The multifinger force deficit: A protocol to detect incipient cognitive decline

Deficits in force production during multifinger tasks demarcate cognitive dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The multifinger force deficit (MFFD) is the decline in force generated by each finger as the number of fingers contributing to an action is increased. It has been shown to associate with cognitive status.

AIMS

The aim was to establish whether a particularly challenging form of multifinger grip dynamometry, that provides minimal tactile feedback via cutaneous receptors and requires active compensation for reaction forces, will yield an MFFD that is more sensitive to cognitive status.

METHODS

Associations between measures of motor function, and cognitive status (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) and latent components of cognitive function (derived from 11 tests using principal component analysis), were estimated cross-sectionally using generalized partial rank correlations. The participants (n  =  62) were community dwelling, aged 65-87.

RESULTS

Approximately half the participants were unable to complete the dynamometry task successfully. Cognitive status demarcated individuals who could perform the task from those who could not. Among those who complied with the task requirements, the MFFD was negatively correlated with MoCA scores-those with the highest MoCA scores tended to exhibit the smallest deficits, and vice versa. There were corresponding associations with latent components of cognitive function.

DISCUSSION

The results support the view that neurodegenerative processes that are a feature of normal and pathological aging exert corresponding effects on expressions of motor coordination-in multifinger tasks, and cognitive sufficiency, due to their dependence on shared neural systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes add weight to the assertion that deficits in force production during multifinger tasks are sensitive to cognitive dysfunction.

Deficits in rate of force production during multifinger tasks are associated with cognitive status

OBJECTIVES

The multifinger force deficit (MFFD) is the decline in force generated by an individual finger as the number of fingers contributing to the action is increased. It has been proposed that as a measure of neural sufficiency rather than muscle status, it provides a means of detecting individuals at risk of cognitive decline. Age-related deficits in central neural drive exert a disproportionate impact on the rate at which force can be generated. We examined whether a MFFD derived from the maximum rate at which force is generated, is more sensitive to individual differences in cognitive status, than one calculated using the maximum level of force.

METHODS

Monotonic associations between each of two variants of the MFFD, and cognition (measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment), were estimated cross sectionally using generalized partial rank correlations, in which age, level of education and degree of handedness were included as covariates. The participants (n=26) were community dwelling adults aged 66-87.

RESULTS

The MFFD derived using the maximum rate of force development was negatively associated with cognitive status. The association for the MFFD based on the maximum level of force, was not statistically reliable. The associations with cognitive status obtained for both variants of the MFFD were of greater magnitude than those reported previously for standard grip strength dynamometry.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity with which the MFFD detects risk of cognitive decline may be enhanced by using the maximum rate of force developed by each finger, rather than the maximum force generated by each finger.

Discrepancies in hand motor performance and executive function in older adults

There is increasing interest in using motor function tests to identify risk of cognitive impairment in older adults (OA). This study examined associations among grip strength, with and without adjustment for muscle mass, manual dexterity and Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B in 77 OA (73.4 ± 5.2 years) with globally intact cognition. A subset of OA who exhibited mismatched motor function (e.g., in the highest strength and lowest dexterity tertiles, or vice versa) was identified and analyzed. Dexterity showed stronger associations with TMT-A and -B than grip strength (absolute or adjusted). OA with mismatched motor function scored worse on tests of TMT-B, but not -A than those with matched motor function. Dexterity may have more promise than grip strength for identifying increased risk of cognitive impairment. Intriguing, though limited, data suggest that mismatched motor function (strength vs. dexterity) in OAs might be an even more robust marker of such risk.