1
|
Parisi R, Shah H, Navarini AA, Muehleisen B, Ziv M, Shear NH, Dodiuk-Gad RP. Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis: Clinical Features, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. Am J Clin Dermatol 2023:10.1007/s40257-023-00779-3. [PMID: 37156992 PMCID: PMC10166469 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-023-00779-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, acute, severe cutaneous adverse reaction mainly attributed to drugs, although other triggers, including infections, vaccinations, ingestion of various substances, and spider bites, have also been described. AGEP is characterized by the development of edema and erythema followed by the eruption of multiple punctate, non-follicular, sterile pustules and subsequent desquamation. AGEP typically has a rapid onset and prompt resolution within a few weeks. The differential diagnoses for AGEP are broad and include infectious, inflammatory, and drug-induced etiologies. Diagnosis of AGEP depends on both clinical and histologic criteria, as cases of overlap with other disease processes have been reported. Management includes removal of the offending drug or treatment of the underlying cause, if necessary, and supportive care, as AGEP is a self-limited disease. This review aims to provide an overview and update on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, reported precipitating factors, differentials, diagnosis, and management of AGEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Parisi
- Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hemali Shah
- Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander A Navarini
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beda Muehleisen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Ziv
- Department of Dermatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Neil H Shear
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Roni P Dodiuk-Gad
- Department of Dermatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada.
- Department of Dermatology, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3525433, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nikolaou V, Tsimpidakis A, Stratigos A. Cutaneous Adverse Reactions of Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072084. [PMID: 37046745 PMCID: PMC10093334 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have been widely used during the last decade for the treatment of various tumors, including advanced and metastatic melanoma. While these agents have improved melanoma patients’ survival rates, they have also been associated with various autoimmune toxicities, with the skin being most commonly affected. The severity of cutaneous toxicity can not only negatively affect patients’ quality of life but can also limit the proper treatment of cancer. Thus, the role of the dermatologist is substantial in early detecting and promptly treating these adverse events. Maculopapular rash, psoriasiform, lichenoid dermatoses and bullous pemphigoid are the most frequent cutaneous adverse events that require immediate intervention. Other rare autoimmune toxicities, e.g., sarcoidosis, dermatomyositis or subacute lupus, have also been reported. In this review, we summarize the aspects of ICB-induced cutaneous toxicities in patients with melanoma, emphasizing their management and treatment options in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuo AM, Markova A. High Grade Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:898790. [PMID: 35770005 PMCID: PMC9234653 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves survival in many types of cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung, renal cell, breast, and cervical cancers. However, many of these therapies are also associated with high grade dermatologic adverse events (DAEs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), SJS/TEN-like reactions, high grade maculopapular and psoriasiform rashes, autoimmune bullous eruptions, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), which may limit their tolerability and use. It is important to properly identify and treat DAEs to ICB because these DAEs may be associated with positive anti-tumor response and patients may have limited options for alternative anti-cancer therapeutics. In this review, we describe high grade DAEs to increasingly used ICB agents, which target CTLA-4 and PD-1 or its ligand, PD-L1 and enable the immune system to target cancer cells. We further differentiate life-threatening adverse reactions from mimickers and report cases of serious DAEs which have been recorded in association with ICB through the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), which is an archive of adverse events associated with various drugs and therapeutic biologic products reported voluntarily by consumers and healthcare professionals as well as mandatorily by manufacturers. Lastly, we summarize management recommendations for these adverse events and discuss knowledge and evidence gaps in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyce M. Kuo
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alina Markova
