Medication reconciliation at admission to surgical departments

Effectiveness of Medication Reconciliation in a Chinese Hospital: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Implementing medication reconciliation (MR) was complex and challenging because of the variability in the guidance provided for conducting. The processes of MR adopted in China were different from that recommended by the World Health Organization. A pilot study to inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of these two workflows was undertaken.

Methods

Patients taking at least one home/regular medication for hypertension, diabetes, or coronary heart disease were recruited at admission, and then were randomized using a computer-generated random number in a closed envelope. In the study group, the pharmacist reviewed electronic medical record systems before communication with patients. In the control group, pharmacists communicated with patients at patient's admission. The time investment of pharmacists for MR process, the number of unintended medication discrepancies, and physician acceptance were tested as outcome measures.

Results

One hundred and forty adult patients were randomized, of which 66 patients in the intervention received MR within 24 hours, while 58 patients in control received MR at some point during admission. The most common condition in the study group was hypertension (coronary heart disease in the control group). The workflow of the study group can save an average 7 minutes per patient compared with the WHO recommended process [17.5 minutes (IQR 14.00, 28.25) vs 24.5 minutes (IQR17.75, 35.25), p = 0.004]. The number of unintended discrepancies was 42 in the study group and 34 in the control group (p = 0.33). Physicians' acceptance in the study and control groups were 87.5% and 92.3%, respectively (p = 0.87).

Conclusion

The results suggest that changes in outcome measures were in the appropriate direction and that the time limit for implementing MR can be set within 48 hours. A future multi-centre RCT study to determine the effectiveness of MR is feasible and warranted.

Development and validation of a ready-to-use score to prioritise medication reconciliation at patient admission in an orthopaedic and trauma department

OBJECTIVE

Medication reconciliation (MR) is recognised as an important tool in preventing medication errors such as unintentional discrepancies (UDs). The aim of this study was to identify independent predictive factors of UDs during MR at patient admission to an orthopaedic and trauma department. The secondary objective was to build and validate a ready-to-use score to prioritise patients.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed on 3.5 years of pharmacist-led MR in the orthopaedic and trauma department of a large university teaching hospital. Independent predictors of UD were identified by multivariable logistic regression. A priority score to identify patients at risk of at least one UD was constructed from the odds ratios of the risk factors, and validated in a separate cohort. Performance was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit.

RESULTS

In total, 888 patients were included and 387 UDs were identified, mainly drug omissions (65.1%). Five independent predictors of UD were identified: age >75 years (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.00; p<0.001), admission during school holidays (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.44; p=0.005), female gender (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.16; p<0.001), emergency hospitalisation (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.92; p<0.001), and ≥5 medications on the best possible medication history (BPMH) (OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.20 to 4.94; p<0.001). Based on these predictors, a priority score ranging from 0 to 10 was built and internally and externally validated (C statistic 0.72, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the high prevalence of UD in patients admitted to orthopaedic and trauma surgery departments. Five independent predictive factors of UD during MR were identified (female gender, emergency hospitalisation, hospitalisation during school holidays, age ≥75 years, and ≥5 medicines on the BPMH). The developed risk score will help to prioritise MR among patients at risk of medication error and is ready-to-use in other orthopaedic and trauma departments.

Risk factors for clinically relevant deviations in patients' medication lists reported by patients in personal health records: a prospective cohort study in a hospital setting

Background Personal health records have the potential to identify medication discrepancies. Although they facilitate patient empowerment and broad implementation of medication reconciliation, more medication discrepancies are identified through medication reconciliation performed by healthcare professionals. Aim We aimed to identify the factors associated with the occurrence of a clinically relevant deviation in a patient’s medication list based on a personal health record (used by patients) compared to medication reconciliation performed by a healthcare professional. Method Three- to 14 days prior to a planned admission to the Cardiology-, Internal Medicine- or Neurology Departments, at Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands, patients were invited to update their medication file in their personal health records. At admission, medication reconciliation was performed by a pharmacy technician. Deviations were determined as differences between these medication lists. Associations between patient-, setting-, and medication-related factors, and the occurrence of a clinically relevant deviation (National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention class \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ E) were analysed. Results Of the 488 patients approached, 155 patients were included. Twenty-four clinically relevant deviations were observed. Younger patients (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.94; 95%CI:0.91–0.98), patients who used individual multi-dose packaging (aOR 14.87; 95%CI:2.02–110), and patients who used \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ 8 different medications, were at highest risk for the occurrence of a clinically relevant deviation (sensitivity 0.71; specificity 0.62; area under the curve 0.64 95%CI:0.52–0.76). Conclusion Medication reconciliation is the preferred method to identify medication discrepancies for patients with individual multi-dose packaging, and patients who used eight or more different medications.

