Considerations of prescribers and pharmacists for the use of non-selective β-blockers in asthma and COPD patients: An explorative study

Metoprolol decreases retention of fear memory and facilitates long-term depression in lateral amygdala

Posttraumatic stress disorder is a mental disorder with a known cause, yet effective behavioral and pharmacotherapies remain elusive for many afflicted patients. Propranolol is suggested to be effective as a fear-reducing agent when paired with behavioral therapy soon after trauma when psychological stress is high, possibly dampening or preventing the later development of posttraumatic stress disorder. In our previous study, we found propranolol efficaciously reduced fear retention induced by reactivation via β-adrenergic receptors in lateral amygdala. However, it is unclear which subtypes of β-adrenergic receptors dominate the function of adrenergic activation in lateral amygdala. In this study, we investigated the action of β1-adrenergic receptor antagonist-metoprolol and β2-adrenergic receptor antagonist-butoxamine on the retention of conditioned fear memory and synaptic adaptation in the lateral amygdala of rats. We found metoprolol not butoxamine attenuated the reactivation-induced strengthening of fear retention and restored the impaired long-term depression in lateral amygdala. Intra-amygdala infusion of metoprolol not butoxamine attenuated reactivation-induced enhancement of fear retention. Our results suggest that β1-adrenergic receptor antagonist-metoprolol may be more suitable for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder.

An estimation of patients at potential risk for drug-induced sexual dysfunction using pharmacy dispensing data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Adverse drug reactions on sexual functioning (sADRs) may seriously decrease a person's quality of life. A multitude of diseases and drugs are known risk factors for sexual dysfunction. To inform patients better about these potential effects, more insight is needed on the estimated number of patients at high risk for sADRs and their characteristics.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study estimated the number of patients in the Netherlands who were dispensed drugs with a potential very high risk (>10%) or high risk (1-10%) for sADRs as registered in the Summary of Product Characteristics, the official drug information text in Europe.

RESULTS

In April 2019, 2.06% of the inhabitants of the Netherlands received drugs with >10% risk for sADRs and 7.76% with 1-10% risk. The majority of these patients had at least one additional risk factor for decreased sexual function such as high age or depression. Almost half of the patients were identified with two or more morbidities influencing sexual functioning. Paroxetine, sertraline and spironolactone were the most dispensed drugs with a potential >10% risk for sADRs. One-third of their first dispenses were not followed by a second dispense, with a higher risk of discontinuation for a decreasing number of morbidities.

CONCLUSION

About 1 in 11 inhabitants of the Netherlands was dispensed a drug with a potential high risk for sADRs, often with other risk factors for sexual complaints. Further research is needed whether these users actually experience sADRs, to understand its impact on multimorbid patients and to provide alternatives if needed.

InterMiG: international differences in the therapeutic approach to migraine patients in specialized headache centers

Background

There is currently a wide therapeutic arsenal for migraine patients, without a single first-line preventive drug and we choose the different available alternatives taking into account comorbidities, national guidelines, previous treatments and personal experiences.

Our objective was to evaluate the differences in the use of migraine treatments between neurologists from different countries.

Methods

This is a multi-centre observational study carried out by neurologists from specialized headache units in seven countries, retrospective with consecutive inclusion of all patients presenting with a migraine diagnosis, over a period of three months.

Results

A total of 734 patients were recruited but only 600 were considered in the analysis in order to homogenize the patient cohorts from countries: 200 Spain (ES), 100 Italy (IT), 85 Russia (RUS), 80 Germany (DE), 60 Portugal (PT), 45 Poland (PL) and 30 Australia (AU). 85.4 % of patients were women with a mean age of 42.6 ± 11.8 years. Considering previous and current preventive treatment, the order of use was: antidepressants (69.3 %), antiepileptic drugs (54.7 %), beta-blockers and antihypertensive drugs (49.7 %), OnabotulinumtoxinA (44.0 %) and others (36.2 %).

Statistically significant differences were found between all pharmacological classes: antidepressants were commonly used in all countries, with the exception of Poland (AU: 76.7 %, IT: 71.0 %, DE: 60.0 %, PL: 31.1 %, PT: 71.7 %, RUS: 70.6 %, ES: 78.5 %; p < 0.0001); antiepileptic drugs were more frequently prescribed in Portugal, Australia and Spain (AU: 73.3 %, IT: 40.0 %, DE: 37.5 %, PL: 48.9 %, PT: 85.0 %, RUS: 29.4 % and ES: 69.0 %; p < 0.0001); beta-blockers and antihypertensive drugs were frequently used in all countries except Italy (AU: 60.0 %, IT: 14.0 %, DE: 53.8 %, PL: 48.9 %, PT: 68.3 %, RUS: 49.4 % and ES: 59.0 %; p < 0.0001); BTX-A were predominately used in Spain, Italy and Australia (AU:56.7 %, IT:58.0 %, DE:20.0 %, PL: 42.2 %, PT: 26.7 %, RUS: 24.7 % and ES: 58.5 %; p < 0.0001) and others were most frequently used in Poland (AU: 0.0 %, IT: 19.0 %, DE: 42.5 %, PL: 95.6 %, PT: 31.7 %, RUS: 3.5 % and ES: 49.5 %; p < 0.0001). If only patients without comorbidities are considered (200/600), statistically differences between countries persist in all preventive treatments.

Conclusions

There is heterogeneity in the choice of preventive treatment between different countries. Prospective comparative studies of the different oral and subcutaneous alternatives would help to create a global therapeutic algorithm that would guarantee the best option for our patients.

