1
|
Hill MG. Maternal levels of care during pregnancy influence labor and delivery outcomes - present practices and future priorities. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2024:101529. [PMID: 38614837 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2024.101529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a diagnosis that is usually unexpected. Though there are many risk factors for the condition and multiple theories as to its genesis, the majority of cases cannot be predicted prior to the occurrence of the clinical syndrome. Indeed, it is common for a pregnant person to have multiple risk factors and a completely healthy child. Conversely, people with seemingly no risk factors may go on to have a profoundly affected child. In this synopsis we review risk factors, potential mechanisms for encephalopathy, the complicated issue of choosing which morbidity to take on and how the maternal level of care may influence outcomes. The reader should be able to better understand the limitations of current testing and the profound levels of maternal intervention that have been undertaken to prevent or mitigate the rare, but devastating occurrence of NE. Further, we suggest candidate future approaches to prevent the occurrence, and decrease the severity of NE. Any future improvements in the NE syndrome cannot be achieved via obstetric intervention and management alone or conversely, by improvements in treatments offered post-birth. Multidisciplinary approaches that encompass prepregnancy health, pregnancy care, intrapartum management and postpartum care will be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan G Hill
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Numeracy levels influence shared decision-making and surgical outcomes: A scoping review of the literature. Am J Surg 2023; 225:967-974. [PMID: 36623965 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health literacy has been widely studied with regard to medical decision-making and health care access, however research regarding numeracy - the ability to comprehend and attach meaning to numbers - is more limited. METHODS A scoping review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. We screened 132 abstracts and 12 studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS Surgical population numeracy ranged from 47 to 86.1%. We found heterogeneity in the scales used to measure numeracy and the cutoff values used to define adequate numeracy. Low numeracy was shown to influence the accuracy of patients' responses to quality of life measures used to determine surgical outcomes and was associated with patient overestimation of pre-operative risk. Adequate numeracy was correlated with improved outcomes 2-4 years after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS Patient numeracy is generally poor and has important implications for pre-operative risk understanding, accuracy of health measurement tools and long-term surgical outcomes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gimovsky AC, Schlichting LE, White J, Fisher K, Vivier PM, Werner EF. Early childhood educational outcomes of children associated with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4:100698. [PMID: 35908729 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery have decreased and cesarean delivery rates have increased in the last 2 decades. Evidence on short-term neonatal outcomes is available, but data on long-term childhood outcomes following vaginal birth after cesarean delivery are insufficient. Long-term childhood outcome data are essential in decision-making regarding mode of delivery. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the association between delivery mode and long-term educational outcomes of the children of pregnant individuals with a previous cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study linking Rhode Island third-grade education data from 2014 to 2017 to birth certificate data. Data were obtained from a statewide database using Department of Education data, and were linked to Department of Health birth certificate data. Participants were children of multiparous women who were term, singleton births without congenital anomalies. Children delivered by primary cesarean delivery were excluded. The exposure was mode of delivery classified as vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, repeated cesarean delivery, or repeated vaginal birth. The primary outcome was children's third-grade reading and math proficiency. Bivariate analyses were conducted to assess differences in demographic variables. Bivariable and multivariable log-binomial regression was used to examine the association between subject proficiency and predictors including mode of delivery, maternal education, sex, child race or ethnicity, and lunch subsidy. RESULTS Of the 10,923 children who met the inclusion criteria, 2.0% were delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, 22.0% by repeated cesarean delivery, and 76.0% by repeated vaginal delivery. After adjustment for confounders, there was no difference in reading proficiency (adjusted risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.15) or math proficiency (adjusted risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.15) between those born by vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and those born by repeated cesarean delivery. There was no difference found in either proficiency between children born by repeated vaginal birth and those born by repeated cesarean delivery (reading: adjusted risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.01; math: adjusted risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.02). CONCLUSION In comparison with repeated cesarean delivery, both vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and repeated vaginal birth were not associated with differences in educational outcomes. This may aid in counseling about long-term safety outcomes regarding vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and may assist in shared decision-making when selecting between trial of labor after cesarean delivery and repeated cesarean delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis C Gimovsky
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (Drs Gimovsky and Werner).