Value of pharmacy services upon admission to an orthopedic surgery unit

Background

In Lebanon, the role of the pharmacist remains underestimated in the medication reconciliation process, especially in surgical departments. This study aims to assess the impact of pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation performed within 48 h of hospital admission to the orthopedic surgical department.

Methods

This was a prospective single-arm study conducted in a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Lebanon between October 2019 and April 2020. Participants were adult inpatients hospitalized for orthopedic surgeries with ≥ 1 outpatient medications. Properly trained pharmacy resident obtained the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and led the reconciliation process. The primary endpoint was the number of reconciliation errors (REs) identified. Descriptive statistics were used to report participants’ responses and relevant findings. Linear regression was performed with the number of REs as a continuous dependent variable using backward method. Results were assumed to be significant when p was < 0.05.

Results

The study included 100 patients with a mean age of 73.8 years, admitted for elective (54%) or emergency (46%) surgeries. Half of the study population had ≥ 5 home medications. The mean time for taking BPMH was around 8 min. A total of 110 REs were identified in 74 patient cases. The most common discrepancies consisted of medication omission (89.1%) and the most common medications involved were antihyperlipidemic agents. Twenty-four REs were judged as clinically significant, and four as serious. The most common interventions included the addition of a medication (71.9%). Most of the relayed interventions (84.5%) were accepted. The number of home medications was the only variable significantly associated with the number of REs (β 0.492; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Pharmacy-led medication reconciliation upon admission to orthopedic surgery department can reduce reconciliation errors and improve medication safety.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered in the Lebanon Clinical Trials Registry (LBCTR2020124680).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00384-x.

Medication Reconciliation During Hospitalization and in Hospital-Home Interface: An Observational Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Medication errors are one of the leading causes of patient harms. Medication reconciliation is a fundamental process that to be effective, it should be embraced during each single care transition. Our objectives were to investigate current medication reconciliation practices in the 2 Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio hospitals and comprehensively assess the quality of medication reconciliation practices between inpatient and outpatient care by analyzing the medication patterns 6 months before admission, during hospitalization, and 9 months after discharge for a selected group of patients with cardiovascular diseases.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Cardiothoracic Department of the Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio hospitals. Medication history was reviewed for all the patients admitted from and discharged to the community, from January to March 2013. Patients were excluded if they had less than 4 drugs or less than 2 drugs for cardiovascular system in their prescription list at admission or if they died during follow-up. We selected 714 patients, and we obtained the clinical charts and all drug prescriptions collected during patients' hospitalization by the electronic clinical recording system. We also analyzed the list of prescriptions of this sample of patients, from 6 months before admission to 9 months after discharge, extracted from the regional prescription registry. In the resulting sample, prescriptions were analyzed to assess unintentional discrepancies.

RESULTS

The study included 298 patients (mean age, 71.2 years), according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among 14,573 prescriptions analyzed, we found 4363 discrepancies (14.6 discrepancies per patient). Among these discrepancies, 1310 were classified as unintentional (4.4 discrepancies per patient). Among unintentional discrepancies, only 63 (4.8%) took place during hospitalization. Although at the hospital-home interface, 33.1% of unintentional discrepancies were detected through the comparison between the patients' declared therapy and the previous medication consumption and 62.1% were identified in the comparison between the prescription at the discharge and the following medication pattern at home.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication errors have important implications for patient safety, and their identification is a main target for improving clinical practice. The comparison between the medication patterns acquired through the regional prescription registry before and after hospitalization outlined critical touchpoint in the current medication reconciliation process, calling for the definition of shared medication reconciliation standards between hospitals and primary care services to minimize medication discrepancies and enhance patient safety.

