1
|
Haeussler K, Ismaila AS, Malmenäs M, Noorduyn SG, Green N, Compton C, Thabane L, Vogelmeier CF, Halpin DMG. Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians. Respir Res 2024; 25:438. [PMID: 39709425 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024] Open
Abstract
To optimize patient outcomes, healthcare decisions should be based on the most up-to-date high-quality evidence. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are vital for demonstrating the efficacy of interventions; however, information on how an intervention compares to already available treatments and/or fits into treatment algorithms is sometimes limited. Although different therapeutic classes are available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), assessing the relative efficacy of these treatments is challenging. Synthesizing evidence from multiple RCTs via meta-analysis can help provide a comprehensive assessment of all available evidence and a "global summary" of findings. Pairwise meta-analysis is a well-established method that can be used if two treatments have previously been examined in head-to-head clinical trials. However, for some comparisons, no head-to-head studies are available, for example the efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapies for the treatment of COPD. In such cases, network meta-analysis (NMA) can be used, to indirectly compare treatments by assessing their effects relative to a common comparator using data from multiple studies. However, incorrect choice or application of methods can hinder interpretation of findings or lead to invalid summary estimates. As such, the use of the GRADE reporting framework is an essential step to assess the certainty of the evidence. With an increasing reliance on NMAs to inform clinical decisions, it is now particularly important that healthcare professionals understand the appropriate usage of different methods of NMA and critically appraise published evidence when informing their clinical decisions. This review provides an overview of NMA as a method for evidence synthesis within the field of COPD pharmacotherapy. We discuss key considerations when conducting an NMA and interpreting NMA outputs, and provide guidance on the most appropriate methodology for the data available and potential implications of the incorrect application of methods. We conclude with a simple illustrative example of NMA methodologies using simulated data, demonstrating that when applied correctly, the outcome of the analysis should be similar regardless of the methodology chosen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Mia Malmenäs
- ICON Health Economics, ICON Plc, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen G Noorduyn
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Nathan Green
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franco-Gil ME, Graça A, Martins A, Marto J, Ribeiro HM. Emollients in dermatological creams: Early evaluation for tailoring formulation and therapeutic performance. Int J Pharm 2024; 653:123825. [PMID: 38253270 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
The targeted choice of the emollient of a cream determines its physicochemical properties and clinical effectiveness. This work researched the effects of emollient properties on the final characteristics and potential performance of oil-in-water dermatological creams. Seven emollients with different chemical characteristics and structures (alkane, triglyceride, ether, silicone, vegetable oils, and mineral oil) were tested in a model formulation. Early stability, pH, droplet size distribution, rheology, tackiness, adhesivity, spreadability, tribology, and release profile of a lipophilic substance model (in Franz cells, through a synthetic membrane, for six hours) were assessed. The creams had acid epicutaneous pH and a "shear-thinning" "solid-like" viscoelastic behavior. Among the seven emollients' properties, polarity, density, and viscosity were the most influential. Droplet parameters were the most impacted, pH and release were moderately affected, and the textural properties were lowly to moderately impacted. The emollient substitution in the model formulation affected the experimental parameters differently, allowing formulation optimization and tailoring its potential therapeutic performance regarding drug release, coadjutant effects, and dwell time on the skin. By looking at the creams' characteristics, it was possible to select the best-suited emollients for releasing a lipophilic drug, applying on painful skin, and formulation in wash-off products or leave-on protective barrier creams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Franco-Gil
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.UL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto S/N, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal; Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain; University Institute of Industrial Pharmacy (IUFI), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
| | - A Graça
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.UL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto S/N, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - A Martins
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.UL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto S/N, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - J Marto
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.UL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto S/N, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - H M Ribeiro
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.UL), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto S/N, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torres T, Galván J, Crutchley N, Praestegaard M, Iversen L, Gisondi P, Carrascosa JM, Halioua B, Bewley A, Pinter A. Calcipotriol and Betamethasone Dipropionate Cream Based on PAD Technology for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis: A Narrative Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2023; 13:2153-2169. [PMID: 37740858 PMCID: PMC10539254 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-023-01003-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Topical treatment plays a crucial role in psoriasis management, with non-adherence being a major barrier to treatment success. The fixed-dose combination of calcipotriol (CAL) and betamethasone dipropionate (BDP) represents the first-line choice in topical psoriasis treatment. A CAL/BDP cream based on polyaphron dispersion (PAD) Technology has emerged as a novel formulation for a more convenient topical treatment of psoriasis. This article aims to summarize the most relevant published evidence about CAL/BDP PAD-cream and its underlying PAD Technology. The PAD Technology enables CAL and BDP stability in an aqueous cream through a multimolecular shell structure, as well as it increases the penetration of both active ingredients into the epidermis and dermis. This technology also demonstrated to increase the cosmetic acceptability and to provide the desirable sensory properties for a topical psoriasis treatment. Two phase III clinical trials have been conducted so far with CAL/BDP PAD-cream. Findings from both trials revealed high efficacy with a fast onset of action, a favourable safety and tolerability profile and convenience for CAL/BDP PAD-cream compared to CAL/BDP gel. In the trial including patients with psoriasis affecting the scalp (MC2-01-C7), results support the use of CAL/BDP PAD-cream in scalp psoriasis. An anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to compare CAL/BDP PAD-cream and CAL/BDP foam, as both products had been previously compared to CAL/BDP gel. CAL/BDP PAD-cream and CAL/BDP foam showed equivalent efficacy and quality of life at their recommended treatment duration, whereas greater treatment satisfaction for CAL/BDP PAD-cream was found after one week of treatment. Overall, the high patient acceptability and treatment satisfaction observed with CAL/BDP PAD-cream in clinical trials may lead to improved adherence and hence higher efficacy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Torres
- Department of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, University of Porto, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | - Lars Iversen
- MC2 Therapeutics, Hørsholm, Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Paolo Gisondi
- Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - José Manuel Carrascosa
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, IGTP. UAB, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Anthony Bewley
- Department of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust & Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Andreas Pinter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|