Outcomes of home-based primary care for homebound older adults: A randomized clinical trial

Improve the satisfaction of medical staff on the use of home nursing mobile APP by using a hybrid multi-standard decision model

OBJECTIVE

To identify critical satisfaction gaps in a home nursing mobile application (APP) using a systematic decision-making model.

METHODS

Initially, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method was used to analyze the relationship structure and corresponding weights among the indicators. The Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method was used to identify the categories of all indicators and their corresponding strategic directions. Twenty-six home nursing specialists currently providing home nursing services were recruited for this study.

RESULTS

The IPA results revealed that "Assurance," "Reliability," and "Personal security protection" are critical satisfaction gaps. From the influence network and weight results, "information quality" and "system quality" were the critical quality factors in the home nursing mobile APP. The influence of the network relationship structure and weight demonstrated a 98.12% significance level, indicating good stability.

CONCLUSION

Continuous improvement in information and system quality is recommended to optimize the overall quality of the home nursing mobile APP. Additionally, user demands should be considered, and personal safety guarantee functions should be developed and integrated into the system to ensure the safety of home nursing workers.

Trajectories of care and outcomes of Veterans receiving home-based primary care

BACKGROUND

Veterans Affairs (VA) home-based primary care (HBPC) provides comprehensive longitudinal care to patients with complex, chronic disabling disease. While enrollment is associated with lower hospitalization rates and costs, detailed trajectories have not been well described.

METHODS

We performed a longitudinal descriptive study of patients newly enrolled in VA HBPC in fiscal year (FY) 2015. We extracted demographics, comorbidities, functional status, and social supports from VA and Medicare data and examined patterns of care and clinical outcomes, including hospital, nursing home (NH), hospice use and mortality from FY2015-2017. We present results using descriptive statistics, alluvial plots, and heat maps.

RESULTS

We identified 10,571 HBPC enrollees in FY2015; mean age was 77.7. HBPC patients commonly had chronic medical conditions with high self-management burden (e.g., diabetes 48.2%) and disabling conditions such as dementia (39.3%). Over half had ≥2 deficits in activities of daily living, 46% had caregivers with functional limitations or no caregiver, and 25% resided in a socially deprived area. Patients experienced variable care trajectories. Mean time enrolled in HBPC was 331 days, 8.3% of patients were discharged after 3 months, and 22.8% stayed enrolled for over 2 years. Institutional health care use declined in the 6 months after initial enrollment: (e.g., hospital: 41%-25%, NH: 34%-11%). At 2 years, 36% of patients had died; among decedents, 58% received hospice and 72% died in a non-institutional setting. In the last 180 days of life, 84% of time was spent at home, and once enrolled in hospice, 97% of time was spent outside of institutional care.

CONCLUSIONS

HBPC patients experience highly variable care trajectories but on average have reductions in acute care use and spend a majority of time in non-institutional settings. These data allow for a nuanced understanding of HBPC, providing a platform for monitoring, evaluating, and improving program function.

Implementation of patient priorities-aligned care in a home-based primary care program

BACKGROUND

Older adults may be limited in their ability to access care that meets their health goals owing to disease burden, financial instability, and psychosocial barriers. A home-based primary care (HBPC) program established in 2020 within a large family medicine practice uses the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach to identify and address patients' health priorities. When incorporated as part of the HBPC model of care, the PPC approach has the potential to enhance person-centered care for older adults in a way that best supports their health goals.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to summarize common recommendations for alignment of care with patients' health outcome goals after implementation of the PPC approach in an HBPC population.

METHODS

This retrospective study was exempt from review by an institutional review board. After enrollment in the HBPC program, patients participated in a PPC priorities identification conversation to identify their health outcome goals and care preferences. Through chart review, 2 researchers independently categorized these goals based on the set of values they most reflect: connecting, managing health, enjoying life, and functioning. Aspects of care in place before enrollment in HBPC were considered to determine any adjustments that needed to be made to align care with patients' identified priorities.