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Alina Markova,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Magdelaine P, Costantini A, Fabre L, Giroux-Leprieur E. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis caused by gemcitabine after nivolumab in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma followed by a dramatic tumor response: A case report. Thorac Cancer 2022; 13:1994-1997. [PMID: 35615894 PMCID: PMC9250844 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Herein, we report a case of a 73‐year‐old female patient diagnosed with cT4N0M1a lung adenocarcinoma with KRAS G12C mutation, PDL1 < 1% and treated in fourth‐line setting with gemcitabine after progression under nivolumab. After one infusion of gemcitabine, the patient presented with an acute worsening of general condition (performance status 4) with extensive skin lesions and fever, leading to hospitalization and diagnosis of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Initial blood work revealed multiple organ failures with an important inflammatory syndrome. Patient state improved after intravenous hydration and local and systemic corticosteroids. The decision was made to stop systemic cancer treatment. Two months follow‐up showed a remarkable response on all cancer localizations. Although immunotherapy is transforming cancer care, predicting response to immunotherapy remains challenging and resistant mechanisms remain mostly unknown. This case underlines that important immune‐stimulation can lead to tumor response in a patient previously refractory to all antitumor treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Magdelaine
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Oncology, APHP - Hopital Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Adrien Costantini
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Oncology, APHP - Hopital Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,University Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, EA 4340 BECCOH, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Lucie Fabre
- Department of pathology, APHP-Hopital Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Etienne Giroux-Leprieur
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Oncology, APHP - Hopital Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,University Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, EA 4340 BECCOH, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen CH, Yu HS, Yu S. Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review Article. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2871-2886. [PMID: 35448208 PMCID: PMC9032875 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29040234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as novel options that are effective in treating various cancers. They are monoclonal antibodies that target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, activation of the immune systems through ICIs may concomitantly trigger a constellation of immunologic symptoms and signs, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with the skin being the most commonly involved organ. The dermatologic toxicities are observed in nearly half of the patients treated with ICIs, mainly in the form of maculopapular rash and pruritus. In the majority of cases, these cutaneous irAEs are self-limiting and manageable, and continuation of the ICIs is possible. This review provides an overview of variable ICI-mediated dermatologic reactions and describes the clinical and histopathologic presentation. Early and accurate diagnosis, recognition of severe toxicities, and appropriate management are key goals to achieve the most favorable outcomes and quality of life in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chieh-Hsun Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan;
| | - Hsin-Su Yu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan;
| | - Sebastian Yu
- Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan;
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-3121101 (ext. 6103)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Drug Triggers and Clinic of Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP): A Literature Case Series of 297 Patients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11020397. [PMID: 35054090 PMCID: PMC8780223 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare skin reaction, commonly caused by drugs. Available evidence mostly relies on small studies or case reports. We collected published AGEP case reports and, subsequently, described the patient characteristics, suspect and concomitant drugs, time to onset, disease management, and clinical prognosis. This study included 297 AGEP patients (64.3% women) obtained from 250 published case reports or case series with individual patient data. AGEP affected patients of all ages, but the majority of patients (88.2%) were ≥25 years old. The most frequently reported suspect drugs were anti-infectives for systemic use (36.5%), particularly antibacterials for systemic use (31.0%), and especially beta-lactam antibacterials (18.3%) and macrolides (4.3%). Other frequent suspect drugs were antineoplastics (12.2%), and anti-inflammatory/anti-rheumatic products (5.2%) plus hydroxychloroquine (12.8%). Mean time to onset was 9.1 days (standard deviation SD 13.94). Some patients developed fever (64.3%) and systemic involvement (18.9%), and most patients (76.4%) received pharmacological treatment for AGEP. Seven patients died, although five of them were already critically ill prior to AGEP. In conclusion, antibiotics remain the most common suspected cause of AGEP. While case mortality rate may be up to 2.5%, disentangling the role of AGEP on the fatal outcome from the role of the preexisting health conditions remains challenging.
