(Dis)respect and shame in the context of 'medically unexplained' illness

Sources of diagnostic delay for people with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: Qualitative research study

OBJECTIVE

An improved understanding of the causes and experience of diagnostic delay in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).

METHODS

Framework analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 adults with IBD.

RESULTS

Participants' prior knowledge of normal bowel function/IBD was limited. Symptoms were sometimes misattributed to mild/transient conditions or normalised until intolerable. Family pressures, work, education, mistrust of doctors, fear and embarrassment could exacerbate delays. Poor availability of face-to-face appointments deterred people from seeing a GP. Patients feared that by the time they got to see their GP, their symptoms would have resolved. Patients instead self-managed symptoms, but often regretted not seeking help earlier. Limited time in consultations, language barriers, embarrassment, and delays in test results subsequently delayed specialist referrals. GPs misattributed symptoms to other conditions due to atypical or non-specific presentations, leading to reduced trust in health systems. Patients complained of poor communication, delays in accessing test results, appointments, and onward referrals-all associated with clinical deterioration. GPs were sometimes unable to 'fast-track' patients into specialist care. Consultations and endoscopies were often difficult experiences for patients, especially for non-English speakers who are also less likely to receive information on mental health support and the practicalities of living with IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

The framework analysis demonstrates delay in the diagnosis of IBD at each stage of the patient journey.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Greater awareness of IBD amongst the general population would facilitate presentation to healthcare services through symptom recognition by individuals and community advice. Greater awareness in primary care would help ensure IBD is included in differential diagnosis. In secondary care, greater attention to the wider needs of patients is needed-beyond diagnosis and treatment. All clinicians should consider atypical presentations and the fluctuating nature of IBD. Diagnostic overshadowing is a significant risk-where other diagnoses are already in play the risk of delay is considerable.

Emotions of endometriosis in clinical encounters: An analysis of women's experiences of health care

BACKGROUND

A large number of illnesses that lack physical visibility are characterised by troubled clinical encounters. Endometriosis is one such condition with very real and often debilitating symptoms that remain invisible to the clinician's eye, but are experienced and lived by the patient.

METHOD

This paper probes into two first person accounts of endometriosis to find out how endometriosis patients experience health care. The Tiger and the Cage: A Memoir of a Body in Crisis (2022) by Emma Bolden and Vagina Problems: Endometriosis, Painful Sex, and Other Taboo Topics (2020) by Lara Parker are both memoirs that details on the trivialisation and delegitimization of the women's accounts of their own lived reality by a health care system that often privileges medical evidence over lived experiences of the patients. After giving a brief introduction on the condition, the paper goes on to detail on the method and conceptual frameworks chosen for analysis. This is followed by an in-depth analysis into the two texts using thematic analysis proposed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke to identify shared patterns of meanings in the texts.

DISCUSSION

The identified themes take the form of emotions repeatedly narrated by the women. The findings indicate instances of disrespect, epistemic invalidation and compromised autonomy, due to which six shared categories of negative emotions are experienced by the patients: self-doubt, shame, fear, powerlessness, self-blame and anger.

CONCLUSION

The paper concludes by indicating the urgency of improved medical training, that better educates and facilitates health care professionals in dealing with conditions with complicated aetiology, difficult diagnosis and no cure.

Medically unexplained pain and suicidal ideation among US adults

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is an established risk factor for suicide. Pain syndromes are complex to diagnose, particularly in cases with limited evidence of injury or pathology. The goal of this study is to assess whether pain of unknown origin (i.e., medically-unexplained pain, MUEP) is more strongly associated with suicide behaviors than pain with a diagnostic explanation.

METHODS

Data comes from the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication, a nationally-representative sample of US adults. Analysis was limited to participants with a lifetime history of any type of chronic pain (n = 3421), which were categorized as having medically-explained pain (MEP, e.g., pain due to a specific health condition or resulting from an injury identified in an x-ray) or MUEP. Logistic regression, using survey procedures, was used to assess the relationship between lifetime MUEP and lifetime history of suicidal ideation and attempts.

RESULTS

Approximately 1 in 10 (11.6 %) adults with chronic pain had MUEP. Those with MUEP reported earlier age of pain onset and more impairment due to health problems. Suicidal ideation was reported by 18.7 % of those with MEP and 28.4 % of those with MUEP. In fully-adjusted models, MUEP was associated with 1.60 times (95 % CI: 1.17-2.18) higher odds of suicidal ideation, and 1.89 (1.25-2.83) higher odds of suicide attempt, compared to MEP.

LIMITATIONS

Cross-sectional analysis; MUEP assessed by self-report.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with chronic pain, those with MUEP are more likely to report suicide behaviors. Findings illustrate a role for diagnostic and treatment processes in the relationship between pain and suicide.

Philosophy and the clinic: Stigma, respect and shame

Since its foundation in 2010, the annual philosophy thematic edition of this journal has been a forum for authors from a wide range of disciplines and backgrounds, enabling contributors to raise questions of an urgent and fundamental nature regarding the most pressing problems facing the delivery and organization of healthcare. Authors have successfully exposed and challenged underlying assumptions that framed professional and policy discourse in diverse areas, generating productive and insightful dialogue regarding the relationship between evidence, value, clinical research and practice. These lively debates continue in this thematic edition, which includes a special section on stigma, shame and respect in healthcare. Authors address the problems with identifying and overcoming stigma in the clinic, interactional, structural and phenomenological accounts of stigma and the 'stigma-shame nexus'. Papers examine the lived experience of discreditation, discrimination and degradation in a range of contexts, from the labour room to mental healthcare and the treatment of 'deviancy' and 'looked-after children'. Authors raise challenging questions about the development of our uses of language in the context of care, and the relationship between stigma, disrespect and important analyses of power asymmetry and epistemic injustice. The relationship between respect, autonomy and personhood is explored with reference to contributions from an important conference series, which includes analyses of shame in the context of medically unexplained illness, humour, humiliation and obstetric violence.