| | - Lauren E Schlichting
- Hassenfeld Child Health Innovation Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI (Drs Schlichting, Vivier, and Werner)
| | - Jordan White
- Rhode Island Departments of Health and Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (Dr White)
| | - Kirtley Fisher
- Rhode Island Department of Education, Providence, RI (Ms Fisher)
| | - Patrick M Vivier
- Hassenfeld Child Health Innovation Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI (Drs Schlichting, Vivier, and Werner)
| | - Erika F Werner
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (Drs Gimovsky and Werner); Hassenfeld Child Health Innovation Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI (Drs Schlichting, Vivier, and Werner); Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (Dr Werner)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams AC, Martinez LI, Garrison A, Frost CJ, Gren LH. Factors leading to satisfaction with counseling for Labor after Cesarean among Latina women in the United States. Birth 2022; 49:71-79. [PMID: 34263970 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cesarean birth, especially repeat cesarean, is associated with significantly higher morbidity than vaginal birth. Appropriately counseling women who are candidates for labor after cesarean (LAC) has the potential to confer significant health benefits for women. Little guidance exists about optimal counseling techniques, especially for Latina women. The aim of this study was to evaluate satisfaction among Latinas about how LAC counseling is performed, specifically as it relates to shared decision making. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study of pregnant women at several clinics in a Federally Qualified Health Center system in Utah. We interviewed eleven Latina women about satisfaction with recent LAC counseling with a specific aim of obtaining rich, personal narratives rather than reaching data saturation. A codebook representing the most common themes was developed. RESULTS Three major themes emerged related to LAC counseling including influences on satisfaction, influences on the birth decision process, and preferences surrounding method and timing of counseling. Women experienced greater satisfaction from providers who used jargon-free communication, were perceived as trustworthy, cared about her experiences, and empowered her to make an informed decision. Women's decisions were influenced by prior birth experiences, desire for a safe delivery and easy recovery, and future family planning. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the aspects of LAC counseling that are most meaningful for Latina women can promote effective communication between patient and provider and improve patient satisfaction. Globally, our findings highlight the importance of evaluating the experiences and preferences of minority groups; majority populations cannot be assumed to speak for minority populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lisa H Gren
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:664.e1-664.e7. [PMID: 34043983 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Investigators have attempted to derive tools that could provide clinicians with an easily obtainable estimate of the chance of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery for those who undertake trial of labor after cesarean delivery. One tool that has been validated externally was derived from data from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry. However, concern has been raised that this tool includes the socially constructed variables of race and ethnicity. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop an accurate tool to predict vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, using data easily obtainable early in pregnancy, without the inclusion of race and ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN This was a secondary analysis of the Cesarean Registry of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The approach to the current analysis is similar to that of the analysis in which the previous vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction tool was derived. Specifically, individuals were included in this analysis if they were delivered on or after 37 0/7 weeks' gestation with a live singleton cephalic fetus at the time of labor and delivery admission, had a trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and had a history of 1 previous low-transverse cesarean delivery. Information was only considered for inclusion in the model if it was ascertainable at an initial prenatal visit. Model selection and internal validation were performed using a cross-validation procedure, with the dataset randomly and equally divided into a training set and a test set. The training set was used to identify factors associated with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and build the logistic regression predictive model using stepwise backward elimination. A final model was generated that included all variables found to be significant (P<.05). The accuracy of the model to predict vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was assessed using the concordance index. The independent test set was used to estimate classification errors and validate the model that had been developed from the training set, and calibration was assessed. The final model was then applied to the overall analytical population. RESULTS Of the 11,687 individuals who met the inclusion criteria for this secondary analysis, 8636 (74%) experienced vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. The backward elimination variable selection yielded a model from the training set that included maternal age, prepregnancy weight, height, indication for previous cesarean delivery, obstetrical history, and chronic hypertension. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was significantly more likely for women who were taller and had a previous vaginal birth, particularly if that vaginal birth had occurred after a previous cesarean delivery. Conversely, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was significantly less likely for women whose age was older, whose weight was heavier, whose indication for previous cesarean delivery was arrest of dilation or descent, and who had a history of medication-treated chronic hypertension. The model had excellent calibration between predicted and empirical probabilities and, when applied to the overall analytical population, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.77), which is similar to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the previous model (0.75) that included race and ethnicity. CONCLUSION We successfully derived an accurate model (available at https://mfmunetwork.bsc.gwu.edu/web/mfmunetwork/vaginal-birth-after-cesarean-calculator), which did not include race or ethnicity, for the estimation of the probability of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Collapse