Collapse
|
7
|
Apalla Z, Nikolaou V, Fattore D, Fabbrocini G, Freites-Martinez A, Sollena P, Lacouture M, Kraehenbuehl L, Stratigos A, Peris K, Lazaridou E, Richert B, Vigarios E, Riganti J, Baroudjian B, Filoni A, Dodiuk-Gad R, Lebbé C, Sibaud V. European recommendations for management of immune checkpoint inhibitors-derived dermatologic adverse events. The EADV task force 'Dermatology for cancer patients' position statement. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 36:332-350. [PMID: 34910332 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) opened a new era in oncologic therapy. The favourable profile of ICIs in terms of efficacy and safety can be overshadowed by the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Dermatologic irAEs (dirAEs) appear in about 40% of patients undergoing immunotherapy and mainly include maculopapular, psoriasiform, lichenoid and eczematous rashes, auto-immune bullous disorders, pigmentary disorders, pruritus, oral mucosal lesions, hair and nail changes, as well as a few rare and potentially life-threatening toxicities. The EADV task force Dermatology for Cancer Patients merged the clinical experience of the so-far published data, incorporated the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of each specific dirAEs, and released dermatology-derived, phenotype-specific treatment recommendations for cutaneous toxicities (including levels of evidence and grades of recommendation). The basic principle of management is that the interventions should be tailored to serve the equilibrium between patients' relief from the symptoms and signs of skin toxicity and the preservation of an unimpeded oncologic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Apalla
- Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - V Nikolaou
- First Department of Dermatology, "Andreas Sygros" Hospital for Skin Diseases, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - D Fattore
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - G Fabbrocini
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - A Freites-Martinez
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Ruber Juan Bravo y Universidad Europea, Madrid, España
| | - P Sollena
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M Lacouture
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - L Kraehenbuehl
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology, "Andreas Sygros" Hospital for Skin Diseases, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - K Peris
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - E Lazaridou
- Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - B Richert
- Department of Dermatology, Brugmann & Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Vigarios
- Department of Oral Medicine, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - J Riganti
- Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - B Baroudjian
- Dermatology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, AP-HP, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - A Filoni
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - R Dodiuk-Gad
- Dermatology Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - C Lebbé
- Dermatology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, AP-HP, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - V Sibaud
- Oncodermatology Department, Cancer University Institute, Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pospischil I, Hoetzenecker W. Arzneimittelexantheme unter modernen zielgerichteten Therapien - Immuncheckpoint- und EGFR-Inhibitoren. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:1621-1645. [PMID: 34811897 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14641_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Pospischil
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Johannes Kepler Universität, Linz, Österreich
| | - Wolfram Hoetzenecker
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Johannes Kepler Universität, Linz, Österreich
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pospischil I, Hoetzenecker W. Drug eruptions with novel targeted therapies - immune checkpoint and EGFR inhibitors. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2021; 19:1621-1643. [PMID: 34811916 PMCID: PMC9299005 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Given the increasing use of novel targeted therapies, dermatologists are constantly confronted with novel cutaneous side effects of these agents. A rapid diagnosis and appropriate management of these side effects are crucial to prevent impairment of the patients' quality of life and interruptions of essential cancer treatments. Immune checkpoint and EGFR inhibitors are frequently used targeted therapies for various malignancies and are associated with a distinct spectrum of cutaneous adverse events. Exanthematous drug eruptions represent a particular diagnostic challenge in these patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can elicit a plethora of immune-related exanthemas, most commonly maculopapular, lichenoid, and psoriasiform eruptions. Additionally, autoimmune bullous dermatoses and exanthemas associated with connective tissue diseases may arise. In cases of severe, atypical or therapy-resistant presentations an extensive dermatological investigation including a skin biopsy is recommended. Topical and systemic steroids are the mainstay of treatment. Papulopustular eruptions represent the major cutaneous adverse effect of EGFR inhibitor therapy, occurring in up to 90 % of patients within the first two weeks of therapy, depending on the agent. Besides topical antibiotics and steroids, oral tetracyclines are the first choice in systemic treatment and can also be used as prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Pospischil
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Wolfram Hoetzenecker
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sollena P, Cappilli S, Federico F, Schinzari G, Tortora G, Peris K. "Skin rashes" and immunotherapy in melanoma: distinct dermatologic adverse events and implications for therapeutic management. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 18:1889449. [PMID: 33759689 PMCID: PMC9122307 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1889449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in the treatment of different cancers by stimulating the antitumoral activity of the patient’s immune system, representing a major breakthrough in the field of cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4, anti–programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand inhibitors have been approved for advanced melanoma among other solid cancers. Although immunotherapy demonstrated a good safety profile, a new spectrum of multisystemic immune-related adverse events has been recently reported due to their use. Cutaneous reactions represent one of the leading adverse events, often reported in literature as “skin rash”, and rarely further characterized in distinct dermatologic entities. Herein we describe the distinctive cutaneous rashes occurring during immunotherapies for advanced melanoma, discussing implications in the treatment management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Sollena
- Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Cappilli
- Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Federico
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ketty Peris
- Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The Clinical and Histopathological Features of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Their Outcomes. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040728. [PMID: 33673164 PMCID: PMC7918541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause a variety of inflammatory eruptions. The understanding of ICI-induced inflammatory eruptions with detailed histopathological findings is not adequate, particularly in Asian populations. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following ICI therapy between 2014 and 2020 at the Department of Dermatology of Kyushu University Hospital. Of the 51 patients (30 men, 21 women), maculopapular rash (38/51, 74.5%), erythema multiforme (2/51, 3.9%), lichenoid reaction (3/51, 5.9%), psoriasiform reaction (3/51, 5.9%), bullous pemphigoid (3/51, 5.9%), scleroderma-like reaction (1/51, 2.0%), and Stevens–Johnson syndrome (1/51, 2.0%) were observed. The clinical and histopathological findings of these eruptions were equivalent to typical cases of common drug eruptions. The onset of maculopapular rash was relatively early (more than half of events occurred within 1 month), whereas lichenoid reactions and autoimmune diseases occurred relatively late (4–8 months). With appropriate treatment and/or interruption of ICIs, most rashes improved (50/51, 98.0%). The ICI-induced inflammatory eruptions shared similar clinical and histopathological features with classical inflammatory eruptions, but a variety of inflammatory eruptions may occur with different degrees of severity. Dermatologists play an important role in providing specialized care for cutaneous irAEs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Apalla Z, Papageorgiou C, Lallas A, Delli F, Fotiadou C, Kemanetzi C, Lazaridou E. Cutaneous Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Literature Review. Dermatol Pract Concept 2021; 11:e2021155. [PMID: 33614223 DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1101a155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoints assist with self-tolerance and minimize collateral tissue damage when immune responses are activated. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are characterized by a favorable risk/benefit ratio, immune checkpoint blockade has been associated with a new subset of autoimmune-like toxicities, named immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Dermatologic reactions are among the most prevalent irAEs triggered by CPIs. In a majority of cases they are self-limiting and readily manageable. However, it is not uncommon that they result in severe skin involvement and impairment of patients' quality of life. Awareness of the spectrum of cutaneous irAEs is mandatory for every clinician involved in the management of oncologic patients. The role of the dermatologists is essential because early recognition and appropriate management of skin toxicity may prevent dose modifications and discontinuation of CPIs. The latter is particularly relevant, considering that recent data suggest favorable oncologic response in patients developing irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Apalla
- Second Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Chryssoula Papageorgiou
- Second Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Florentina Delli
- State Dermatology Department, Hippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christina Fotiadou
- Second Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christina Kemanetzi
- Second Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Elizabeth Lazaridou
- Second Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions produce a significant clinical, financial, and psychological burden on our healthcare industry. The importance of considering a drug reaction in the cause of any dermatitis is underscored by the diversity of clinical manifestations and the prolific rate of drug discovery and approval. We present an update on the variety of drug reactions encountered in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Immunomodulatory drugs used in oncology will be reviewed separately as their clinical manifestations cross many reaction patters and morphologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert T Spaulding
- Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
| | - Cindy E Owen
- Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Callen
- Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Management of Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors for the Inpatient Dermatologist. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s13671-020-00314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
15
|
Deinlein T, Kränke B, Cerroni L, Weger W. Intracorneal pustular drug eruption associated with nivolumab in a patient with metastatic renal cancer. Int J Dermatol 2020; 59:e435-e437. [PMID: 32864767 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.15149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Deinlein
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Birger Kränke
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Lorenzo Cerroni
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Weger
