Long-term study of infliximab for psoriasis in daily practice: drug survival depends on combined treatment, obesity and infusion reactions

Efficacy and survival of infliximab in psoriasis patients: A single-center experience in China

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic disease that requires long-term management. Biologic agents have been used widely against psoriasis, such as infliximab. We analyzed the survival and discontinuation rates of infliximab when treating psoriasis under real-world conditions in China. Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with infliximab in Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital from January 2015 to April 2020 were included in our retrospective study. Information from their medical records (clinical characteristics, Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] score, laboratory results, and time of discontinuation) was collected through the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital database. The survival of infliximab was assessed with Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression. Forty-two patients who underwent treatment were assessed retrospectively (38.1% had been diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis [PsA]). The discontinuation rate was 57.1%, the mean survival time of discontinuation was 57 weeks for patients with PsA vs 69 weeks for those without PsA (P = .5993). The cholesterol level (P = .003) and lymphocyte percentage (P = .010) were associated with longer survival of infliximab according to Cox regression analysis. Our study revealed that infliximab had a similar drug survival as previous studies, the high cholesterol level and lymphocyte percentage might function as negative predictor for infliximab persistence.

Association between infliximab concentrations and clinical response in psoriasis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) trough concentrations (C_min) have been linked to treatment efficacy in psoriatic patients. Inter-individual IFX C_min variability and factors influencing IFX pharmacokinetics could explain differences in treatment response.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between IFX C_min and clinical outcomes in psoriatic patients.

METHODS

Prospective study of 33 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis receiving IFX at Bellvitge University Hospital, between October 2013 and November 2016. IFX C_min and antibodies toward infliximab (ATI) were measured.

RESULTS

We collected 155 IFX C_min and ATI values (mean age, 46 (14) years; 11 (33.3%) women). Mean IFX C_min was 2.5 (2.4) mg/L and ATIs were detected in six patients, resulting in undetectable IFX C_min. IFX C_min was significantly associated with ATI and body mass index (BMI) (β -2.51, 95% CI -3.56 to -1.4 and β -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.01). PASI score and PASI 90/100 response were significantly associated with IFX C_min (IRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.92; OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.71 and OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.81).

CONCLUSION

IFX C_min significantly influences PASI 90/100 response rates. IFX C_min wa significantly associated with ATI and BMI. The observed inter-individual variability in IFX C_min supports the need for IFX drug monitoring.

Drug survival and reasons for drug discontinuation in palmoplantar pustulosis: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease-related to psoriasis. Its treatment is challenging, and little is known about the sustainability of different medications. The aim of this study was to analyze drug survival rates and drug discontinuation in the treatment of PPP under real-world conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with PPP treated in the dermatology departments of five German university medical centers between 01/2005 and 08/2017 were included in our retrospective study. Drug survival of systemic therapies was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 347 patients with 935 treatment courses were identified. Within the group of non-biologic systemic agents, apremilast showed the highest median drug survival (15 months), followed by cyclosporine (12 months), the combination of acitretin and topical PUVA (9 months), MTX (8 months), acitretin monotherapy (6 months), alitretinoin (5 months), and fumaric acid esters (3 months). Among biologicals, the highest maintenance rate was detected for certolizumab pegol (restricted mean: 47.4 months), followed by infliximab (median: 26 months), golimumab (22 months), ustekinumab (21 months), adalimumab (18 months), secukinumab (9 months), and etanercept (8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Biologicals and apremilast may serve as second-line options for treatment of PPP and should be further evaluated.

Drug survival of biologics in treating psoriasis: a meta-analysis of real-world evidence

Drug survival of biologics represents their real-world effectiveness and safety. We conducted a meta-analysis of real-world evidence on the drug survival of biologics in treating psoriasis. We searched the PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases from inception to 7th October 2017 for studies reporting the annual drug survival for at least 1 year. Two authors independently screened and selected relevant studies, and assessed their risk of bias. A third author was available for arbitrating discrepancies. We conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis to obtain the respective pooled drug survival from year 1 to 4. We conducted subgroup analysis on biologic-naïve subjects, discontinuation for loss of efficacy and adverse effects. We included 37 studies with 32,631 subjects. The drug survival for all biologics decreased with time, dropping from 66% at year 1 to 41% at year 4 for etanercept, from 69% to 47% for adalimumab, from 61% to 42% for infliximab, and from 82% to 56% for ustekinumab. Ustekinumab was associated with the highest drug survival in all and biologic-naïve subjects. Etanercept was associated with the lowest drug survival and was most commonly discontinued for loss of efficacy. Infliximab was most frequently associated with discontinuation for adverse effects. Clinicians may use this study as a reference in treating psoriasis.

Can etanercept treatment failure in moderate-to-severe psoriasis be overcome by addition of low-dose methotrexate? A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Loss of efficacy is a major anticipated shortcoming of utilizing etanercept and other biologic agents for treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

PURPOSE

To investigate the addition of low-dose methotrexate as a means to increase etanercept drug survival.

