1
|
Zanjir M, Azarpazhooh A. ADJUNCTIVE ANTIBIOTICS MAY REDUCE PROBING DEPTH, INCREASE BONE LEVEL GAIN, AND CONTRIBUTE TO OVERALL SUCCESS IN PERI-IMPLANTITIS TREATMENT FOR UP TO 12 MONTHS POSTOPERATIVELY. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2024; 24:101960. [PMID: 38821657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Wang Y, Chen CY, Stathopoulou PG, Graham LK, Korostoff J, Chen YW. Efficacy of Antibiotics Used as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis and Peri-implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Mar-Apr;37(2):235-249. doi:10.11607/jomi.9220. PMID: 35476853. SOURCE OF FUNDING None. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis of data.
Collapse
|
2
|
Riben Grundström C, Lund B, Kämpe J, Belibasakis GN, Hultin M. Systemic antibiotics in the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 2024. [PMID: 38699828 DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
AIM To study the clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis, with or without adjunctive systemic antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-four patients (113 implants) with peri-implantitis were randomized into three groups (A, amoxicillin and metronidazole; B, phenoxymethylpenicillin and metronidazole; or C, placebo). Treatment included resective surgery and implant surface decontamination with adjunctive antibiotics or placebo. Primary outcomes were probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and marginal bone level (MBL) stability. Secondary outcomes were treatment success (defined as PPD ≤ 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] ≤ 1site, absence of suppuration on probing [SOP] and absence of progressive bone loss of >0.5 mm), changes in BOP/SOP, mucosal recession (REC), clinical attachment level (CAL), bacterial levels and adverse events. Outcomes were evaluated for up to 12 months. The impact of potential prognostic indicators on treatment success was evaluated using multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 76 patients (104 implants) completed the study. All groups showed clinical and radiological improvements over time. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups for MBL stability (A = 97%, B = 89%, C = 76%), treatment success (A = 68%, B = 66%, C = 28%) and bacterial levels of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Tannerella forsythia, favouring antibiotics compared to placebo. Multiple regression identified antibiotic use as potential prognostic indicator for treatment success. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most reported adverse events in the antibiotic groups. CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive systemic antibiotics resulted in additional improvements in MBL stability. However, the potential clinical benefits of antibiotics need to be carefully balanced against the risk of adverse events and possible antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Riben Grundström
- Department of Periodontology, Specialist Clinic Kaniken, Public Dental Health Service, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Bodil Lund
- Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Medical Unit of Plastic Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Jaw Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Kämpe
- Department of Plastic and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Margareta Hultin
- Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carrillo de Albornoz A, Montero E, Alonso-Español A, Sanz M, Sanz-Sánchez I. Treatment of peri-implantitis with a flapless surgical access combined with implant surface decontamination and adjunctive systemic antibiotics: A retrospective case series study. J Clin Periodontol 2024. [PMID: 38690660 DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of a flapless surgical approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis and to explore the factors influencing its outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present retrospective study evaluated patients with at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated with a flapless surgical access, with or without systemic antimicrobials, curettage and, when needed, prostheses modification. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at baseline and at 3 months and at least 12 months. The primary outcome was disease resolution (≤1 bleeding sites, probing depth [PD] ≤5 mm, no bone loss >0.5 mm). Multilevel regression analyses were used to identify predictors influencing the probability of attaining disease resolution. RESULTS One hundred and seventeen patients with 338 implants were included. Disease resolution was attained in 54.4% of the 338 implants receiving flapless surgical access. At the end of the follow-up period, 111 patients (94.9%) with 295 implants (87.3%) did not require any further treatment, with 81.4% of these implants presenting PD ≤ 5 mm. History of periodontitis and PD at baseline were identified as negative predictors, while compliance with supportive peri-implant care, a machined surface and the adjunctive use of systemic azithromycin or metronidazole were identified as positive predictive factors for disease resolution. CONCLUSIONS A flapless surgical approach led to disease resolution in 54.4% of the implants with peri-implantitis. Several risk/protective predictors for disease resolution were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Carrillo de Albornoz
- Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (ETEP) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Section of Graduate Periodontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Montero
- Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (ETEP) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Section of Graduate Periodontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mariano Sanz
- Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (ETEP) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Section of Graduate Periodontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez
- Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (ETEP) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Section of Graduate Periodontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
West N, Chapple I, Culshaw S, Donos N, Needleman I, Suvan J, Nibali L, Patel A, Preshaw PM, Kebschull M. BSP Implementation of Prevention and Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases - The EFP S3 Level Clinical Practice Guideline. J Dent 2024:104980. [PMID: 38697506 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES to adapt the supranational European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) Prevention and Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases - The EFP S3 Level Clinical Practice Guideline for UK healthcare environment, taking into account a broad range of views from stakeholders and patients. SOURCES This UK version, based on the supranational EFP guideline [1] published in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology, was developed using S3-level methodology, combining assessment of formal evidence from 13 systematic reviews with a moderated consensus process of a representative group of stakeholders, and accounts for health equality, environmental factors and clinical effectiveness. It encompasses 55 clinical recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases, based on the classification for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions [2]. METHODOLOGY The UK version was developed from the source guideline using a formal process called the GRADE ADOLOPMENT framework. This framework allows for adoption (unmodified acceptance), adaptation (acceptance with modifications) and the de novo development of clinical recommendations. Using this framework, following the S3-process, the underlying evidence was updated and a representative guideline group of 111 delegates from 26 stakeholder organisations was assembled into four working groups. Following the formal S3-process, all clinical recommendations were formally assessed for their applicability to the UK and adoloped accordingly. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Using the ADOLOPMENT protocol, a UK version of the EFP S3-level clinical practice guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases was developed. This guideline delivers evidence- and consensus-based clinical recommendations of direct relevance to the UK healthcare community including the public. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The S3-level-guidelines combine evaluation of formal evidence, grading of recommendations and synthesis with clinical expertise of a broad range of stakeholders. The international S3-level-guideline was implemented for direct clinical applicability in the UK healthcare system, facilitating a consistent, interdisciplinary, evidence-based approach with public involvement for the prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola West
- Restorative Dentistry, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK; Restorative Dentistry, Bristol Dental Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, Secretary General of the European Federation of Periodontology.
