Safety and efficacy of the combination of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide with an oral antidiabetic drug in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized, 52-week, open-label, parallel-group trial

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Pharmacological treatment of eating disorders, comorbid mental health problems, malnutrition and physical health consequences

The pharmacological treatment of patients with an eating disorder (ED) often includes medications to treat their ED, comorbid mental health problems, malnutrition and the physical health problems resulting from it. The currently approved pharmacological treatment options for EDs are limited to fluoxetine for bulimia nervosa (BN) and - in some countries - lisdexamfetamine for binge eating disorder (BED). Thus, there are no approved pharmacological options for anorexia nervosa (AN), even though study results for olanzapine and dronabinol are promising. Topiramate might be an additional future option for the treatment of BN and BED. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), mirtazapine and bupropion could be considered for the treatment of comorbid unipolar depression. However, AN and BN are contraindications for bupropion. For ED patients with a manic episode, we recommend olanzapine in AN and risperidone in BN and BED; whereas for bipolar depression, olanzapine (plus fluoxetine) seems appropriate in AN and lamotrigine in BN and BED. Acute anxiety or suicidality may warrant benzodiazepine treatment with lorazepam. Proton-pump inhibitors, gastroprokinetic drugs, laxatives and hormones can alleviate certain physical health problems caused by EDs. Therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacogenomic testing, a more restrictive use of "pro re nata" (PRN) medication, an interdisciplinary treatment approach, shared decision making (SDM) and the formulation of common treatment goals by the patients, their family or carers and clinicians could improve treatment success and safety. Novel genetic, immunological, microbiome and brain imaging research as well as new pharmacological developments like the use of psychedelics, stimulants, novel monoaminergic drugs, hormone analogues and drugs which enhance the effects of psychotherapy may extend our therapeutic options in the near future.

Liraglutide Reduces Visceral and Intrahepatic Fat Without Significant Loss of Muscle Mass in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Case Series

Background

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been reported to reduce body fat as well as improving glycemic control in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the maximum dose of liraglutide is limited to 0.9 mg in Japan, while the international dose is 1.8 mg; and the effect of this low dose on body composition has not been assessed in detail. Accordingly, this study was performed to evaluate the effect of liraglutide on body composition when administered at 0.9 mg once daily for 24 weeks.

Methods

Nine patients were enrolled and started liraglutide at 0.3 mg once daily, which was titrated to 0.9 mg once daily after 1 - 2 weeks and continued for 24 weeks. To comprehensively investigate changes of body composition, the body fat and muscle weight were determined by dual energy absorptiometry, visceral fat volume (VFV) and abdominal subcutaneous fat volume (SFV) were measured by abdominal computed tomography (CT), and the intrahepatic lipid content (IHL) was assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Measurements were obtained before starting liraglutide therapy and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment.

Results

Fasting plasma glucose was significantly reduced from 127 ± 22 to 101 ± 14 mg/dL at 24 weeks and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) showed significant reduction from 6.4±0.9% to 5.2±0.5%. Body weight was reduced from 103.4 ± 14.7 to 97.0 ± 12.4 kg (mean reduction: 11.7%) and BMI decreased from 37.4 ± 6.4 to 35.0 ± 5.3 kg/m² (mean reduction: 5.8%). Furthermore, VFV and IHL decreased from 5,192 ± 1,730 to 4,513 ± 1,299 cm³ (mean reduction: 11.9%) and 32.1±12.6% to 15.2±9.2% (mean reduction: 49.2%), respectively, but SFV did not change. Moreover, the fat index was reduced from 14.8 ± 4.4 to 12.9 ± 3.4 kg/m² (mean reduction: 10.9%), but the skeletal muscle index did not change.

Conclusions

In obese Japanese drug-naive patients who had type 2 diabetes, treatment with liraglutide (0.9 mg once daily for 24 weeks) reduced body fat, especially visceral fat and intrahepatic fat, while having no significant effect on skeletal muscle.