Using learning flexibly and remembering after a delay: understanding cognitive dysfunction in adults with Down syndrome

Executive Functioning in Adults with Down Syndrome: Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Inhibitory Capacity

The study of executive function decline in adults with Down syndrome (DS) is important, because it supports independent functioning in real-world settings. Inhibitory control is posited to be essential for self-regulation and adaptation to daily life activities. However, cognitive domains that most predict the capacity for inhibition in adults with DS have not been identified. The aim of this study was to identify cognitive domains that predict the capacity for inhibition, using novel data-driven techniques in a sample of adults with DS (n = 188; 49.47% men; 33.6 ± 8.8 years old), with low and moderate levels of intellectual disability. Neuropsychological tests, including assessment of memory, attention, language, executive functions, and praxis, were submitted to Random Forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression algorithms for the purpose of predicting inhibition capacity, assessed with the Cats-and-Dogs test. Convergent results from the three algorithms show that the best predictors for inhibition capacity were constructive praxis, verbal memory, immediate memory, planning, and written verbal comprehension. These results suggest the minimum set of neuropsychological assessments and potential intervention targets for individuals with DS and ID, which may optimize potential for independent living.

A comprehensive examination of the memory profile of youth with Down syndrome in comparison to typically developing peers

Down syndrome (DS) is associated with significant memory deficits beyond overall global cognitive impairment. Although a number of studies have examined memory abilities in adults and teens with DS, very few studies have examined memory abilities in children with DS. Additionally, research has yet to examine prospective memory (i.e., remembering to carry out an action in the future) in youth with DS. Consequently, the current study aimed to comprehensively examine the memory profile, including learning, immediate recall, delayed recall and prospective memory, of youth with DS (n = 22, age M = 11.43) in comparison to typically developing, mental-age (MA) matched children (n = 20, age M = 5.04) Consistent with past research, the results indicated that youth with DS performed significantly below MA-expectations on tasks of immediate verbal recall, learning across trials, and prospective memory, and there was a trend toward youth with DS performing below MA-expectations on delayed recall tasks. However, youth with DS did not differ significantly from MA-matched peers on immediate visual recall, rate of learning across trials, or proportion of items recalled on verbal and visual memory tasks following a delay (i.e., proportion relative to their own recall performance prior to the delay). These results highlight the relative strengths and challenges experienced by youth with DS on different learning and memory tasks. The implications of these findings for educators and caregivers are discussed.