The safety of cardioselective β1-blockers in asthma: literature review and search of global pharmacovigilance safety reports

INTRODUCTION

Beta-blockers are key in the management of cardiovascular diseases but blocking airway β2-receptors can cause severe and sometimes fatal bronchoconstriction in people with asthma. Although cardioselective β1-blockers may be safer than non-selective β-blockers, they remain relatively contraindicated and under-prescribed. We review the evidence of the risk associated with cardioselective β1-blocker use in asthma.

METHODS

We searched "asthma" AND "beta-blocker" in PubMed and EmbaseOvid from start to May 2020. The World Health Organization (WHO) global database of individual case safety reports (VigiBase) was searched for reports of fatal asthma or bronchospasm and listed cardioselective β1-blocker use (accessed February 2020). Reports were examined for evidence of pre-existing asthma.

RESULTS

PubMed and EmbaseOvid searches identified 304 and 327 publications, respectively. No published reports of severe or fatal asthma associated with cardioselective β1-blockers were found. Three large observational studies reported no increase in asthma exacerbations with cardioselective β1-blocker treatment. The VigiBase search identified five reports of fatalities in patients with pre-existing asthma and reporting asthma or bronchospasm during cardioselective β1-blocker use. Four of these deaths were unrelated to cardioselective β1-blocker use. The circumstances of the fifth death were unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no published reports of cardioselective β1-blockers causing asthma death. Observational data suggest that cardioselective β1-blocker use is not associated with increased asthma exacerbations. We found only one report of an asthma death potentially caused by cardioselective β1-blockers in a patient with asthma in a search of VigiBase. The reluctance to use cardioselective β1-blockers in people with asthma is not supported by this evidence.

Current Bronchodilator Responsiveness Criteria Underestimate Asthma in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Asthma is common in older adults and is confirmed by demonstration of variable expiratory air-flow limitations, typically evaluated by spirometric assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness. However, many patients with clinically suspected asthma and documented air-flow obstruction do not exhibit a post-bronchodilator response that meets or exceeds current established guidelines. We investigated if extending the time from bronchodilator administration to assessment of bronchodilator response increases the yield of spirometry for the diagnosis of asthma in older adults.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. The subjects were non-smokers, ≥ 60 y old, and with suspected asthma. Subjects were characterized as (1) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, (2) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 60-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, and (3) those without a positive bronchodilator response but with a positive methacholine challenge test. Factors associated with a late response to bronchodilator were evaluated by using bivariate analysis and by multivariate analysis by using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 165 subjects. Of these, 81 (49.1%) had a positive bronchodilator response on 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry; 25 (15.2%) had a positive bronchodilator response on the 1-h post-bronchodilator spirometry; and 59 (35.8%) had no positive bronchodilator response but had a positive methacholine challenge test. On multivariable regression analysis, those with a higher baseline percentage of predicted FEV₁, higher scores on a standard asthma control test, and wheezing and/or cough after exercise were more likely to either have a late bronchodilator response or no bronchodilator response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that a late positive response to bronchodilator use was more common than previously presumed in older subjects with suspected asthma. Pulmonary function testing laboratories should consider routinely reassessing spirometry at 1 h after bronchodilator use if the earlier assessment did not reveal a significant response.

Beta-blockers in asthma: myth and reality

Introduction: Patients with asthma often have important co-morbidities which reduce the likelihood of gaining optimal asthma control. Beta2-blockers are commonly prescribed for the treatment of different clinical indications, including coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmia, arterial hypertension, heart failure and glaucoma. Areas covered: The aim of this reviw is to summarize current evidence on the effect of systemic and local β-blockers on asthma outcomes based on their pharmacologic properties,and to help clinicians when prescribing for patients with asthma and co-morbidities. Current data suggest that risk of asthma worsening from systemic and local use of non-selective β-blockers outweighs any potential benefits for their clinical indications. Recent studies confirm that topical and systemic prescription of cardio-selective β-blockers is not associated with a significant increased risk of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations. Expert opinion: Non-selective β-blockers should not be prescribed for the management of comorbidities in patients with asthma while cardio-selective β-blockers, preferably in low doses, may be used when strongly indicated and other therapeutic options are not available. More prospective real-life studies are needed to evaluate the risk of long-term use of β-blockers in patients with asthma.

Considerations of prescribers and pharmacists for the use of non-selective β-blockers in asthma and COPD patients: An explorative study

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

Despite recommendations in prevailing guidelines to avoid the use of non-selective (NS) β-blockers in patients with asthma or COPD, on average, 10 patients per community pharmacy receive NS β-blockers monthly. The aim of our study was to identify the reasons of prescribers and pharmacists to treat asthma and COPD patients with NS β-blockers.

METHODS

Fifty-three community pharmacists in the Netherlands selected patients with actual concurrent use of inhalation medication and NS β-blockers. For at least 5 patients, each pharmacist screened all medication surveillance signals and actions taken at first dispensing. Each pharmacist selected 3 different initial prescribers for a short interview to explore their awareness of the co-morbidity and reasons to apply NS β-blockers.

RESULTS

Pharmacists identified 827 asthma/COPD patients with actual use of NS β-blockers. From these, 153 NS β-blocker prescribers were selected and interviewed (64 general practitioners, 45 ophthalmologists, 24 cardiologists, and 20 other prescribers). One hundred seven prescribers were aware of the drug-disease interaction of the asthma or COPD co-morbidity when initiating the NS β-blocker, and 46 were not. From these, 40 prescribers did not consider the contraindication to be relevant. For 299 patients, medication surveillance signals and actions at first dispensing were retrieved. Patients used predominantly ocular timolol (39.8%), and the oral preparations propranolol (30.8%) and carvedilol (15.1%). In 154 cases, the pharmacy system generated a warning alert.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of prescribers was unaware of the co-morbidity or did not regard NS β-blockers contraindicated, despite prevailing clinical guidelines. Improvement programs should target prescribers' awareness and knowledge of NS β-blockers in patients with asthma or COPD.