Hepatitis B viral load predicts survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib

Well-controlled viremia reduces the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic viral hepatitis patients treated with lenvatinib

Lenvatinib has been approved as one of the first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its high treatment efficacy being non-inferior to sorafenib. Previous studies have shown well-controlled viremia contributes to the prognosis of HCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib; hence, we postulated this association might also exist in HCC patients with lenvatinib treatment. From April 2018 to December 2021, 201 unresectable HCC patients with first-line lenvatinib treatment in our institute were assessed. High-effect nucleoside analogues were administered for hepatitis B virus (HBV) control, while direct-acting antivirals were used for hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. Based on our previous study, well-controlled viremia was defined as patients who had undetectable viremia, or who had been receiving antivirals at least 6 months before lenvatinib. This study enrolled 129 patients, including 85 patients with HBV-related HCC (HBV-HCC) and 44 patients with HCV-related HCC (HCV-HCC), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between the two groups were not different. Before administration of lenvatinib, 57.1% of the HBV-HCC patients and 88.4% of the HCV-HCC patients had well-controlled viremia, and their PFS (8.8 vs. 3.1 months, p < 0.001) and OS (30.2 vs. 12.8 months, p = 0.041) were better than those who had uncontrolled viremia; moreover, well-controlled viremia reduced tumor progression in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio: 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.68, p = 0.001) after adjusting for albumin-bilirubin grade and concurrent treatment. HBV or HCV infection was not associated with tumor progression of HCC patients receiving lenvatinib, but viremia, controlled or not, was.

Hepatotoxicity of Small Molecule Protein Kinase Inhibitors for Cancer

Small molecule protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) have become an effective strategy for cancer patients. However, hepatotoxicity is a major safety concern of these drugs, since the majority are reported to increase transaminases, and few of them (Idelalisib, Lapatinib, Pazopanib, Pexidartinib, Ponatinib, Regorafenib, Sunitinib) have a boxed label warning. The exact rate of PKI-induced hepatoxicity is not well defined due to the fact that the majority of data arise from pre-registration or registration trials on fairly selected patients, and the post-marketing data are often based only on the most severe described cases, whereas most real practice studies do not include drug-related hepatotoxicity as an end point. Although these side effects are usually reversible by dose adjustment or therapy suspension, or by switching to an alternative PKI, and fatality is uncommon, all patients undergoing PKIs should be carefully pre-evaluated and monitored. The management of this complication requires an individually tailored reappraisal of the risk/benefit ratio, especially in patients who are responding to therapy. This review reports the currently available data on the risk and management of hepatotoxicity of all the approved PKIs.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Application and Impact of Antiviral Therapy for Patients with HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Sorafenib and Lenvatinib Treatment

Overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has improved in the era of multi-line sequential therapy. The application of antiviral therapy and its impact on survival for patients with HBV-related HCC needs to be reassessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application and impact of antiviral therapy on survival for patients with HBV-related HCC receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients with advanced HBV-related HCC treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line therapy with (n = 377) and without (n = 182) nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) therapy were retrospectively enrolled. Prognostic factors of OS were evaluated. Secular trends in the increased application of NUC therapy and improved survival were observed in the last decade. The HBV reactivation rate in patients without NUC therapy was 6.6%. By multivariate analysis, baseline low HBV viral load, achieving undetectable HBV DNA after TKI therapy, and ability to receive second-line therapy were found to be independent predictors of OS. In subgroup patients with NUC therapy, starting NUC before TKI was associated with a better OS. In conclusion, the application of antiviral therapy for patients with HBV-related HCC receiving TKI therapy has increased over time. Achieving complete virological suppression may contribute to a better OS in patients with advanced HBV-related HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Well-Controlled Viremia Predicts the Outcome of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Viral Hepatitis Patients Treated with Sorafenib

Simple Summary

Previous studies reported hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC) patients might have better prognosis than hepatitis B virus-related HCC (HBV-HCC) patients at using sorafenib. However, the information about status of viremia was limited in these studies. We defined well-controlled viremia as patients who had undetectable viremia, or who had been receiving antivirals at least six months before sorafenib. We reported 116 (65.2%) HBV-HCC patients and 62 (34.8%) HCV-HCC patients who received sorafenib, and progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates between these two groups were not different. Before sorafenib, 56% of HBV-HCC patients and 54.8% of HCV-HCC patients had well-controlled viremia and their OS was superior to those who had uncontrolled viremia (15.5 vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.001). Besides, well-controlled viremia was associated with mortality in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.42–0.93, p = 0.022). The significance of our study is the first research to confirm the prognostic value of well-controlled viremia between HBV-HCC and HCV-HCC patients receiving sorafenib. Besides, HBV or HCV infection was not associated with the outcome, neither in univariate nor in multivariate analysis.