|
6
|
African American Women's Experiences with Birth After a Prior Cesarean Section. Matern Child Health J 2021; 26:806-813. [PMID: 34731358 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03277-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Women who have had a cesarean section (C-section) and become pregnant again may choose to have a planned repeat cesarean delivery (RCD) or vaginal birth after a cesarean (VBAC). This study aimed to characterize the pregnancy and birth experiences of African American (AA) women who had a successful VBAC, failed VBAC, or RCD. METHODS Eligible participants (N = 25) self-identified as AA, had a C-section and a subsequent birth(s) in the past 12 years, and were educated past high school. Each participant was individually interviewed via phone call. The Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method was used to evaluate interview transcripts to minimize researcher bias and emphasize the voices of the participants. RESULTS The resulting themes included the impact of providers on pregnancy and childbirth satisfaction, the value of autonomy in maternal health decision-making, and the role that racism plays in AA women's birth experiences. Although some participants recalled a positive experience, the presence of limited autonomy, lack of support, and negative experiences with providers indicate that birth after a prior C-section for AA women can be improved. CONCLUSIONS Providers should address their own racial biases and utilize the shared decision-making approach when their patients decide between a VBAC and RCD to improve patient satisfaction.
Collapse
|
7
|
The Perspectives of Women and Their Health-Care Providers Regarding Using an ECA to Support Mode of Birth Decisions. J Perinat Educ 2021; 30:135-144. [DOI: 10.1891/j-pe-d-20-00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study used focus groups to assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA) to support decision-making about mode of birth after previous cesarean. Twelve women with previous cesareans, and eight prenatal providers at an academic, tertiary-care medical center, viewed a prototype ECA and were asked to share feedback on the potential role in helping women prepare for decision-making. Both groups felt that although it was somewhat “robot-like,” the ECA could provide easy access to information for patients and could augment the visit with providers. Future work is needed to improve ECA visual appeal and clarify the role and timing for utilization of decision aids using ECA technology to enhance the shared decision-making process.
Collapse
|
8
|
Basile Ibrahim B, Knobf MT, Shorten A, Vedam S, Cheyney M, Illuzzi J, Kennedy HP. "I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States. Birth 2021; 48:164-177. [PMID: 33274500 PMCID: PMC8122048 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is safe, cost-effective, and beneficial. Despite professional recommendations supporting VBAC and high success rates, VBAC rates in the United States (US) have remained below 15% since 2002. Very little has been written about access to VBAC in the United States from the perspectives of birthing people. We describe findings from a mixed methods study examining experiences seeking a VBAC in the United States. METHODS Individuals with a history of cesarean and recent subsequent birth were recruited through social media groups. Using an online questionnaire, we collected sociodemographic and birth history information, qualitative accounts of participants' experiences, and scores on the Mothers on Respect Index, the Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, and the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. RESULTS Participants (N = 1711) representing all 50 states completed the questionnaire; 1151 provided qualitative data. Participants who planned a VBAC reported significantly greater decision-making autonomy and respectful treatment in their maternity care compared with those who did not. The qualitative theme: "I had to fight for my VBAC" describes participants' accounts of navigating obstacles to VBAC, including finding a supportive provider and traveling long distances to locate a clinician and/or hospital willing to provide care. Participants cited support from providers, doulas, and peers as critical to their ability to acquire the requisite knowledge and power to effectively self-advocate. DISCUSSION Findings highlight the difficulties individuals face accessing VBAC within the context of a complex health system and help to explain why rates of attempted VBAC remain low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Basile Ibrahim
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
| | - M Tish Knobf
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
| | - Allison Shorten
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Saraswathi Vedam
