1
|
Fagerstedt KW, Vesterinen T, Leijon H, Sihto H, Böhling T, Arola J. Somatostatin receptor expression in Merkel cell carcinoma: correlation with clinical data. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1001-1007. [PMID: 37540574 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2239481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) of the skin. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are G protein-linked receptors that regulate cell proliferation and growth. SSTRs are expressed in many NENs; however, scant information is available on their expression in MCCs or their association with clinical parameters and patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at Helsinki University Hospital and the University of Helsinki. Using a tissue microarray, we investigated SSTR1-5 expression by immunohistochemistry in 99 MCC tissue samples. Samples were collected between 1983 and 2017 and coupled with the patients' clinical data. RESULTS SSTR2-SSTR5 were detected in 69%, 6%, 4%, and 1% of the tumours, respectively. However, SSTR1 expression was not observed. Cytoplasmic SSTR2 positivity was associated with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.009), but it did not correlate with disease-specificity or overall survival. CONCLUSION SSTR2-5 expression was observed in MCCs. In particular, SSTR2 expression is clinically valid because it is associated with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and can thus serve as a prognostic marker. Moreover, SSTR2 overexpression provides a molecular basis for tumour imaging and treatment with somatostatin analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus W Fagerstedt
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Vesterinen
- HUS Diagnostic Centre, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helena Leijon
- HUS Diagnostic Centre, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Harri Sihto
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tom Böhling
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Arola
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- HUS Diagnostic Centre, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Current State of Treatment and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143506. [PMID: 34298720 PMCID: PMC8305628 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with increasing incidence. The skin of the head and neck is a common subsite for MCC with distinctions in management from other anatomic areas. Given the rapid pace of developments regarding MCC pathogenesis (Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV)-positive or virus-negative, cell of origin), diagnosis, staging and treatment, and up to date recommendations are critical for optimizing outcomes. This review aims to summarize currently available literature for MCC of the head and neck. The authors reviewed current literature, including international guidelines regarding MCC pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Subsequently recommendations were derived including the importance of baseline imaging, MCPyV serology testing, primary site surgery, nodal evaluation, radiotherapy, and the increasing role of immune modulating agents in MCC. MCPyV serology testing is increasingly important with potential distinctions in treatment response and surveillance between virus-positive and virus-negative MCC. Surgical management continues to balance optimizing local control with minimal morbidity. Similarly, radiotherapy continues to have importance in the adjuvant, definitive, and palliative setting for MCC of the head and neck. Immunotherapy has changed the paradigm for advanced MCC, with increasing work focusing on optimizing outcomes for non-responders and high-risk patients, including those with immunosuppression.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is the most recently discovered human oncogenic virus. MCPyV asymptomatically infects most of the human population. In the elderly and immunocompromised, however, it can cause a highly lethal form of human skin cancer called Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Distinct from the productive MCPyV infection that replicates the viral genome as episomes, MCC tumors contain replication-incompetent, integrated viral genomes. Mutant MCPyV tumor antigen genes expressed from the integrated viral genomes are essential for driving the oncogenic development of MCPyV-associated MCC. In this chapter, we summarize recent discoveries on MCPyV virology, mechanisms of MCPyV-mediated oncogenesis, and the current therapeutic strategies for MCPyV-associated MCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Jianxin You
- Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
La Rosa S, Bonzini M, Sciarra A, Asioli S, Maragliano R, Arrigo M, Foschini MP, Righi A, Maletta F, Motolese A, Papotti M, Sessa F, Uccella S. Exploring the Prognostic Role of Ki67 Proliferative Index in Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: Clinico-Pathologic Analysis of 84 Cases and Review of the Literature. Endocr Pathol 2020; 31:392-400. [PMID: 32696301 PMCID: PMC7666272 DOI: 10.1007/s12022-020-09640-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The exact prediction of outcome of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the skin is difficult to determine, although several attempts have been made to identify clinico-pathologic prognostic factors. The Ki67 proliferative index is a well-known marker routinely used to define the prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, its prognostic value has been poorly investigated in MCC, and available published results are often contradictory mainly because restricted to small series in the