Abstract

Without analyzing the status of viremia, hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC) patients are proposed to have better prognosis than hepatitis B virus-related HCC (HBV-HCC) patients using sorafenib. We aimed to elucidate the efficacy of concurrent sorafenib and anti-viral treatment for HCC patients with HBV or HCV infection in real world. Between January 2018 and January 2021, 256 unresectable HCC patients receiving first-line sorafenib were evaluated. High-potency nucleoside analogs were used for HBV control, whereas direct-acting antivirals were administered for HCV eradication. Well-controlled viremia was defined as patients who had undetectable viremia, or who had been receiving antivirals at least 6 months before sorafenib. We recruited 116 (65.2%) HBV-HCC patients and 62 (34.8%) HCV-HCC patients. Using sorafenib, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates between these two groups were not different. Before sorafenib, 56% of HBV-HCC patients and 54.8% of HCV-HCC patients had well-controlled viremia and their OS was superior to those who had uncontrolled viremia (15.5 vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.001). Dividing our patients into four subgroups as well-controlled HCV viremia, well-controlled HBV viremia, uncontrolled HCV viremia, and uncontrolled HBV viremia, their OS rates were distributed with a significantly decreasing trend as 21.9 months, 15.0 months, 14.2 months, and 5.7 months (p = 0.009). Furthermore, well-controlled viremia was associated with mortality in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.42–0.93, p = 0.022). In real-life, HBV or HCV infection did not contribute to the prognosis of HCC patients receiving sorafenib; however, whether viremia was controlled or not did contribute.

Risk of HBV reactivation during therapies for HCC: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment for HCC has evolved rapidly, but the risk of HBV reactivation to new therapies is unclear. We systematically reviewed data on HBV reactivation in patients receiving HCC therapy in relation to use of HBV antiviral prophylaxis.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

A literature search was performed to identify all published studies including HBsAg-positive patients with HCC providing data on HBV reactivation. Forty-one studies with 10,223 patients, all from Asia, were included. The pooled HBV reactivation rate was 5% in patients receiving no specific HCC therapy and was higher in patients undergoing surgical resection (16%), transarterial chemoembolization (19%), or radiotherapy (14%) and intermediate in patients treated with local ablation therapy (7%) or systemic agents (7%). HBV reactivation rates were higher in those without compared to those with HBV prophylaxis (ablation, 9% versus 0%; resection, 20% versus 3%; chemoembolization, 23% versus 1%; external radiotherapy alone, 18% versus 0%; systemic therapy, 9% versus 3%). HBV-related biochemical reactivation rates varied between 6%-11% and 2% in patients receiving HCC therapies with high and intermediate HBV reactivation risk, respectively. Liver decompensation and death were rarely reported (0%-3%) and only in patients receiving HCC treatment with high HBV reactivation risk.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg-positive patients with HCC are at high or intermediate risk of HBV reactivation depending on the type of HCC therapy. Nucleos(t)ide analogue prophylaxis reduces the risk of HBV reactivation, practically eliminates the risk of hepatitis flare, and should be administered regardless of HCC treatment.

Virological breakthrough after immune checkpoint inhibitor and nucleos(t)ide analog treatment in patients with hepatitis B surface antigen positive hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to be a promising and effective treatment for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is a lack of evidence-based data demonstrating the impact of ICIs on HBV DNA level in HBV-HCC patients undergoing nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy and of HBV DNA variation on patient survival. In this study, we aimed to investigate this issue in the real world.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed 182 baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive HBV-HCC patients who were treated with ICIs and pre-emptive NAs. The demographic characteristics, tumor status, treatments, HBV DNA, HBsAg, liver function, antitumor response, and patient survival were investigated. The primary endpoints were the virological breakthrough (VB) rate, HBV reactivation (HBVr) rate, and long-term HBV DNA control; the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

(1) VB and HBVr occurred in 18.1% (33/182) and 4.4% (8/182) of patients with a median occurrence time of 3.9 months (range, 0.7–16.0) and 8.0 months (range, 3.0–16.0), respectively. The HBV DNA negative rates were 26.1% and 0 at 24 and 48 weeks in the VB group and 12.5% and 0 in the HBVr group, respectively. A baseline HBsAg level ≥200 IU/mL was the only risk factor for VB (OR 9.9, 95% CI 2.2 to 45.2, p=0.003); (2) patients with VB had much shorter median OS and median PFS than those without (12.3 months vs 18.1 months, p=0.035; 4.5 months vs 7.5 months, p=0.011).

