Atopy patch testing with aeroallergens in a large clinical population of dermatitis patients in Germany and Switzerland, 2000-2015: a retrospective multicentre study

Allergens in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex relationship to allergens. While AD itself is not an allergic reaction and does not necessarily involve allergen sensitization, AD patients show higher rates of sensitization to food and inhalant allergens compared to the general population. Recent evidence refining the "dual allergen exposure hypothesis" demonstrates that early oral exposure to allergens through an intact gastrointestinal barrier typically promotes tolerance, while exposure through compromised skin or respiratory barriers often leads to sensitization. Therefore, the impaired skin barrier function in AD patients increases the risk of transcutaneous sensitization and may interfere with oral tolerance development. Interestingly, AD patients' sensitivity to contact allergens (such as metals and fragrances) is not necessarily higher than that of the general population, which may be related to the inherent properties of these allergens. Personalized allergen testing can help guide appropriate allergen avoidance and reintroduction strategies in AD management. The insights into optimal allergen exposure conditions have also expanded the potential applications of allergen-specific immunotherapy in preventing AD onset in high-risk populations and halting the atopic march.

Belgian atopic dermatitis guidelines

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common, bothersome and difficult to treat skin disorders. Recent introduction of new systemic treatments has revolutionized the management of AD. The goal of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients suffering from atopic dermatitis that easily can be implemented in clinical practice. These recommendations were developed by 11 Belgian AD experts. Comments of all experts on the proposed statements were gathered, followed by an online voting session. The most relevant strategies for the management and treatment of AD in the context of the Belgian health care landscape are discussed. General measures, patient education and adequate topical treatment remain the cornerstones of AD management. For moderate to severe AD, the introduction of biologics and JAK inhibitors show unprecedented efficacy, although currently access is limited to a subgroup of patients meeting the reimbursement criteria.

The Diagnostic Value of Delayed-Type Reactions to Perennial Aeroallergens for Atopic Disease

Background: Delayed-type reactions to aeroallergens have been observed, however, their clinical significance continues to be debated. Objective: We assessed the prevalence and significance of delayed-type reactions to aeroallergens in atopic patients. Methods: Retrospective study including 266 patients with history or evidence of atopic disease (atopic dermatitis [AD], allergic rhinitis, and/or allergic asthma) and tested via either the intradermal skin test (IDT) or atopy patch test for common aeroallergens, specifically house dust mites (Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) and perennial molds (Aspergillus fumigatus, Penicillium notatum). All patients were tested via IDT with both immediate (15 minute) and delayed (2 and 4 days) readings. Delayed reading was considered positive if the IDT injection site demonstrated at least 5 mm induration 48 hours after inoculation. Results: In total, 195 (73.3%) patients demonstrated an immediate-type reaction, whereas 118 (44.4%) had a delayed-type reaction. In total, 75 (28.2%) patients experienced both immediate- and delayed-type reactions, 43 (16.2%) reacted delayed-type only, and 85.3% of delayed-type reactions to individual aeroallergens were associated with eczematous lesions predominantly in air-exposed areas. Conclusion: Delayed-type reactions to aeroallergens are prevalent and clinically significant as a component of extrinsic AD and atopic diseases. The data support delayed reading of the IDT to guide diagnosis and management in these patients.

Atopic dermatitis: Current standards of diagnosis and treatment, including the latest methods of management

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing disease which causes characteristic eczematous skin lesions. The most common symptoms of atopic dermatitis are persistent pruritus, xerosis, and skin lesions with a typical location and appearance that changes with the patient’s age. The prevalence of the disease in the pediatric population is estimated at 10% to 30%, while in adults it ranges from 1% to 3%. The number of people who suffer from AD is rising every year. The pathophysiology of the disease is complex and multifactorial. It involves elements of epidermal barrier dysfunction, alterations in cellular immune response, IgE hypersensitivity, and environmental factors. AD significantly reduces the quality of life of both patients and their families. Patients with AD are at higher risk for neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and headaches. The decreased quality of life of AD patients and their families is associated with the discomfort of recurrent and chronic inflammatory skin lesions, persistent pruritus, and the inconvenience of long-term therapy. It also affects the psychological development of children, contributes to behavioral disorders (hyperactivity, hypersensitivity) and impacts many areas of family life such as sleep, leisure activities, and relationships between family members. The basic treatment of AD is avoidance of potential harmful factors, proper care in the treatment of exacerbations, topical corticosteroids, and calcineurin inhibitors in proactive therapy. In some patients who meet age criteria, phototherapy and cyclosporine should be considered. In individuals with severe AD who do not respond to topical treatment and who will not benefit from general therapy, dupilumab, a biologic drug, is the treatment of choice. Biologic treatment has an increasingly important place in the effective and modern therapy of AD. Currently, new biologic drugs are being researched, which may bring a therapeutic revolution in AD in the future. Allergen immunotherapy in patients with AD should be carefully evaluated on an individual basis, as proper selection of patients with documented IgE-dependent sensitization is important for the success of this therapy. Close collaboration with the patient and their caregivers, education, and psychological support as appropriate are integral to the treatment.

A new era of atopic eczema research: Advances and highlights

Atopic eczema (AE) is an inflammatory skin disease with involvement of genetic, immunological and environmental factors. One hallmark of AE is a skin barrier disruption on multiple, highly interconnected levels: filaggrin mutations, increased skin pH and a microbiome dysbiosis towards Staphylococcus aureus overgrowth are observed in addition to an abnormal type 2 immune response. Extrinsic factors seem to play a major role in the development of AE. As AE is a first step in the atopic march, its prevention and appropriate treatment are essential. Although standard therapy remains topical treatment, powerful systemic treatment options emerged in the last years. However, thorough endotyping of the individual patients is still required for ideal precision medicine approaches in future. Therefore, novel microbial and immunological biomarkers were described recently for the prediction of disease development and treatment response. This review summarizes the current state of the art in AE research.

Environmental Exposure and Childhood Atopic Dermatitis in Shanghai: A Season-Stratified Time-Series Analysis

BACKGROUND

Childhood atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease which sometimes predisposes to allergies. Environmental factors (low humidity, irritants, etc.) are prominent causative triggers of AD.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the effects of both meteorological factors and air pollutants on childhood AD, and the modification effects by season in Shanghai, China.

METHODS

Quasi-Poisson generalized linear regression model, combined with a distributed lag nonlinear model was used to examine the nonlinear and lagged effects of environmental factors on childhood AD from 2009 to 2017 in Shanghai. We also performed a season-stratified analysis to determine the modification effects of environmental exposure by season on childhood AD.

RESULTS

There were 1,043,240 outpatient visits for childhood AD in total, at 3 major pediatric hospitals. Low temperature and relative humidity (RH), and high daily temperature difference (DTD) and air pollutants (i.e., NO2) increased the relative risks (RRs) of outpatient visits for childhood AD in the whole year. In the cold season, an increased risk of outpatient visits for childhood AD was associated with low RH (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.69-3.02) and high NO2 (1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17). In the warm season, outpatient visits for childhood AD were associated with low temperature (3.49, 95% CI 3.22-3.77), low RH (1.89, 95% CI 1.74-2.06), high DTD (1.41, 95% CI 1.31-1.53), and high NO2 (1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that environmental exposure may be a key trigger for outpatient visits for childhood AD with apparent seasonal effects. Tailored preventive strategies to avoid environmental triggers of childhood AD should be developed.

Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study

This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired T-test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.