Evaluation of potentially inappropriate medications in older patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit according to the 2019 Beers criteria, STOPP criteria version 2 and Chinese criteria

Pharmacotherapy assessment and adverse drug reactions in older patients admitted to intensive care

INTRODUCTION

Older patients are more susceptible to medication use, and physiological changes resulting from aging and organic dysfunctions presented by critically ill patients may alter the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic behavior. Thus, critically ill older people present greater vulnerability to the occurrence of pharmacotherapeutic problems.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pharmacotherapy and the development of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHOD

A cohort study was conducted in an ICU for adults of a Brazilian University Hospital during a 12-month period. The patients' pharmacotherapy was evaluated daily, considering the occurrence of ADRs and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older people, and the pharmacotherapy anticholinergic burden (ACB). A trigger tool was used for active search of ADRs, with subsequent causality evaluation. PIM use was evaluated by means of the Beers criteria and the STOPP/START criteria. The ABC scale was employed to estimate ACB. The Micromedex® and Drugs.com® medication databases were employed to evaluate the DDIs.

RESULTS

The sample of this study consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 66.8 years old (±5.2). The 22 triggers used assisted in identifying 15 potential ADRs, and 26.8% of the patients developed them. The mean estimated ACB score was 3.0 (±1.8), and the patients used 3.1 (±1.4) and 3.3 (±1.6) PIMs according to the Beers and the STOPP criteria, respectively. A total of 672 DDIs were identified, with a mean of 16.8 (±9.5) DDIs/patient during ICU hospitalization. Our findings show an association between occurrence of ADRs in the ICU and polypharmacy (p=.03) and DDIs (p=.007), corroborating efforts for rational medication use as a preventive strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Using tools to evaluate the pharmacotherapy for older people in intensive care can assist in the recognition and prevention of pharmacotherapeutic problems, with emphasis on the identification of ADRs through the observation of triggers and subsequent causality analysis.

Evaluation of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly according to beers, STOPP, START, and Chinese criteria

Objective: Polypharmacy prevalence is increasing worldwide, and it is becoming more popular among the elderly. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using the Beers criteria (2019 edition), criteria for potentially inappropriate medications for older adults in China (Chinese criteria), Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP), and Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria and to identify risk factors associated with PIM use. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 276 inpatients aged ≥65 years old from January 2020 to June 2020. A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze PIMs based on the Beers (2019 edition), Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria. PIMs use was analysed based on four different criteria and logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent factors associated with PIM use. Results: The mean number of medications used by the elderly population was nine (range, 0-28). A total of 252 patients (accounting for 91.30%) took five or more medications and 120 patients (accounting for 43.48%) took 10 or more medications. The prevalence rates of PIMs were 66.30% (183/276), 55.07% (152/276), 26.45% (73/276), and 64.13% (177/276) determined by the Beers, Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria, respectively. The top PIMs screened using the Beers, Chinese, and STOPP criteria were proton pump inhibitors, clopidogrel, and benzodiazepines, respectively. Missed use of ACEI in patients with systolic heart failure and/or coronary artery disease was found to be the most common potential prescription omission (PPOs) analyzed using the START criteria. Logistic regression analysis showed that the strongest predictor of PIMs, as determined by all four criteria, was an increased number of medications (p < 0.001). Age was another risk factor for PIMs based on the STOPP criteria in our study (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIMs were common in our study, and the risk of PIMs correlated with polypharmacy. Application of the Beers, Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria is a useful tool for detecting PIM use.