Histological long-term outcomes from acute antibody-mediated rejection following ABO-compatible liver transplantation

Liver Transplantation from a Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Sibling Donor: Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy against Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Through living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor, it may be possible to stop the use of immunosuppressants. It is possible that acute antibody-mediated rejection and chronic active antibody-mediated rejection through the positivity of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and/or T cell-mediated rejection may affect the prognosis of liver transplantation. The etiologies of liver diseases of the recipient may also affect the post-transplantation course. Herein, we report on the successful re-treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a patient who underwent a LDLT from HLA-matched sibling donor. After liver transplantation for HCV-related liver diseases, it is easy for HCV to re-infect the graft liver under a lack of immunosuppressants. DAA therapy against HCV re-infection immediately after transplantation should be commenced, and it is important to eradicate HCV for better prognosis of the recipients in LDLT for HCV-related liver diseases.

Recipient gender and body mass index are associated with early acute rejection in donation after cardiac death liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early acute rejection (EAR) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT).

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of EAR in donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation recipients.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed the data of 461 DCD liver transplants performed during the period from January 2010 to June 2016 to study the relationship between EAR and various clinical factors. EAR was defined as histologically proven acute cellular rejection occurring less than 90 days after transplantation.

RESULT

The median follow-up time for this study was 33.1 months (range: 0.03-92.8 months). Thirty-two (6.9%) patients developed EAR with a median period of 20.5 days (5-88 days) after transplantation. A multivariate analysis revealed that female recipient (hazard ratio: 2.801; P=0.024) and high recipient body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio: 1.005; P=0.049) were two independent risk factors for early acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

In DCD liver transplantation, recipient female gender and high BMI were associated with a higher incidence of EAR, while the use of CD25-Ab and/or MMF had a protective effect.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome as a manifestation of acute antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is uncommon but, when present, manifests as graft dysfunction. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman who developed portal hypertension with pleural effusion and ascites secondary to sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) due to acute AMR following an ABO-matched liver transplantation for autoimmune cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Initial immunosuppression comprised basiliximab, decreasing prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. After 1 month, she presented with the massive pleural effusion, slight ascites, and normal liver tests. After excluding common causes of pleural effusion, we performed a liver biopsy that showed atypical rejection with the involvement of large centrilobular veins partially occluded by marked endotheliitis and lax fibrosis suggestive of SOS. Direct immunofluorescence study of C4d showed diffuse endothelial sinusoidal staining, and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were detected in his blood. Thus, we diagnosed AMR focused on centrilobular veins and initiated treatment with defibrotide, steroid pulses, and diuretics. However, this was ineffective, and the pleural effusion only resolved when plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin were started. This case shows that AMR can cause SOS with portal hypertension and present with a pleural effusion, and as such, it should be suspected after excluding other more common causes of effusion.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Late Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

An early and accurate diagnosis of liver antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) followed by timely intervention is important for clinical management but remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of late acute AMR in pediatric liver transplantation recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 739 ABO-identical/compatible allograft liver biopsies from 199 pediatric transplantation recipients.

RESULTS

Based on Banff 2016 AMR criteria, 3 recipients fulfilled the criteria for definite for late acute AMR, 2 met the criteria for suspicious for AMR, and 2 were indeterminate for AMR. We further assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics of these 7 patients. All 7 patients had at least 1 biopsy with a histopathologic pattern compatible with acute AMR. Additionally, we observed accompanied moderately to markedly dilated portal/central veins and endothelialitis disproportionate to the degree of bile duct injury in all 7 patients; periportal/perivenular hepatocyte necrosis was seen in 6 of 7 patients; and arteritis was seen in 3 of 7 patients. In each case, microvascular C4d deposition was present in at least 1 biopsy. Posttransplant donor specific anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 5 patients. Two of 7 patients were retransplanted, and 2 died after developing refractory AMR. The remaining 5 patients were alive with stable graft function at a median follow-up of 4.1 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that acute AMR in pediatric liver grafts is rare, can develop late, and may be associated with graft loss or patient death. The recurrent histopathologic findings of moderately to markedly dilated portal/central veins and endothelialitis disproportionate to the degree of bile duct injury are features that appear unique to pediatric acute AMR of liver grafts.

