Platelet count to spleen diameter ratio non-invasively identifies severe fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

Diagnostic role of transient elastography in patients with autoimmune liver diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive methods have been developed to detect fibrosis in many liver diseases due to the limits of liver biopsy. However, previous studies have focused primarily on chronic viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The diagnostic value of transient elastography for autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) is worth studying.

AIM

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques with serum biomarkers of fibrosis in AILD.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched. Studies evaluating the efficacy of noninvasive methods in the diagnosis of AILDs [autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)] were included. The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the accuracy of these noninvasive methods for staging fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 60 articles were included in this study, and the number of patients with AIH, PBC and PSC was 1594, 3126 and 501, respectively. The summary AUROC of transient elastography in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with AIH were 0.84, 0.88 and 0.90, respectively, while those in patients with PBC were 0.93, 0.93 and 0.91, respectively. The AUROC of cirrhosis for patients with PSC was 0.95. However, other noninvasive indices (aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, fibrosis-4 index) had corresponding AUROCs less than 0.80.

CONCLUSION

Transient elastography exerts better diagnostic accuracy in AILD patients, especially in PBC patients. The appropriate cutoff values for staging advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis ranged from 9.6 to 10.7 and 14.4 to 16.9 KPa for PBC patients.

Blood-Based Non-Invasive Tests of Hepatic Fibrosis in Autoimmune Hepatitis: Application among Selected Patients Leads to Higher Accuracy

Background. Assessment of liver fibrosis is essential to guide treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but non-invasive tests (NITs) showed poor accuracy. Our study aims to evaluate the performance of NITs among different AIH presentations. Methods. Monocentric retrospective study among 122 AIH patients. NITs were compared to histological grading of liver fibrosis. We performed an accuracy analysis among acute (jaundice and/or transaminases > 10 times upper limit of normal) and non-acute patients. Results. A significant difference in the distribution of NIT values for each Ishak stage was found for spleen-diameter-to-platelet-count ratio (SD/PC) (p < 0.001), fibrosis-4-score (FIB-4) (p = 0.002), AST-to-ALT ratio (AAR) (p = 0.002), red-blood-cell-width-distribution-to-platelet-count ratio (RDW/PC) (p = 0.008) and AST-to-platelet-count ratio (APRI) (p = 0.029). The AUC for advanced fibrosis of SD/PC, FIB-4, RDW/PC, APRI and AAR were, respectively, 0.814, 0.770, 0.768, 0.708 and 0.694. The AUC of SD/PC, FIB-4 and APRI in non-acute subgroup were 0.902, 0.834 and 0.758, while in acute patients they were 0.754, 0.724 and 0.716. RDW/PC and AAR weren’t different among the two subgroups. Conclusions. For SD/PC, FIB-4 and APRI, diagnostic accuracy is higher in patients with non-acute presentation. In this context, SD/PC and FIB-4 showed an overall performance that could be of interest in clinical practice alongside other non-invasive techniques.

Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index and Fibrosis-4 Index for Detecting Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) are the two most widely studied noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for liver fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) using liver biopsy as the reference standard.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for studies (published as of May 1st, 2021) that assessed the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 for liver fibrosis in AIH. The summary area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for detecting liver fibrosis.

Results

Fourteen studies (including 1015 patients) were selected with 13 studies each evaluating the use of APRI and FIB-4 for detecting different stages of fibrosis in AIH. For prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, the summary AUROC value was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.70], 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.75), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) for APRI, and the summary AUROC value was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.77) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82) for FIB-4, respectively. The summary sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 90% and 36%, 78% and 55%, and 77% and 61% for APRI, and 70% and 70%, 65% and 70%, and 78% and 65% for FIB-4, respectively.

Conclusions

APRI and FIB-4 showed suboptimal diagnostic performance for identifying liver fibrosis in AIH with mediocre sensitivity and specificity.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis - 2021 update

Non-invasive tests are increasingly being used to improve the diagnosis and prognostication of chronic liver diseases across aetiologies. Herein, we provide the latest update to the EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the use of non-invasive tests for the evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis, focusing on the topics for which relevant evidence has been published in the last 5 years.

The role of fibrosis index FIB-4 in predicting liver fibrosis stage and clinical prognosis: A diagnostic or screening tool?

This review evaluates the ability of the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4) identifying fibrosis stages, long-time prognosis in chronic liver disease, and short-time outcomes in acute liver injury. FIB-4 was accurate in predicting the absence or presence of advanced fibrosis with cut-offs of 1.0 and 2.65 for viral hepatitis B, 1.45 and 3.25 for viral hepatitis C, 1.30 (<65 years), 2.0 (≥65 years), and 2.67 for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), respectively, but had a low-to-moderate accuracy in alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and autoimmune hepatitis. It performed better in excluding fibrosis, so we built an algorithm for identifying advanced fibrosis by combined methods and giving work-up and follow-up suggestions. High FIB-4 in viral hepatitis, NAFLD, and ALD was associated with significantly high hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and mortality. Additionally, FIB-4 showed the ability to predict high-risk varices with cut-offs of 2.87 and 3.91 in cirrhosis patients and predict long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy. In acute liver injury caused by COVID-19, FIB-4 had a predictive value for mechanical ventilation and 30-day mortality. Finally, FIB-4 may act as a screening tool in the secondary prevention of NAFLD in the high-risk population.

A comparison of spleen size measured by ultrasound in a random population sample and a matched sample of patients at a university hospital, and the determination of normal values and influencing factors

OBJECTIVES

 This study aimed to compare spleen sizes in a hospital and a population sample using ultrasound and define normal values and factors influencing spleen size.