| | - Iain Chapple
- Birmingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre in Inflammation. The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Shauna Culshaw
- University of Glasgow Dental School, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nikos Donos
- Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London (AMUL), Turner Street, London, E1 2AD
| | - Ian Needleman
- Unit of Periodontology, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, Bloomsbury Campus, Rockefeller Building, 21 University Street, London, WC1E 6DE
| | - Jeanie Suvan
- Unit of Periodontology, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, Bloomsbury Campus, Rockefeller Building, 21 University Street, London, WC1E 6DE
| | - Luigi Nibali
- Periodontology Unit, Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT
| | - Amit Patel
- Birmingham Dental Specialists, Associate Professor, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, President of the Association of Dental Implantology
| | - Philip M Preshaw
- School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee UK; School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Moritz Kebschull
- Birmingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre in Inflammation. The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Division of Periodontics, Section of Oral, Diagnostic and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B5 7EG, UK, President-Elect of the European Federation of Periodontology.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berglundh T, Mombelli A, Schwarz F, Derks J. Etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of peri-implantitis: A European perspective. Periodontol 2000 2024. [PMID: 38305506 DOI: 10.1111/prd.12549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Peri-implantitis is a plaque-associated pathological condition occurring in tissues around dental implants. It is characterized by inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa and progressive loss of supporting bone. Over the last 30 years, peri-implantitis has become a major disease burden in dentistry. An understanding of the diagnosis, etiology and pathogenesis, epidemiology, and treatment of peri-implantitis must be a central component in undergraduate and postgraduate training programs in dentistry. In view of the strong role of European research in periodontology and implant dentistry, the focus of this review was to address peri-implantitis from a European perspective. One component of the work was to summarize new and reliable data on patients with dental implants to underpin the relevance of peri-implantitis from a population perspective. The nature of the peri-implantitis lesion was evaluated through results presented in preclinical models and evaluations of human biopsy material together with an appraisal of the microbiological characteristics. An overview of strategies and outcomes presented in clinical studies on nonsurgical and surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is discussed with a particular focus on end points of therapy and recommendations presented in the S3 level Clinical Practice Guideline for the prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tord Berglundh
- Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andrea Mombelli
- Division of Regenerative Dental Medicine and Periodontology, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frank Schwarz
- Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe University, Carolinum, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jan Derks
- Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scarano A, Khater AGA, Gehrke SA, Serra P, Francesco I, Di Carmine M, Tari SR, Leo L, Lorusso F. Current Status of Peri-Implant Diseases: A Clinical Review for Evidence-Based Decision Making. J Funct Biomater 2023; 14:jfb14040210. [PMID: 37103300 PMCID: PMC10142594 DOI: 10.3390/jfb14040210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND the prevalence of peri-implant diseases is constantly growing, particularly with the increasing use of dental implants. As such, achieving healthy peri-implant tissues has become a key challenge in implant dentistry since it considers the optimal success paradigm. This narrative review aims to highlight the current concepts regarding the disease and summarize the available evidence on treatment approaches clarifying their indications for usage following the World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (2017). METHODS we reviewed the recent literature and conducted a narrative synthesis of the available evidence on peri-implant diseases. RESULTS scientific evidence on case definitions, epidemiology, risk factors, microbiological profile, prevention, and treatment approaches for peri-implant diseases were summarized and reported. CONCLUSIONS although there are numerous protocols for managing peri-implant diseases, they are diverse and nonstandardized, with no consensus on the most effective, leading to treatment confusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Scarano
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Ahmad G A Khater
- Health Affairs Directorate, Egyptian Ministry of Health and Population, Banisuif 62511, Egypt
| | - Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
- Department of Research, Bioface/PgO/UCAM, Calle Cuareim 1483, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay
- Department of Biotecnology, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain
| | - Paola Serra
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Inchingolo Francesco
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Section of Dental Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Mariastella Di Carmine
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Sergio Rexhep Tari
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Lucia Leo
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Felice Lorusso
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|