Donor-Specific Antibodies Against Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen are Associated with Graft Inflammation but Not with Fibrosis Long-Term After Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of Protocol Biopsies

Background

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor human leukocyte antigen after liver transplantation, which are associated with histological changes, have been widely studied with respect to their sustained impact on transplant function. However, their long-term impact after liver transplantation remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis from June 2016 to July 2017 that included all patients who presented themselves for scheduled follow-up after receiving a liver transplantation between September 1989 and December 2016. In addition to a liver protocol biopsy, patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLAab) and donor-specific antibodies. Subsequently, the association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, histologic and clinical features, and immunosuppression was analyzed.

Results

Analysis for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was performed for 291 and 271 patients. A significant association between higher inflammation grades and the presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies was detected, while fibrosis stages remained unaffected. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression for inflammation showing a significant increase for presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (OR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.67–12.6; p=0.0035). Furthermore, the use of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus was significantly associated with the status of negative human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Viral etiology for liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher steatosis grades of the graft were significantly associated with a lower rate of human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was associated with higher levels of laboratory parameters, such as transaminases and bilirubin.

Conclusion

Donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen are associated with histological and biochemical graft inflammation after liver transplantation, while fibrosis seems to be unaffected. Future studies should validate these findings for longer observation periods and specific subgroups.

Outcome of Liver Transplant Patients With Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies

After liver transplantation (LT), the role of preformed donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (pDSAs) remains incompletely understood. We conducted a retrospective, case-control analysis to determine the impact of pDSAs after LT in 3 French transplant centers (Bordeaux, Lyon, and Toulouse). Among the 1788 LTs performed during the study period, 142 (7.9%) had at least 1 pDSA. The patient survival rate was not different between patients who received an LT with pDSAs and the matched-control group. A liver biopsy was performed 1 year after transplantation in 87 recipients. The metavir fibrosis score did not differ between both groups (1 ± 0.8 versus 0 ± 0.8; P = 0.80). However, undergoing a retransplantation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-6.77; P = 0.05) and receiving induction therapy with polyclonal antibodies (HR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.33-4.74; P = 0.01) were associated with a higher risk of mortality. Nonetheless, high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) donor-specific antibodies (ie, >10,000 with One Lambda assay or >5000 with Immucor assay) were associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.12-3.49; P = 0.02). Acute antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed in 10 patients: 8 recipients were alive 34 (1-125) months after rejection. The use of polyclonal antibodies or rituximab as an induction therapy did not reduce the risk of acute rejection, but it increased the risk of infectious complications. In conclusion, high MFI pDSAs increase the risk of graft rejection after LT, but they do not reduce medium-term and longterm patient survival. The use of a T or B cell-depleting agent did not reduce the risk of acute rejection.

Impact of transplant accessibility for sensitized patients by avoiding unacceptable antigens

Recent data have confirmed the negative impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies (pDSAs) after liver transplantation (LT). In order to reduce the risk of developing lesions associated with acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection in LT recipients, we evaluated the consequences in terms of transplant accessibility, associated with avoiding pDSAs according to several mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) titer thresholds that have been previously reported to be relevant in LT. Among the 484 included LT candidates, 99 (20.5%) presented with anti-human leukocyte antibodies (HLAs). The predictive factors for anti-HLA sensitization were a history of previous kidney transplantation (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.9; P = 0.05), a history of previous LT (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6-2.1; P = 0.01), a history of blood transfusion (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.2-4.1; P = 0.01), and a history of pregnancy (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4-3.3; P = 0.04). By applying a strategy of unacceptable mismatches for recipients with an antibody (Ab) MFI of > 5000, only 35 patients were affected (7% of the cohort), but 22 of these (63%) would have been considered incompatible with >50% of the donors. Using a MFI threshold of >10,000, only 16 patients were affected (1.4% of the cohort), but half of these would have been considered incompatible with >50% of the proposed donors. Considering only those with anti-class II Ab and a MFI >5000 and >10,000, respectively, 10/14 and 4/8 patients were considered incompatible with >50% of the donors. In conclusion, avoiding pDSAs affects a small but not negligible proportion of LT candidates. However, in these sensitive patients, avoiding pDSAs has the potential to significantly reduce the donor pool and, consequently, transplant accessibility. Liver Transplantation 23 880-886 2017 AASLD.