- Division of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Acceptance of trial of labor after cesarean (Tolac) among obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021; 28:2795-2801. [PMID: 34012321 PMCID: PMC8116973 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Babies to women eligible for trial of labor after a cesarean (TOLAC) are sometimes delivered by cesarean section (CS). To obtain clinicians' attitudes and beliefs about TOLAC, this study was designed to investigate the views of clinicians when advising TOLAC-eligible pregnant women about TOLAC, and to explore their reasons in favor of or against TOLAC. Methods Interviews were carried out individually (face-to-face) with clinicians using a specially designed questionnaire to collect data from obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi. Regression analysis was used as appropriate. Results Among the 183 obstetricians included in the current study, approximately 79.2% were against offering TOLAC. However, most of the physicians (89.1%) were in favor of offering TOLAC to patients who had had a successful vaginal birth after CS. significant associations were found between physicians' opposition to TOLAC and medical and most non-medical factors. Conclusion Clinicians should recognize that the critical role they play in the delivery decision-making process and in boosting women's confidence in TOLAC may be key to increasing the rate of TOLAC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Scaffidi, RM, Padden‐Denmead, ML. Use of Shared Decision‐Making in Response to Maternal Request for Elective Cesarean Birth. J Midwifery Womens Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Basile Ibrahim B, Kennedy HP, Whittemore R. Women's Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States: An Integrative Review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2020; 65:349-361. [PMID: 32352635 PMCID: PMC8017908 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize the literature on women's perceived barriers and facilitators to achieving a vaginal birth after cesarean. METHODS A search of Scopus and PubMed databases and relevant citations from 2000 to 2018 was conducted to identify resources meeting inclusion criteria. Conclusion drawing and verification were completed using data displays, data analysis, and comparison. RESULTS Sixteen resources met inclusion criteria. Factors identified by women with a history of cesarean that act as facilitators or barriers to achieving a vaginal birth after cesarean included (1) individual factors (knowledge, body, and psychological), (2) social factors (culture and social support), and (3) systemic factors (perinatal care provider, health system, and financial). Some factors related to barriers and facilitators reflected opposing aspects of the same phenomenon on a continuum. DISCUSSION Enhancing facilitators identified by women, while addressing perceived barriers, may increase access to labor after cesarean for women in the United States. Increasing access to labor after cesarean may subsequently improve women's experiences of care and decrease the US cesarean rate, positively affecting individual health outcomes and overall health of childbearing women in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Basile Ibrahim
- Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Yale University, Orange, Connecticut
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Non-Clinical Variables Influencing Cesarean Section Rate According to Robson Classification. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56040180. [PMID: 32326574 PMCID: PMC7231232 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56040180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The incidence of cesarean section (CS) has progressively increased worldwide, without any proven benefit to either the mother or the newborn. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between CS rates and both clinical and non-clinical variables, while applying the Robson classification system. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of pregnant women delivering at a tertiary care hospital between 2012 and 2017, either under public or private healthcare. The overall CS rate, and the elective and non-elective CS rate, divided by classes of Robson, were determined. The rate of vaginal deliveries and CSs was compared between the public and private setting. The distribution of incidence of non-elective CSs and their main indications were analyzed between daytime and nighttime. Results: 18,079 patients delivered during the study period: 69.2% delivered vaginally and 30.8% by CS. Robson class 5 was the most frequent (23.4%), followed by class 2B (16.8%). Of the 289 private practice deliveries, 59.2% were CSs. The CS rate was significantly higher in private compared to public practice: 59.2% and 30.4%, respectively (OR 3.32, 95% CI 2.62 ± 4.21). When only considering elective CSs, a statistically significant difference was found in Robson class 5 between private and public practice, with the latter having more CSs (94.2% and 83.8%, respectively (p = 0.046)). The rate of non-elective CS was significantly lower during nighttime than during daytime (17.2% vs. 21.5%, p < 0.01). During daytime, the higher incidence of CS occurred between 4:00 and 4:59 pm, and during nighttime between 9:00 and 9:59 pm. Failed induction was significantly more common as an indication to CS during daytime when compared to nighttime (p = 0.01). Conclusions: This study identified two non-clinical variables that influenced the CS rate: the type of healthcare setting (private vs. public) and the time of the day. We believe that these indications might be related more to the practitioner attitude, rather than objective delivery complications.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
This study evaluated a shared decision-making (SDM) Toolkit (decision aid, counseling guide, and provider scripts) designed to prepare and engage racially diverse women in shared decision-making discussions about the mode of birth after cesarean. The pilot study, involving 27 pregnant women and 63 prenatal providers, assessed women's knowledge, preferences, and satisfaction with decision making, as well as provider perspectives on the Toolkit's acceptability. Most women experienced knowledge improvement, felt more in control and that providers listened to their concerns and supported them. Providers reported that the Toolkit helped women understand their options and supported their counseling. The SDM Toolkit could be used to help women and providers improve their SDM regarding mode of birth after cesarean.
