Real-world comparison of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin or metronidazole in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is a lack of real-world evidence of the comparative effectiveness of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin or metronidazole for treating patients with Clostridium difficile (CDI) infection. No systematic evidence comparing these treatment regimens using real-world observational studies was published up to date. The goal of this study is to compare the fidaxomicin and vancomycin/metronidazole regimens in terms of treatment outcomes in CDI patients.

METHODS

Systematic and comprehensive search was carried out in the following databases and search engines: EMBASE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from 1954 until January 2022. Newcastle-Ottawa (NO) scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was carried out using random effects model, and pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, most of them were with poorer quality. The pooled OR was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.09-1.68; I² = 82.4%) for clinical cure and 2.02 (95% CI: 0.36-11.39; I² = 88.4%) for sustained cure. We reported pooled OR of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.40-1.20; I² = 65.7%) for the recurrence rate, 2.81 (95% CI: 1.08-7.29; I² = 70.6%) for the treatment failure, and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.50-1.07; I² = 0%) for all-cause mortality between patients that received fidaxomicin and vancomycin. The pooled OR was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.05-9.47; I² = 69.6%) in terms of recurrence between patients receiving fidaxomicin and metronidazole.

CONCLUSION

Fidaxomicin and vancomycin/metronidazole regimens did not have significant difference in terms of treatment outcomes, such as clinical cure, sustained cure, recurrence, and all-cause mortality. However, there was significantly higher risk of treatment failure in CDI patients taking fidaxomicin.

Effectiveness of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin in the treatment of recurrent clostridioides difficile

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The 2017 IDSA/SHEA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recommend treating recurrent episodes with fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin, but there is little evidence to support one strategy over another, particularly beyond the first recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent CDI treated with vancomycin vs. fidaxomicin.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated inpatients with recurrent CDI treated with vancomycin or fidaxomicin between 1 January 2013 and 1 May 2019. The primary outcome was CDI recurrence. Secondary outcomes included re-infection, treatment failure, infection-related length of stay (IRLOS) and in-hospital all-cause mortality (IHACM). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized, as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval assessing recurrence while adjusting for confounding variables. A survival analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

135 patients met the inclusion criteria (35 fidaxomicin vs. 100 vancomycin). There was no difference in CDI recurrence [7 (20%) fidaxomicin vs. 11 (11%) vancomycin, p = 0.18]; this persisted in the MLR model (OR: 0.85 [95% CI 0.27-2.7]) and survival analysis (p = 0.1954). Additionally, there was no difference in re-infection rate (p = 0.73), treatment failure (p = 0.13), IRLOS (p = 0.19) or IHACM (p = 0.65).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This represents the first analysis of CDI recurrence that included patients with >2 prior episodes of CDI. The study found no difference in additional recurrences when patients were treated with oral vancomycin vs fidaxomicin for recurrent CDI. However, the current study is limited by the small sample size available for inclusion. Prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this study's conclusions.

Outcomes associated with recent guideline recommendations removing metronidazole for treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The 2017 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI) removed metronidazole as a preferred option for initial episodes of non-severe CDI. This study aimed to determine if the shift away from metronidazole improved clinical outcomes of initial episodes of non-severe CDI.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study using a Veterans Health Administration national clinical administrative database. Adult patients treated for non-severe CDI before and after the February 2018 publication of the 2017 IDSA/SHEA C. difficile Clinical Practice Guidelines were included. The primary outcome was the composite of treatment failure or probable recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 3608 patients were included, with 1809 in the pre-guideline cohort (mean [SD] age, 65.5 [14.2] years; 1602 [88.6%] male) and 1799 in the post-guideline cohort (mean [SD] age, 64 [14.6] years; 1584 [88%] male). Overall composite of treatment failure or probable recurrence was similar between both cohorts (318 of 1809 [17.6%] pre-guideline cohort vs. 317 of 1799 [17.6%] post-guideline cohort [P = 0.97]).

CONCLUSION

The shift away from metronidazole as a preferred option in initial non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection did not improve the composite of treatment failure or recurrence.

Real-life experience with fidaxomicin in Clostridioides difficile infection: a multicentre cohort study on 244 episodes