Conclusions

There was a high risk of VB and a moderate risk of HBVr in HBsAg-positive HBV-HCC patients (with poor long-term HBV DNA control) undergoing ICI and pre-emptive NA therapies. The only risk factor for VB was the pretreatment HBsAg level. Further, VB might be considered as a clinical biomarker predicting inferior OS and PFS in the patients.

Sorafenib use in hepatitis B virus- or hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

Sorafenib is the recommended first-line treatment option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related advanced HCC (HCV-HCC) seemed to have a better response than hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC (HBV-HCC) in sorafenib use, but it was undetermined. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effect of sorafenib between HBV-HCC and HCV-HCC patients in Taiwan. From August 2012 to December 2016, 575 consecutive advanced HCC patients received sorafenib under the reimbursement of Taiwan national health insurance in our hospital. Radiologic assessment was performed at a 2-month interval. Those patients with tumor progression or liver function deterioration were disallowed for further sorafenib use. Patients with HBV or HCV infection were, retrospectively, enrolled and followed till December 2018. There were 277 (62.4%) HBV-HCC patients and 167 (37.6%) HCV-HCC patients. Before sorafenib, 192 (69.3%) HBV-HCC patients who had used nucleoside analogs (NAs) for HBV management, whereas only 5 (3%) HCV-HCC patients received interferon-based antiviral therapy. Overall survival (OS) of HCV-HCC patients was significantly superior to HBV-HCC patients without NAs (8.8 months vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.006), but was noninferior to HBV-HCC patients with NAs (8.8 months vs. 10.7 months, p = 0.54). Using propensity score matching, progression-free survival (2.0 months vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.374) and OS (10.5 months vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.746) between HBV-HCC and HCV-HCC groups were not different. Antiviral therapy might increase survival benefits of advanced HBV-HCC patients underwent sorafenib use, leading to a comparable OS to HCV-HCC patients in Taiwan.

Baseline HBV Loads Do Not Affect the Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 Immunotherapy

Background

A high hepatitis B virus (HBV) load is a common exclusion criterion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) clinical trials for anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 immunotherapy. However, the validity of this criterion is barely verified. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline HBV DNA levels and antiviral therapy on the oncological outcomes and liver functions of patients with HCC receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

Methods

We reviewed HCC trials related to anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and whether they ruled out patients with increased HBV loads on clinicaltrials.gov. Then, for this retrospective study, we enrolled 253 HCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 blockade in our institution. Baseline information was compared between patients with low and high HBV loads. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared, and univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors for oncological outcomes and hepatic impairment.

Results

Among 76 HCC clinical trials including 13,927 patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 blockade, 41 (53.9%) excluded patients with relatively high baseline HBV loads. The PFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with baseline HBV loads ≤ 2000 IU/mL and those with viral loads >2000 IU/mL (p=0.615 and 0.982). The incidence of hepatic impairment showed no association with the baseline HBV load (p=0.319). Patients receiving antiviral therapy had a better OS than those without antiviral therapy in the high baseline HBV load group (p= 0.001).

Conclusion

High HBV loads did not compromise the clinical outcomes of HCC patients receiving anti-PD-1 blockade. Antiviral therapy could improve the OS of HCC patients with high HBV loads.

Prospective analysis of tiopronin in prevention of sorafenib and antiviral therapy inducing liver toxicity in advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatotoxicity induced by sorafenib and antiviral therapy is a limitation for its continuation treatment for patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This prospective study determined the efficacy of tiopronin in hepatotoxicity prevention of HBV-related HCC treatment. Eighty-two patients (median age, 50 years; 71 % male) of advanced HCC treated with sorafenib and antiviral therapy were included, of whom 40 were given the supplementation of tiopronin. The primary endpoint was liver function which was checked before the treatment and every week during the therapy. Besides, course discontinuations, dose reductions, HBV DNA levels and treatment efficacy were evaluated. Patient characteristics and liver function were comparable (p > 0.05). The proportion of abnormal liver function was significantly lower in tiopronin group than in control group including alanine transaminase (ALT, p = 0.035), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, p = 0.041), total bilirubin (TBIL, p = 0.021) and albumin (ALB, p = 0.001). Rates of course discontinuations (p = 0.024) and dose reductions (p = 0.046) were significantly lower in tiopronin groups, and disease control rate (p = 0.036) was higher. No difference was found in HBV DNA level. Multivariate regression analysis showed that sorafenib (OR 7.837; 95 % CI 3.845-15.333; p = 0.004), antiviral therapy (OR 3.871; 95 % CI 1.572-9.569; p = 0.044) and hepatoprotective drug (OR 3.007; 95 % CI 1.321-6.308; p = 0.046) played important roles in clinical outcome. Tiopronin tends to prevent the HCC patients from the treatment-induced hepatotoxicity, enhance patients' tolerance to sorafenib and antiviral therapy and even improve the cancer treatment efficacy.