Collapse
|
14
|
Counseling Women with a Previous Cesarean Birth: Toward a Shared Decision‐Making Partnership. J Midwifery Womens Health 2020; 65:177. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
15
|
Xu P, Feng Y, Shen H, Luo J, Tao Y. Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e18421. [PMID: 31876717 PMCID: PMC6946503 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of our research was to confirm the prediction role of Grobman model for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in Chinese pregnant women. In this research, 535 pregnant who had once cesarean delivery and the least once subsequent try to a vaginal labor in Jiaxing of China were involved. The Grobman background factors and five new factors were included. Overall, in total of 456 women had successful VBAC, the success percent was 85.2%. The new background variable "maternal height" was considered as an additional predictor for VBAC. The Grobman model's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.811 (95% CI = 0.751-0.870) and the AUC of this modified model combined 2 new factors was 0.834 (95% CI = 0.781-0.886). Nevertheless, there has no markedly difference between these 2 models of the AUC. In conclusion, the Grobman model was suitable for Chinese pregnant. However, further improvements were needed to make a new predictive model of VBAC success rate for Chinese pregnant women through analyzing the clinical data of vaginal trial delivery after cesarean section.
Collapse
|
16
|
Fersini F, Govi A, Rizzo ML, De Nooijer K, Ingravallo F, Fais P, Rizzo N, Pelotti S. Shared decision-making for delivery mode: An OPTION scale observer-based evaluation. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1833-1839. [PMID: 31079955 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 04/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision-making (SDM) may help to reduce the rate of Cesarean Delivery (CD). The aim of the study was to evaluate the extent to which pregnant women are involved in SDM about the mode of delivery, applying the Italian version of the OPTION12 scale to obstetric consultations. METHODS Fifty-eight outpatient consultations were rated; statistical associations between OPTION12 scores and sociodemographic data of both patient and physicians were determined. RESULTS The OPTION12 total scores showed a skewed distribution in the lower range of total scores. Total scores in a percentage basis ranged from 0 to 69, with a mean of 21.2 (±19.84) and a median of 13.5. Mean and median scores for all the 12 OPTION12 items never reached the minimum skill level. CONCLUSION A low level of patient involvement in deciding between a CD and a Vaginal Delivery (VD) was demonstrated. Interventions aiming at educating obstetricians as well as the adoption of decision aids are requested. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The OPTION12 scale may prove useful for testing the extent of pregnant women's involvement in deciding between CD and VD. The awareness of a low patient involvement seems mandatory to improve SDM and may lead to medico-legal protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Fersini
- DIMEC, University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Legal Medicine, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Annamaria Govi
- DIMEC, University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Legal Medicine, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Livia Rizzo
- Interdepartmental Centre for Research in the History of law and in Computer Science and Law, (CIRSFID), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Kim De Nooijer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesca Ingravallo
- DIMEC, University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Legal Medicine, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Fais
- DIMEC, University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Legal Medicine, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Nicola Rizzo
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Susi Pelotti
- DIMEC, University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Legal Medicine, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miller YD, Holdaway W. How communication about risk and role affects women's decisions about birth after caesarean. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:68-76. [PMID: 30213641 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated how health care provider communication of risk information, and women's role in decision-making, influenced women's preferences for mode of birth after a previous caesarean birth. METHODS Women (N = 669) were randomised to one of eight conditions in a 2 (selectivity of risk information) × 2 (format of risk information) × 2 (role in decision making) experimental design. After exposure to a hypothetical decision scenario that varied information communicated by an obstetrician to a pregnant woman with a previous caesarean birth across the three factors, women were asked to decide their preferred hypothetical childbirth preference. RESULTS Women provided with selective information (incomplete/biased toward repeat caesarean) and relative risk formats (ratio of incidence being compared e.g. 2.5 times higher), perceived lower risk for caesarean and were significantly more likely to prefer repeat caesarean birth than those provided with non-selective information (complete/unbiased) and absolute risk formats (incidence rate e.g. 0.01 per 100). Role in decision-making did not significantly influence childbirth preferences CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable aspects of healthcare provider communication may influence women's decision-making about childbirth preferences PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Optimised communication about risks of all options may have an impact on over-use of repeat CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette D Miller