RESULTS

The most common value associated with patients' most desired health outcome goal was functioning (n = 33, 66%). For secondary and tertiary health outcome goals, the most common value identified was managing health (secondary, n = 28, 56%; tertiary, n = 22, 44%). Common recommendations made to align care with patients' identified priorities included stopping potentially harmful medications, starting medications for untreated conditions, starting physical or occupational therapy, and adjusting medications.

CONCLUSION

Through the PPC approach, patients' values were identified and care was assessed to aid in attainment of individualized health outcome goals and tailor care to What Matters most.

Reply to: Independence at home evaluation findings do not support creating a permanent Medicare program - It does

This letter comments on the letter by Kimmey et al in this issue.

Addition of community paramedics to a physician home-visit program: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Home-based primary care promotes aging in place but is not immediately responsive to urgent needs. Community paramedicine leverages emergency medical services clinicians to expedite in-home care, though limited evidence supports this model. We evaluated the primary care and acute care use of older adults evaluated urgently by a community paramedic with telemedicine physician compared to a physician home visit model.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled older adults in home-based primary care who requested an urgent evaluation. We allocated participants to the physician home visit model or physician home visit plus community paramedic model by ZIP code. We observed primary care and acute care use for 6 months following enrollment. The primary outcome was the median number of primary care and acute care visits per participant. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, median wait times, and physician productivity. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, comparison of means and proportions, and negative binomial regression modeling reported as incidence rate ratios (IRR).

RESULTS

We screened 255 participants, determined 203 eligible, allocated 199, and completed observation for 167 (84 community paramedicine, 83 physician home visit). Participants were mostly female, age 76-86 years, with 3-5 comorbidities, living in a home/apartment. Community paramedic participants had 29% more primary care visits (IRR 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.57) and shorter wait times for urgent evaluations (1 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001) without increasing acute care use (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.18) or 30-day readmissions (IRR 1.32, 95% CI 0.49-3.55). Physician productivity increased 81% (40 vs. 22 visits/week, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Older adults evaluated by a community paramedic for urgent needs were seen sooner, used acute care similarly to patients evaluated by a physician home visit, and nearly doubled physician efficiency. This suggests that older adults may benefit from combining emergency medical services and primary care resources for urgent evaluations.

Home-Based Medical Care Use In Medicare Advantage And Traditional Medicare In 2018

The use of home-based medical care differed in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare in 2018. Having exactly one such visit was thirty-one times as likely for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries (18.6 percent) as for traditional Medicare beneficiaries (0.6 percent), likely reflecting incentives in the Medicare Advantage program to code all accurate diagnoses. Multiple home-based medical care visits were less likely in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare (1.6 percent versus 2.1 percent of beneficiaries, respectively).

The Impact of Home-Based Primary Care on Outcomes Among Older Adults in South Korea

OBJECTIVES

Although Korea issued a law and developed benefits of National Health Insurance (NHI) to enable the provision of home-based primary care (HBPC) along with implementation of a pilot project for community care for older adults in August 2019, the outcomes of HBPC services were not surveyed in Korea. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of HBPC among older adults.

DESIGN

Analyses were conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service in connection with administrative survey data. Difference-in-differences analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equation and Cox proportional hazards model.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 538 older adults who used HBPC services in a pilot project for community care and 2059 propensity score-matched older individuals who did not use HBPC services in Korea were included.

METHODS

The length of home stay, total costs of NHI, hospitalizations, and admission to long-term care (LTC) facilities were measured as outcomes, and the outcomes of the participants were compared to those of the control group.

RESULTS

The findings indicated an increase of 8.3 days (95% CI 2.1-14.5) in the length of home stay and a reduction of US$1241 (95% CI -2342 to -139) in total costs of NHI among older adults who used HBPC services compared to the control group. The odds ratio for rates of hospitalization among older adults who utilized HBPC services was 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98) and the hazard ratio for the admission of LTC facilities was 0.12 (95% CI 0.04-0.32) in comparison to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The HBPC intervention has resulted in an increased length of home stay and reduced total costs, hospitalizations, and admission to LTC facilities among Korean older adults. In the future, new HBPC models must be developed to provide interprofessional team-based HBPC services with a standardized protocol of service provision.