Feasibility of an 8-item questionnaire for early diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in primary care

Diagnostic delay in inflammatory bowel diseases in a German population

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis is key to prevent bowel damage in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Risk factor analyses linked with delayed diagnosis in European IBD patients are scarce and no data in German IBD patients exists.

AIM

To identify risk factors leading to prolonged diagnostic time in a German IBD cohort.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2022, 430 IBD patients from four Berlin hospitals were enrolled in a prospective study and asked to complete a 16-item questionnaire to determine features of the path leading to IBD diagnosis. Total diagnostic time was defined as the time from symptom onset to consulting a physician (patient waiting time) and from first consultation to IBD diagnosis (physician diagnostic time). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for each time period.

RESULTS

The total diagnostic time was significantly longer in Crohn's disease (CD) compared to ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (12.0 vs 4.0 mo; P < 0.001), mainly due to increased physician diagnostic time (5.5 vs 1.0 mo; P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the predominant symptoms diarrhea (P = 0.012) and skin lesions (P = 0.028) as well as performed gastroscopy (P = 0.042) were associated with longer physician diagnostic time in CD patients. In UC, fever was correlated (P = 0.020) with shorter physician diagnostic time, while fatigue (P = 0.011) and positive family history (P = 0.046) were correlated with longer physician diagnostic time.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that CD patients compared to UC are at risk of long diagnostic delay. Future efforts should focus on shortening the diagnostic delay for a better outcome in these patients.

Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: Evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations

Background:

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with comorbidities that contribute to poor health, impaired life quality, and mortality risk.

Objective:

To provide evidence-based screening recommendations for comorbidities linked to HS.

Methods:

Systematic reviews were performed to summarize evidence on the prevalence and incidence of 30 comorbidities in patients with HS relative to the general population. The screening recommendation for each comorbidity was informed by the consistency and quality of existing studies, disease prevalence, and magnitude of association, as well as benefits, harms, and feasibility of screening. The level of evidence and strength of corresponding screening recommendation were graded by using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) criteria.

Results:

Screening is recommended for the following comorbidities: acne, dissecting cellulitis of the scalp, pilonidal disease, pyoderma gangrenosum, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, suicide, smoking, substance use disorder, polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, spondyloarthritis, and sexual dysfunction. It is also recommended to screen patients with Down syndrome for HS. The decision to screen for specific comorbidities may vary with patient risk factors. The role of the dermatologist in screening varies according to comorbidity.

Limitations:

Screening recommendations represent one component of a comprehensive care strategy.

Conclusions:

Dermatologists should support screening efforts to identify comorbid conditions in HS.

Diagnostic accuracy of faecal calprotectin in a symptom-based algorithm for early diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease adjusting for differential verification bias using a Bayesian approach

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic delay in IBD is a major problem and diagnosis is frequently arrived when irreversible damage has already occurred. This study evaluated accuracy of faecal calprotectin (fCAL) integrated with diagnostic criteria for early diagnosis of IBD in a primary care setting.

METHODS

General practitioners (GPs) were trained to recognize alarm symptoms for IBD classified as major and minor criteria. Fulfilment of one major or at least two minor criteria was followed by free fCAL testing and a visit by an IBD specialist and follow-up over 12 months. All patients with positive fCAL testing, i.e., ≥70 μg/g underwent colonoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of fCAL was estimated after adjusting for differential-verification bias following a Bayesian approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-four GPs participated in the study and 133 patients were tested for fCAL between July 2016 and August 2017. Positivity of fCAL was seen in 45/133 patients (34%) and a final IBD diagnosis was made in 10/45 (22%). According to the threshold of 70 μg/g, fCAL achieved a sensitivity of 74.8% (95%CI: 39.10-96.01%), a specificity of 70.4% (95%CI: 61.76-78.16%) and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 70.6% (95%CI: 61.04-78.37%). As for prognostic accuracy, despite positive predictive value being low, 21.9% (95%CI: 11.74-35.18%), the negative predictive value was definitely higher: 96.2% (95%CI: 84.96-99.51%).