Impact of a preoperative pharmaceutical consultation in scheduled orthopedic surgery on admission: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Medication errors have a high prevalence in surgery and management of home medication is strongly involved in these errors. In scheduled surgery, the preoperative consultation is a privileged time to inform the patient about the management of her/his home medication before admission. This study assessed the impact of a pre-anesthesia best possible medication history (PA-BPMH) on admission. The PA-BPMH was performed by a clinical pharmacist prior to the anesthesia consultation for anesthesiologists to prescribe admission medical orders for scheduled orthopedic surgery patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study which was carried out in an orthopedic surgery department. All patients over 18 years old with an elective orthopedic surgery were eligible except ambulatory surgery patients. The pharmacist registered the PA-BPMH into the software making it available for anesthesiologists for the pre-admission medication order. Finally, a medication reconciliation was performed at admission. The main outcome was the percentage of patients with at least one unintended medication discrepancy (UMD) at admission. The nature, potential clinical impact and acceptance rate of each UMD detected were assessed. Also, the PA-BPMH process was described and patients and anesthesiologists satisfaction was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 455 patients had a pharmaceutical consultation. Medication reconciliation was performed at admission for 360 patients. Overall, at least one UMD was observed in 13.0% of patients (n = 47). A total of 63 UMD were detected. The most common type of UMD was omission (25.4%) and incorrect drug (23.8%).Two UMD (3.2%) were evaluated as life threatening. All the UMD detected were corrected on the admission medication order.

CONCLUSION

A preoperative pharmacist-anesthesiologist teamwork seems to improve the safety of perioperative management of home medication for scheduled orthopedic surgery patients. This process needs a randomized clinical trial across a wider range of surgeries before its implementation.

Quantifying the Crisis: Opioid-Related Adverse Events in Outpatient Ambulatory Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The United States is currently in the midst of an opioid epidemic precipitated, in part, by the excessive outpatient supply of opioid pain medications. Accordingly, this epidemic has necessitated evaluation of practice and prescription patterns among surgical specialties. The purpose of this study was to quantify opioid-related adverse events in ambulatory plastic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 43,074 patient profiles captured from 2001 to 2018 within an American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities quality improvement database was conducted. Free-text search terms related to opioids and overdose were used to identify opioid-related adverse events. Extracted profiles included information submitted by accredited ambulatory surgery facilities and their respective surgeons. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify opioid-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Among our cohort, 28 plastic surgery patients were identified as having an opioid-related adverse event. Overall, there were three fatal and 12 nonfatal opioid-related overdoses, nine perioperative opioid-related adverse events, and four cases of opioid-related hypersensitivities or complications secondary to opioid tolerance. Of the nonfatal cases evaluated in the hospital (n = 17), 16 patients required admission, with an average 3.3 ± 1.7 days' hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid-related adverse events are notable occurrences in ambulatory plastic surgery. Several adverse events may have been prevented had different diligent medication prescription practices been performed. Currently, there is more advocacy supporting sparing opioid medications when possible through multimodal anesthetic techniques, education of patients on the risks and harms of opioid use and misuse, and the development of societal guidance regarding ambulatory surgery prescription practices.

Piloting Medication Histories in a Pediatric Postanesthesia Care Unit

PURPOSE

Develop a medication history process for pediatric postanesthesia care unit (PACU) patients to identify discrepancies between home and inpatient medications and prevent medication errors.

DESIGN

Pilot an evidence-based practice change to perform PACU medication histories.

METHODS

Inpatients or surgical admissions to general care units at a pediatric tertiary care 348-bed hospital ages 2-18 years were included. Parents/guardians were asked about their child's prescription and over-the-counter medications, allergies, and adherence. Data included patient age, surgery, medication categories, and error classifications. Information was compared to the patient's medical record.

FINDINGS

From June to July 2016, 75 medication histories were performed, covering 44.6% of eligible cases within the period. Seventy-four discrepancies were found, the most frequent being omission. The medication category with the most errors was vitamins/herbals/supplements.

CONCLUSION

The workflow designed assessed discrepancy frequency and type in surgical patients' medication lists when transitioning from the PACU to general care units.

Implications of involving pharmacy technicians in obtaining a best possible medication history from the perspectives of pharmaceutical, medical and nursing staff: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, the involvement of pharmacy technicians in medication reconciliation has increasingly been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the implications on professional roles and collaboration when a best possible medication history (BPMH) at admission is obtained by pharmacy technicians.

DESIGN

Qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using a qualitative content analysis approach.

SETTING

Internal medicine units in two mid-sized Swiss hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

21 staff members working at the two sites (6 pharmacy technicians, 2 pharmacists, 6 nurses, 5 physician residents and 2 senior physicians).