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Wendy Holdaway
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barger MK. When Does the Odds Ratio Not Equal the Relative Risk, and Why Should You Care? J Midwifery Womens Health 2018; 63:648-651. [PMID: 30288890 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
19
|
Torigoe I, Shorten A. Using a pregnancy decision support program for women choosing birth after a previous caesarean in Japan: A mixed methods study. Women Birth 2018; 31:e9-e19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
20
|
Munro S, Kornelsen J, Corbett K, Wilcox E, Bansback N, Janssen P. Do Women Have a Choice? Care Providers' and Decision Makers' Perspectives on Barriers to Access of Health Services for Birth after a Previous Cesarean. Birth 2017; 44:153-160. [PMID: 27917532 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repeat cesarean delivery is the single largest contributor to the escalating cesarean rate worldwide. Approximately 80 percent of women with a past cesarean are candidates for vaginal birth after a cesarean (VBAC), but in Canada less than one-third plan VBAC. Emerging evidence suggests that these trends may be due in part to nonclinical factors, including care provider practice patterns and delays in access to surgical and anesthesia services. This study sought to explore maternity care providers' and decision makers' attitudes toward and experiences with providing and planning services for women with a previous cesarean. METHODS In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with family physicians, midwives, obstetricians, nurses, anesthetists, and health service decision makers recruited from three rural and two urban Canadian communities. Constructivist grounded theory informed iterative data collection and analysis. RESULTS Analysis of interviews (n = 35) revealed that the factors influencing decisions resulted from interactions between the clinical, organizational, and policy levels of the health care system. Physicians acted as information providers of clinical risks and benefits, with limited discussion of patient preferences. Decision makers serving large hospitals revealed concerns related to liability and patient safety. These stemmed from competing access to surgical resources. CONCLUSIONS To facilitate women's increased access to planned VBAC, it is necessary to address the barriers perceived by care providers and decision makers. Strategies to mitigate concerns include initiating decision support immediately after the primary cesarean, addressing the social risks that influence women's preferences, and managing perceptions of patient and litigation risks through shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Munro
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Jude Kornelsen
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Centre for Rural Health Research and Applied Policy Research Unit, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kitty Corbett
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Wilcox
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nick Bansback
- University of British Columbia School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Patricia Janssen
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
‘Stress, anger, fear and injustice’: An international qualitative survey of women's experiences planning a vaginal breech birth. Midwifery 2017; 44:41-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
22
|
Van Wagner V. Risk talk: Using evidence without increasing fear. Midwifery 2016; 38:21-8. [PMID: 27174012 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Revised: 04/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE this paper explores unexpected findings about how to "do risk talk" which emerged during a broader research project on of the application and misapplication of evidence-based practice in Canada. DESIGN the study used qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis of inter-professional maternity care conference presentations. SETTING Canada PARTICIPANTS fifty Canadian midwives, doctors and nurses involved in maternity care were interviewed to uncover the "how and whys" of differing interpretations and uneven application of evidence. RESULTS care providers described a "lean to technology" as an unexpected result of using evidence in their discussions with pregnant women. They perceived risk talk as undermining low intervention approaches and reassurance about the safety of birth. Across professional groups, interviewees described how they attempted to mitigate this unwanted effect. Their strategies to put risk in perspective include finding comparable everyday risks, using words and pictures to describe numbers and using absolute risk and numbers needed to treat rather than relative risk. They warned about the need to balance a culture of fear combined with maternal altruism. Time, reassurance, awareness and humility were seen as key tools. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE midwives and other maternity care providers can use a variety of techniques to put risk into perspective. It is important to discuss evidence and risk with an awareness that the process itself can exaggerate risk. Care providers in all professional groups were motivated to avoid contributing to a culture of fear about childbirth and increasing rates of intervention.
