The self-evaluation of upper-gastrointestinal symptoms in Chinese patients with digestive disease: A multicenter questionnaire survey

Significant improvement of physicians' knowledge and clinical practice: an opportune, effective, and convenient continuing medical education program on functional dyspepsia

Aims

This cohort study aimed to explore the effect of a one-day online continuing medical education (CME) on the improvement of physicians' knowledge and clinical practice on functional dyspepsia (FD).

Methods

Physicians were invited to participate in this CME via medical education applications. FD training videos made in advance were sent to participants via a weblink. Before and after training, participants were required to finish the FD knowledge test and provide case information of FD patients. McNemar test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Freidman test, Chi-square test, quantile regression, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to perform statistical analysis.

Results

There were 397 of 430 (92.33%) physicians finished this CME program. The total score of the FD knowledge test after training was significantly higher compared with before training [488.3 (468.3-510.0) vs. 391.7 (341.7-450.0), p < 0.001]. Particularly, physicians from primary hospitals show more increase in total scores than physicians from secondary and tertiary hospitals. According to the GEE model, receiving this online training was an independent predictor of physicians' choice of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with FD [OR 1.73, 95%CI (1.09-2.73), p = 0.020], especially in PDS. Also, it was an independent predictor of physicians' choice of acid-suppressive drugs in patients with FD [OR 1.30, 95%CI (1.03-1.63), p = 0.026], especially in EPS and PDS overlapping EPS.

Conclusion

This one-day online CME program effectively and conveniently improved physicians' knowledge and clinical practice, providing new ideas for future CME and facilitating precise clinical management of FD patients with different subtypes especially in primary hospitals.

Development and validation of a scoring system to predict esophagogastroduodenoscopy necessity

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system for predicting the need for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in clinical practice to enhance accuracy and reduce misapplications.

METHODS

From February 2021 to April 2022, outpatients scheduled for EGD at the Department of Gastroenterology in our hospital were recruited. Patients completed the system evaluation by providing clinical symptoms, relevant medical history, and endoscopic findings. Patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts (at 2:1 ratio). The optimal algorithm was selected from five alternatives including a parallel test. Six physicians participated in a human-computer comparative validation. Sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) were used as the primary indicators.

RESULTS

Altogether 865 patients were enrolled, with 578 in the training cohort and 287 in the validation cohort. The scoring system comprised 21 variables, including age, 13 typical clinical symptoms, and seven medical history variables. The parallel test was selected as the final algorithm. Positive EGD findings were reported in 54.5% of the training cohort and 62.7% of the validation cohort. The scoring system demonstrated a sensitivity of 79.0% in the training cohort and 83.9% in the validation cohort, with -LR being 0.627 and 0.615, respectively. Compared to physicians, the scoring system exhibited higher sensitivity (84.0% vs 68.7%, P = 0.02) and a lower -LR (1.11 vs 2.41, P = 0.439).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a scoring system to predict the necessity of EGD using a parallel test algorithm, which was user-friendly and effective, as evidenced by single-center validation.

Esophageal symptoms versus epigastric symptoms: Relevance for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Although pathological acid reflux in patients with reflux symptoms is uncommon, it affects one-third of patients with epigastric symptoms in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the relevance of esophageal and epigastric symptoms in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China.

METHODS

Consecutive outpatients with predominantly esophageal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, dysphagia) or predominantly epigastric symptoms (epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiety, postprandial fullness) were enrolled. Patients underwent upper endoscopy and esophageal function tests, and took proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The prevalence of GERD and PPI efficacy was assessed and compared among patients with different dominant symptoms.

RESULTS

Altogether 374 patients (244 with predominantly esophageal symptoms and 130 with predominantly epigastric symptoms) were enrolled. Patients with predominantly epigastric symptoms had a slightly lower prevalence of reflux esophagitis and pathological acid reflux but a significantly lower PPI response rate than those with predominantly esophageal symptoms. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the predominant symptom was independently associated with PPI efficacy but could not predict the objective existence of GERD. GERD was objectively found in 136 patients, 30% of whom complained of predominantly epigastric symptoms and had similar reflux profiles and symptom outcomes as patients with predominantly esophageal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 30% of patients with GERD complain of predominantly epigastric symptoms and have comparable reflux profiles and symptom outcomes as those with predominantly esophageal symptoms. Epigastric symptoms may be part of the diagnosis for GERD in a Chinese population. The study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02506634).