Health and Aging Policy Fellows: Dementia and Mental Health Policy to Improve Lives of Older Adults

Are we on the same page? Multiple stakeholders and service users priorities for dementia care and policy: A Delphi study

BACKGROUND

It's crucial to develop a national policy for dementia due to the growing number of persons living with the condition and the attendant impact on individuals, families, and society at large. However, there has been limited exploration of the views on long-term goals for dementia of different stakeholders involved in different aspects of service use, planning or delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine and compare the perceived priorities of service users (i.e., people living with dementia and their family caregivers) and other multiple stakeholders for dementia care and policy.

DESIGN

Two independent Delphi studies were conducted in Hong Kong.

SETTING(S) AND PARTICIPANTS

In Delphi study 1, 75 stakeholders were recruited from public and private nursing, medical and social care providers, philanthropic organizations, policy-makers and government sectors. In Delphi study 2, 45 people living with dementia and 55 family caregivers were recruited from community care settings.

METHODS

The Delphi study 1 was conducted using online surveys, while the Delphi study 2 was conducted using phone interviews. Each Delphi study comprised a qualitative study for exploring the range of views of the two panels and a quantitative validation for generating consensus. We systematically compared the two panels' identified priorities in terms of contents and consensus levels.

RESULTS

Multiple stakeholders identified 32 consensus-based statements and service users identified 25 statements, most of which achieved moderate to high level of consensus. Through content analysis, statements from the two panels were converged into six common themes: (1) early prevention, detection and referral systems for dementia, (2) care and intervention services, (3) health and social care workforce capacity building within and across service sectors, (4) supportive services for family caregivers, (5) development of longer-term dementia service planning and a policy framework, and (6) promotion of a dementia-friendly community. Despite the similarity of the themes expressed by the two panels, critical comparison of their priorities identified the dementia service and policy gaps in providing integrated and informed healthcare, a mechanism for sensitive care allocation, enabling seamless social inclusion, and proactive health orientation of dementia caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between two panels reflect the distinctive value of service user engagement in the policy-making process. Our findings have implications for developing a multi-disciplinary integrated action plan for the local health response across the primary and secondary care settings to dementia and expanding the practice scope of person-centered dementia care in a collaborative way.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The voices of user, caregivers and service stakeholders excel the person-centered care and policy context for integrated dementia care.

Future-Proofing Geriatric Mental Health Care Services in India: Training and Policy Directions

BACKGROUND

A burgeoning rise in the elderly subpopulation is being noted in India. This rise has already earned the designation as a shining nation by the United Nations/World Health Organization. This growth will take the elderly subpopulation to 324 million persons above 60 years by 2050. The mental health needs of this subpopulation are varied and nuanced compared to that of the general population. The risk and prevalence of mental health morbidity are also greater. There is an urgent need to gear up the health care systems.

CONSIDERATIONS

Various aspects of the ongoing demographic transitions are considered alongside available health information. Legislative mandates and laws are also reviewed to provide context to qualify the action points and recommendations. Recommendations, India must act urgently to strengthen health care delivery systems in a concurrent multipronged approach. These efforts should focus on developing trained Human Resources and adequate infrastructural resources. Review mechanisms to inform on required updates on best practices and evidence-based medicine must also be incorporated and developed to perform periodically.

Advances in geropsychiatric nursing: A decade in review

This article provides a brief overview of the early development of geropsychiatric nursing (GPN) as background for examining its advancement subsequent to the 2010 Future of Nursing (FON) Report. The FON's education, practice and leadership recommendations form the three pillars that have supported geropsychiatric nursing's continuing evolution, framed within a practice and policy perspective. Lessons learned are relevant to developing the next phase of FON recommendations. The importance of overcoming challenges faced by the field of GPN is supported by the aging global population, the directions of nursing as a discipline, and the clear necessity of an intra- and inter-professional approach to mental health and aging.

Emerging roles for research intensive PhD prepared nurses: Beyond faculty positions

Research-intensive PhD programs need to prepare nurse scientists to bridge the chasms between research, and practice and policy in an increasingly complex healthcare system. In practice, nurse scientists are critical to building capacity for research, promoting excellence in patient-centered care, and achieving or exceeding national quality benchmarks. Moreover, they provide methodological expertise and insight to address pressing clinical questions. PhD-prepared nurses also leverage their research expertise and practice knowledge to transform health policy in roles as organizational executives and leaders, advocates, and communicators. Re-envisioning nursing PhD curricula is required to ensure that PhD students are capable of not only conducting rigorous and impactful science, but launching careers across sectors of healthcare. Here, we summarize viewpoints of a special session from the October 2019 PhD Summit "Re-Envisioning PhD Programs of the Future" sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing and literature to invigorate thinking about ways to promote career transitions into nontraditional vital positions for nurse scientists. Advancing the health of patients and communities depends on preparing the next generation of nurse scientist to pursue career trajectories outside of traditional academic institutions.