METHODS

 Both samples' spleen sizes (n = 1520) were measured using ultrasound under the same conditions. Blood counts and other laboratory parameters were determined under the same conditions in both samples.

RESULTS

 In the hospital sample (n = 760), the mean spleen size was 114.7 mm, and in the population sample (n = 760), it was 99.1 mm. In both, spleen size in men was significantly higher than in women (p < 0.0001) and influenced by body height, weight, and BMI (body mass index) (p < 0.0001). In the hospital sample, there was a correlation with higher values for ALT (p = 0.0160), AST (p = 0.0394), AP (p = 0.0482), and ferritin (p = 0.0008) and lower values for HDL (p = 0.0091) and thrombocytes (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, higher values for AP (p = 0.0059) and lower values for hemoglobin (p = 0.0014) and thrombocytes (p = 0.0001) were found. Stratified for sex (men, women), spleen size increased with higher values for ALT (p = 0.0116, p = 0.0113), AST (p = 0.0014, p = 0.0113), and AP (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0012), and with lower values of hemoglobin (p = 0.0057, p = 0.0016), thrombocytes (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0003), and albumin (p = 0.0029, p = 0.0432). In women, there was a discordant correlation with red blood cells (p = 0.0005) and a concordant correlation with GGT (p = 0.0241), and in men discordant correlations with cholesterol (p = 0.0010) and HDL (p = 0.0404).

CONCLUSIONS

 The already proven impact of anthropometric data on spleen size was confirmed. The role of laboratory values should be further analyzed.

Noninvasive inflammatory markers for assessing liver fibrosis stage in autoimmune hepatitis patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of noninvasive inflammatory markers in predicting liver fibrosis stage in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 55 patients with AIH and 60 healthy controls in this study, and divided them into three groups: F0 (control); F1-F3 (noncirrhotic fibrosis); and F4 (cirrhosis). The following markers were analyzed for all participants: lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio (LNR); lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (LPR); lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); immunoglobulin-to-platelet ratio (IGPR); aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI); aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR); and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4). The predictive accuracy of these noninvasive markers was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were used to analyze associations between the noninvasive markers and liver fibrosis stage.

RESULTS

AAR, LPR, LMR, IGPR, APRI, and FIB-4 were linked to liver fibrosis-stage (P < 0.05), with correlation indices of - 0.219, 0.258, - 0.149, 0.647, 0.841, and 0.704, respectively, but not LNR (P = 0.093). area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of LPR, IGPR, AAR, LMR, APRI, and FIB-4 for detecting cirrhosis (F4 vs. F0-F3) were 0.936 (95% confidence interval: 0.870-1.000, P < 0.001), 0.939 (0.875-1.000, P < 0.001), 0.528 (0.319-0.738, P = 0.768), 0.555 (0.409-0.700, P = 0.568), 0.798 (0.694-0.902, P = 0.002), and 0.881 (0.796-0.967, P < 0.001). Our multivariate ordinal regression analysis showed that LPR and IGPR were associated independently with liver fibrosis stage, with a coefficient of 0.385 (95% confidence interval: 0.103-0.667, P = 0.007) and 14.903 (2.091-27.786, P = 0.023), respectively.

CONCLUSION

LPR and IGPR were associated independently with liver fibrosis stage in treatment-naive AIH, and were superior to APRI and FIB-4 in detecting cirrhosis.

Systematic review: diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for staging liver fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-invasive fibrosis assessment has been highly recommended in many liver diseases. However, comparative diagnostic accuracy of laboratory markers, ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients has not been established.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. Primary outcome was significant fibrosis (SF), advanced fibrosis (AF) and cirrhosis, defined as Metavir stage F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3 and F = 4 according to liver biopsy. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) model was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods. Summary area under ROC (AUROC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Overall, 16 studies with 861 patients were included, comparing aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, transient elastography (TE), acoustic radiation force impulse, shear wave elastography and MRE versus liver biopsy. Among all non-invasive markers, TE had good performance for fibrosis staging. Summary AUROCs and DORs of TE were 0.90 (95% CI 0.87, 0.92) and 23.7, 0.91 (95% CI 0.89, 0.93) and 31.6, 0.89 (95% CI 0.86, 0.92) and 80.5 for staging SF, AF and cirrhosis, whereas APRI and FIB-4 showed poor performance for detecting AF (DOR, 4.6 and 4.7) and cirrhosis (DOR, 5.5 and 12.9).

CONCLUSIONS

TE performs well to stage liver fibrosis in patients with AIH, compared with other laboratory non-invasive indexes. Nevertheless, diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 is poor.

Evolving strategies for liver fibrosis staging: Non-invasive assessment

Transient elastography and the acoustic radiation force impulse techniques may play a pivotal role in the study of liver fibrosis. Some studies have shown that elastography can detect both the progression and regression of fibrosis. Similarly, research results have been analysed and direct and indirect serum markers of hepatic fibrosis have shown high diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. The prognosis of different stages of cirrhosis is well established and various staging systems have been proposed, largely based on clinical data. However, it is still unknown if either non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis or elastography may contribute to a more accurate staging of liver cirrhosis, in terms of prognosis and fibrosis regression after effective therapy. In fact, not enough studies have shown both the fibrosis regression in different cirrhosis stages and the point beyond which the prognosis does not change - even in the event of fibrosis regression. Therefore, future studies are needed to validate non-invasive methods in predicting the different phases of liver cirrhosis.