The high cost of fidaxomicin has restricted its use despite the benefit of a lower Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recurrence rate at 4 weeks of follow-up. This short follow-up represents the main limitation of pivotal clinical trials of fidaxomicin, and some recent studies question its benefits over vancomycin. Moreover, the main risk factors of recurrence after treatment with fidaxomicin remain unknown. We designed a multicentre retrospective cohort study among four Spanish hospitals to assess the efficacy of fidaxomicin in real life and to investigate risk factors of fidaxomicin failure at weeks 8 and 12. Two-hundred forty-four patients were included. Fidaxomicin was used in 96 patients (39.3%) for a first episode of CDI, in 95 patients (38.9%) for a second episode, and in 53 patients (21.7%) for a third or subsequent episode. Patients treated with fidaxomicin in a first episode were younger (59.9 years vs 73.5 years), but they had more severe episodes (52.1% vs. 32.4%). The recurrence rates for patients treated in the first episode were 6.5% and 9.7% at weeks 8 and 12, respectively. Recurrence rates increased for patients treated at second or ulterior episodes (16.3% and 26.4% at week 8, respectively). Age greater than or equal to 85 years and having had a previous episode of CDI were identified as recurrence risk factors at weeks 8 and 12. We conclude that the outcomes with fidaxomicin in real life are at least as good as those observed in clinical trials despite a more demanding evaluation. Be it 85 years of age or older, and the use after a first episode appears to be independent factors of CDI recurrence after treatment with fidaxomicin.

Economic evaluation of Faecal microbiota transplantation compared to antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a hospital acquired disease associated with significant morbidity, hospitalisation and mortality. Almost 30% of treated patients experience at least one recurrence after treatment of their first episode. Treatment of recurrent CDI (rCDI) utilises vancomycin or fidaxomicin, however, a newer treatment option is faecal microbial transplantation (FMT) administered by nasogastric tube (NGT) or colonoscopy. It is associated with higher cure and lower recurrence rates than fidaxomicin or vancomycin. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of FMT for rCDI using the latest and best evidence.

METHOD

A cost utility analysis was conducted using a decision model representing the cost per additional Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) from a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. A Markov model was constructed to compare FMT NGT and colonoscopy to antibiotic treatment (fidaxomicin or vancomycin). The model was informed by a literature review of clinical evidence, specifically focussing on hospitalised patients with rCDI over 65 years. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainties around the model inputs and assumptions.

FINDINGS

The base case analysis showed that FMT is a less costly and more effective treatment than either fidaxomicin or vancomycin. FMT colonoscopy was slightly more effective than FMT NGT leading to an additional 0.012 QALYs but more expensive and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was £242,514/QALY. The Probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on 10,000 simulations suggested the probability of FMT NGT being cost effective was almost 78% at £20,000/QALY Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) threshold.

INTERPRETATION

FMT is both more effective and less costly option than antimicrobial therapy. FMT NGT was the preferred route of administration and is likely to be considered the most cost-effective strategy by decision makers given current acceptable thresholds.

Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in Taiwan

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major enteric disease associated with antibiotic use and a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections worldwide. This is the first guideline for treatment of CDI in Taiwan, aiming to optimize medical care for patients with CDI. The target audience of this document includes all healthcare personnel who are involved in the medical care of patients with CDI. The 2018 Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group was formed, comprising of infectious disease specialists from 13 medical centers in Taiwan, to review the evidence and draft recommendations using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) methodology. A nationwide expert panel reviewed the recommendations during a consensus meeting in March 2019. The recommendation is endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan (IDST). This guideline describes the epidemiology and risk factors of CDI, and provides recommendations for treatment of CDI in both adults and children. Recommendations for treatment of the first episode of CDI, first recurrence, second and subsequent recurrences of CDI, severe CDI, fulminant CDI, and pediatric CDI are provided.

Patient Experiences with Clostridioides difficile Infection: Results of a Canada-Wide Survey

PURPOSE

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most prevalent cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea in Canada and is highly correlated with antibiotic use and contact with health care facilitates. The often-severe symptoms of CDI include diarrhea, dehydration, and abdominal pain. Patients often relapse following symptom resolution, resulting in increased morbidity. Previous research on the impact of CDI centered around the health-care system, clinician perspectives and economic burden, but not on patient experiences. The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of CDI on patients in Canada.

METHODS

The Gastrointestinal Society conducted online surveys and gathered data from 167 qualifying participants, who were either patients or their non-treating caregivers. Quantitative parameters were analyzed by descriptive and comparative statistics and contextualized with qualitative insights derived from thematic analysis of open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Our findings, which focused on clinical parameters such as prior exposure to health-care settings, antibiotic use, and patients' symptoms, mirrored findings from previous research. Interestingly, most surveyed respondents experienced delays in diagnosis and treatment; 29% waited 6-30 days and 10% over 30 days. This delayed diagnosis was further complicated by the report that 62% of respondents did not experience symptom resolution within 7 days of initiating treatment. Importantly, our results suggest a lasting impact after the resolution of CDI and we saw a reduction of self-assessed quality of life from prior to post CDI. Patients' priorities regarding their experience with CDI focused around concerns about the health-care system, particularly time to diagnosis and treatment, concerns about antibiotic usage and needs from health-care providers.

CONCLUSION

This is the first Canadian report on patients' experience with CDI. Our data highlight the symptom-related impact on patients and the long-lasting effect on the quality of life including emotional impact. Reducing time to diagnosis and improving patient education are important priorities to attenuate the impact on patients.