1
|
van Straten D, Sork H, van de Schepop L, Frunt R, Ezzat K, Schiffelers RM. Biofluid specific protein coronas affect lipid nanoparticle behavior in vitro. J Control Release 2024; 373:481-492. [PMID: 39032575 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have successfully entered the clinic for the delivery of mRNA- and siRNA-based therapeutics, most recently as vaccines for COVID-19. Nevertheless, there is a lack of understanding regarding their in vivo behavior, in particular cell targeting. Part of this LNP tropism is based on the adherence of endogenous protein to the particle surface. This protein forms a so-called corona that can change, amongst other things, the circulation time, biodistribution and cellular uptake of these particles. The formation of this protein corona, in turn, is dependent on the nanoparticle properties (e.g., size, charge, surface chemistry and hydrophobicity) as well as the biological environment from which it is derived. With the potential of gene therapy to target virtually any disease, administration sites other than intravenous route are considered, resulting in tissue specific protein coronas. For neurological diseases, intracranial administration of LNPs results in a cerebral spinal fluid derived protein corona, possibly changing the properties of the lipid nanoparticle compared to intravenous administration. Here, the differences between plasma and CSF derived protein coronas on a clinically relevant LNP formulation were studied in vitro. Protein analysis showed that LNPs incubated in human CSF (C-LNPs) developed a protein corona composition that differed from that of LNPs incubated in plasma (P-LNPs). Lipoproteins as a whole, but in particular apolipoprotein E, represented a higher percentage of the total protein corona on C-LNPs than on P-LNPs. This resulted in improved cellular uptake of C-LNPs compared to P-LNPs, regardless of cell origin. Importantly, the higher LNP uptake did not directly translate into more efficient cargo delivery, underlining that further assessment of such mechanisms is necessary. These findings show that biofluid specific protein coronas alter LNP functionality, suggesting that the site of administration could affect LNP efficacy in vivo and needs to be considered during the development of the formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demian van Straten
- CDL Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Helena Sork
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Rowan Frunt
- CDL Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papadimitrakis D, Perdikakis M, Gargalionis AN, Papavassiliou AG. Biomarkers in Cerebrospinal Fluid for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Gliomas. Biomolecules 2024; 14:801. [PMID: 39062515 PMCID: PMC11274947 DOI: 10.3390/biom14070801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common type of malignant brain tumor and are characterized by a plethora of heterogeneous molecular alterations. Current treatments require the emergence of reliable biomarkers that will aid personalized treatment decisions and increase life expectancy. Glioma tissues are not as easily accessible as other solid tumors; therefore, detecting prominent biomarkers in biological fluids is necessary. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulates adjacent to the cerebral parenchyma and holds promise for discovering useful prognostic, diagnostic, and predictive biomarkers. In this review, we summarize extensive research regarding the role of circulating DNA, tumor cells, proteins, microRNAs, metabolites, and extracellular vesicles as potential CSF biomarkers for glioma diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring. Future studies should address discrepancies and issues of specificity regarding CSF biomarkers, as well as the validation of candidate biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimosthenis Papadimitrakis
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.P.)
| | - Miltiadis Perdikakis
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.P.)