METHODS

Eleven patients with severe psoriasis were switched to a combination of etanercept with low-dose methotrexate therapy, after a primary or secondary failure with etanercept treatment as a monotherapy. Time period for cessation of combined treatment and side effects were documented. The effect of previous methotrexate treatment was investigated.

RESULTS

Six men and five women were included in the study. The patients had moderate-to-severe psoriasis with a mean baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 29 (median 25). Median duration of etanercept monotherapy was 12 months. Median duration of combined treatment was 13 months. Combined treatment was discontinued in three patients due to side effects. Previous failure of methotrexate monotherapy did not alter the duration of the combined treatment.

CONCLUSION

Addition of low-dose methotrexate may rescue etanercept therapy after failure of etanercept monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Drug survival rates and reasons for drug discontinuation in psoriasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Moderate-to-severe psoriasis frequently requires long-term systemic therapy. Reflecting efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction, drug survival is an indicator of therapeutic success. The objective of the present study was to assess drug survival rates and reasons for discontinuation of fumaric acid esters (FAE), methotrexate (MTX), acitretin (ACI), cyclosporine A (CyA), adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA), infliximab (INF), and ustekinumab (UST) in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 373 patients who had received a total of 696 treatment courses at a German university hospital in the period 1/2003-5/2014.

RESULTS

The crude probability of survival was highest for UST, followed by ADA, ETA, INF, FAE, MTX, ACI, and CyA. In multivariate regression analysis using FAE as reference, hazard ratios (HR) for discontinuation were 0.14 (95 % confidence interval: 0.06-0.35) for UST, 0.43 (0.26-0.73) for ADA, 2.11 (1.14-3.91) for ACI, and 3.26 (1.44-7.39) for CyA. INF showed longer survival when combined with MTX (HR 2.87, 1.21-6.81). Traditional systemic antipsoriatic agents as well as INF were most frequently discontinued due to adverse events; all other biologics, due to inefficacy with respect to cutaneous lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug survival rates should be integrated into therapeutic decisions in order to provide patients with an optimal long-term strategy.

Adherence to biologics in patients with psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis has a profound impact on patients' lives, but adherence to topical treatment of psoriasis is still poor. Biologic treatment has revolutionized the management of psoriasis, but adherence to treatment may still be a barrier for some patients. Areas covered: A PubMed search was conducted in August 2017 using the terms 'biologics psoriasis adherence' and 'biologics psoriasis survival.' Additional articles were obtained by perusing the references of articles identified in the original PubMed search. Articles that did not specifically mention 'survival,' 'adherence,' or 'persistence' were not included. We review the measures used to assess adherence to biologics for psoriasis and the factors impacting drug survival and adherence rates for biologics in psoriasis. Expert commentary: Drug survival and adherence rates for biologic therapy is less than ideal but may be modifiable. Means that may improve adherence and drug survival include individualized choice of biologic and providing additional support for patients who are at increased risk for prematurely stopping treatment.

Drug survival of biologic treatments in psoriasis: a systematic review

Drug survival measures the length of time until discontinuation of a drug. The length of time a patient remains on a biologic drug is impacted by several factors such as tolerability, side effects, safety profile and effectiveness. To evaluate the long-term drug survival, data of the most commonly prescribed biologic medications used in the treatment of psoriasis, a systematic review was conducted. A literature search using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from January 1 2010 to October 28 2016 identified 3734 abstracts. Of which, 36 publications with over 40,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median overall drug survival for ustekinumab, adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept was 38.0, 36.5, 26.6 and 24.7 months, respectively. The mean annual drug survival rate of TNF inhibitors was 70%, 57%, 51%, 45% and 41% at years-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The 5-year mean annual drug survival rate of ustekinumab was 87%, 78%, 70%, 71% and 51%, respectively. Based on our findings, ustekinumab appears to have a longer drug survival with lower rates of discontinuation compared to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Old and New Biological Therapies for Psoriasis

Biological therapy became available for psoriasis with the introduction of alefacept at the beginning of this century. Up to then, systemic treatment options comprised small molecule drugs, targeting the immune system in a non-specific manner. The first biologics targeted T-cell activation and migration and served as an alternative to small molecules. However, significant improvement in outcome was first accomplished with the introduction of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors that were already approved for other inflammatory disorders, including rheumatic diseases. Along with the progress in understanding psoriasis pathogenesis, highly targeted and effective therapies have since developed with the perspective not only to improve but to clear psoriasis. These accomplishments enable future achievement of advanced goals to individualize treatment best suited for each patient. Mechanistic studies with patients treated with the new highly targeted biologics may guide us towards these goals. This review offers an overview of biologics developed for psoriasis and illustrate a historical progress in the treatment of this common chronic inflammatory skin condition.