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Cox KJ, Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Leeman LM. Planned Home VBAC in the United States, 2004-2009: Outcomes, Maternity Care Practices, and Implications for Shared Decision Making. Birth 2015; 42:299-308. [PMID: 26307086 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, the number of planned home vaginal births after cesarean (VBACs) has increased. This study describes the maternal and neonatal outcomes for women who planned a VBAC at home with midwives who were contributing data to the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project 2.0 cohort during the years 2004-2009. METHOD Two subsamples were created from the parent cohort: 12,092 multiparous women without a prior cesarean and 1,052 women with a prior cesarean. Descriptive statistics were calculated for maternal and neonatal outcomes for both groups. Sensitivity analyses comparing women with a prior vaginal birth and those who were at the lowest risk with various subgroups in the parent cohort were also conducted. RESULTS Women with a prior cesarean had a VBAC rate of 87 percent, although transfer rates were higher compared with women without a prior cesarean (18% vs 7%, p < 0.001). The most common indication for transfer was failure to progress. Women with a prior cesarean had higher proportions of blood loss, maternal postpartum infections, uterine rupture, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions than those without a prior cesarean. Five neonatal deaths (4.75/1,000) occurred in the prior cesarean group compared with 1.24/1,000 in multiparas without a history of cesarean (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION Although there is a high likelihood of a vaginal birth at home, women planning a home VBAC should be counseled regarding maternal transfer rates and potential for increased risk to the newborn, particularly if uterine rupture occurs in the home setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim J Cox
- College of Nursing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Marit L Bovbjerg
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Melissa Cheyney
- Department of Anthropology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Lawrence M Leeman
- School of Medicine, Departments of Family & Community Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Suzuki S, Ikeda M. Reasons Why Some Japanese Pregnant Women Choose Trial of Labor After Cesarean. J Clin Med Res 2015; 7:641-2. [PMID: 26124912 PMCID: PMC4471753 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2214w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We examined whether or not the Japanese pregnant women with a history of a cesarean section have the knowledge about the benefits and harms of trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD). Methods We reviewed the obstetric records of 121 Japanese women with a prior cesarean section who visited our hospital for reservation of their second delivery between January and December 2013. Results Forty-five (37%) of them wanted to perform TOLAC at the first interview. Of these, 14 women (31%) with a history of an urgent cesarean chose TOLAC because of the insufficient anesthetic effect during cesarean, while 11 women (24%) with a history of an elective cesarean did not have the knowledge of the risks of TOLAC and urgent cesarean. Nineteen of those (76%) selected ERCD following the counseling. Conclusions Some Japanese pregnant women with TOLAC hope seemed to have insufficient knowledge about the benefits and harms of TOLAC and ERCD. Therefore, the improvement of the process of counseling and decision making may be needed for pregnant women with a history of a cesarean section in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunji Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shorten A, Fagerlin A, Illuzzi J, Kennedy HP, Lakehomer H, Pettker CM, Saran A, Witteman H, Whittemore R. Developing an Internet-Based Decision Aid for Women Choosing Between Vaginal Birth After Cesarean and Planned Repeat Cesarean. J Midwifery Womens Health 2015; 60:390-400. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
27
|
King TL, Pinger W. Evidence‐Based Practice for Intrapartum Care: The Pearls of Midwifery. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014; 59:572-585. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|