Efficacy and long-term durability of intradermal recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccine among intramuscular vaccine nonresponders: A prospective study in healthcare personnel

Clinical trial: intra dermal hepatitis B vaccination with topical imiquimod versus intra muscular hepatitis B vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Efficacy with conventional intra muscular (IM) hepatitis B vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is suboptimal.

AIM

To compare the immunogenicity of intradermal (ID) hepatitis B vaccination after topical imiquimod pre-treatment with IM hepatitis B vaccination in patients with IBD.

METHODS

Adult IBD patients with no evidence of hepatitis B infection or immunity (negative to HBsAg/anti-HBc/anti-HBs) were randomised 1:1 to receive either ID hepatitis B vaccine with topical imiquimod pre-treatment to injection site (ID-Imq) or IM hepatitis B vaccine with aqueous cream pre-treatment (IM-Aq) at 0, 1 and 6 months. Patients and investigators were blinded to the randomisation and intervention. The primary endpoint was seroprotection rate at 12-month, defined as percentage of subjects with anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/ml.

RESULTS

Between September 2019 and December 2020, 104 patients with IBD (68% male; 50% Crohn's) enrolled, and 53 assigned to ID-Imq group. The percentage of patients using steroids, immunomodulators or biologics at randomisation was 15%, 55% or 22%, respectively. Seroprotection rate at 12 months was significantly higher in the ID-Imq group than the IM-Aq group (91% vs 69%; OR 4.39, 95% CI 1.47-13.11). Multivariate analysis showed that ID vaccine with topical imiquimod and higher albumin level were associated with a higher seroprotection rate. The safety profile was similar but local reactions were more common in the ID-Imq group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination with topical imiquimod pre-treatment is safe and offers superior seroprotection to conventional IM administration in patients with IBD.

Vaccines for Health Care Personnel

Medical Center Occupational Health (MCOH) programs must protect health care personnel (HCP) against the occupational risk of vaccine-preventable diseases. This thematic review outlines the rationale for the use of recommended vaccines in HCP; summarizes the available evidence regarding vaccine effectiveness, administration, and assessment of immunity; and provides guidance for MCOH programs navigating challenging situations.

Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal delivery of hepatitis B booster vaccine using the novel drug delivery device VAX-ID™

BACKGROUND

Although intramuscular (IM) injection is still the most preferred method for vaccination, intradermal (ID) delivery may have several advantages over intramuscular and subcutaneous (SC), including an improved immune response and antigen dose sparing effect. However it is currently limited due to the difficulty in standardizing the injection technique often based on the Mantoux technique. Difficulties encountered using the Mantoux technique could be overcome by the use of alternative ID delivery systems that confer more uniform and standardized procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a newly developed intradermal injection device, VAX-ID™, via a proof-of-concept to assess the immunogenicity of a commercially available hepatitis B booster vaccination in healthy hepatitis B pre-immunised subjects. Additionally, device safety and tolerability was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different routes of administration were compared over 4 groups, each receiving hepatitis B vaccine antigen: (1) standard IM injection in the deltoid region (HBVAXPRO® 10 µg/1 ml), (2) ID injection in the proximal posterior area of the forearm according to the Mantoux technique, (3) with VAX-ID™ in one forearm, or (4) with VAX-ID™ in both forearms. For ID injections 0.11 cc, of which 0.01 cc is overfill, was drawn from a vial containing HBVAXPRO® 40 µg/1 ml. Immunogenicity and safety were followed-up at day 0, 14, 30 and 210.

RESULTS

A total of 48 subjects were included. All subjects showed an anamnestic response at 14 days post booster vaccination. Elevated titres persisted until end of follow-up at day 210. For the ID groups a 3 fold higher immune response at day 14 and day 30 was recorded compared to IM group. Local adverse events were more reported for ID compared to IM.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigated ID injection device VAX-ID™ proves to be a good alternative to offer ID vaccination.