1
|
Nauta IM, van Dam M, Bertens D, Kessels RPC, Fasotti L, Uitdehaag BMJ, Speckens AEM, de Jong BA. Improved quality of life and psychological symptoms following mindfulness and cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis and their mediating role for cognition: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol 2024:10.1007/s00415-024-12327-y. [PMID: 38653820 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12327-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently gives rise to depressive and anxiety symptoms, but these are often undertreated. This study investigated the effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT) on psychological outcomes and quality of life (QoL), and whether they mediate treatment effects on MS-related cognitive problems. METHODS This randomized controlled trial included MS patients with cognitive complaints (n = 99) and compared MBCT (n = 32) and CRT (n = 32) to enhanced treatment as usual (n = 35). Baseline, post-treatment and 6-months follow-up assessments included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and cognitive outcomes (self-reported and neuropsychological assessment). PROMS concerned psychological symptoms, well-being, QoL, and daily life function. Linear mixed models indicated intervention effects on PROMS and mediation effects of PROMS on cognitive outcomes. RESULTS MBCT positively affected depressive symptoms (Cohen's d (d) = -0.46), fatigue (d = -0.39), brooding (d = -0.34), mindfulness skills (d = 0.49), and mental QoL (d = -0.73) at post-treatment. Effects on mindfulness skills remained significant 6 months later (d = 0.42). CRT positively affected depressive symptoms (d = -0.46), mindfulness skills (d = 0.37), and mental QoL (d = -0.45) at post-treatment, but not at 6-month follow-up. No effects on anxiety, well-being, self-compassion, physical QoL, and daily life function were found. Treatment effects on self-reported, but not objective, cognition were mediated by psychological symptoms and mindfulness skills. CONCLUSIONS MBCT and CRT reduced a wide array of psychological symptoms and improved mental QoL. These improvements seemed to impact self-reported cognitive problems after both treatments, whereas objective cognitive improvements after MBCT seemed independent of improvement in psychological symptoms. Future studies should investigate long-term sustainability of these beneficial effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was prospectively registered in the Dutch Trial registry on 31 May 2017 (NL6285; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6459 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse M Nauta
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen van Dam
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Dirk Bertens
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Roy P C Kessels
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Vincent Van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luciano Fasotti
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bernard M J Uitdehaag
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E M Speckens
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Brigit A de Jong
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stein C, O'Keeffe F, McManus C, Tubridy N, Gaughan M, McGuigan C, Bramham J. Premorbid cognitive functioning influences differences between self-reported cognitive difficulties and cognitive assessment in multiple sclerosis. J Neuropsychol 2024; 18:47-65. [PMID: 37212461 DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive difficulties are reported in up to 60% of people with MS (pwMS). There is often a discrepancy between self-reported cognitive difficulties and performance on cognitive assessments. Some of this discrepancy can be explained by depression and fatigue. Pre-MS cognitive abilities may be another important variable in explaining differences between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities. PwMS with high estimated premorbid cognitive functioning (ePCF) may notice cognitive difficulties in daily life whilst performing within the average range on cognitive assessments. We hypothesised that, taking into account depression and fatigue, ePCF would predict (1) differences between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities and (2) performance on cognitive assessments. We explored whether ePCF predicted (3) self-reported cognitive difficulties. Eighty-seven pwMS completed the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF), the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), self-report measures of cognitive difficulty (MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire; MSNQ), fatigue (MS Fatigue Impact Scale; MFIS) and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS). Results revealed that, taking into account covariates, ePCF predicted (1) differences between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities, p < .001 (model explained 29.35% of variance), and (2) performance on cognitive assessments, p < .001 (model explained 46.00% of variance), but not (3) self-reported cognitive difficulties, p = .545 (model explained 35.10% of variance). These results provide new and unique insights into predictors of the frequently observed discrepancy between self-reported and assessed cognitive abilities for pwMS. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, including the importance of exploring premorbid factors in self-reported experience of cognitive difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fiadhnait O'Keeffe
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe McManus
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall Tubridy
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Christopher McGuigan
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jessica Bramham
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hynes SM, O'Keeffe F, Bane E, Oglesby MH, Dwyer CP, Joyce R, Klein OA. Assessment and Management of Cognitive and Psychosocial Difficulties for People with Multiple Sclerosis in Ireland: A National Survey of Clinical Practice. Int J Clin Pract 2022; 2022:3232076. [PMID: 36340964 PMCID: PMC9616662 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3232076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent survey of 109 healthcare professionals explored how UK healthcare professionals typically assess and treat multiple sclerosis (MS)-related cognitive impairment. Little is currently known about what constitutes usual care for cognitive impairment and psychosocial care for people with MS in Ireland. AIM The aim of the current research was to survey healthcare professionals (HCPs) who work with people with MS, to understand current assessment and management of cognition and psychosocial care in people with MS in the Republic of Ireland. METHODS A cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected online through Microsoft forms and through postal responses. The original UK questionnaire was adapted, piloted, and distributed to Irish HCPs. Participants were qualified HCPs who work clinically with people with MS in the Republic of Ireland. RESULTS Ninety-eight HCPs completed the survey. Only 34% of those surveyed reported routine screening of cognition for people with MS within their services; approximately, 36% HCPs reported that they did not provide information or services in relation to cognition to people with MS and 39% reported not referring elsewhere when cognitive difficulties were suspected. Out of the 98 HCPs, 47% reported assessing mood difficulties as part of their services, with 14% unsure. In total, 70% of participants reported onward referral took place if mood difficulties were identified. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was the most commonly administrated cognitive assessment. Cognitive intervention choices were found to be guided by clinical judgement in 75.5% of cases. Discussion. Despite the high importance placed on cognitive and psychosocial care, there is very little consistency in treatment and assessment across services for people with MS in Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinéad M. Hynes
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Eimear Bane
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Megan H. Oglesby
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Christopher P. Dwyer
- School of Social Science, Technological University of the Shannon IE, Athlone, Ireland
| | - Robert Joyce
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Olga A. Klein
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Rostock, DE, Germany
| |
Collapse
|