Effects of Anesthesia on Cerebral Blood Flow and Functional Connectivity of Nonhuman Primates

Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are the closest living relatives of humans and play a critical and unique role in neuroscience research and pharmaceutical development. General anesthesia is usually required in neuroimaging studies of NHPs to keep the animal from stress and motion. However, the adverse effects of anesthesia on cerebral physiology and neural activity are pronounced and can compromise the data collection and interpretation. Functional connectivity is frequently examined using resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) to assess the functional abnormality in the animal brain under anesthesia. The fMRI signal can be dramatically suppressed by most anesthetics in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, rsfMRI studies may be further compromised by inter-subject variations when the sample size is small (as seen in most neuroscience studies of NHPs). Therefore, proper use of anesthesia is strongly demanded to ensure steady and consistent physiology maintained during rsfMRI data collection of each subject. The aim of this review is to summarize typical anesthesia used in rsfMRI scans of NHPs and the effects of anesthetics on cerebral physiology and functional connectivity. Moreover, the protocols with optimal rsfMRI data acquisition and anesthesia procedures for functional connectivity study of macaque monkeys are introduced.

Comparison between three dosages of intramuscular alfaxalone and a ketamine-dexmedetomidine-midazolam-tramadol combination in golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas)

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the cardiopulmonary and anesthetic effects of alfaxalone at three dose rates in comparison with a ketamine-dexmedetomidine-midazolam-tramadol combination (KDMT) for immobilization of golden-headed lion tamarins (GHLTs) (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) undergoing vasectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

ANIMALS

A total of 19 healthy, male, wild-caught GHLTs.

METHODS

Tamarins were administered alfaxalone intramuscularly (IM) at 6, 12 or 15 mg kg^-1, or KDMT, ketamine (15 mg kg^-1), dexmedetomidine (0.015 mg kg^-1), midazolam (0.5 mg kg^-1) and tramadol (4 mg kg^-1) IM. Immediately after immobilization, lidocaine (8 mg kg^-1) was infiltrated subcutaneously (SC) at the incision site in all animals. Physiologic variables, anesthetic depth and quality of immobilization were assessed. At the end of the procedure, atipamezole (0.15 mg kg^-1) was administered IM to group KDMT and tramadol (4 mg kg^-1) SC to the other groups; all animals were injected with ketoprofen (2 mg kg^-1) SC.

RESULTS

A dose-dependent increase in sedation, muscle relaxation and immobilization time was noted in the alfaxalone groups. Despite the administration of atipamezole, the recovery time was longer for KDMT than all other groups. Muscle tremors were noted in some animals during induction and recovery with alfaxalone. No significant differences were observed for cardiovascular variables among the alfaxalone groups, whereas an initial decrease in heart rate and systolic arterial blood pressure was recorded in KDMT, which increased after atipamezole administration.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Alfaxalone dose rates of 12 or 15 mg kg^-1 IM with local anesthesia provided good sedation and subjectively adequate pain control for vasectomies in GHLTs. KDMT induced a deeper plane of anesthesia and should be considered for more invasive or painful procedures. All study groups experienced mild to moderate hypothermia and hypoxemia; therefore, the use of more efficient heating devices and oxygen supplementation is strongly recommended when using these protocols.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Marmoset Monkeys

The use of the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) for neuroscientific research has grown markedly in the last decade. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has played a significant role in establishing the extent of comparability of marmoset brain architecture with the human brain and brains of other preclinical species (eg, macaques and rodents). As a non-invasive technique, MRI allows for the flexible acquisition of the same sequences across different species in vivo, including imaging of whole-brain functional topologies not possible with more invasive techniques. Being one of the smallest New World primates, the marmoset may be an ideal nonhuman primate species to study with MRI. As primates, marmosets have an elaborated frontal cortex with features analogous to the human brain, while also having a small enough body size to fit into powerful small-bore MRI systems typically employed for rodent imaging; these systems offer superior signal strength and resolution. Further, marmosets have a rich behavioral repertoire uniquely paired with a lissencephalic cortex (like rodents). This smooth cortical surface lends itself well to MRI and also other invasive methodologies. With the advent of transgenic modification techniques, marmosets have gained significant traction as a powerful complement to canonical mammalian modelling species. Marmosets are poised to make major contributions to preclinical investigations of the pathophysiology of human brain disorders as well as more basic mechanistic explorations of the brain. The goal of this article is to provide an overview of the practical aspects of implementing MRI and fMRI in marmosets (both under anesthesia and fully awake) and discuss the development of resources recently made available for marmoset imaging.