CONCLUSIONS

fCAL with a threshold set at 70 μg/g seems to represent a potentially reliable negative test to be used in primary care settings for patients with symptoms suggestive of IBD.

Prevalence and patient awareness of inflammatory bowel disease in Kazakhstan: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

There has been a paucity of published data on the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Therefore, we aimed to study IBD prevalence and patient awareness among adults in Kazakhstan.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was carried out among subjects of both sexes aged 18 years and older using IBD Alert Questionnaire (CalproQuest), single fecal calprotectin test, and endoscopy with biopsy to verify IBD from January to December 2017, across regions of Kazakhstan. All participants were included in the study after providing informed consent.

RESULTS

Out of 115,556 subjects, there were 128 confirmed IBD cases, in which 36 Crohn's disease (CD) and 92 ulcerative colitis (UC) cases identified. The age and sex-adjusted IBD prevalence were 113.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.0-158.9) per 100,000 population. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence for UC were 84.4 (95% CI, 44.8-123.9) and for CD were 29.5 (95% CI, 8.2-50.9) per 100,000 population.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on the prevalence of IBD with a verified diagnosis in the Central Asia and could be used to better plan and allocate healthcare resources for IBD management program.

Development and Validation of the IBD-REFER Criteria: Early Referral for Suspected Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Adults and Children

Background

Early treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with positive outcomes but a significant diagnostic delay has been reported in most countries.

Aim

We aimed to develop and validate IBD-REFER criteria, intended for primary care physicians, to screen patients at risk for IBD.

Methods

A Delphi group of 10 experts generated a list of symptoms associated with the onset of IBD, supplemented by a review of the literature. The list was reduced in an iterative process and graded based on importance. For data-driven statistical formatting, the charts of 200 IBD (100 children, 100 adults) and 100 non-IBD controls but with gastrointestinal symptoms were reviewed. The IBD-REFER items were scored for each subject, as well as the contending Red Flag criteria from the International Organization for the Study of IBD. External validation was performed on additionally enrolled cohorts of 100 IBD patients and 50 controls.

Results

The Delphi process retained 5 items as major criteria (≥1 item required for early referral) and 11 as minor (≥2 items required). Following the removal of uninformative items and further formatting in the data-driven stage, 10 core items were retained: 3 as major and 7 as minor. In the external validation, the final IBD-REFER criteria had a sensitivity/specificity of 98%/96% in adults and 96%/96% in children, significantly higher than achieved by the Red Flag criteria (71%/84% and 60%/88%, respectively; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The IBD-REFER criteria may guide the selection of patients for expedited gastrointestinal investigation.

Can the CalproQuest predict a positive Calprotectin test? A prospective diagnostic study

Background

Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in primary care (PC) is challenging and associated with a considerable diagnostic delay. Using a calprotectin test for any PC patient with abdominal complaints would cause significant costs. The 8-item-questionnaire CalproQuest was developed to increase the pre-test probability for a positive Calprotectin. It is a feasible instrument to assess IBD in PC, but has not yet been evaluated in clinical routine. This study, therefore, aimed to validate whether the CalproQuest increases pretest-probability for a positive fecal Calprotectin.

Methods

Prospective diagnostic trial. The CalproQuest consists of 4 major and 4 minor questions suggestive for IBD. It is considered positive if ≥ 2 major or 1 major and 2 minor criteria are positive. Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity of the CalproQuest for Calprotectin levels ≥ 50 μg/g and for positive IBD diagnosis among patients referred to endoscopic evaluation at secondary care level. Secondary finding: Patient-reported diagnostic delay.

Results

156 patients from 7 study centers had a complete CalproQuest and fecal Calprotectin test. The sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for Calprotectin ≥ 50 μg/g was 36% and 57%. The sensitivity and specificity of the CalproQuest for positive IBD diagnosis was 37% and 67%. The diagnostic delay was 61 months (SD 125.2).

Conclusion

In this prospective diagnostic study, the sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for Calprotectin levels ≥ 50 μg/g and positive IBD diagnosis were poor. Additional prospective studies concerning the ideal cut-off values, validity and cost-effectiveness of a combined use with the Calprotectin test in the PC setting are necessary.