How mothers feel: Validation of a measure of maternal mood

Patient-reported outcome measures evaluating postpartum maternal health and well-being: a systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically review and evaluate postpartum health and well-being using patient-reported outcome measures across all domains of postpartum health using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Based on a preprepared published protocol, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL was undertaken to identify patient-reported outcome tools. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42021283472), and this work followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines for systematic reviews.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies eligible for inclusion included those that assessed a patient-reported outcome measure examining postpartum women's health and well-being with no limitation on the domain. The included studies aimed to evaluate one or more measurement properties of the patient-reported outcome measure.

METHODS

Data extraction and the methodological assessment of the quality of the patient-reported outcome measure were assessed by 2 reviewers independently based on content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity or measurement invariance, reliability, measurement error, hypotheses testing for construct validity, and responsiveness, as defined by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. The standard used for content validity were the domains of importance to women in postpartum health and well-being proposed by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. The outcome domains for patient-reported health status include mental health, health-related quality of life, incontinence, pain with intercourse, breastfeeding, and motherhood role transition. The quality of the methods was rated an overall rating of results, awarded a level of evidence, and assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations assessment tool, and a level of recommendation was awarded for each tool.

RESULTS

There were 10,324 studies identified in the initial search, of which 29 tools were identified from 41 eligible studies included in the review. Moreover, 21 tools were awarded an "A" grading of recommendation for use as a patient-reported outcome measure in postpartum women following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments standards. Of the "A"-rated tools, 17 (80%) examined the domain of mental health, 5 examined health-related quality of life, 4 examined breastfeeding, and 6 represented role transition. No "A"-recommended tool examined postpartum incontinence or pain with intercourse. Of note, 3 tools did not cover domains as recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, and 5 tools were awarded a "B" rating, requiring more research before their recommendation for use. Here, most tools were awarded very low-moderate Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations level of evidence. Moreover, the highest quality tool identified that covered multiple domains of postpartum health and well-being was the women's Postpartum Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified the best performing patient-reported outcome measures to assess postpartum health and well-being. No individual tool covers all 6 domains of postpartum health and well-being. Here, the highest quality tool found that covered multiple domains of postpartum health and well-being was the Postpartum Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. The Postpartum Quality-of-Life Questionnaire captures 4 of 6 domains of importance to women, with domains of incontinence and sexual health unevaluated. The domain of urinary incontinence was represented by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form, which requires further psychometric analysis before its recommended use. Postpartum sexual health, not represented by any tool, necessitates the development of a patient-reported outcome measure. A postpartum patient-reported outcome measure would be best provided by a combination of tools; however, further research is required before its implementation.

How mothers feel: Validation of a measure of maternal mood

RATIONALE

Low mood may affect developing relationships with a new baby, partner and family. Early identification of mood disturbance is crucial to improve outcomes for women perinatally. Instruments such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) are used routinely, with evidence that some women do not feel comfortable with how they are asked about their mental health.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a mood checklist as a user-friendly, effective measure of well-being in post-partum women, for use by health professionals.

METHODS

Cognitive interviews with women who had recently given birth assessed response format and face validity of a prototype measure. A cross-sectional survey followed. A random split-half instrument development protocol was used. Exploratory factor analysis determined factor structure with the first sample,. The second sample confirmed factor structure and evaluationof key psychometric variables and known-groups discriminant validity (KGDV), requiring a supplementary between-subjects design with stratification based on case negative/case positive classification using EPDSscreening cut-off criteria.

RESULTS

Cognitive interview data confirmed the face validity of the measure. Exploratory factor analysis indicated an 18 item two-factor model with two (negatively) correlated factors. Factor 1 loaded with items reflecting positive mood and factor 2 negative items. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit to the two-factor model across the full spectrum of fit indices. Statistically significant differences between groups were observed in relation to as EPDS caseness classification. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the positive and negative subscales revealed acceptable internal consistency of 0.79 and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The outcome checklist may be appropriate for use in clinical practice. It demonstrated effective psychometric properties and clear cross-validation with existing commonly used measures.