Endoscopic revision efficacy after clinically successful bilateral metal stenting for advanced malignant hilar obstruction

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for ingrowth occlusion after bilateral metal stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be an option for the treatment of ingrowth occlusion after self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) deployment; however, its utility remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of RFA for the palliation of ingrowth after bilateral SEMS placement in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center, pilot study enrolled 30 patients who met the eligibility criteria between April 2020 and March 2022. Study outcomes were technical success, clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and adverse events (AEs) besides RBO associated with RFA for ingrowth occlusion. Furthermore, factors predictive of clinical success were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rates were 93.3% (28/30) and 71.4% (20/28), respectively. The rates of early and late AEs were 6.7% (2/30) and 10.0% (2/20), respectively. The incidence rate of RBO after RFA was 45.0% (9/20), and the median time to RBO was 163 days. Multivariate analysis of the factors affecting clinical success revealed a positive association between the recanalization diameter on the ingrown part within the SEMS (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.26; P = .038). The calculated optimal cutoff for the ratio of the recanalization diameter to the SEMS diameter for predicting clinical success was 51.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biliary RFA elicited promising results, with good long-term stent patency and without the requirement of any additional stent placement, for the palliation of ingrowth occlusion after bilateral SEMS placement. However, the clinical success rate was insufficient, necessitating improvements in the future. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000040154.).

Comparison of Bilateral and Trisegment Drainage in Patients with High-Grade Hilar Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background/Aims

Bilateral endoscopic drainage with self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) can be used to effectively manage hilar malignant biliary obstruction. However, the benefits of using a trisegment drainage method remain unknown.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed the data of 125 patients with Bismuth type IIIa or IV unresectable malignant strictures who underwent bilateral endoscopic drainage using SEMSs at four tertiary centers. The patients were divided into the bilateral and trisegment drainage groups for comparison. The primary endpoint was stent patency and the secondary endpoints were technical success, technical and clinical success of reintervention, and overall survival.

Results

The technical success rates of the bilateral and trisegment drainage groups were 95% (34/36) and 90% (80/89) (p=0.41), respectively, with median stent patency durations of 226 and 170 days (p=0.26), respectively. Although the technical success of reintervention was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.51), the clinical success rate of reintrvention was significantly higher in the trisegment drainage group (73% [11/15] vs 96% [47/49], p=0.009). The median survival times were 324 and 323 days in the bilateral and trisegment drainage groups, respectively (p=0.72). Multivariate Cox hazards model revealed no stent patency-associated factor; however, chemotherapy was associated with longer survival.

Conclusions

Although no significant difference was noted with respect to stent patency, significantly higher clinical success rates were achieved with reintervention using the trisegment drainage method than using the bilateral drainage method alone.

Endoscopic re-intervention after stent-in-stent versus side-by-side bilateral self-expandable metallic stent deployment

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is widely performed; however, re-intervention after recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is often challenging. We compared stent-in-stent (SIS) and side-by-side (SBS) SEMS placement for MHBO considering re-intervention for RBO.

METHODS

One hundred five consecutive patients with MHBO who underwent endoscopic bilateral SEMS placement in our hospital and its affiliated institutions were enrolled in this study; 75 patients underwent partial SIS deployment between December 2005 and December 2012; and 30 underwent SBS deployment between January 2013 and March 2019. Initial treatments and re-interventions in each group were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success rate (92% vs 100%, P = 0.179), procedure duration (46 vs 35 min, P = 0.382), functional success rate (97.1% vs 100%, P = 1.00), complication rate (24.6% vs 20.0%, P = 0.797), time to RBO (260 vs 312 days; Gray test, P = 0.815), and rate of RBO (59.4% vs 70.0%, P = 0.371) were not significantly different between the SIS and SBS groups. However, bilateral re-stenting with plastic stents through SEMS was successful in 63.4% of patients in the SIS group compared with 100% of patients in the SBS group (P = 0.0013). Median time to RBO upon first re-stenting with a plastic stent was 75 days (range, 11-195 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic re-stenting after RBO was significantly more successful in the SBS group than in the SIS group. SBS method is suitable for MHBO considering revisionary stent placement.

Endoscopic bilateral revision after metal stent deployment for hepatic hilar obstruction using molting technique (with videos)

BACKGROUND

After multiple uncovered self-expandable metal stent (UCSEMS) deployments, endoscopic revision becomes complex and potentially challenging. A novel stent delivery system with a dilation function has recently been developed in Japan. This study evaluated the technical feasibility of this device for patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO) after multiple UCSEMS deployments.

METHOD

Participants comprised consecutive patients with unresectable MHO who had undergone multiple UCSEMS deployments and required endoscopic revision for the right or left hepatic bile ducts, as decided by cholangiography under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients requiring endoscopic revision of right and left hepatic bile ducts were enrolled in this study. Among these 14 patients, guidewire insertion through the mesh of previously placed stents failed in 2 patients. As a result, these two patients underwent only unilateral UCSEMS deployment. Because clinical success was not obtained, transmural placement of the UCSEMS under Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guidance to the segment of the liver not being drained was performed in those patients. The molting technique was attempted in 12 patients, proving successful in all patients. The technical success rate was therefore 92.8% (12/14). Mean procedure time was 23.2 min.

CONCLUSION

This novel stent delivery system with a dilation function may be useful in endoscopic revision techniques for bilateral UCSEMS deployment.

Recent advances regarding endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is still associated with a number of controversies to be resolved. The superiority of bilateral drainage in comparison to unilateral drainage has not been proven obviously yet. However, bilateral drainage is necessary to treat obstructive jaundice in some UMHBO patients, and this may be connected with preservation of the functional liver volume. The partial stent-in-stent (SIS) method and side-by-side (SBS) method developed as bilateral drainage methods. There is no significant difference in the technical or clinical success rates of the SIS and SBS methods. In addition, these methods are comparable in terms of adverse events, patency period, and survival period. On the other hand, reintervention for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after the SBS method seems to be easier in comparison to cases with RBO after the SIS method; however, there is no remarkable difference in the clinical results of these procedures. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage also has become an option for patients with UMHBO. Left hepatic drainage using EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has become common; however, few studies have reported the results of bridging drainage for the right lobe using the EUS-HGS route or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy. A few studies addressed the results of newly designed stents, such as the 6-mm braided metal stent and inside stent. The development of various drainage methods and new devices is necessary for the further advancement of endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with UMHBO, further studies to evaluate those methods and devices are warranted.