Pediatric Cancer Genetics Research and an Evolving Preventive Ethics Approach for Return of Results after Death of the Subject

Stakeholders' perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review

The majority of biobank policies and consent forms do not address post-mortem use of data for medical research, thus causing uncertainty after research participants' death. This systematic review identifies studies examining stakeholders' perspectives on this issue. We conducted a search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science. Findings were categorised in two themes: (1) views on the use of data for medical research after participants' death, and (2) perspectives regarding the post-mortem return of individual genetic research results. An important subtheme was the appropriate authority and degree of control over posthumous use of data. The sixteen included studies all focused on genetic data and used quantitative and qualitative methods to survey perspectives of research participants, family members, researchers and Institutional Review Board members. Acceptability of post-mortem use of data for medical research was high among research participants and their relatives. Most stakeholders thought participants should be informed about post-mortem research uses during initial consent. Between lay persons and professionals, disagreement exists about whether relatives should receive actionable genetic findings, and whether the deceased's previous preferences can be overridden. We conclude that regulations and ethical guidance should leave room for post-mortem use of personal data for research, provided that informed consent procedures are transparent on this issue, including the return of individual research findings to relatives. Future research is needed to explore underlying causes for differences in views, as well as ethical and legal issues on the appropriate level of control by deceased research participants (while alive) and their relatives.

Integrating genetic counseling and testing in the pediatric oncology setting: Parental attitudes and influencing factors

BACKGROUND

Cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) are caused by germline pathogenic variants that put an individual at increased risk of developing cancer throughout their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 10-15% of children with cancer have an underlying CPS. Although research has investigated the clinical utility of genetic testing for children diagnosed with cancer, this study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of parental attitudes toward genetic testing in this population.

PROCEDURE

Attitudes toward genetic counseling and testing among parents of children diagnosed with cancer were solicited through questionnaires distributed to a pediatric cancer clinic and online support groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests for association.

RESULTS

The majority of participants had prior knowledge of genetic counseling (64.3%), yet most were not offered genetic counseling (59.5%). Fifty percent of parents reported interest in pursuing genetic counseling/testing and 31.0% reported uncertainty. Statistically significant associations were identified between interest in genetic counseling/testing and the child's age at diagnosis, child's sex, and participant annual income (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Parents of children diagnosed with cancer generally expressed interest in genetic counseling/testing; however, notable uncertainty was also reported. In light of this uncertainty, genetic counselors have an ideal skill set to engage families in their decision-making process as they weigh the benefits and drawbacks to pursuing genetic testing among this population. Demonstrated parental receptiveness to genomic technologies supports expansion of genetics providers in pediatric oncology care.

Using genomics to define pediatric blood cancers and inform practice

Over the past decade, there has been exponential growth in the number of genome sequencing studies performed across a spectrum of human diseases as sequencing technologies and analytic pipelines improve and costs decline. Pediatric hematologic malignancies have been no exception, with a multitude of next generation sequencing studies conducted on large cohorts of patients in recent years. These efforts have defined the mutational landscape of a number of leukemia subtypes and also identified germ-line genetic variants biologically and clinically relevant to pediatric leukemias. The findings have deepened our understanding of the biology of many childhood leukemias. Additionally, a number of recent discoveries may positively impact the care of pediatric leukemia patients through refinement of risk stratification, identification of targetable genetic lesions, and determination of risk for therapy-related toxicity. Although incredibly promising, many questions remain, including the biologic significance of identified genetic lesions and their clinical implications in the context of contemporary therapy. Importantly, the identification of germ-line mutations and variants with possible implications for members of the patient's family raises challenging ethical questions. Here, we review emerging genomic data germane to pediatric hematologic malignancies.