitis in Chinese nonsmokers followed. Meta-analysis indicated rs5742909 of CTLA4 and rs1800796 of IL6 appeared significantly associated with periodontitis.

Global prevalence of aggressive periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The prevalence of aggressive periodontitis (AgP) varies considerably between studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate, throughout the world, the prevalence of this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Science Direct, EBSCO and Cochrane library were systematically searched up to March 2018. Study selection criteria included cross-sectional studies reporting prevalence of AgP in non-specific population and permanent dentition. We assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. A random effect meta-analysis model was used to estimate the prevalence of AgP. Publication bias was assessed by Begg and Egger's tests and visual aspect of funnel plot.

RESULTS

A total of 33 articles were included. Pooled prevalence for AgP was 1.6% (95% CI 1.1-2.3). Higher pooled prevalence rates were reported in Africa (4.2%, 95% CI 2.0-7.1) and South America (4.0%, 95% CI 0.9-9.1) compared with Europe (0.1%, 95% CI 0.1-0.2). A pooled prevalence of 1.2%, 95% CI 0.5-2.2 was found in Asia and 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.4 in North America. Heterogeneity between groups was statistically significant (Q statistic p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively high prevalence of AgP was found in Africa. However, the data support the weakness of the definition of this form of periodontal disease. Studies with less heterogeneity are needed to address accurately the prevalence of AgP.