| | - Antonios N. Gargalionis
- Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical School, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios G. Papavassiliou
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (D.P.); (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu VM, Shah AH, González MM. The Potential of Liquorpheresis to Treat Leptomeningeal Disease. World Neurosurg 2024; 187:93-98. [PMID: 38636632 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequela of many cancers, with an extremely poor prognosis. Barriers to improving outcomes are related to the inability of many traditional therapies to effectively reach the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space within the central nervous system. Liquorpheresis is an emerging treatment modality specific to CSF diseases, the primary mechanism of action of which is direct targeted filtration of CSF content by neurosurgical access. In this review, we highlight the principles of liquorpheresis and detail how LMD can be amenable to this treatment. Further, we summarize the current in vitro and in vivo evidence supporting liquorpheresis as a feasible method to treat LMD and other central nervous system diseases as well as describe its conceivable limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | - Ashish H Shah
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Manuel Menéndez González
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mikolajewicz N, Yee PP, Bhanja D, Trifoi M, Miller AM, Metellus P, Bagley SJ, Balaj L, de Macedo Filho LJM, Zacharia BE, Aregawi D, Glantz M, Weller M, Ahluwalia MS, Kislinger T, Mansouri A. Systematic Review of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Discovery in Neuro-Oncology: A Roadmap to Standardization and Clinical Application. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1961-1974. [PMID: 38608213 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Effective diagnosis, prognostication, and management of CNS malignancies traditionally involves invasive brain biopsies that pose significant risk to the patient. Sampling and molecular profiling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a safer, rapid, and noninvasive alternative that offers a snapshot of the intracranial milieu while overcoming the challenge of sampling error that plagues conventional brain biopsy. Although numerous biomarkers have been identified, translational challenges remain, and standardization of protocols is necessary. Here, we systematically reviewed 141 studies (Medline, SCOPUS, and Biosis databases; between January 2000 and September 29, 2022) that molecularly profiled CSF from adults with brain malignancies including glioma, brain metastasis, and primary and secondary CNS lymphomas. We provide an overview of promising CSF biomarkers, propose CSF reporting guidelines, and discuss the various considerations that go into biomarker discovery, including the influence of blood-brain barrier disruption, cell of origin, and site of CSF acquisition (eg, lumbar and ventricular). We also performed a meta-analysis of proteomic data sets, identifying biomarkers in CNS malignancies and establishing a resource for the research community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Mikolajewicz
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia P Yee
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Debarati Bhanja
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Mara Trifoi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Alexandra M Miller
- Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Manhattan, NY
| | - Philippe Metellus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonora Balaj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Brad E Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Dawit Aregawi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Thomas Kislinger
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alireza Mansouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Riviere-Cazaux C, Graser CJ, Warrington AE, Hoplin MD, Andersen KM, Malik N, Palmer EA, Carlstrom LP, Dasari S, Munoz-Casabella A, Ikram S, Ghadimi K, Himes BT, Jusue-Torres I, Sarkaria JN, Meyer FB, Van Gompel JJ, Kizilbash SH, Sener U, Michor F, Campian JL, Parney IF, Burns TC. The dynamic impact of location and resection on the glioma CSF proteome. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.05.15.24307463. [PMID: 38798641 PMCID: PMC11118641 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.15.24307463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
While serial sampling of glioma tissue is rarely performed prior to recurrence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an underutilized longitudinal source of candidate glioma biomarkers for understanding therapeutic impacts. However, the impact of key variables to consider in longitudinal CSF samples, including anatomical location and post-surgical changes, remains unknown. To that end, pre- versus post-resection intracranial CSF samples were obtained at early (1-16 days; n=20) or delayed (86-153 days; n=11) timepoints for patients with glioma. Paired lumbar-versus-intracranial glioma CSF samples were also obtained (n=14). Using aptamer-based proteomics, we identify significant differences in the CSF proteome between lumbar, subarachnoid, and ventricular CSF. Our analysis of serial intracranial CSF samples suggests the early potential for disease monitoring and evaluation of pharmacodynamic impact of targeted therapies. Importantly, we found that resection had a significant, evolving longitudinal impact on the CSF proteome. Proteomic data are provided with individual clinical annotations as a resource for the field. One Sentence Summary Glioma cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accessed intra-operatively and longitudinally via devices can reveal impacts of treatment and anatomical location.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vatankhahan H, Esteki F, Jabalameli MA, Kiani P, Ehtiati S, Movahedpour A, Vakili O, Khatami SH. Electrochemical biosensors for early diagnosis of glioblastoma. Clin Chim Acta 2024; 557:117878. [PMID: 38493942 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.117878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and life-threatening neurological malignancy of predominant astrocyte origin. This type of neoplasm can develop in either the brain or the spine and is also known as glioblastoma multiforme. Although current diagnostic methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) facilitate tumor location, these approaches are unable to assess disease severity. Furthermore, interpretation of imaging studies requires significant expertise which can have substantial inter-observer variability, thus challenging diagnosis and potentially delaying treatment. In contrast, biosensing systems offer a promising alternative to these traditional approaches. These technologies can continuously monitor specific molecules, providing valuable real-time data on treatment response, and could significantly improve patient outcomes. Among various types of biosensors, electrochemical systems are preferred over other types, as they do not require expensive or complex equipment or procedures and can be made with readily available materials and methods. Moreover, electrochemical biosensors can detect very small amounts of analytes with high accuracy and specificity by using various signal amplification strategies and recognition elements. Considering the advantages of electrochemical biosensors compared to other biosensing methods, we aim to highlight the potential application(s) of these sensors for GBM theranostics. The review's innovative insights are expected to antecede the development of novel biosensors and associated diagnostic platforms, ultimately restructuring GBM detection strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Vatankhahan