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Morris LM, Lewis HA, Cornelius LA, Chen DY, Rosman IS. Neutrophil-predominant bullous pemphigoid induced by checkpoint inhibitors: A case series. J Cutan Pathol 2020; 47:742-746. [PMID: 32196722 DOI: 10.1111/cup.13687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitors have been revolutionary in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. By restricting negative feedback of T-cells, checkpoint inhibitors allow the immune system to identify and destroy malignant cells. This enhanced immune response is efficacious in the treatment of the aforementioned malignancies; however, it may lead to immune-related adverse events. Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a well-documented cutaneous adverse reaction of checkpoint inhibitors, with a majority of cases reporting an eosinophil-predominant or mixed inflammatory infiltrate. We report two cases of neutrophil-predominant BP presenting in patients on checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Morris
- Columbia School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Hal A Lewis
- Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lynn A Cornelius
- Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Y Chen
- Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ilana S Rosman
- Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Coleman EL, Olamiju B, Leventhal JS. The life-threatening eruptions of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Clin Dermatol 2020; 38:94-104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
18
|
Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis Caused by the Combination of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in a Patient With Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. Clin Lung Cancer 2019; 21:e54-e56. [PMID: 31874730 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
19
|
Ravi V, Maloney NJ, Worswick S. Neutrophilic dermatoses as adverse effects of checkpoint inhibitors: A review. Dermatol Ther 2019; 32:e13074. [DOI: 10.1111/dth.13074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh Ravi
- Department of DermatologyKeck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California Los Angeles California
| | - Nolan J. Maloney
- Division of Dermatology, Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California
| | - Scott Worswick
- Department of DermatologyKeck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California Los Angeles California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Plachouri KM, Vryzaki E, Georgiou S. Cutaneous Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Summarized Overview. Curr Drug Saf 2019; 14:14-20. [DOI: 10.2174/1574886313666180730114309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background:The introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the recent years has resulted in high response rates and extended survival in patients with metastatic/advanced malignancies. Their mechanism of action is the indirect activation of cytotoxic T-cells through the blockade of inhibitory receptors of immunomodulatory pathways, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Despite their impressive therapeutic results, they can also induce immune-related toxicity, affecting various organs, including the skin.Objective:To provide an updated summarized overview of the most common immune-mediated cutaneous side effects and their management.Method:English articles derived from the databases PubMed and SCOPUS and published between 2009 and 2018, were analyzed for this narrative review.Results:The most common adverse cutaneous reactions include maculopapular rash, lichenoid reactions, vitiligo and pruritus, with severity Grade 1 or 2. Less frequent but eventually life-threatening skin side effects, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms and Toxic Epidermal necrolysis, have also been reported.Conclusion:Basic knowledge of the Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitors-induced skin toxicity is necessary in order to recognize these treatment-related complications. The most frequent skin side effects, such as maculopapular rash, vitiligo and pruritus, tend to subside under symptomatic treatment so that permanent discontinuation of therapy is not commonly necessary. In the case of life-threatening side effects, apart from the necessary symptomatic treatment, the immunotherapy should be permanently stopped. Information concerning the management of ICIs-mediated skin toxicity can be obtained from the literature as well as from the Summary of Product Characteristics of each agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eleftheria Vryzaki
- Dermatology Department, University General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Sophia Georgiou
- Dermatology Department, University General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Coleman E, Ko C, Dai F, Tomayko MM, Kluger H, Leventhal JS. Inflammatory eruptions associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A single-institution retrospective analysis with stratification of reactions by toxicity and implications for management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:990-997. [PMID: 30399387 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.10.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing recognition of distinct inflammatory eruptions associated with checkpoint inhibitors. A better understanding of their severity, therapeutic response, and impact on cancer treatment is needed. OBJECTIVE To analyze the different rashes associated with immunotherapy referred to our institution's oncodermatology clinic and inpatient consultative service and to evaluate their therapeutic response and impact on immunotherapy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients referred to the oncodermatology clinic or inpatient dermatology service during 2016-2018 at Yale-New Haven Hospital for eruptions that developed during immunotherapy. RESULTS In total, 98 patients (51 men, 47 women) treated with checkpoint inhibitors developed 103 inflammatory eruptions, with a range of mean latency of 0.2-17.7 months. A minority of patients (25/103; 24.3%) required immunotherapy interruption; most of these cases involved immunobullous (7/8; 87.5%), lichenoid (8/26; 30.8%), maculopapular (6/18; 33.3%), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome-like (2/2, 100%) reactions. Only 3 of 16 (18.8%) patients who had their immunotherapy interrupted had a grade 2 or 3 flare on rechallenge. Most reactions (93/103; 90.3%) responded to dermatologic therapy or immunotherapy interruption. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective study from a single tertiary care center. CONCLUSION A variety of inflammatory reactions might occur from immunotherapy with differing degrees of severity. While most rashes responded to topical treatment, immunobullous and exfoliative presentations frequently interrupted immunotherapy. Increased awareness and early recognition could reduce the need for unnecessary immunotherapy interruption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Coleman