absence of standardized methods for Ki67 evaluation. For this reason, we explored the potential prognostic role of Ki67 proliferative index in a large series of MCCs using the WHO standardized method of counting positive cells in at least 500 tumor cells in hot spot areas on camera-captured printed images. In addition, since MCC may be considered as the cutaneous counterpart of digestive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), we decided to stratify MCCs using the available and efficient Ki67 threshold of 55%, which was found prognostic in digestive NECs. This choice was also supported by the Youden index analysis. In addition, we analyzed the prognostic value of other clinico-pathologic parameters using both univariate and multivariate analysis. Ki67 index appeared significantly associated with prognosis at univariate analysis together with stage IV, lack of MCPyV, and p63 expression, but not at the multivariate analysis, where survival resulted independently influenced by p63 expression and tumor stage, only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano La Rosa
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Institut Universitaire de Pathologie, CHUV, 25 rue du Bugnon, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Matteo Bonzini
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan and IRCCS Policlinico Maggiore Hospital Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Amedeo Sciarra
- Division of Pathology, University of Milan and IRCCS Policlinico Maggiore Hospital Foundation, Milan, Italy. Current affiliation: Department of Histopathology, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Sofia Asioli
- Unit of Pathology, Bellaria Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Maragliano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Maria Pia Foschini
- Unit of Pathology, Bellaria Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Righi
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Maletta
- Department of Oncology, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Papotti
- Department of Oncology, City of Health and Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Fausto Sessa
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Silvia Uccella
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akaike T, Qazi J, Anderson A, Behnia FS, Shinohara MM, Akaike G, Hippe DS, Thomas H, Takagishi SR, Lachance K, Park SY, Tarabadkar ES, Iyer JG, Blom A, Parvathaneni U, Vesselle H, Nghiem P, Bhatia S. High somatostatin receptor expression and efficacy of somatostatin analogues in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2020; 184:319-327. [PMID: 32320473 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive, high-grade, cutaneous neuroendocrine tumour (NET). Agents blocking programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 have efficacy in metastatic MCC (mMCC), but half of patients do not derive durable benefit. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly used to treat low- and moderate-grade NETs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). OBJECTIVES To assess SSTR expression and the efficacy of SSAs in mMCC, a high-grade NET. Methods In this retrospective study of 40 patients with mMCC, SSTR expression was assessed radiologically by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS; n = 39) and/or immunohistochemically when feasible (n = 9). Nineteen patients (18 had SRS uptake in MCC tumours) were treated with SSA. Disease control was defined as progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥ 120 days after initiation of SSA. RESULTS Thirty-three of 39 patients (85%) had some degree (low 52%, moderate 23%, high 10%) of SRS uptake. Of 19 patients treated with SSA, seven had a response-evaluable target lesion; three of these seven patients (43%) experienced disease control, with a median PFS of 237 days (range 152-358). Twelve of 19 patients did not have a response-evaluable lesion due to antecedent radiation; five of these 12 (42%) experienced disease control (median PFS of 429 days, range 143-1757). The degree of SSTR expression (determined by SRS and/or immunohistochemistry) did not correlate significantly with the efficacy endpoints. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to other high-grade NETs, mMCC tumours appear frequently to express SSTRs. SSAs can lead to clinically meaningful disease control with minimal side-effects. Targeting of SSTRs using SSA or other novel approaches should be explored further for mMCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Akaike
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J Qazi
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - A Anderson
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - F S Behnia
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M M Shinohara
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - G Akaike
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - D S Hippe
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - H Thomas
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - S R Takagishi
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - K Lachance
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - S Y Park
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - E S Tarabadkar
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J G Iyer
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - A Blom
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - U Parvathaneni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - H Vesselle
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - P Nghiem
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - S Bhatia
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|