Treatment preferences for biologicals in psoriasis: experienced patients appreciate sustainability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Treatment satisfaction can be improved by integrating patients' preferences into shared decision-making. We recently investigated patients' preferences for attributes of biologicals, and showed high preferences for safety and efficacy. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of treatment experience on these preferences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preferences for outcome (probability of 50 % and 90 % improvement, time until response, sustainability of success, probability of mild and severe adverse events, probability of ACR 20 response) and process attributes (treatment location, frequency, duration, and delivery method) were analyzed in 200 participants with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using conjoint analysis. The impact of current and previous therapies, disease duration, and treatment satisfaction on 'Relative Importance Scores' was determined by analysis of variance, post hoc tests, and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Participants presently on topical therapy (p = 0.02) or phototherapy (p = 0.032) placed more importance on treatment duration than others. Individuals who had previously been given traditional systemic agents (p = 0.028) or biologicals (p = 0.044) favored sustainability more than others. With an increasing number of systemic agents ever received (p = 0.045) and longer disease duration (p = 0.018), the latter attribute became increasingly important.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' preferences for biologicals vary in correlation with treatment experience and disease duration, aspects to be addressed in the context of shared decision-making.

Patients with Crohn's Disease with High Body Mass Index Present More Frequent and Rapid Loss of Response to Infliximab

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) is effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with luminal and anoperineal Crohn's disease (CD). However, treatment failure within 12 months after initiating IFX is observed in a significant proportion of patients. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the body mass index (BMI) affects response to IFX during the first year of treatment in patients with CD.

METHODS

All patients with luminal CD who began IFX between January 2010 and May 2014 were prospectively included. BMI was calculated before IFX treatment was begun, and patients were divided into 3 groups: normal BMI (BMI < 25 kg/m), overweight patients (BMI of 25.0-30 kg/m), and obese patients (BMI > 30.0 kg/m). The primary outcome was to evaluate the rate and delay of IFX optimization during the first year of treatment among normal weight, overweight, and obese patients.

RESULTS

One hundred forty patients were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics at IFX initiation were comparable among the 3 groups. Within 12 months after the initiation of IFX, the rate of IFX optimization was significantly higher in overweight and obese patients than in the normal BMI group: 52%, 56%, and 20%, respectively (P = 0.0002). The median time until optimization of IFX was significantly shorter in overweight and obese patients than in the normal BMI group: 7, 7, and 10 months, respectively (P = 0.03). A BMI >25 kg/m was significantly associated with IFX optimization within 12 months on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to show that optimization of IFX is more frequent and faster in obese and overweight patients with CD and occurs within 12 months after beginning IFX, suggesting that an induction regimen with higher doses of IFX and a tight control of IFX concentrations may be needed in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of dose escalation of infliximab therapy in Japanese patients with psoriasis: Results of the SPREAD study

Although infliximab is approved for psoriasis, its efficacy is reduced over time in some patients. The aim of this phase III trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of infliximab dose escalation in Japanese psoriasis patients with loss of efficacy to standard‐dose therapy. Patients with plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, pustular psoriasis or psoriatic erythroderma who showed loss of efficacy to standard‐dose therapy received infliximab dose escalation (10 mg/kg every 8 weeks) from weeks 0 to 32. Loss of efficacy was defined as not maintaining 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) after achieving PASI 75. Efficacy and safety were evaluated up to week 40. Fifty‐one patients received dose escalation and 43 completed the study. PASI 75 and median improvement rate of PASI score at week 40 were 44% and 70.0%, respectively, showing efficacy in skin symptoms. Efficacies in quality of life, nail psoriasis and joint pain were also obtained. Median serum infliximab level increased from less than 0.1 to 1.1 μg/mL from weeks 0 to 40, showing positive correlation between efficacy and serum infliximab level at week 40. Favorable efficacy was observed in patients with detectable serum infliximab levels (≥0.1 μg/mL) at baseline. Incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infections and serious infusion reactions were 92%, 10%, 4% and 0%, respectively. No marked difference was observed in both efficacy and safety among psoriasis types. No new safety concerns were observed. Infliximab dose escalation was effective and well‐tolerated in psoriasis patients with loss of efficacy to standard‐dose therapy, suggesting that dose escalation may be a useful therapeutic option for these patients.

The infliximab biosimilar in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND

The infliximab originator's patent recently expired, leading to the production of biosimilar versions of the drug. The biosimilars' efficacy was not tested on patients with psoriasis but most regulatory authorities approved their use in psoriasis because of an extrapolation of data from studies conducted in other diseases.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the use of the infliximab biosimilar (Remsima; CT-P13) in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Objective (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) and subjective (visual analog pain scale) measurements of disease activity were collected in 2 cohorts of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: cohort 1 patients switched from the infliximab originator to the infliximab biosimilar; and cohort 2 patients were infliximab-naïve and started on the infliximab biosimilar.

RESULTS

We observed no changes of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and visual analog pain scale scores in 30 patients who switched from the infliximab originator to the biosimilar. Four of 5 infliximab-naïve patients who started infliximab biosimilar treatment achieved 75% improvement or better from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score at the end of the induction phase.

LIMITATIONS

Number of patients and length of follow-up was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psoriasis taking infliximab originator treatment can switch to the infliximab biosimilar without experiencing a significant change in clinical response or additional adverse events. The use of the infliximab biosimilar could reduce the growing pressure on health care budgets.