The Innovation Imperative: Scaling Freestanding Birth Centers, CenteringPregnancy, and Midwifery-Led Maternity Health Homes

Salary and Workload of Midwives Across Birth Center Practice Types and State Regulatory Structures

INTRODUCTION

Expansion of the midwifery-led birth center model of care is one pathway to improving maternal and newborn health. There are a variety of practice types among birth centers and a range of state regulatory structures of midwifery practice across the United States. This study investigated how those variations relate to pay and workload for midwives at birth centers.

METHODS

Data from the American Association of Birth Centers Practice Survey and the Bureau of Labor Statistics' report on occupational employment and wage statistics were analyzed to explore how midwife salaries and workload at birth centers compare within and beyond the birth center model.

RESULTS

Survey results from 161 birth centers across the United States demonstrate wide variation in nurse-midwife salaries and are inconsistent with nurse-midwife salaries across all settings as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The reported number of hours worked by midwives within the birth center model is high. Salaries of midwives who work in birth center-only practices were consistently lower than salaries of midwives who worked in blended birth center and hospital practices, independent of the midwife's level of experience, geographic region of the country, and state regulatory structure.

DISCUSSION

Further research is needed to understand how to bring salaries and workload for midwives at birth centers into alignment with national averages.

A Consideration of Benefits for Midwives Employed in Public Health Systems and Private Midwifery Practices

BACKGROUND

Benefits add to the total compensation received by midwives for their professional work in global settings. Some benefits are commonly offered as a package by employers as components of employment contracts. Some benefits may be individually negotiated or may be self-funded by midwives who own their own businesses.

PURPOSE

Identify benefits associated with midwifery employment.

METHODS

Benefits data available to certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) and certified midwives (CMs) in the United States were collected in online surveys conducted in 2004, 2007, 2010, and 2014. Benefits types received and benefits cost-sharing for midwives and their families were compared descriptively.

RESULTS

More than 90% of respondents employed full-time in 2014 reported that they received at least 1 of 16 types of benefits in their midwifery-related employment. Professional liability insurance, paid vacation (paid holiday), and paid time off for continuing education were the only benefits reported by 75% or more of respondents in each of 4 survey years. Trends over time reported by U.S. CNMs/CMs employed full-time suggest a decrease in employer contributions to benefit costs. Nearly half of all CNM/CM respondents reported not knowing the basis for calculation of their salary and compensation package.

CONCLUSION

Changes appear to indicate increasing employee cost-sharing of benefits packages in recent years for U.S. midwives. Similarities and differences identified for midwives in global settings are discussed, although information on benefits in global settings was limited. Midwives in all settings may gain from education about strategies for negotiation of salary and compensation packages.

Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review

Background

Strengthening of midwives' position and support for freestanding birth centers, frequently referred to as Freestanding Midwife-led Units (FMUs), raise hopes for a return to humanized labor. Our study aimed to review published evidence regarding FMUs to systematize the knowledge of their functioning and to identify potential gaps in this matter.

Materials and Methods

A structured integrative review of theoretical papers and empirical studies was conducted. The literature search included MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases. The analysis included papers published in 1977-2017. Relevant documents were identified using various combinations of search terms and standard Boolean operators. The search included titles, abstracts, and keywords. Additional records were found through a manual search of reference lists from extracted papers.

Results

Overall, 56 out of 107 originally found articles were identified as eligible for the review. Based on the critical analysis of published data, six groups of research problems were identified and discussed, namely, 1) specifics of FMUs, 2) costs of perinatal care at FMUs, 3) FMUs as a place for midwife education, 4) FMUs from midwives' perspective, 5) perinatal, maternal, and neonatal outcomes, and 6) FMUs from the perspective of a pregnant woman.

Conclusions

FMUs offers a home-like environment and complex midwifery support for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Although emergency equipment is available as needed, FMU birth is considered a natural spontaneous process. Midwives' supervision over low-risk labors may provide many benefits, primarily related to lower medicalization and fewer medical interventions than in a hospital setting.

Integrating a Nurse-Midwife-Led Oral Health Intervention Into CenteringPregnancy Prenatal Care: Results of a Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

National and professional organizations recommend oral health promotion in prenatal care to improve women's oral health. However, few prenatal programs include education about oral health promotion. The objective of this study was to determine if women receiving a brief, low-cost, and sustainable educational intervention entitled CenteringPregnancy Oral Health Promotion had clinically improved oral health compared to women receiving standard CenteringPregnancy care.

METHODS

Women attending CenteringPregnancy, a group prenatal care model, at 4 health centers in the San Francisco Bay Area, participated in this nonrandomized controlled pilot study in 2010 to 2011. The intervention arm received the CenteringPregnancy Oral Health Promotion intervention consisting of two 15-minute skills-based educational modules addressing maternal and infant oral health, each module presented in a separate CenteringPregnancy prenatal care session. The present analysis focused on the maternal module that included facilitated discussions and skills-building activities including proper tooth brushing. The control arm received standard CenteringPregnancy prenatal care. Dental examinations and questionnaires were administered prior to and approximately 9 weeks postintervention. Primary outcomes included the Plaque Index, percent bleeding on probing, and percent of gingival pocket depths 4 mm or greater. Secondary outcomes were self-reported oral health knowledge, attitudes (importance and self-efficacy), and behaviors (tooth brushing and flossing). Regression models tested whether pre to post changes in outcomes differed between the intervention versus the control arms.

RESULTS

One hundred and one women participated in the study; 49 were in the intervention arm, and 52 were in the control arm. The control and intervention arms did not vary significantly at baseline. Significant pre to post differences were noted between the arms with significant improvements in the intervention arm for the Plaque Index, bleeding on probing, and pocket depths 4 mm or greater.

DISCUSSION

Providing brief oral health education and skills-building activities within prenatal care may be effective in improving women's oral health during pregnancy. These findings provide support for developing a full-scale randomized clinical trial of the CenteringPregnancy Oral Health Promotion intervention.