- Department of Biochemistry and Clinical Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Farnaz Esteki
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Jabalameli
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pouria Kiani
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Sajad Ehtiati
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Omid Vakili
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; Autophagy Research Center, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Seyyed Hossein Khatami
- Student Research Committee, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hai L, Hoffmann DC, Wagener RJ, Azorin DD, Hausmann D, Xie R, Huppertz MC, Hiblot J, Sievers P, Heuer S, Ito J, Cebulla G, Kourtesakis A, Kaulen LD, Ratliff M, Mandelbaum H, Jung E, Jabali A, Horschitz S, Ernst KJ, Reibold D, Warnken U, Venkataramani V, Will R, Suvà ML, Herold-Mende C, Sahm F, Winkler F, Schlesner M, Wick W, Kessler T. A clinically applicable connectivity signature for glioblastoma includes the tumor network driver CHI3L1. Nat Commun 2024; 15:968. [PMID: 38320988 PMCID: PMC10847113 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45067-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor microtubes (TMs) connect glioma cells to a network with considerable relevance for tumor progression and therapy resistance. However, the determination of TM-interconnectivity in individual tumors is challenging and the impact on patient survival unresolved. Here, we establish a connectivity signature from single-cell RNA-sequenced (scRNA-Seq) xenografted primary glioblastoma (GB) cells using a dye uptake methodology, and validate it with recording of cellular calcium epochs and clinical correlations. Astrocyte-like and mesenchymal-like GB cells have the highest connectivity signature scores in scRNA-sequenced patient-derived xenografts and patient samples. In large GB cohorts, TM-network connectivity correlates with the mesenchymal subtype and dismal patient survival. CHI3L1 gene expression serves as a robust molecular marker of connectivity and functionally influences TM networks. The connectivity signature allows insights into brain tumor biology, provides a proof-of-principle that tumor cell TM-connectivity is relevant for patients' prognosis, and serves as a robust prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Hai
- Bioinformatics and Omics Data Analytics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk C Hoffmann
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robin J Wagener
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel D Azorin
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Hausmann
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ruifan Xie
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magnus-Carsten Huppertz
- Department of Chemical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julien Hiblot
- Department of Chemical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Sievers
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, DKTK, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sophie Heuer
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Ito
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gina Cebulla
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexandros Kourtesakis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leon D Kaulen
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Miriam Ratliff
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Neurosurgery Clinic, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Henriette Mandelbaum
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erik Jung
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ammar Jabali
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Hector Institute for Translational Brain Research, Mannheim, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sandra Horschitz
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Hector Institute for Translational Brain Research, Mannheim, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kati J Ernst
- Pediatric Glioma Research Group, DKTK, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Reibold
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Warnken
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Varun Venkataramani
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuroanatomy, Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rainer Will
- Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility, DKTK, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mario L Suvà
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, DKTK, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Winkler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schlesner
- Bioinformatics and Omics Data Analytics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Informatics, Data Mining and Data Analytics, Faculty of Applied Computer Science and Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kessler
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Neurology and Neurooncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heuer S, Burghaus I, Gose M, Kessler T, Sahm F, Vollmuth P, Venkataramani V, Hoffmann D, Schlesner M, Ratliff M, Hopf C, Herrlinger U, Ricklefs F, Bendszus M, Krieg SM, Wick A, Wick W, Winkler F. PerSurge (NOA-30) phase II trial of perampanel treatment around surgery in patients with progressive glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:135. [PMID: 38279087 PMCID: PMC10811925 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11846-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is the most frequent and a particularly malignant primary brain tumor with no efficacy-proven standard therapy for recurrence. It has recently been discovered that excitatory synapses of the AMPA-receptor subtype form between non-malignant brain neurons and tumor cells. This neuron-tumor network connectivity contributed to glioma progression and could be efficiently targeted with the EMA/FDA approved antiepileptic AMPA receptor inhibitor perampanel in preclinical studies. The PerSurge trial was designed to test the clinical potential of perampanel to reduce tumor cell network connectivity and tumor growth with an extended window-of-opportunity concept. METHODS PerSurge is a phase IIa clinical and translational treatment study around surgical resection of progressive or recurrent glioblastoma. In this multicenter, 2-arm parallel-group, double-blind superiority trial, patients are 1:1 randomized to either receive placebo or perampanel (n = 66 in total). It consists of a treatment and observation period of 60 days per patient, starting 30 days before a planned surgical resection, which itself is not part of the study interventions. Only patients with an expected safe waiting interval are included, and a safety MRI is performed. Tumor cell network connectivity from resected tumor tissue on single cell transcriptome level as well as AI-based assessment of tumor growth dynamics in T2/FLAIR MRI scans before resection will be analyzed as the co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints will include further imaging parameters such as pre- and postsurgical contrast enhanced MRI scans, postsurgical T2/FLAIR MRI scans, quality of life, cognitive testing, overall and progression-free survival as well as frequency of epileptic seizures. Further translational research will focus on additional biological aspects of neuron-tumor connectivity. DISCUSSION This trial is set up to assess first indications of clinical efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in recurrent glioblastoma, a repurposed drug which inhibits neuron-glioma synapses and thereby glioblastoma growth in preclinical models. If perampanel proved to be successful in the clinical setting, it would provide the first evidence that interference with neuron-cancer interactions may indeed lead to a benefit for patients, which would lay the foundation for a larger confirmatory trial in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION EU-CT number: 2023-503938-52-00 30.11.2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Heuer