RESULTS

Pharmacy technicians generally appreciated their new tasks in obtaining a BPMH. However, they also experienced challenges associated with their new role. Interviewees reported unease with direct patient interaction and challenges with integrating the new BPMH tasks into their regular daily duties. We found that pharmacists played a key role in the BPMH process, since they act as coaches for pharmacy technicians, transmit information to the physicians and reconcile preadmission medication lists with admission orders. Physicians stated that they benefitted from the delegation of administrative tasks to pharmacy technicians. Regarding the interprofessional collaboration, we found that pharmacy technicians in the study acted on a preliminary administrative level and did not become part of the larger treatment team. There was no direct interaction between pharmacy technicians and physicians, but rather, the supervising pharmacists acted as intermediaries.

CONCLUSION

The tasks assumed by pharmacy technicians need to be clearly defined and fully integrated into existing processes. Engaging pharmacy technicians may generate new patient safety risks and inefficiencies due to process fragmentation. Communication and information flow at the interfaces between professional groups therefore need to be well organised. More research is needed to understand if and under which circumstances such a model can be efficient and contribute to improving medication safety.

An admission medication reconciliation programme carried out by pharmacists: impact on surgeons' prescriptions

Objectives

To describe a medication reconciliation (MR) procedure prepared by the pharmacist for patients admitted for elective surgery and to assess the surgeon's degree of acceptance.

Methods

A 1-year retrospective observational study was conducted. The patient population consisted of patients aged ≥18 years admitted during 2016 for elective surgery and whose planned length of hospital stay was >24 hours. A pharmacist performed MR following a specific protocol. A review of the reconciliations prescribed later by the surgeons was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed for qualitative and quantitative variables.

Results

The pharmacist prepared a total of 1986 reconciliation reports. The 179 patients reviewed in this study had a mean age of 65.7±11.8 years, 49.2% were women and 98.9% of patients were reconciled by the surgeon in the operating theatre using an electronic prescribing system (85.5% were fully reconciled).

Conclusion

The hospital's MR protocol resulted in almost 100% of patients being reconciled within the subgroup of elective surgery patients by the prescribing surgeons.

The role of clinical pharmacists in the optimisation of medication prescription and reconciliation on admission in an emergency department

Objectives

To describe a clinical pharmacist's (CP) activity in an emergency department (ED) regarding medication reconciliation and optimisation of pharmacotherapy of patients at hospital admission.

Methods

A 1-year prospective observational study was conducted to analyse the activity of a CP in the ED of a 350-bed hospital in Spain. The CP reviewed home medications and medical prescriptions of patients to perform medication reconciliation if required and intervene if medication errors were detected.

Results

The CP reviewed medications and medical orders of 1048 patients. 816 patients had home medication: 440 patients (53.9%) were correctly reconciled by the physician; 136 (16.7%) were reconciled by the physician with unintentional discrepancies; and 240 (29.4%) by the CP, with a higher percentage in patients admitted to surgical departments (χ²:38.698; P<0.001). Following pharmaceutical validation, 434 pharmaceutical interventions were performed.

Conclusions

The presence of a CP in an ED could increase the detection of reconciliation errors and help resolve medication errors.

Appropriate Reconciliation of Cardiovascular Medications After Elective Surgery and Postdischarge Acute Hospital and Ambulatory Visits

OBJECTIVE

To describe appropriate discharge reconciliation of cardiovascular medications and assess associations with postdischarge healthcare utilization in surgical patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study from January 2007 to December 2011.

SETTING

An academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Seven hundred and fifty-two adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery and taking antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, or statin lipid-lowering agents before surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary predictor: appropriate discharge reconciliation of preoperative cardiovascular medications (continuation without documented contraindications). Primary outcomes: acute hospital visits (emergency department visits or hospitalizations) and unplanned ambulatory visits (primary care or surgical) at 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperative medications were appropriately reconciled in 436 (58.0%) patients. For individual medications, appropriate discharge reconciliation occurred for 156 of the 327 patients on antiplatelet agents (47.7%), 507 of the 624 patients on beta-blockers (81.3%), 259 of the 361 patients on renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (71.8%), and 302 of the 406 patients on statins (74.4%). In multivariable analyses, appropriate reconciliation of all preoperative medications was not associated with acute hospital (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.41) or unplanned ambulatory visits (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.94-2.35). Appropriate reconciliation of statin therapy was associated with lower odds of acute hospital visits (AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85). There were no other statistically significant associations between appropriate reconciliation of individual medications and either outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although large gaps in appropriate discharge reconciliation of chronic cardiovascular medications were common in patients undergoing elective surgery, these gaps were not consistently associated with postdischarge acute hospital or ambulatory visits.