A survey about the contents and features of oncology clinical pharmacy services and self-evaluations of the oncology pharmacists in China

Qualitative study on the problems and potential solution strategies for part-time clinical pharmacists' clinical services work in a tertiary hospital in China

OBJECTIVE

To provide an initial understanding of problems and potential solution strategies for part-time clinical pharmacist work in China, and provide references for the training of part-time clinical pharmacists.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in China, and the project lasted 6 months. Phenomenological methods were used to guide the research design. Research data were obtained by conducting one-to-one semistructured interviews with part-time clinical pharmacists, and interview data were coded and analysed through thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 21 pharmacists were interviewed in a semistructured manner, and the results showed that following problems exist in the work of part-time clinical pharmacists: the existing professional knowledge is not adequate to meet the demands of clinical service; the career orientation of part-time clinical pharmacists is not clear; lack of professional self-confidence in clinical pharmacy practice; there is no suitable entry point to carry out pharmacy service work; it is difficult to communicate effectively, and for in addition, 17 potential solution strategies are proposed for the current problems, which can provide reference for the development of part-time clinical pharmacists' work.

CONCLUSIONS

The work performed by part-time clinical pharmacists is currently immature and the strategies derived from this study may serve as potential solutions to resolve the part-time clinical pharmacy practice challenges.

Therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines in oncology: what do we know and how to move forward? Insights from a systematic review

Background

Compared with anti-infective drugs, immunosuppressants and other fields, the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology is somewhat limited.

Objective

We aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of TDM guidelines for antineoplastic drugs and to promote the development of individualized drug therapy in oncology.

Design

This study type is a systematic review.

Data sources and methods

This study was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the official websites of TDM-related associations and Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted data. The methodological and reporting quality was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), respectively. Recommendations and quality evaluation results were presented by visual plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022325661).

Results

A total of eight studies were included, with publication years ranging from 2014 to 2022. From the perspective of guideline development, two guidelines were developed using evidence-based methods. Among the included guidelines, four guidelines were for cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs, three for small molecule kinase inhibitors, and one for antineoplastic biosimilars. Currently available guidelines and clinical practice provided recommendations of individualized medication in oncology based on TDM, as well as influencing factors. With regard to methodological quality based on AGREE II, the average overall quality score was 55.21%. As for the reporting quality by RIGHT evaluation, the average reporting rate was 53.57%.

Conclusion

From the perspective of current guidelines, TDM in oncology is now being expanded from cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs to newer targeted treatments. Whereas, the types of antineoplastic drugs involved are still small, and there is still room for quality improvement. Furthermore, the reflected gaps warrant future studies into the exposure-response relationships and population pharmacokinetics models.

Pharmacist-led olaparib follow-up service for ambulatory ovarian cancer patients: A prospective study in a tertiary specialized cancer hospital in China

Purpose: To establish a pharmacist-led olaparib follow-up program for ovarian cancer patients, provide patient education, get information on adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and identify and manage drug-related problems. Methods: Ambulatory adult patients with ovarian cancer receiving olaparib were enrolled. At least one follow-up session was conducted by clinical pharmacists. Pharmacists collected data on the type and grade of ADRs, drug adherence, olaparib dosing, concomitant medications, and pharmacists' suggestions. Results: 83 patients were enrolled with the median age of 58. The average number of the follow-up sessions provided to each patient was 1.31, and the average duration of each follow-up was 17.78 min. The olaparib starting dose for most patients (97.59%) was 600 mg/d. 36.14% of the patients had missed olaparib doses and 27.71% of the patients had dose adjustments due to ADRs. The most common ADRs (incidence≥10%) were: fatigue (40.96%), anemia (36.14%), leukopenia (36.14%), nausea (28.92%), thrombocytopenia (16.87%), anorexia (16.87%), dyspepsia (15.66%). The tolerability profiles were generally similar between patients treated for "first-line maintenance" and those treated for "recurrence maintenance" (p > .05). There were 42% of the patients who were concomitantly taking medications without exact chemical contents (such as formulated Chinese medicines and Chinese decoctions), and common types of concomitant medications with exact drug names were antihypertensive, anti-hyperglycemic, and anti-hyperlipidemic medications. The pharmacists identified 4 clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in two patients. Pharmacists made 196 suggestions mainly related to rational use of the medications and management of ADRs. Conclusion: The study provides the first report about pharmacist-led follow-up service for olaparib. The types of ADRs were similar to those previously observed in clinical trials, and the profiles of ADRs in different types of patients (first-line maintenance vs. recurrence maintenance) were also similar. Pharmacists identified drug-related problems (such as adherence, DDIs and management of ADRs) and offer suggestions for the patients.