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ina Burghaus
- Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS) Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Gose
- Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS) Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kessler
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Geman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Varun Venkataramani
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Functional Neuroanatomy, Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Hoffmann
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schlesner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Informatics, Data Mining and Data Analytics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Miriam Ratliff
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Neurosurgery Clinic, University Hospital Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Carsten Hopf
- Center for Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy (CeMOS), Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, Paul-Wittsack Str. 10, 68163, Mannheim, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and Centre of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franz Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandro M Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Winkler
- Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Joshi SK, Piehowski P, Liu T, Gosline SJC, McDermott JE, Druker BJ, Traer E, Tyner JW, Agarwal A, Tognon CE, Rodland KD. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteogenomics: New Therapeutic Opportunities for Precision Medicine. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 64:455-479. [PMID: 37738504 PMCID: PMC10950354 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022723-113921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Proteogenomics refers to the integration of comprehensive genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic measurements from the same samples with the goal of fully understanding the regulatory processes converting genotypes to phenotypes, often with an emphasis on gaining a deeper understanding of disease processes. Although specific genetic mutations have long been known to drive the development of multiple cancers, gene mutations alone do not always predict prognosis or response to targeted therapy. The benefit of proteogenomics research is that information obtained from proteins and their corresponding pathways provides insight into therapeutic targets that can complement genomic information by providing an additional dimension regarding the underlying mechanisms and pathophysiology of tumors. This review describes the novel insights into tumor biology and drug resistance derived from proteogenomic analysis while highlighting the clinical potential of proteogenomic observations and advances in technique and analysis tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil K Joshi
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Paul Piehowski
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
| | - Tao Liu
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
| | - Sara J C Gosline
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
| | - Jason E McDermott
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Brian J Druker
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elie Traer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Tyner
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Anupriya Agarwal
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Cristina E Tognon
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Karin D Rodland
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA;
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pellerino A, Bertero L, Pronello E, Rudà R, Soffietti R. The early recognition and diagnosis of neoplastic meningitis. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:105-116. [PMID: 38145502 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2295999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The diagnosis and monitoring of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors are challenging, and the combination of neurological symptoms, MRI findings, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology does not always allow to achieve a definitive diagnosis. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the studies that have investigated CSF liquid biopsy to improve the initial diagnosis of LM in case the CSF cytology is negative or only suspicious for tumor cells, and monitoring of tumor response following targeted therapies or immunotherapy. In this regard, the early detection of LM recurrence and the development of resistant mutations are critical issues. Moreover, the early identification of subgroups of patients with a higher risk of LM progression, as well as the correlation of LM burden with survival, are discussed. EXPERT OPINION There is an urgent need of prospective studies to monitor longitudinally LM using CSF liquid biopsy and investigate the role of CTC, ctDNA or novel assays. The optimal setting for the longitudinal CSF and blood collection can be clinical trials focused on the molecular diagnosis of LM as well as the response and monitoring following targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Edoardo Pronello
- Neurology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Oncology, Candiolo Institute for Cancer Research, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Candiolo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Birhanu AG. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as an emerging tool in clinical laboratories. Clin Proteomics 2023; 20:32. [PMID: 37633929 PMCID: PMC10464495 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-023-09424-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics have been increasingly implemented in various disciplines of laboratory medicine to identify and quantify biomolecules in a variety of biological specimens. MS-based proteomics is continuously expanding and widely applied in biomarker discovery for early detection, prognosis and markers for treatment response prediction and monitoring. Furthermore, making these advanced tests more accessible and affordable will have the greatest healthcare benefit.This review article highlights the new paradigms MS-based clinical proteomics has created in microbiology laboratories, cancer research and diagnosis of metabolic disorders. The technique is preferred over conventional methods in disease detection and therapy monitoring for its combined advantages in multiplexing capacity, remarkable analytical specificity and sensitivity and low turnaround time.Despite the achievements in the development and adoption of a number of MS-based clinical proteomics practices, more are expected to undergo transition from bench to bedside in the near future. The review provides insights from early trials and recent progresses (mainly covering literature from the NCBI database) in the application of proteomics in clinical laboratories.
