Inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: the start of the epidemic?

Does Ulcerative Colitis Influence the Inter-individual Heterogeneity of the Human Intestinal Mucosal Microbiome?

The dysbiosis of the gut microbiome associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) has been extensively studied in recent years. However, the question of whether UC influences the spatial heterogeneity of the human gut mucosal microbiome has not been addressed. Spatial heterogeneity (specifically, the inter-individual heterogeneity in microbial species abundances) is one of the most important characterizations at both population and community scales, and can be assessed and interpreted by Taylor’s power law (TPL) and its community-scale extensions (TPLEs). Due to the high mobility of microbes, it is difficult to investigate their spatial heterogeneity explicitly; however, TPLE offers an effective approach to implicitly analyze the microbial communities. Here, we investigated the influence of UC on the spatial heterogeneity of the gut microbiome with intestinal mucosal microbiome samples collected from 28 UC patients and healthy controls. Specifically, we applied Type-I TPLE for measuring community spatial heterogeneity and Type-III TPLE for measuring mixed-species population heterogeneity to evaluate the heterogeneity changes of the mucosal microbiome induced by UC at both the community and species scales. We further used permutation test to determine the possible differences between UC patients and healthy controls in heterogeneity scaling parameters. Results showed that UC did not significantly influence gut mucosal microbiome heterogeneity at either the community or mixed-species levels. These findings demonstrated significant resilience of the human gut microbiome and confirmed a prediction of TPLE: that the inter-subject heterogeneity scaling parameter of the gut microbiome is an intrinsic property to humans, invariant with UC disease.

Alternative and Complementary Approaches for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Evidence From Cochrane Reviews

The Cochrane IBD Group presented a symposium at Digestive Diseases Week 2018 entitled “Alternative and Complementary Approaches for the Treatment of IBD: Evidence from Cochrane Reviews.” This article summarizes the data presented at this symposium.

Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease

Objective:

The metabolites produced by the gut microbiota are of interest to scientists. The objective of this review was to provide an updated summary of progress regarding the microbiota and their metabolites and influences on the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Data sources:

The author retrieved information from the PubMed database up to January 2018, using various combinations of search terms, including IBD, microbiota, and metabolite.

Study selection:

Both clinical studies and animal studies of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in IBD were selected. The information explaining the possible pathogenesis of microbiota in IBD was organized.

Results:

In IBD patients, the biodiversity of feces/mucosa-associated microbiota is decreased, and the probiotic microbiota is also decreased, whereas the pathogenic microbiota are increased. The gut microbiota may be a target for diagnosis and treatment of IBD. Substantial amounts of data support the view that the microbiota and their metabolites play pivotal roles in IBD by affecting intestinal permeability and the immune response.

Conclusions:

This review highlights the advances in recent gut microbiota research and clarifies the importance of the gut microbiota in IBD pathogenesis. Future research is needed to study the function of altered bacterial community compositions and the roles of metabolites.

Compassionate access anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy for ulcerative colitis in Australia: the benefits to patients

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of infliximab has been demonstrated in patients with both acute severe and moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there is a need for 'real-life data' to ensure that conclusions from trial settings are applicable in usual care. We therefore examined the national experience of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) therapy in UC.

METHODS

Case notes review of patients with UC who had received compassionate access (CA) anti-TNF-α therapy from prospectively maintained inflammatory bowel disease databases of six Australian adult teaching hospitals.

RESULTS

Patients either received drug for acute severe UC (ASUC) failing steroids (n = 29) or for medically refractory UC (MRUC) (n = 35). In ASUC, the treating physicians judged that anti-TNF-α therapy was successful in 20/29 patients (69%); in these cases, anti-TNF-α was able to be discontinued (after 1-3 infusions in 19/20 responders) as clinical remission was achieved. Consistent with this perceived benefit, only 7/29 (24%) subsequently underwent colectomy during a median follow up of 12 months (interquartile range (IQR) 5-16). Eight of the 35 patients with MRUC (23%) required colectomy during a median follow up of 28 months (IQR 11-43). The majority of these patients (20/35 or 57%) had anti-TNF-α therapy for ≥4 months, whereas, 27/29 (93%) of ASUC patients had CA for ≤3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show an excellent overall benefit for anti-TNF-α therapy in both ASUC and MRUC. In particular, only short-duration anti-TNF-α was required in ASUC. These real-life data thus support the clinical trial data and should lead to broader use of this therapy in UC.