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christine Ko
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Feng Dai
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mary M Tomayko
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harriet Kluger
- Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jonathan S Leventhal
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dermatologic Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors : Skin Toxicities and Immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2018; 19:345-361. [PMID: 29256113 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-017-0336-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 364] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors [monoclonal antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] represents a major breakthrough in cancer therapy. Although they present a favorable risk/benefit ratio, immune checkpoint blockade therapies have a very specific safety profile. Due to their unique mechanism of action, they entail a new spectrum of adverse events that are mostly immune related [immune-related adverse events (irAEs)], notably mediated by the triggering of cytotoxic CD4+/CD8+ T cell activation. Cutaneous toxicities appear to be one of the most prevalent irAEs, both with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents or with the newly developed anti-PD-L1 agents, which corresponds to a class effect. They are observed in more than one-third of the treated patients, mainly in the form of a maculopapular rash (eczema-like spongiotic dermatitis) and pruritus. A wide range of other dermatologic manifestations can also occur, including lichenoid reactions, psoriasis, acneiform rashes, vitiligo-like lesions, autoimmune skin diseases (e.g., bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, alopecia areata), sarcoidosis or nail and oral mucosal changes. In addition, the use of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies in combination is associated with the development of more frequent, more severe and earlier cutaneous irAEs compared to single agents. In most cases, these dysimmune dermatologic adverse events remain self-limiting and readily manageable. Early recognition and adequate management, however, are critical to prevent exacerbation of the lesions, to limit treatment interruption and to minimize quality of life impairment. This review describes the variable clinical and histopathologic aspects of dermatologic irAEs induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Appropriate treatment and counseling are also proposed, with a step-by-step approach for optimized management by both practicing oncologists and dermatologists.
Collapse
|
23
|
Sibaud V, Boulinguez S, Pagès C, Riffaud L, Lamant L, Chira C, Boyrie S, Vigarios E, Tournier E, Meyer N. [Dermatologic toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2018; 145:313-330. [PMID: 29678394 DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2018.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4) represents a significant advance in the treatment of multiple cancers. Given their particular mechanism of action, which involves triggering CD4+/CD8+ T-cell activation and proliferation, they are associated with a specific safety profile. Their adverse events are primarily immune-related, and can affect practically all organs. In this context, dermatological toxicity is the most common, though it mostly remains mild to moderate and does not require discontinuation of treatment. More than a third of patients are faced with cutaneous adverse events, usually in the form of a maculopapular rash, pruritus or vitiligo (only in patients treated for melanoma). Much more specific dermatologic disorders, however, may occur such as lichenoid reactions, induced psoriasis, sarcoidosis, auto-immune diseases (bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, alopecia areata), acne-like rash, xerostomia, etc. Rigorous dermatological evaluation is thus mandatory in the case of atypical, persistent/recurrent or severe lesions. In this article, we review the incidence and spectrum of dermatologic adverse events reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, a management algorithm is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Sibaud
- Oncologie médicale, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; Oncodermatologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
| | - S Boulinguez
- Oncodermatologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - C Pagès
- Oncodermatologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - L Riffaud
- Oncodermatologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - L Lamant
- Anatomo-pathologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - C Chira
- Radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - S Boyrie
- Radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - E Vigarios
- Médecine bucco-dentaire, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; UFR d'odontologie, 3, rue des Maraîchers, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - E Tournier
- Anatomo-pathologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - N Meyer
- Oncodermatologie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu RC, Consuegra G, Fernández-Peñas P. Management of the cutaneous adverse effects of antimelanoma therapy. Melanoma Manag 2017; 4:187-202. [PMID: 30190925 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma. However, these novel therapies are associated with adverse effects (AEs), of which cutaneous toxicities are the most frequently observed. These cutaneous AEs can exert significant morbidity and impact on patient quality of life, hence the recognition and management of AEs is fundamental in preventing interruption or cessation of survival-prolonging treatments. Additionally, knowledge of these AEs are necessary in order for healthcare professionals to counsel patients when starting treatment and in the initiation of AE prophylaxis. The incidence and clinical presentation of the cutaneous toxicities of novel melanoma therapies will be discussed, and treatment guidelines provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Congwei Liu
- Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia
| | - Germana Consuegra
- Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia
| | - Pablo Fernández-Peñas
- Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|