Collapse
|
12
|
Li F, Liu A, Zhao M, Luo L. Astrocytic Chitinase-3-like protein 1 in neurological diseases: Potential roles and future perspectives. J Neurochem 2023; 165:772-790. [PMID: 37026513 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) is a secreted glycoprotein characterized by its ability to regulate multiple biological processes, such as the inflammatory response and gene transcriptional signaling activation. Abnormal CHI3L1 expression has been associated with multiple neurological disorders and serves as a biomarker for the early detection of several neurodegenerative diseases. Aberrant CHI3L1 expression is also reportedly associated with brain tumor migration and metastasis, as well as contributions to immune escape, playing important roles in brain tumor progression. CHI3L1 is synthesized and secreted mainly by reactive astrocytes in the central nervous system. Thus, targeting astrocytic CHI3L1 could be a promising approach for the treatment of neurological diseases, such as traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and glioma. Based on current knowledge of CHI3L1, we assume that it acts as a molecule mediating several signaling pathways driving the initiation and progression of neurological disorders. This narrative review is the first to introduce the potential roles of astrocytic CHI3L1 in neurological disorders. We also equally explore astrocytic CHI3L1 mRNA expression under physiological and pathological conditions. Inhibiting CHI3L1 and disrupting its interaction with its receptors through multiple mechanisms of action are briefly discussed. These endeavors highlight the pivotal roles of astrocytic CHI3L1 in neurological disorders and could contribute to the development of effective inhibitors based on the strategy of structure-based drug discovery, which could be an attractive therapeutic approach for neurological disease treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Li
- Precision Pharmacy and Drug Development Center, Department of Pharmacy, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital of 92880 Troops, PLA Navy, Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China
| | - An Liu
- Precision Pharmacy and Drug Development Center, Department of Pharmacy, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Minggao Zhao
- Precision Pharmacy and Drug Development Center, Department of Pharmacy, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shaanxi, Xi'an, China
| | - Lanxin Luo
- Precision Pharmacy and Drug Development Center, Department of Pharmacy, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shaanxi, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Soltys BJ, Grausam KB, Messerli SM, Hsia CJC, Zhao H. Inhibition of metastatic brain cancer in Sonic Hedgehog medulloblastoma using caged nitric oxide albumin nanoparticles. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1129533. [PMID: 37213306 PMCID: PMC10197928 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1129533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is a tumor of the cerebellum that metastasizes to the leptomeninges of the central nervous system (CNS), including to forebrain and to spinal cord. The inhibitory effect of polynitroxylated albumin (PNA), a caged nitroxide nanoparticle, on leptomeningeal dissemination and metastatic tumor growth was studied in a Sonic Hedgehog transgenic mouse model. PNA treated mice showed an increased lifespan with a mean survival of 95 days (n = 6, P<0.05) compared with 71 days in controls. In primary tumors, proliferation was significantly reduced and differentiation was significantly increased (P<0.001) as shown by Ki-67+ and NeuN+ immunohistochemistry, while cells in spinal cord tumors appeared unaffected. Yet, histochemical analysis of metastatic tumor in spinal cord showed that the mean total number of cells in spinal cord was significantly reduced in mice treated with PNA compared to albumin vehicle (P<0.05). Examination of various levels of the spinal cord showed that PNA treated mice had significantly reduced metastatic cell density in the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spinal cord levels (P<0.05), while cell density in the cervical region was not significantly changed. The mechanism by which PNA may exert these effects on CNS tumors is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katie B. Grausam
- Cancer Biology and Immunotherapies, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Shanta M. Messerli
- Cancer Biology and Immunotherapies, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | | | - Haotian Zhao
- Cancer Biology and Immunotherapies, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, United States