Current Topics in Marmoset Anesthesia and Analgesia

Anesthetic and analgesics are essential components of both clinical and research procedures completed in marmosets. A review of current anesthetic and analgesic regimens for marmosets has been complied to provide a concise reference for veterinarians and investigator teams. Published dose regimens for injectable and inhalant anesthetic drugs and analgesic drugs are included. Appropriate physiological monitoring is key to the success of the procedure and perianesthetic options are provided. Although recent publications have refined anesthesia and analgesia practices, our review demonstrates the continued need for evidence-based resources specific to marmosets.

Effects of alfaxalone on cerebral blood flow and intrinsic neural activity of rhesus monkeys: A comparison study with ketamine

OBJECTIVE

Alfaxalone has been used increasingly in biomedical research and veterinary medicine of large animals in recent years. However, its effects on the cerebral blood flow (CBF) physiology and intrinsic neuronal activity of anesthetized brains remain poorly understood.

METHODS

Four healthy adult rhesus monkeys were anesthetized initially with alfaxalone (0.125 mg/kg/min) or ketamine (1.6 mg/kg/min) for 50 min, then administrated with 0.8% isoflurane for 60 min. Heart rates, breathing beats, and blood pressures were continuously monitored. CBF data were collected using pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeling (pCASL) MRI technique and rsfMRI data were collected using single-shot EPI sequence for each anesthetic.

RESULTS

Both the heart rates and mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained more stable during alfaxalone infusion than those during ketamine administration. Alfaxalone reduced CBF substantially compared to ketamine anesthesia (grey matter, 65 ± 22 vs. 179 ± 38 ml/100g/min, p<0.001; white matter, 14 ± 7 vs. 26 ± 6 ml/100g/min, p < 0.05); In addition, CBF increase was seen in all selected cortical and subcortical regions of alfaxalone-pretreated monkey brains during isoflurane exposure, very different from the findings in isoflurane-exposed monkeys pretreated with ketamine. Also, alfaxalone showed suppression effects on functional connectivity of the monkey brain similar to ketamine.

CONCLUSION

Alfaxalone showed strong suppression effects on CBF of the monkey brain.The residual effect of alfaxalone on CBF of isoflurane-exposed brains was evident and monotonous in all the examined brain regions when used as induction agent for inhalational anesthesia. In particular, alfaxalone showed similar suppression effect on intrinsic neuronal activity of the brain in comparison with ketamine. These findings suggest alfaxalone can be a good alternative to veterinary anesthesia in neuroimaging examination of large animal models. However, its effects on CBF and functional connectivity should be considered.

Evaluation of anaesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects after intramuscular administration of alfaxalone alone, alfaxalone-ketamine and alfaxalone-butorphanol-medetomidine in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

BACKGROUND

Anaesthesia is often required in common marmosets undergoing various procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate anaesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of alfaxalone, alfaxalone-ketamine and alfaxalone-butorphanol-medetomidine in common marmosets.

METHODS

The following treatments were repeatedly administered to seven female common marmosets: Treatment A, alfaxalone (12 mg kg^-1 ) alone; treatment AK, alfaxalone (1 mg animal^-1 ) plus ketamine (2.5 mg animal^-1 ); treatment AMB, alfaxalone (4 mg kg^-1 ), medetomidine (50 µg kg^-1 ) plus butorphanol (0.3 mg kg^-1 ); and treatment AMB-Ati, AMB with atipamezole at 45 minutes.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Marmosets became laterally recumbent and unresponsive for approximately 30 minutes in A and AK and for approximately 60 minutes in AMB. The animals showed rapid recovery following atipamezole injection in AMB-Ati. The decrease in heart rate and SpO₂ was significantly greater in AMB compared to A and AK. Oxygen supplementation, anaesthetic monitors and atipamezole should be available especially when AMB is administered.