Putting quality food on the tray: Factors associated with patients' perceptions of the hospital food experience

Meals are more than nutrition for children with a malignant or non-malignant disorder with a gastrostomy tube: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

To elucidate mealtime experiences of children hospitalized with a malignant or severe non-malignant disorder -and their parents-after a gastrostomy tube insertion.

METHODS

A qualitative design involving a child-centred care approach was used. Parents of children aged 1-18 years old who had received a gastrostomy tube during treatment for a malignant or non-malignant disorder were included, as were the children themselves when aged 5-18 years old. Semi-structured interviews with 21 families were carried out and a thematic analysis performed.

RESULTS

The findings were presented in four themes: changed meal conditions, a troublesome sensory dimension, aggravating obstacles and solving the unmanageable. Hospitalization involves challenges regarding environmental aspects, hospital food and side effects, contributing to impaired nutritional intake and aggravated mealtime situations.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital environment and hospital food have a profound impact on children's nutritional intake and mealtime situations. In addition, sensory aspects and side effects aggravate the child's motivation to eat, resulting in demanding meals. The families described a gastrostomy tube as a valuable strategy for improving mealtime situations.

Evaluating Patient Experience with Food in a Hospital-Wide Survey

Purpose: Patient dissatisfaction with hospital food is an important driver of poor food intake in hospitals. The objective of this study was to examine patient satisfaction with current menu offerings and explore patient preferences and values, in order to inform a patient-centred menu redesign.Methods: Between July and September 2021, a cross-sectional survey was distributed to inpatients receiving a lunch tray at Vancouver General Hospital, a large tertiary care centre in Vancouver, Canada. The survey was based on the Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, with additional questions on food experience, factors impacting preferences for hospital meals, interest in plant-rich diets, and demographics.Results: The response rate was 5.5%, with 271 patients completing at least part of the survey. On a 5-point Likert scale, (5 - highest score; 1 - lowest score) satisfaction with food quality (mean = 3.09, p < 0.001) and the overall experience (mean = 3.54, p < 0.001) was lower than industry benchmark of 4, and qualitative feedback was generally negative. Open-ended responses indicated patients were interested in expanded cultural diversity in food provision, more fresh produce and better flavours, and were generally open to trying plant-rich foods.Conclusions: A number of opportunities for improvement were identified in this survey, which will inform an upcoming menu redesign in this institution.

Family Caregivers' Role in Navigating Diet: Perspectives from Caregivers of Older Asian Americans

Family caregivers uphold significant healthcare responsibilities including language translation and diet management. This study sought to understand family caregivers' experiences and challenges navigating and managing their older Asian American relative's diet. We conducted an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study with family caregivers involving (1) qualitative interviews (n = 40) and (2) a nationwide survey (n = 100). Interviewees discussed their role and challenges with (a) applying American/Western clinical dietary recommendations to their relative's traditional meal preferences and (b) managing misalignment between their relative's traditional dietary preferences and the food offered in hospitals and long-term care environments. Survey responses triangulated; almost 65% of family caregivers prepared and brought traditional meals to healthcare facilities upon observing a lack of culturally relevant food options. Culturally relevant nutrition training for family caregivers can help them support their relative in community settings. Creating an inclusive healthcare system requires transforming the food environment within healthcare facilities.

The Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire Predicts Adult Patient Food Intake

Purpose: Describe food/beverage intake among all patients and those with low meal intake and determine if the Hospital Food Experience Questionnaire (HFEQ), or its shorter version (HFEQ-sv), predicts food intake while considering patient (e.g., gender) and hospital characteristics (e.g., foodservice model).Methods: Cross-sectional study of 1087 adult patients from 16 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. The valid and reliable HFEQ assessed patients' meal quality perceptions. Visual estimation determined overall meal and food/beverage intake using the Comstock method. Binary logistic regressions tested the association between patient and hospital characteristics and whether HFEQ or HFEQ-sv scores added utility in predicting overall meal intake (≤50% vs. ≥75%).Results: Approximately 29% of patients consumed ≤50% of their meal. Models assessing patient and hospital characteristics and either the HFEQ or the HFEQ-sv were significant (LRT(43) = 72.25, P = 0.003; LRT(43) = 93.46, P < 0.001). Men and higher HFEQ or HFEQ-sv scores demonstrated significantly higher odds of ≥75% meal consumption. Considering HFEQ or HFEQ-sv scores explained greater variance in meal intake and resulted in better model fits.Conclusions: The HFEQ and HFEQ-sv predict patient meal intake when adjusting for covariates and add utility in understanding meal intake. Either version can be confidently used to support menu planning and food delivery to promote food intake.

Guidance and perspectives on highly processed foods

Guidance from Health Canada to limit highly processed foods (HPF) seeks to ensure that Canadians remain within intake recommendations for nutrients of concern. However, HPF can contribute to dietary requirements of specific populations. The Canadian Nutrition Society and Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutritional Sciences convened speakers for a Food for Health workshop in 2021 to provide evidence and perspectives from government, industry, and healthcare on reasons for advocating limits and potential unintended consequences of limiting HPF, and implications and necessity of HPF in clinical settings. This paper discusses advantages and disadvantages of HPF explored at this workshop.