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bernhardt AM, Tiedt S, Teupser D, Dichgans M, Meyer B, Gempt J, Kuhn PH, Simons M, Palleis C, Weidinger E, Nübling G, Holdt L, Hönikl L, Gasperi C, Giesbertz P, Müller SA, Breimann S, Lichtenthaler SF, Kuster B, Mann M, Imhof A, Barth T, Hauck SM, Zetterberg H, Otto M, Weichert W, Hemmer B, Levin J. A unified classification approach rating clinical utility of protein biomarkers across neurologic diseases. EBioMedicine 2023; 89:104456. [PMID: 36745974 PMCID: PMC9931915 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A major evolution from purely clinical diagnoses to biomarker supported clinical diagnosing has been occurring over the past years in neurology. High-throughput methods, such as next-generation sequencing and mass spectrometry-based proteomics along with improved neuroimaging methods, are accelerating this development. This calls for a consensus framework that is broadly applicable and provides a spot-on overview of the clinical validity of novel biomarkers. We propose a harmonized terminology and a uniform concept that stratifies biomarkers according to clinical context of use and evidence levels, adapted from existing frameworks in oncology with a strong focus on (epi)genetic markers and treatment context. We demonstrate that this framework allows for a consistent assessment of clinical validity across disease entities and that sufficient evidence for many clinical applications of protein biomarkers is lacking. Our framework may help to identify promising biomarker candidates and classify their applications by clinical context, aiming for routine clinical use of (protein) biomarkers in neurology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Bernhardt
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Tiedt
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Teupser
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Dichgans
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peer-Hendrik Kuhn
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Mikael Simons
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technical University Munich, 80802, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Endy Weidinger
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Georg Nübling
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany
| | - Lesca Holdt
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lisa Hönikl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christiane Gasperi
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pieter Giesbertz
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Neuroproteomics, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan A Müller
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Neuroproteomics, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Breimann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Neuroproteomics, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Bioinformatics, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Stefan F Lichtenthaler
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany; Neuroproteomics, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kuster
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich Partner Site, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Mann
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Axel Imhof
- Protein Analysis Unit, Biomedical Center (BMC), Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Großhaderner Straße 9, 82152, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Teresa Barth
- Protein Analysis Unit, Biomedical Center (BMC), Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Großhaderner Straße 9, 82152, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Stefanie M Hauck
- Research Unit Protein Science and Metabolomics and Proteomics Core, Helmholtz Centre Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK; Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, Halle University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Saale, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany; Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Site Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
An ideal biomarker must meet several parameters to enable its successful adoption; however, the nature of glioma makes it challenging to discover valuable biomarkers. While biomarkers require simplicity for clinical implementation, anatomical features and the complexity of the brain make it challenging to perform histological examination. Therefore, compared to biomarkers from general histological examination, liquid biomarkers for brain disease offer many more advantages in these minimally invasive methods. Ideal biomarkers should have high sensitivity and specificity, especially in malignant tumors. The heterogeneous nature of glioma makes it challenging to determine useful common biomarkers, and no liquid biomarker has yet been adopted clinically. The low incidence of brain tumors also hinders research progress. To overcome these problems, clinical applications of new types of specimens, such as extracellular vesicles and comprehensive omics analysis, have been developed, and some candidate liquid biomarkers have been identified. As against previous reviews, we focused on and reviewed the sensitivity and specificity of each liquid biomarker for its clinical application. Perusing an ideal glioma biomarker would help uncover the common underlying mechanism of glioma and develop new therapeutic targets. Further multicenter studies based on these findings will help establish new treatment strategies in the future.