Management and treatment outcome of DRESS patients in Europe: An international multicentre retrospective study of 141 cases

Amoxicillin and lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome: A case report

This case demonstrated with importance of recognizing DRESS syndrome presenting without the typical eosinophilia due to possible cross-reactivity between amoxicillin and the well-documented inciting medication lamotrigine. Steroid tapering is an effective treatment, but medication avoidance should be stressed to avoid symptom recurrence.

Demystifying drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): a review of the literature and guidelines for management

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe, adverse drug reaction that is notoriously complex in both its presentation and treatment. Although early diagnosis and cessation of the causative agent are universally accepted as the initial interventions for DRESS, the subsequent management lacks a standardized approach. Historically, systemic steroids have been used as first-line treatment, but there is debate about the optimal dosing and route of administration, and evidence persists on the long-term complications associated with steroid use. Novel treatment approaches with targeted therapy, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis have been gaining interest as alternative mono- and adjuvant therapies, but their use has yet to be supported by clinical trials. This narrative review provides a summary of the current knowledge of DRESS, with a focus on clinical management. The various mono- and adjuvant therapy options are discussed, with literature-supported suggestions for their optimal use in clinical practice. The risks for relapses, viral reactivation, and long-term complications are also considered. The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for articles on DRESS, published between January 1, 2008, and May 1, 2023. 334 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the literature, a DRESS management tool with step-by-step guidance is provided. Further suggestions for management are woven throughout this review, giving clinicians a toolbelt of resources with which to approach diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

The systemic treatments for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) beyond corticosteroids

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), is a severe type of cutaneous adverse reaction. The gold standard therapy for DRESS involves the discontinuation of the culprit drug, supportive therapies, and administration of corticosteroids. However, in cases of primary treatment failure or suboptimal response, there arises an urgent need for alternative interventions. This review focuses on exploring alternative systemic therapies for patients with steroid-resistant DRESS, steroid-dependent DRESS, or refractory DRESS, encompassing immunosuppressive agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, biologics, and small molecule drugs, with an emphasis on their clinical efficacy and the underlying mechanisms in the treatment of DRESS. Furthermore, this review provides a summary of potential management strategies and laboratory workup during the treatment of DRESS.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), which include Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption, are life-threatening conditions. The pathogenesis of SCARs involves T cell receptors recognizing drug antigens presented by human leukocyte antigens, triggering the activation of distinct T cell subsets. These cells interact with keratinocytes and various immune cells, orchestrating cutaneous lesions and systemic manifestations. Genetic predisposition, impaired drug metabolism, viral reactivation or infections, and heterologous immunity influence SCAR development and clinical presentation. Specific genetic associations with distinct SCAR phenotypes have been identified, leading to the implementation of genetic screening before prescription in various countries to prevent SCARs. Whilst systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunomodulators have been the primary therapeutic agents, evolving strategies, including biologics and small molecules targeting tumour necrosis factor, different cytokines, or Janus kinase signalling pathways, signify a shift towards a precision management paradigm that considers individual clinical presentations.

The Unusual Adverse Effects of Antituberculosis Therapy in Kidney Patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are at a high risk of tuberculosis (TB), with a relative risk of developing active TB of 10%-25%. Similarly, glomerular disease increases the risk of TB due to diminished glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and immunosuppression use. Further, the first-line anti-TB drugs are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) even in patients with normal kidney functions.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 10 patients hospitalized with unusual adverse effects of antituberculosis therapy (ATT) from 2013 to 2022.

RESULTS

We found three cases of AKI caused by rifampicin: acute interstitial nephritis, crescentic glomerulonephritis, and heme pigment-induced acute tubular necrosis. We observed rifampicin-induced accelerated hypertension and thrombocytopenia in two patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Isoniazid caused pancreatitis and cerebellitis in two CKD patients, respectively. In a CKD patient, we detected acute gout secondary to pyrazinamide-induced reduced uric acid excretion. We also observed cases of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and hypercalcemia due to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients with glomerular disease on ATT. Immediate discontinuation of the offending drug, along with specific and supportive management, led to a recovery in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The adverse effects of ATT may be unusually severe and varied in kidney patients due to decreased renal elimination. Early recognition of these adverse effects and timely discontinuation of the offending drug is essential to limit morbidity and mortality.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

Characteristics of DRESS Syndrome in the Elderly: A Comparative Study of 55 Patients

Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare drug reaction characterized by a skin rash, eosinophilia, and organ involvement. Objective: Our purpose is to focus on the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of DRESS in the elderly and to identify the incriminated drugs. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients, hospitalized for DRESS with a RegiSCAR ≥4. The population was divided into 2 groups according to age: 65 years or older (G1) and <65 years (G2). The statistical study was performed using the comparative and multivariate analysis. Results: We included 55 patients (30.9% G1 and 69.1% G2). Skin manifestations were comparable in both groups. Lymphadenopathy was less common in G1 with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.012). Renal impairment was more frequent in the elderly with a statistically significant result (P = 0.005). DRESS in the elderly group was significantly associated with the occurrence of sepsis (P = 0.008). Allopurinol was the most common culprit associated with DRESS in G1 (P = 0.001). Relapses and recurrences were comparable in both groups (P = 0.71). Conclusions: DRESS in the elderly is associated with a high risk of complications, mainly kidney involvement and sepsis. Allopurinol is the most incriminated drug.

