Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma with anastomosing glands of the stomach

Managing crawling-type gastric adenocarcinoma with endoscopic techniques and postoperative monitoring

Crawling-type gastric adenocarcinoma is a rare subtype of gastric cancer with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its flat, ill-defined lesions. Advanced diagnostic techniques, such as narrow-band imaging and linear endoscopic ultrasonography, improve detection, but endoscopic submucosal dissection poses a risk of incomplete resection. Despite negative resection margins, vigilant postoperative monitoring is crucial due to the potential for recurrence. This letter highlights the importance of refined diagnostic criteria, individualized treatment approaches, and continuous follow-up to optimize management of this unique gastric cancer subtype.

Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Foveolar-Type Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

PURPOSE

Foveolar-type adenocarcinoma of the stomach is a rare variant of gastric cancer. The clinicopathological features and outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric foveolar-type adenocarcinoma remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 1,161 patients who underwent ESD for single early gastric cancers (EGCs) (78 foveolar-type adenocarcinomas and 1,083 well-differentiated [WD] adenocarcinomas). The clinicopathological features and short- and long-term outcomes of ESD for gastric foveolar-type adenocarcinomas were reviewed and compared with those for WD EGCs.

RESULTS

Gastric foveolar-type adenocarcinomas were larger and more likely to exhibit an elevated macroscopic appearance than WD EGCs. Foveolar-type adenocarcinomas exhibited higher rates of lymphatic invasion, histological heterogeneity, and lateral margin involvement than WD EGCs. The en bloc R0 and curative resection rates of foveolar-type adenocarcinoma were 85.9% and 76.9%, respectively. Both foveolar-type adenocarcinoma rates were significantly lower than those of WD EGCs (95.8% and 91.3%, respectively). Lateral margin involvement accounted for 55.6% of the non-curative resection cases of foveolar-type adenocarcinoma. Among patients who underwent curative ESD for foveolar-type adenocarcinoma, no recurrence occurred during the median 62.3 months of follow-up. No lymph node metastases were detected in patients with foveolar-type adenocarcinoma who underwent additional surgery following ESD. The overall and disease-specific survival rates of patients with foveolar-type adenocarcinoma were comparable to those of patients with WD EGC.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric foveolar-type adenocarcinomas have distinct clinicopathological features among WD EGCs. Given favorable long-term outcomes after curative resection, ESD can be indicated for early gastric foveolar-type adenocarcinomas.

Mixed crawling-type gastric adenocarcinoma

Crawling-type gastric carcinoma is a rare variant of early gastric carcinoma. Endoscopically, it is a poorly defined tumor with a flat appearance and histologically, especially in a small biopsy, mimic intestinal metaplasia with reactive atypia. We present a case in which, due to the finding of foci of signet ring cell carcinoma, correct management of the patient was carried out.

Risk-Scoring System for Prediction of Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Requiring Additional Gastrectomy in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer

Purpose

When patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) undergo non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection requiring gastrectomy (NC-ESD-RG), additional medical resources and expenses are required for surgery. To reduce this burden, predictive model for NC-ESD-RG is required.

Materials and Methods

Data from 2,997 patients undergoing ESD for 3,127 forceps biopsy-proven differentiated-type EGCs (2,345 and 782 in training and validation sets, respectively) were reviewed. Using the training set, the logistic stepwise regression analysis determined the independent predictors of NC-ESD-RG (NC-ESD other than cases with lateral resection margin involvement or piecemeal resection as the only non-curative factor). Using these predictors, a risk-scoring system for predicting NC-ESD-RG was developed. Performance of the predictive model was examined internally with the validation set.

Results

Rate of NC-ESD-RG was 17.3%. Independent pre-ESD predictors for NC-ESD-RG included moderately differentiated or papillary EGC, large tumor size, proximal tumor location, lesion at greater curvature, elevated or depressed morphology, and presence of ulcers. A risk-score was assigned to each predictor of NC-ESD-RG. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting NC-ESD-RG was 0.672 in both training and validation sets. A risk-score of 5 points was the optimal cut-off value for predicting NC-ESD-RG, and the overall accuracy was 72.7%. As the total risk score increased, the predicted risk for NC-ESD-RG increased from 3.8% to 72.6%.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a risk-scoring system for predicting NC-ESD-RG based on pre-ESD variables. Our risk-scoring system can facilitate informed consent and decision-making for preoperative treatment selection between ESD and surgery in patients with EGC.

Management of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in endoscopy: A review of literature

Endoscopic procedures hold a basal risk of bleeding that depends on the type of procedure and patients’ comorbidities. Moreover, they are often performed in patients taking antiplatelet and anticoagulants agents, increasing the potential risk of intraprocedural and delayed bleeding. Even if the interruption of antithrombotic therapies is undoubtful effective in reducing the risk of bleeding, the thromboembolic risk that follows their suspension should not be underestimated. Therefore, it is fundamental for each endoscopist to be aware of the bleeding risk for every procedure, in order to measure the risk-benefit ratio for each patient. Moreover, knowledge of the proper management of antithrombotic agents before endoscopy, as well as the adequate timing for their resumption is essential.

This review aims to analyze current evidence from literature assessing, for each procedure, the basal risk of bleeding and the risk of bleeding in patients taking antithrombotic therapy, as well as to review the recommendation of American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy, European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy, British society of gastroenterology, Asian pacific association of gastroenterology and Asian pacific society for digestive endoscopy guidelines for the management of antithrombotic agents in urgent and elective endoscopic procedures.