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kwon JW, Im JH, Lee KY, Yoo BC, Lee JH, Kim KH, Kim JH, Shin SH, Yoo H, Gwak HS. Different Metabolomic and Proteomic Profiles of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Ventricular and Lumbar Compartments in Relation to Leptomeningeal Metastases. Metabolites 2022; 12:80. [PMID: 35050202 PMCID: PMC8778711 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12010080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The different molecular profiles of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) between ventricular and lumbar compartments remain elusive, especially in the context of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), which affects CSF flow. We evaluated CSF metabolomic and proteomic profiles based on the compartments and the diagnosis of spinal LM, proved by MRI from 20 paired ventricular and lumbar CSF samples of LM patients, including 12 spinal LM (+) samples. In metabolome analysis, 9512 low-mass ions (LMIs) were identified-7 LMIs were abundant in all lumbar versus paired ventricular CSF samples, and 3 LMIs were significantly abundant in all ventricular CSF. In comparisons between spinal LM (+) CSF and LM (-) CSF, 105 LMIs were discriminative for spinal LM (+) CSF. In proteome analysis, a total of 1536 proteins were measured. A total of 18 proteins, including complement C3, were more highly expressed in all lumbar CSF, compared with paired ventricular CSF, while 82 proteins, including coagulation factor V, were higher in the ventricular CSF. Of 37 discriminative proteins, including uteroglobin and complement component C8 gamma chain, 4 were higher in all spinal LM (+) CSF versus spinal LM (-) CSF. We further evaluated metabolic pathways associated with these discriminative proteins using the Gene Ontology database. We found that 16/17 spinal LM (+) pathways, including complement activation, were associated with lumbar discriminative proteins, whereas only 2 pathways were associated with ventricular-discriminative proteins. In conclusion, we determined that metabolite and protein profiles differed between paired lumbar and ventricular CSF samples. The protein profiles of spinal LM (+) CSF showed more similarity with the lumbar CSF than the ventricular CSF. Thus, we suggest that CSF LMIs and proteins could reflect LM disease activity and that LM-associated differences in CSF are more likely to be present in the lumbar compartment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Woong Kwon
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.-W.K.); (S.H.S.); (H.Y.)
| | - Ji Hye Im
- Department of Cancer Control, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.H.I.); (K.-Y.L.)
| | - Kyue-Yim Lee
- Department of Cancer Control, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.H.I.); (K.-Y.L.)
| | - Byong Chul Yoo
- Cancer Diagnostics Branch, Division of Cancer Biology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (B.C.Y.); (J.H.L.); (K.-H.K.)
- Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea;
| | - Jun Hwa Lee
- Cancer Diagnostics Branch, Division of Cancer Biology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (B.C.Y.); (J.H.L.); (K.-H.K.)
| | - Kyung-Hee Kim
- Cancer Diagnostics Branch, Division of Cancer Biology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (B.C.Y.); (J.H.L.); (K.-H.K.)
- Proteomics Core Facility, Research Core Center, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Jong Heon Kim
- Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea;
- Cancer Molecular Biology Branch, Division of Cancer Biology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Shin
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.-W.K.); (S.H.S.); (H.Y.)
| | - Heon Yoo
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.-W.K.); (S.H.S.); (H.Y.)
| | - Ho-Shin Gwak
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.-W.K.); (S.H.S.); (H.Y.)
- Department of Cancer Control, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (J.H.I.); (K.-Y.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Asperen JV, Fedorushkova DM, Robe PAJT, Hol E. Investigation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in body fluids as a potential biomarker for glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomarkers 2021; 27:1-12. [PMID: 34844498 DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2021.2006313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liquid biopsies are promising diagnostic tools for glioma. In this quantitative systematic review, we investigate whether the detection of intermediate filaments (IF) in body fluids can be used as a tool for glioma diagnosis and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included all studies in which IF-levels were determined in patients with glioma and healthy controls. Of the 28 identified eligible studies, 12 focused on levels of GFAP in serum (sGFAP) and were included for metadata analysis. RESULTS In all studies combined, 62.7% of all grade IV patients had detectable levels of sGFAP compared to 12.7% of healthy controls. sGFAP did not surpass the limit of detection in lower grade patients or healthy controls, but sGFAP was significantly elevated in grade IV glioma (0.12 ng/mL (0.06 - 0.18), P < 0.001) and showed an average median difference of 0.15 ng/mL (0.04 - 0.25, P < 0.01) compared to healthy controls. sGFAP levels were linked to tumour volume, but not to patient outcome. CONCLUSION The presence of sGFAP is indicative of grade IV glioma, but additional studies are necessary to fully determine the usefulness of GFAP in body fluids as a tool for grade IV glioma diagnosis and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessy Van van Asperen
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daria M Fedorushkova
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre A J T Robe
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,University Hospital Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Elly Hol
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|