Retrospective study on the association of human herpesvirus reactivation with severe DRESS: A description of blood and skin reactivations

BACKGROUND

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) is a severe adverse event (mortality of 10%). Its pathophysiology involves herpesviruses, particularly HHV-6, but the exact mechanisms are still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To describe severe cases of DRESS and especially their association with herpesvirus reactivation.

METHODS

This study was a multicentre case series conducted between 2007 and 2021 at five University Hospital Centres in France. The study included patients who had severe DRESS, which was defined as death, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), or severe damage to internal organs. We excluded patients without blood PCR sample, without a drug formally attributed or with RegiSCAR score < 6. We collected data on severity, causative drug, associated visceral damage and results of viral blood PCRs. HHV-6 reactivation was studied in skin biopsies by detection of small non-coding transcripts (HHV-6 miR-aU14) and a late viral protein (GP82/105).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included (29 female, median age 62, interquartile range (IQR) [37;72]). Eight patients (15%) died, 13 (27%) were admitted to ICU. Most patients (n = 34; 65%) had multisystem involvement: most frequent was liver (n = 46; 88%), then renal failure (n = 24; 46%). Forty patients (77%) had at least one blood viral reactivation among HHV-6, EBV or CMV, of which 21 (53%) had at least two. Median time of blood HHV-6 reactivation was 24 days (IQR [20;35]). HHV-6 reactivation was demonstrated in 15 out of 20 skin biopsies, with a median time of 11 days [9;17].

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the high rate of HHV-6 reactivation in severe DRESS and demonstrated cutaneous HHV-6 reactivation using small non-coding transcripts (HHV-6 miR-aU14), which preceded viral PCR positivity in blood. These results suggest that HHV-6 reactivation during DRESS may start in skin. Furthermore, search for miR-aU14 in skin biopsy could become a useful diagnostic tool for early detection of HHV-6 reactivation.

Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome/Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: Predictive Score and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We previously developed a drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) severity (DDS) score that may predict DIHS/DRESS-associated complications (DACs), including myocarditis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To externally confirm the predictive accuracy of the DDS score, clarify its ability to identify patients at high risk of DACs and fatal outcome, and determine which treatments might reduce or increase the risk.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in which we followed 48 patients with DIHS/DRESS at 5 university hospitals in Japan for 1 year after onset. Patients were divided into mild, moderate, and severe DIHS/DRESS groups depending on their early DDS score.

RESULTS

Eight cases had DACs in the severe group (n = 17); no DACs were observed in the mild group (n = 12). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a cutoff DDS score of ≥4.0 and ≤2.0 could differentiate patients who would and would not develop DACs, respectively. In the moderate-to-severe disease groups, DACs occurred only in patients who received corticosteroids and not in those who received supportive care. None of the patients who received early treatment for cytomegalovirus developed DACs. Autoimmune DACs were significantly more common in patients who received pulse corticosteroid therapy. Four deaths occurred within the 1-year follow-up; all were in patients with infectious DACs who received systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Our scoring system allows early identification of patients at increased risk for DACs. Risk factors for DACs include systemic or pulse corticosteroid therapy.

Novel targeted inhibition of the IL-5 axis for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome

Background

The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome represents a severe hypersensitivity reaction. Up-to-date treatment is based on withdrawal of medication, supportive care, and immunosuppression using high-dose corticosteroid (CS) therapy. However, evidence-based data are lacking regarding second-line therapy for steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent patients.

Objectives

We hypothesize that the interleukin (IL)-5 axis plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of DRESS; hence, inhibition of this signaling pathway could offer a potential therapy for steroid-dependent and/or steroid-resistant cases, and it may offer an alternative to CS therapy in certain patients more prone to CS toxicity.

Methods

Herein, we collected worldwide data on DRESS cases treated with biological agents targeting the IL-5 axis. We reviewed all cases indexed in PubMed up to October 2022 and performed a total analysis including our center experience with two additional novel cases.

Results

A review of the literature yielded 14 patients with DRESS who were treated with biological agents targeting the IL-5 axis as well as our two new cases. Reported patients are characterized by a female-to-male ratio of 1:1 and a mean age of 51.8 (17-87) years. The DRESS-inducing drugs, as expected from the prospective RegiSCAR study, were mostly antibiotics (7/16), as follows: vancomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefepime. DRESS patients were treated with anti-IL-5 agents (mepolizumab and reslizumab) or anti-IL-5 receptor (IL-5R) biologics (benralizumab). All patients have clinically improved under anti-IL-5/IL-5R biologics. Multiple doses of mepolizumab were needed to achieve clinical resolution, whereas a single dose of benralizumab was often sufficient. Relapse was noted in one patient receiving benralizumab treatment. One patient receiving benralizumab had a fatal outcome, although mortality was probably related to massive bleeding and cardiac arrest due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

Conclusion

Current treatment guidelines for DRESS are based on case reports and expert opinion. Understanding the central role of eosinophils in DRESS pathogenicity emphasizes the need for future implementation of IL-5 axis blockade as steroid-sparing agents, potential therapy to steroid-resistant cases, and perhaps an alternative to CS treatment in certain DRESS patients more prone to CS toxicity.